RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute 3040 Cornwallis Road ■ P.O. Box 12194 ■ Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA 27709.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Work Group Developing a Uniform EHR/HIE Patient Consent Form.
Advertisements

Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
PARTISAN CONTROL AND STATE DECISIONS ABOUT OBAMACARE FULL GO STATES (n = 22) Arkansas Michigan CALIFORNIA MINNESOTA COLORADO NEVADA CONNECTICUT New Hampshire.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners May 2012 Developing High Quality IEPs Ensuring each student has access to their least.
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
Certificate of Public Need in Other States
Maxim Healthcare Services. Health Care Services Medical Staffing- providing personnel to service medical facilities Medical Staffing- providing personnel.
Relative Value System Update Committee (RUC) AMDA Efforts Charles Crecelius MD PhD FACP CMD.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2003 CONFERENCE, BURLINGTON, VT SEPTEMBER 3-5, 2003 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
Autor: Mgr. Zdenka Mléčková Zpracováno pro: 5. ročník.
Fasten your seatbelts we’re off on a cross country road trip!
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
September 9, 2005 Washington, D.C. My.Medicare.gov - The Medicare Beneficiary Portal The Future of Beneficiary Self-Service.
Welcome to the Inquiry to Action Teams. 1) Build system-wide instructional and organizational capacity at the central, network, and school levels. 2)
Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
Medicare Advantage Enrollment: State Summary Five Slide Series, Volume 2 July 2013.
A-38 Table 5.1: Total Number of Active Physicians (1) per 1,000 Persons by State, 2007 and 2008 Source: National Center for Health Statistics. (2011).
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov 2009 NASCSP Annual Conference Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective September 16, 2009.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Privacy and Security Solutions For Interoperable Health Information Exchange Presented by Linda Dimitropoulos, PhD RTI International Presented at AHRQ.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration What to Expect When You’re Expecting a Traffic Records Assessment Luke Johnson 2015 Traffic Records Forum.
US MAP TEST Practice
Compliance Challenges for organizations contracting with the Federal Government Robert Klotz, VP of Technology at Akibia.
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.
Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
The United States is a system that can be broken into 5 major parts or regions.
Can you locate all 50 states? Grade 4 Mrs. Kuntz.
September 24,  Project Update ◦ SPF Decision Guide ◦ SPF ‘How to’ Guide  SPF Clearinghouse Con-ops  New FHWA COTM  Annual meeting.
NEADA Winter Meeting February 28, 2017.
Table 2.1: Number of Community Hospitals,(1) 1994 – 2014
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
Visa Bankruptcy Education Services
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Visa Bankruptcy Education Services Bankruptcy Statistics May 19, 2016.
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
Health Information Security and Privacy Collaborative (HISPC) Overview
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
Table 2.1: Number of Community Hospitals,(1) 1981 – 2005
State Adoption of Uniform State Test
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
APPLYING FOR THE CPA EXAM
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
REAL ID Briefing for NEBTA
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Regions of the United States
DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
Percent of adults aged 18 years and older who have obesity †
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute 3040 Cornwallis Road ■ P.O. Box ■ Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA Privacy and Security Solutions for Interoperable Health Information Exchange September 2006

Overview of Session  Purpose of the contract  Assumptions underlying the methodology  Overview of the process  Current Status  Upcoming events and activities

Purpose of the contract  Purposes: (1)assess variations in organization-level business practices, policies and state laws that affect health information exchange; (2)identify and propose practical solutions, while preserving the privacy and security requirements in applicable Federal and state laws; and, (3)develop detailed plans to implement solutions.

Assumptions underlying the methodology  Decisions about how to protect the privacy and security of health information should be made at the local community level  Discussions need to take place to develop an understanding of the current landscape and the variation that exists between organizations within each state, and ultimately across states  Stakeholders at the state and community levels, including patients and consumers, must be involved in identifying the challenges and developing solutions to achieve broad-based acceptance

Health Information Security and Privacy Collaborative  Health Information Security and Privacy Collaborative (HISPC) is comprised of 33 States and 1 Territory, Puerto Rico  1 subcontracted organization per state  Each subcontracted entity was designated by the governor  Each state identified a steering committee which is a private- public partnership comprised of leaders from state government and stakeholder organizations  Work conducted through series of work groups with specific charges

Overview of the process  Modified Community-based Research Model where states bring together a broad range of stakeholders to identify challenges and develop solutions  State project teams follow a ‘core’ methodology that frames discussions in terms of purposes for the exchange of certain types of health information within 9 domains of privacy and security

Purposes for Exchange  Purposes of Health Information Exchange and Relevant Scenarios  Treatment  Payment  RHIO  Research  Law Enforcement  Prescription Drug Use/Benefit  Healthcare Operations/Marketing  Bioterrorism  Employee Health  Public Health  State Government Oversight

Nine Domains of Privacy and Security  User and entity authentication  Authorization and access controls  Patient and provider identification  Information Transmission Security and exchange protocols  Protection against improper modification  Information Audits  Administrative or Physical Security  State Law Restrictions  Information Use and Disclosure Policies

Stakeholder Outreach  Providers  Payers  Federal health facilities  State government  Hospitals  Public health agencies  Community clinics and health centers  Laboratories  Pharmacies  Long term care facilities and nursing homes  Homecare and hospice  Correctional facilities  Professional associations and societies  Medical and public health schools that undertake research  Quality improvement organizations  Consumers or consumer organizations

Variations Work Group and Stakeholder Groups  Facilitated work group meetings discuss scenarios and generate a core set of business practices and policies for each scenario  Core set of practices and policies is reviewed by broader range of stakeholders to validate the business practices and fill gaps  Practices are coded as to whether they pose barriers to HIE or not

Legal Work Group  Reviews “barriers” to determine whether there is a legal basis for the practice or policy  The term “law” used here refers to relevant regulation, statute, or case that is the primary underlying driver behind a business practice

Regional Meeting Schedule Meeting location HISPC StatesNon HISPC States [1] [1] Meeting Date Kansas CityKansas, Oklahoma, ArkansasNebraska, Missouri10/23/2006 MinneapolisMinnesota, Wisconsin, IowaNorth Dakota, South Dakota10/25/2006 IndianapolisMichigan, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio11/3/2006 CharlottteNorth Carolina, West VirginiaVirginia, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, Maryland, District of Columbia 11/13/2006 SeattleAlaska, Washington State, OregonIdaho, Montana11/6/2006 PhoenixCalifornia, ArizonaNevada, Hawaii, Guam, Marianas, American Samoa 11/8/2006 Salt Lake CityNew Mexico, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado11/9/2006 New OrleansFlorida, Louisiana, MississippiAlabama, Texas, US Virgin Islands11/13/2006 NewarkNew York, New Jersey, Puerto RicoPennsylvania, Delaware11/15/2006 BostonConnecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine 11/17/2006 [1] [1] Invited to observe the process HISPC states are following

Regional Meeting Agenda Purpose:  Provide participants the opportunity to interact with a range of stakeholders from multiple states to discuss privacy and security issues related to HIE.  Bring together leadership and stakeholders to discuss variations in practices, policies and laws that are identified as barriers to interoperability and work toward developing a common framework.  Provide an opportunity for state-level stakeholders to hear from national experts and representatives from the federal government

Regional Meeting Agenda Goal for the States:  Develop an understanding of what other states in their region are doing  Develop an understanding of the inter-state issues that they will be facing as they move into the analysis of solutions and implementation planning phases.  Establish a framework that will guide the development of solutions and implementation planning.

Solutions and Implementation Planning Work Groups  Analyze the barriers and develop range of feasible solutions and set priorities  Multi-stakeholder Work groups review and agree upon array of potential solutions to be included in implementation planning  Implementation plans that:  Assign responsibility for tasks  Identify inputs and dependencies  Organize tasks into a sequential path  Define timeframes for completion of stages, and the plan as a whole.  Assess resource requirements and associated costs  Include a plan to monitor and measure performance

Updated Deliverable Schedule Deliverable Title Due Dates Interim Assessments of Variation 11/6/06 Interim Reports of Solutions 12/11/06 Interim Implementation Plans 1/15/07 Final Assessment/Analysis of Solutions 3/30/07 Final Implementation Plans 3/30/07 National Meeting 3/5-3/6/07

For More Information HISPC: healthit.ahrq.gov/privacyandsecurity RTI: HHS/AHRQ: healthit.ahrq.gov HHS/ONC: