Evaluating principal effectiveness Focal Point 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Becoming a High Impact Board Susan Salter Director of Board Development Alabama Association of School Boards.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Whose Job Is It? Part Two © Iowa Association of School Boards At the Board Table Discussion Tool.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. 6 leadership standards what are they? 3 2 Teaching & Learning 1 Vision, Mission & Goals 6 The Education System 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
Roles and Responsibilities of School Principals
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Succession Planning Hosted By: John Nori NASSP Consultant.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
An Administrator Evaluation System Curriculum Leaders Institute Cohort 5 Day 8.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009.
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
ADMN 6130 Class 4 “Cheap teaching is like cheap dentistry, cheap cotton, or cheap anything else.” - Annual Report of the Owensboro Public Schools
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Governor Christie’s Educator Effectiveness Task Force Report March 1, 2011.
April 29, 2011 Developing Effective Leaders: Principal Evaluation Systems CCSSO – National Summit on Educator Effectiveness.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Keys to being an effective principal Mike Miles July 2009.
The School Counseling Program
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
AdvancED Accreditation
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Accreditation External Review
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating principal effectiveness Focal Point 2012

For many, we are their last best hope.

They will need our best work.

Battle for LA video

What is the point?

Purposes Accurately, fairly, and rigorously assess principal effectiveness Provide feedback and develop capacity Make decisions related to who will lead schools Raise student achievement

Purposes Being crystal clear with principals about what the district values In some places differentiate compensation Meet legal requirements

What if principals were the key?

Support PRINCIPALS Results Student Achievement Quality of Instruction Philosophy/ Culture Metrics

Support PRINCIPALS Results Student Achievement Quality of Instruction Philosophy/ Culture Metrics Support Teachers Metrics Results

Support PRINCIPALS Results Student Achievement Quality of Instruction Philosophy/ Culture Metrics Support Central Office Metrics Results School Supervision Other departments Support Metrics

Seven Considerations 1. What does a great school look like? 2. What do effective principals do? 3. How will principal effectiveness be monitored? 4. Is there a process in place for developing principals?

Seven Considerations 5. What are the District’s Core Beliefs? 6. How is accountability defined? 7. What is the capacity of the evaluators?

How ready is your district?

Readiness Assessment 1. There is agreement amongst the leaders in our district about what a great school looks like. 2. There is agreement amongst the leaders in our district about what effective leaders do. 3. The leaders in our district are clear about how effectiveness of what they do will be monitored. 4. There is a process in place to develop current and perspective leaders in our district.

5. Leadership of our district is in agreement regarding the top three priorities for this year. 6. Leadership of our district is in agreement that the above priorities are the three top priorities that are most important for our mission. 7. Leaders know and are in agreement with how accountability for their work will be defined. Readiness Assessment

8. There is agreement amongst the leadership in our district that accountability and evaluation are fair, accurate and rigorous. 9. Leadership at all levels of our district has the capacity to lead and evaluate others. 10. Feedback on progress is provided regularly to all leaders in our district. 11. Leaders in our district can clearly define their roles and who will be evaluating them. Readiness Assessment

12. The leaders in our district would say they have the support they need to do their jobs well. 13. Overall, our leadership is ready for an evaluation instrument that is fair, accurate and rigorous. Readiness Assessment

The Focal Point Principal Practice Evaluation Instrument Please refer to the handouts

The Focal Point Principal Practice Evaluation Instrument Aligns to ISLLC Standards of Is fair rigorous and accurate. Is proven and tested. Provides support for district leaders based on needs assessment. Is part an aligned system can be used to increase overall systemic effectiveness.

Million Dollar Baby Video

What Focal Point says about effective principals…

Great principals lead.

Keep the focus on instruction Are good at instruction  Good, first instruction  Curriculum alignment Develops staff They improve the quality of instruction.

Get results – improve achievement

Establish the “philosophy” and culture of the school

Metric Total Pts. Performance (50%) Performance rubric30 Systems review5 Retention of effective teachers5 Improving teacher effectiveness5 Congruence between teacher performance and student achievement 5 Achievement (50%) State assessments18 District assessments12 School specific goals5 Graduation rate or proficiency rate of 5 th or 8 th graders 5 Accreditation10 Measuring Principal Effectiveness – the Metrics

Performance areas Leadership The instructional program Staff development Effective management Professional responsibilities

A1. ESTABLISHES A SHARED VISION OF SUCCESSWt.  Reinforces core beliefs 2x  Guides staff to a shared vision 1x  Establishes goals and clarifies purpose 1x A2. LEADS CHANGE Wt.  Leads change 2x A3. MAXIMIZES HUMAN POTENTIAL Wt.  Maximizes potential 1x  Inspires staff 1x A4. DEMONSTRATES OTHER LEADERSHIP SKILLS Wt.  Communicates well and practices sense-making 2x  Makes effective decisions 1x  Demonstrates broad perspective 1x LEADERSHIP

THE INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM B1. MAINTAINS A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF INSTR.Wt.  Establishes a standards-based and aligned curriculum 2x  Helps staff understand and learn what great looks like 1x  Develops a program of instruction that meets the needs of all students 1x B2. IMPROVES THE QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION Wt.  Provides effective instructional feedback 2x  Improves the quality of instruction 3x  Conducts effective formal observations and evaluations 2x B3. PROVIDES FOR ASSESSMENT OF INSTRUCTIONWt.  Ensure student proficiency is progress-monitored and accurately assessed 1x

EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT D1. MANAGES RESOURCES EFFECTIVELYWt.  Manages personnel and material resources 1x  Aligns budget with instructional program and professional development 2x D2. TIME MANAGEMENTWt.  Develops effective school and class schedules 1x  Manages his individual time well 1x D3. SCHOOL CLIMATE  Maintains a safe and orderly learning environment 2x

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES E1. MAINTAINS POSITIVE RELATIONS w/ DIST. AND COMMUNITYWt.  Maintains positive relations with District personnel 1x  Builds positive relations with parents and school stakeholders 2x E2. GROWS PROFESSIONALLYWt.  Maintains personal professional development 1x  Contributes to the profession 1x

PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS CriteriaWeight Leadership3x Instructional Program3x Staff Development2x Effective Management1x Professional Responsibilities1x

How does your new, ideal evaluation system differ from the system you have now?

What are the top three things you would want to be evaluated on? Would anything need to change in the way you are currently evaluated?

How will your evaluator know when you have done well?

How will principal effectiveness be monitored?

New Jersey Interim Report Measures of effective practice (40%)  Recommendation to adopt the Educational Leadership Policy Standards (ISLLC)  Districts to choose from a list of state- approved rubrics, templates, and tools  May receive a waiver if the District has a more rigorous locally developed tool

New Jersey Interim Report Retention of effective teachers (10%)  Principal’s effectiveness in improving teacher effectiveness Growth of teachers’ rating  Principal’s effectiveness in recruiting and retaining effective teachers  Principal’s effectiveness in exiting ineffective teachers

New Jersey Interim Report Measures of Student Achievement (50%)  Aggregated performance on statewide assessments (35%)  School-specific achievement goal (15%) Such as graduation rate increase Could be multiple measures

Support Metrics

What does support look like? Professional development of principals?  Trainings  Job-embedded coaching  Professional learning community Instructional support?  Help in coaching teachers  Curriculum alignment Curriculum maps and assessments

What does support look like? Human capital management?  Recruitment and selection of teachers  Removing ineffective teachers Defined autonomy?  Focus on results  Budget and other resources

What does support look like? Leadership development? Accurate evaluations?  Clear expectations  Effective feedback  Use of data  Mid-year reviews  System review

What does support look like? The District working systemically?  Focus  Aligned system Central Office goals related to support? Competent evaluators with time to coach?

The need is great.

The challenges many...

They will need your best work.

Lead well!

Contact Information Dr. Andrea Kutinsky Dr. David Roudebush