Hi-Res Landcover Pete Kollasch, Iowa DNR. You are here.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Comparison of Digital Elevation Models to Accurately Predict Stream Channels Spencer Trowbridge Papillion Creek Watershed.
Advertisements

Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
Zachary Fancher Last updated 12/15/2012. Background Regulatory Division responsible for making jurisdictional determinations on “Waters of the U.S”, as.
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Detecting Emerald Ash Borer Infestation with Hyperspectral data using Spectral Mixture Analysis Silvia Petrova Objective The objective of this project.
The Coeur d'Alene Tribe is learning the remote sensing methodology developed by LANDFIRE, and will be attempting to apply the methods to higher resolution.
CS 128/ES Lecture 5a1 Working with Rasters.
WILD 5750/6750 LAB 5 10/04/2010 IMAGE MOSAICKING.
CGIA Geospatial Imaging. Image Processing. Feature Extraction. Visualization. Frank Obusek Program Manager
The use of Remote Sensing in Land Cover Mapping and Change Detection in Somalia Simon Mumuli Oduori, Ronald Vargas Rojas, Ambrose Oroda and Christian Omuto.
Published in Remote Sensing of the Environment in May 2008.
UNDERSTANDING LIDAR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING LIDAR is a remote sensing technique that can measure the distance to objects on and above the ground surface.
Habitat Analysis in ArcGIS Use of Spatial Analysis to characterize used resources Thomas Bonnot
Chris Cialek; MnGeo January 7, 2010.
Artificial Neural Network Applications on Remotely Sensed Imagery Kaushik Das, Qin Ding, William Perrizo North Dakota State University
Corrie Hannah Mentor: Dr. Stuart E. Marsh, Office of Arid Lands Studies NASA Space Grant Symposium April 17, 2009 Arizona State University Using Remote.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
Possible Satellite Data Sources Chris Elvidge NOAA-NGDC January 22, 2008.
Imagery for the Nation and the changing landscape Remote sensing systems overview Geo-spatial requirements for GIS Technology advancements in sensing systems.
Remote Sensing Applications Supporting Regional Transportation Database Development CLEM 2001 August 6, 2001 Santa Barbara, CA Chris Chiesa,
Ann Krogman Twin Cities Urban Lakes Project. Background Information… 100 lakes throughout the Twin Cities Metro Area Sampled in 2002 Land-use around each.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Introduction to Remote Sensing. Outline What is remote sensing? The electromagnetic spectrum (EMS) The four resolutions Image Classification Incorporation.
Tools in ArcGIS Not only is there an immense toolbox,
Using spectral data to discriminate land cover types.
National Mapping Division EROS Data Center U. S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Operation Systems (EROS) Data Center World Data.
Data Sources Sources, integration, quality, error, uncertainty.
Spring Leaf-Off Imagery for Minnesota July 1, 2010.
Mapping Tile Lines with Remote Sensing and GIS Jim Giglierano Formerly with Iowa DNR - Geological and Water Survey Iowa State University
A Forest Cover Change Study Gone Bad Lessons Learned(?) Measuring Changes in Forest Cover in Madagascar Ned Horning Center for Biodiversity and Conservation.
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Wetlands Investigation Utilizing GIS and Remote Sensing Technology for Lucas County, Ohio: a hybrid analysis. Nathan Torbick Spring 2003 Update on current.
Digital Image Processing
Application of spatial autocorrelation analysis in determining optimal classification method and detecting land cover change from remotely sensed data.
474/574 Remote sensing Lab: Digitizing Sweet water Wetland Park areas, Tucson AZ by using remote sensing imagery (Aerial and Landsat) and ArcGIS software.
GE 3128: Geographical Research Methods Mr. Idrissa Y. H. Assistant Lecturer In Geography Department of Social Sciences State University of Zanzibar Friday22.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Updated Cover Type Map of Cloquet Forestry Center For Continuous Forest Inventory.
SGM as an Affordable Alternative to LiDAR
Measuring Vegetation Health NDVI Analysis of East Sacramento 1.
High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Development for the Coastal United States Eric Morris (Presenter) Chris Robinson The Baldwin Group at NOAA Office for.
CHANGE DETECTION ANALYSIS USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES Change in Urban area from 1992 to 2001 in COIMBATORE, INDIA. FNRM 5262 FINAL PROJECT PRESENTATION.
Estimating intra-annual changes in the surface area of Sand Mesa Reservoir #1 using multi-temporal Landsat images Cody A. Booth 1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai.
LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS Maryia Bakhtsiyarava FNRM 5262.
Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas Sarah Belcher & Grant Cooper December 8, 2014.
Josh Knopik, WRS Jessica Campbell, MGIS FR Outline Background and Objectives Data and Materials Methods Results Discussion.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Remote Sensing. Content Introduction What is remote sensing? History of Remote Sensing Applications of Remote Sensing Components Advantages Disadvantages.
Christopher Steinhoff Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming Ramesh Sivanpillai Department of Botany, University of Wyoming Mapping Changes.
ANALYSIS OF AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA FOR ROAD INVENTORY CLAY WOODS 4/25/2016 NIRDOSH GAIRE CEE 6190 YI HE ZHAOCAI LIU.
Best Practices for Managing Processed Ortho Imagery Cody A. Benkelman.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Rasters Peter Fox – based on materials from Steve Signell
Land Classification on the Kaibuskong River Subwatershed
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION WITH THE IMPACT TOOL
Department of Geography University of New Orleans, Louisiana
VegDRI History, Current Status, and Related Activities
Washington Geological Survey
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
Matthew J. Thoman1 and Kaitlyn McCollum1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai2
Expert/rule based classification
Geography 121 Lab #4 Finding Landsat Data
Bailey Terry1 & Benjamin Beaman2 with Ramesh Sivanpillai3
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Image Classification of the Upper South Fork Eel River Watershed
Calculating land use change in west linn from
Presentation transcript:

Hi-Res Landcover Pete Kollasch, Iowa DNR

You are here

It’s about resolution HRLC 1m

It’s about resolution m

It’s about resolution m

It’s about resolution m

What is it? Statewide Land Cover file 1 meter spatial resolution –Compare to previous 15m 1986, 1990, 2002 Derived from aerial imagery and lidar data –Previous all derived from Landsat imagery Interpreted to Summer 2009 NAIP County files ~ 50% complete now –100% complete by end of 2013

Need 2002 – most recent landcover product –More current data desired In May 2003 – Landsat 7 partial failure –With only Landsat 5: difficult to obtain sufficient satellite imagery coverage Interest in higher resolution product

Opportunity Annual NAIP imagery available –From 2004 through band spring leaf-off imagery available –2007 Northwest by Sanborn –2009 West & 2010 East by ASI Lidar elevation data becoming available

Criteria for Process Reliable enough to produce compatible products from a wide range of input quality That can be completed in a finite period

Issues Aerial Photography has high spectral variability –Collection date (esp. NAIP) –Multiple cameras / collections –Internal variability – hotspots, etc. –Suggests the use of “flattening” technologies Need sufficient spectral content

Technologies Multitemporal Lidar Normalized Elevation Common Land Units Segmentation Knowledge-based classification Classification & Regression Tree

Technologies Multitemporal Lidar Normalized Elevation Common Land Units X Segmentation X Knowledge-based classification X Classification & Regression Tree X Independent Component Analysis Classical Unsupervised

HRLC History Initial research began in 2002 –Initial results were not very successful Meetings: DNR, UI, ISU, UNI late 2008 Procedure design 2009 Began receiving enough data in late to present –Preprocessing, Interpretation, Postprocessing –Final results began emerging early 2012

Inputs Multitemporal Aerial Imagery –2007/2009/2010 Four band spring imagery –2009 NAIP imagery –2008 NAIP imagery LiDAR normalized elevation layer –First return minus Bare earth

Inputs Multitemporal Aerial Imagery –2007/2009/2010 Four band spring imagery –2009 NAIP imagery –2008 NAIP imagery LiDAR normalized elevation layer –First return minus Bare earth What issues do they solve?

Preprocessing Aerial Imagery Stack –10 bands ( ) –Areas of consistent spectral character –ICA (primary flattening technology) Add lidar normalized elevation band Unsupervised / Supervised Classification –250 clusters

Interpretation ERDAS Class Grouping Tool Initially 2 tier –Grouping / Checking Later 3 tier –Grouping / Checking / Final Check –Final check by a single interpreter for consistency

Postprocessing Fuzzy Recode (another flattener) Erode edges of tiles, sequence Mosaic tiles together Lidar normalized elevation filtering Shadow conversion around structures Eliminate objects < 10 pixels Reconstruct entire mosaic

Counties Clip county to rectangle with 100m buffer –If there be holes, wait for enough data to fill Raster edit steps –General rule: if not possible, change it –Affects only a small percent of space, but makes a big difference in the look –2 sets of eyes Prep for NRGIS library – (4 bit, color table, names, round to.5 m)

HRLC Data Access NRGIS library, by FTP –By county: HRLC_2009_xx.img – Map Service available

Thanks Thejashwini Ramarao Matt Swanson Kathryne Clark Matt Gosse Sarah Porter Cody Hackney ISU, UI, UNI remote sensing personnel Jim Giglierano Chris Ensminger Daryl Howell Casey Kohrt Chris Kahle and many more …

Questions? Pete Kollasch –