Dick de Zeeuw Department of Clinical Pharmacology University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands Early detection, prediction and potential treatment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lysaght, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002 Number of patients worldwide treated with chronic dialysis from 1990 to ,000 1,490,000 2,500,000.
Advertisements

The PREVEND Study: Screening for micro-albuminuria
Proteinuria as a Surrogate Outcome in Chronic Kidney Disease Early Diabetes – Microalbuminuria (MA) Type 2 Diabetes in American Indians Robert G Nelson,
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Chronic Kidney Disease in Diabetes Chapter 29 Phil McFarlane, Richard E. Gilbert, Lori MacCallum,
Clinical Trial Results. org Tilman B. Drüeke, M.D.; Francesco Locatelli, M.D.; Naomi Clyne, M.D.; Kai-Uwe Eckardt, M.D.; Iain C. Macdougall, M.D.; Dimitrios.
Temporal Trends in the Prevalence of Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States Ian H. de Boer, MD, MS, Tessa C. Rue, MS, Yoshio N. Hall, MD, Patrick.
BLOOD PRESSURE LOWERING. UKPDS design Aim To determine whether intensified blood glucose control, with either sulphonylurea or insulin, reduces the risk.
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
The INSIGHT study - Reliable blood pressure control and additional benefits for hypertensive patients Anthony M Heagerty Department of Medicine Manchester.
(IRbesartan in MicroAlbuminuria, Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy Trial)
A retrospective cohort study of Childhood post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis as a risk factor for chronic renal disease in later life Andrew V White,
Hypertension and The Kidney Update: Clinical Trials Paul J. Scheel, Jr., M.D. Director, Division of Nephrology The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
The case of microalbuminuria prevention: the ROADMAP study Department for Clinical Pharmacology and Hypertension Charité – University Medicine Berlin,
HYPERTENSION in ADPKD Sabine Karam M.D.. Introduction  ADPKD is the most common life-threatening single-gene disease  It affects over 12 million people.
Lesley Stevens MD Tufts-New England Medical Center
Early Detection and Prevention of Renal Failure Linda Fried, MD, MPH.
Section 4: Managing progression of CKD. Glomerulosclerosis Reduction in number of functioning glomeruli Increased blood flow to remaining nephrons Intraglomerular.
RENAL DISEASE IN DIABETES
Diabetic Nephropathy Yiming Lit, M.D. May 5, 2009.
1 The JNC 7 recommendations for initial or combination drug therapy are based on sound scientific evidence.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
Joint Effects of Routine Blood Pressure Lowering and Intensive Glucose Control ADVANCE Adapted from EASD 2008.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
Microalbuminuria – pathogenesis and clinical implications.
Standards of Medical Care for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus John Guzek, MD March 2003.
1 NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health.
Selective vitamin D receptor activation with paricalcitol for reduction of albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes (VITAL study) Lambers Heerspink,
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) Collaborative Study Group N Eng J Med 345: , 2001 Edmund J. Lewis, M.D. Muehrcke Family Professor of.
Morbidity and Mortality in Contemporary CAD Patients With Hypertension Treated With Either a Verapamil/Trandolapril or Beta-Blocker/Diuretic Strategy (INVEST):
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Proteinuria as a surrogate outcome in CKD UKPDS Rudy Bilous Middlesbrough, UK.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Dick de Zeeuw Department of Clinical Pharmacology University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands Albuminuria; a tool for measuring non-blood pressure.
Dr M Sivalingam Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage.
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Enrollment and Outcomes Fan Fan Hou, et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:
Kimberly Dunbar, PA-S2 Follow-up of Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Hypertensive Patients Treated with Irbesartan: Results of the i-SEARCH Plus Registry.
ASCOT and Steno-2: Aggressive risk reduction benefits two different patient populations *Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI or stroke, revascularization,
Renal damage occurs in 1 out of 4 hypertensives Adapted from Leoncini et al. J Hypertens. 2008;26:
DIABETIC NEPHROPAHTY BY Syed Rizwan, MD Incidence R 2 = 99.8%
Hypertension Control and Progression of Renal Disease
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
Diabetes and the Kidney Richard Kingston Department of Renal Medicine Kent and Canterbury Hospital.
Anemia in CKD The TREAT Trial Reference Pfeiffer MA. A trial of Darbepoetin alpha in type II diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2019–2032.
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Antonio Coca, MD, PhD, FRCP, FESC
What should the Systolic BP treatment goal be in patients with CKD?
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Section 4: Managing progression of CKD
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease    American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
The percentage of subjects with de novo development of renal function impairment (GFR
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Recent studies of ACE inhibition in renal disease
Management of hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease
Section I: RAS manipulation
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Hypertension management in high risk type II diabetes with CKD: Insights from recent trials with a focus on albuminuria. A case based discussion  Matthew.
The Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) Study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 67, Pages S52-S54 (January 2005)
Clinical renoprotection trials involving angiotensin II-receptor antagonists and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors  Barry M. Brenner, Joann Zagrobelny 
Michael R. Lattanzio, Matthew R. Weir  Kidney International 
Presentation transcript:

Dick de Zeeuw Department of Clinical Pharmacology University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands Early detection, prediction and potential treatment of renal and cardiovascular risk in the general population; type 2 diabetes.

For early detection, prediction and treatment, we should not only measure the blood pressure but also…. measure and treat the ALBUMINURIA/PROTEINURIA

PREVEND/it: PREVEND intervention study (ACEi and statin; n=854) Time course of type 2 diabetic renal disease; intervention options evidence from large trials IRMA 2 / LIFEdiab IDNT/RENAAL Secondary Prevention Tertiary Prevention ESRD Early Stage Late Stage End Stage Microalbuminuria Microalbuminuria Proteinuria Cardiovascular and Renal morbidity and mortality PREVEND/it Albuminuria Pre- Stage Primary Prevention IRMA 2: Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria (n=590) LIFEdiab: Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study (n=1195) IDNT: Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (n=1715) RENAAL: Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the AII Antagonist Losartan (n=1513) PREVEND/it: Prevention Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease (n=40.856)

Structure of talk Importance of albuminuria/proteinuria as a risk marker for cardiovascular and renal disease progression in  Advanced nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes)  Pre-nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes)  General “healthy” population Intervention directed at lowering albuminuria offers renal and cardiac protection beyond blood pressure control Early intervention is better and more cost effective than late intervention

= Hemoglobin (g/dL) < Serum albumin (per 0.5 g/dL) < – Serum creatinine (mg/dL) < Urine albumin:creatinine (log, mg/g) p-Value95% Confidence Interval Hazard Ratio* RENAAL; Multivariate analysis for doubling serum creatinine or end-stage renal disease (n=1300) Keane et al; Kidney Int 2003

RENAAL; Baseline proteinuria as a determinant for cardiac events in type 2 diabetes De Zeeuw et al; Circulation, in press CV EndpointHeart Failure Month % with CV endpoint  3.0 g/g <1.5 g/g Month % with heart failure endpoint  3 g/g <1.5 g/g

RENAAL; Baseline proteinuria as a determinant for renal events in type 2 diabetes De Zeeuw et al; Kidney Int, in press Composite Endpoint ESRD Month % with renal endpoint  3.0 g/g <1.5 g/g Month % with esrd endpoint  3.0 g/g <1.5 g/g

Structure of talk  Importance of albuminuria/proteinuria as a risk marker for cardiovascular and renal disease progression in n Advanced nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n Pre-nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n General “healthy” population  Intervention directed at lowering albuminuria offers renal and cardiac protection beyond blood pressure control  Early intervention is better and more cost effective than late intervention

Hillege et al. Circulation 2000;102: Renal function determines CV mortality in patients with heart failure

Renal function determines CV-outcome in patients after first myocardial infarction Hillege et al. Eur Heart Journal 2003

LIFE; Hypertension with LVH; Baseline Albuminuria determines Cardiovascular outcome (primary combined end point) Month Endpoint Rate (%) <= 0.5 mg/mmol (n=2282) mg/mmol (n=1782) 1-3 mg/mmol (n=2438) > 3 mg/mmol (n=2691) Wachtell et al. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:

Structure of talk  Importance of albuminuria/proteinuria as a risk marker for cardiovascular and renal disease progression in n Advanced nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n Pre-nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n General “healthy” population  Intervention directed at lowering albuminuria offers renal and cardiac protection beyond blood pressure control  Early intervention is better and more cost effective than late intervention

13 PREVEND; Prevalence of albuminuria categories in the GENERAL POPULATION normal 0-10mg/l macroproteinuria >200 mg/l microalbuminuria mg/l (7.2%) high-normal high-normal albuminuria albuminuria mg/l mg/l(16.6%) Hillege HL et al. J Int Med 2001;249: N=40.619

PREVEND; Predictive effect of baseline urinary albumin excretion on mortality; general population Hillege et al; Circulation 2002;106(14): albumin concentration (mg/L) non-CV death albumin concentration (mg/L) hazard CV death

HUNT; Crude All-Cause Mortality for different MA in random non- diabetic non-hypertensive sample (follow-up 4.4yr) Romundstad S et al; Am J Kidney Dis 42 (2003)

Structure of talk  Importance of albuminuria/proteinuria as a risk marker for cardiovascular and renal disease progression in  Intervention directed at lowering albuminuria offers renal and cardiac protection beyond blood pressure control n Advanced nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n Pre-nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n General “healthy” population  Early intervention is better and more cost effective than late intervention

RENAAL; AII-antagonist (+ conv tx) is more renal protective than placebo (+ conv tx) in type 2 diabetes % with event p=0.024 Risk Reduction: 16% Placebo Losartan Systolic Diastolic MAP Mo Pulse Pressure Blood Pressure (mmHg) P L Brenner et al; New Engl J Med 2001 Median Percent Change p=< % Overall Reduction Mo P L

RENAAL; Proteinuria Reduction ( 30%) determines the cardiovascular outcome CV EndpointHeart Failure Month % with CV endpoint >30% <0% Month % with heart failure <0% >30% De Zeeuw et al; Circulation, in press

RENAAL; Proteinuria Reduction Groups at Month 6 determines the renal outcome De Zeeuw et al; Kidney Int in press Renal Endpoint ESRD Month % with composite endpoint >30% <0% Month % with ESRD <0% >30%

RENAAL; Initial antiproteinuric response vs renal risk Albuminuria reduction (%) Albuminuria reduction (%) Hazard ratio Renal Endpoint ESRD De Zeeuw et al; Kidney Int; in press

Structure of talk  Importance of albuminuria/proteinuria as a risk marker for cardiovascular and renal disease progression in  Intervention directed at lowering albuminuria offers renal and cardiac protection beyond blood pressure control n Advanced nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n Pre-nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n General “healthy” population  Early intervention is better and more cost effective than late intervention

GFR c >103 ml/min ml/min< 81 ml/min Hillege et al. Eur Heart Journal 2003 RAAS-intervention protects the heart in particular those with poor renal function in patients after MI

Days ____________________________ p=0.034 Placebo Captopril Hillege et al. Eur Heart Journal 2003 GFR (ml/min) RAAS-intervention protects the kidney of patients after myocardial infarction

LIFE: Hypertensive diabetic with LVH; Cardiovascular mortality comparing RAAS-i and beta-blockade LH Lindholm, et al Lancet 2002; 359: Systolic Diastolic Mean Arterial Study Month mmHg Atenolol Losartan Cardiovascular Mortality Adjusted Risk Reduction = 37%; p=0·028 Unadjusted Risk Reduction = 38%; p=0·019

Follow-up (months) Subjects (%) Subjects (%) Control Irbesartan 150 mg Irbesartan 300 mg 70% RRR p < % RRR p < IRMA 2; Hypertensive type 2 diabetes; Primary endpoint: Time to overt proteinuria Parving H-H et al. N Engl J Med 2001;345:870–8.

Time (months) Mean SeSBP and SeDBP (mmHg) Mean SeSBP and SeDBP (mmHg) Control Irbesartan 150 mg Irbesartan 300 mg Control Irbesartan 150 mg Irbesartan 300 mg Concomitant antihypertensive agents received by 56% of patients in the control group, 45% in the irbesartan 150 mg group, and 43% in the irbesartan 300 mg group Concomitant antihypertensive agents received by 56% of patients in the control group, 45% in the irbesartan 150 mg group, and 43% in the irbesartan 300 mg group IRMA 2; Hypertensive type 2 diabetes; Blood pressure response SeSBP SeDBP Parving H-H et al. N Engl J Med 2001;345:870–8.

IRMA-2 Change in UAER Anderson S et al. Diabetes Care 2003;26: Change in UAE (%) Irbesartan 150 mgIrbesartan 300 mg Placebo Months 0 0

Structure of talk  Importance of albuminuria/proteinuria as a risk marker for cardiovascular and renal disease progression in  Intervention directed at lowering albuminuria offers renal and cardiac protection beyond blood pressure control n Advanced nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n Pre-nephropathy (diabetes and non-diabetes) n General “healthy” population  Early intervention is better and more cost effective than late intervention

PREVEND-IT; Effects of ACEi on Albuminuria in the “healthy” with microalbuminuria PREVEND IT DeltaAlbuminuria(%) Months 4 Years FosinoprilPravastatin Change from Placebo * * * * * p < Asselberg and van Gilst et al; AHA; late breaking trial session

Follow-up (Months) Placebo (n = 429) PREVEND-IT; Effect of ACEi on Cardiovascular outcome in ´healthy´ individuals with microalbuminuria Fosinopril Fosinopril (n = 425) * Hazard Ratio: 0.56 (0.30 to 1.04), p = 0.07, Hazard Ratio: 0.53 (0.28 to 0.995), p < 0.05, adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics Hazard Ratio: 0.53 (0.28 to 0.995), p < 0.05, adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics RRR 44 % * Event-FreeSurvival PREVEND IT Asselberg and van Gilst et al; AHA; late breaking trial session

Structure of talk  Importance of albuminuria/proteinuria as a risk marker for cardiovascular and renal disease progression in  Intervention directed at lowering albuminuria offers renal and cardiac protection beyond blood pressure control  Early intervention is better and more cost effective than late intervention n Combined early and late analysis (PRIME)

PRIME; PRogram for Irbesartan Mortality and Morbidity Evaluation Pharmaco-economics Model Project Team  Hans-Henrik Parving  Dick de Zeeuw  Roger Rodby  Andrew Palmer  Stéphane Roze  Lieven Annemans  Mark Lamotte  Pablo Lapuerta  Roland Chen  Sylvie Gabriel  Paulo Carita  Isabelle Villadary

PRIME Model  Question n What is the most efficient starting point for Irbesartan treatment: at microalbuminuria level or at advanced overt nephropathy?  Method n Link IRMA-2 and IDNT studies n Project long-term outcomes for patients with microalbuminuria for progression to overt nephropathy, DSC, ESRD and death

PRIME Model – Disease States Dead DSC Early Overt Nephropathy Late Overt Nephropathy Progressors from IRMA-2 Start of of IDNT STARTING STATE: Cohort with baseline characteristics of patients in IRMA-2 Progressors from IDNT Late Irbesartan: START HERE Early Irbesartan and standard BP control: START HERE MAU Kidney Transplant Dialysis Palmer et al; Submitted

PRIME; Early vs Late intervention; effects on Cumulative Total Costs Placebo Late Irbesartan Early Irbesartan Years since baseline age of 58 Cumulative costs per patient (€) ,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 Palmer et al; Submitted

Conclusion  Albuminuria/Proteinuria is an independent risk markers for cardiovascular and renal disease progression: each doubling of urinary albumin doubles the risk.  Optimal treatment strategy should include RAAS-intervention and target to lower the blood pressure (<130/80) and albuminuria/proteinuria (<500 mg/d): each short-term halving of albuminuria or proteinuria reduces the long-term risk by half.  These protective effects of RAAS-intervention can be achieved not only in advanced diabetes but also in early diabetes and even in the “general healthy” population  Early intervention is more cost effective than late intervention