Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

Title I Directors Conference October 23-25, 2007 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV Reading the Fine Print Monitoring K-3 Reading Programs Presenter: Pat.
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
Table of Contents Summative Assessments Formative Assessment Why Teachers Use Assessments Definitions You may browse through this book by using the arrows.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Fountas & Pinnell Leveled Literacy Intervention.
Adams 12 Five Star Schools PALS Kindergarten Protocol Refresher
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Hanmer School – Margaret Zacchei Highcrest School – Maresa Harvey Webb School – Michael Verderame Emerson-Williams School – Neela Thakur Charles Wright.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Grade 1.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Leveled Literacy Intervention Fountas and Pinnell
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten, Grade 1, and Grade3.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Progress Monitoring for students in Strategic or Intensive intervention levels Based on the work of Roland Good and Ruth Kaminski.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Marie Murray Spring  Learning to read is a complex, multi-faceted process.  Children must understand comprehension is the main goal.  Children.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
The Rural Early Literacy Initiative Effective Professional Development for Rural Kindergarten and First Grade Teachers Steve Amendum Marnie Ginsberg Lynne.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Introduction to Curriculum Topic Study – Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
California Reading First Superintendents’ Summit III Ready, Set, Go: Successful Leadership in a Reading First School Michael Romero, Director District.
ELP Smart Goal Intervention Instruction ELP Inservice Feb 25/26 09.
Marcia L. Grek, Ph.D. The Florida Center for Reading Research Reading Coaches Conference Orlando, Florida August, 2004.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use OCR Grade 6.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use OCR Kindergarten.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… … a process for providing high quality instruction, assessment, and intervention that allows schools to.
Office of Service Quality
© 2011 by The Rector and The Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia. All Rights Reserved. Class Summary Report.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
DRA DEVELOPMENTAL READING ASSESSMENT DeEtte Wick Victoria.
White Pages Team Grey Pages Facilitator Team & Facilitator Guide for School-wide Reading Leadership Team Meetings Elementary.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
PBC Mary dowling.
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

Assessment: Purpose, Process, and Use HMR Kindergarten

2 Introduction to the Assessment Training

3 “Without data, all anyone has is an opinion.” W. Edwards Deming

4 “Ideally, assessment and instruction are linked inextricably within any curriculum. The key to using assessment effectively and efficiently in a program of instruction is to recognize above all that different types of assessment tools must be used for different purposes.” From Reading/Language Arts Framework for California Public Schools

5 Six Key Elements

6 All classrooms deliver a coherent academic program. This includes specific content and an instructional system that is well supported with high quality materials and training. 1.

7 Six Key Elements Everyone at the school uses a frequent assessment system directly connected to the content of the academic program. This system is designed to be used to improve instruction. 2.

8 Six Key Elements All persons work in collegial, collaborative school and grade level teams that focus on developing successful, program-specific strategies to improve achievement for all students. 3.

9 Six Key Elements The school engages in content- specific, site-based professional development with coaching and technical support. Activities are developed using the data generated by the ongoing, program-specific assessment system and are focused on improving instruction for all students. 4.

10 Six Key Elements The school’s active and knowledgeable leadership takes actions focused on developing and strengthening the academic performance of ALL students in the agreed academic area. 5.

11 Six Key Elements The district provides coherent, coordinated support and leadership that technically assists the school to focus work and sustain specific improvements in achievement over time. 6.

12 Three Types of Assessments Screening/Entry Level Monitoring Outcome/Summative

13 The Assessment Program

14 Using the Kindergarten Monitoring Logs Resource Booklet: Kindergarten Monitoring Log

15 Gathering Data Heart Data Spot Check Data Focused Observation

16 Heart Data Subjective Based on assumptions

17 Spot Check Data One day in time Skill focused Unplanned; random students

18 Focused Observation Data Targeted skill Identified students (2-3 per day) Ongoing and objective Unobtrusive – Part of daily instruction; does not require 1-on-1 time

19 Focused Observation Interactive Multiple opportunities Data recorded to help monitor progress

20 Characteristic Features

21 Organization of Monitoring Logs By book, lesson name, or skill, page and lesson numbers Lessons presented sequentially Standards listed for each skill Standards referenced at the front of the teacher booklet Key for teacher notations (for documenting progress) is at the bottom of each page Resource Booklet: Completed Kindergarten Monitoring Log

22 Monitoring Log Notations (+)automaticity; consistently responding with no hesitation (3)accuracy; correct but slow (–)needs practice; some errors (o)needs additional instruction; consistently hesitates or responds after others; reteach the lesson Resource Booklet: Completed Kindergarten Monitoring Log

23 Steps for Gathering Data Before - During - After

24 Discussion

25 Kindergarten Skills Assessments Resource Booklet: Mid-Program Record Sheet #3

26 Teacher and Student Materials

27 Assessment Materials List

28 Naming Upper/Lower Case Resource Booklet: Teachers Administration Guide and Mid-Program Student Record Sheet #1

29 Kindergarten is the Key to Reading Success Phonological Awareness Automaticity of Letter Recognition Automaticity of Sounds to Letters Automaticity of High Frequency Words The kindergarten program supports the development of fluency in first grade by ensuring students have:

30 Oral Fluency Reading Norms

31 Teacher’s Administration Guide Subtests C, D, and E

32 Mid-Program Student Record Sheet #2

33 Teacher’s Administration Guide Subtests F, G and H Resource Booklet: pp.12-14

34 Mid-Program Student Record Sheet #3 Resource Booklet: p. 11

35 Kindergarten Classroom Summary Resource Booklet: Kindergarten Classroom Summary

36 Kindergarten School Summary Resource Booklet: Kindergarten School Summary

37 “Instruction in phonological awareness during kindergarten can have a positive effect on reading growth in first grade. Thus, it will be useful to identify high-risk children at some time during the kindergarten year so that preventive work may begin as early as possible.” Torgersen (1998) Catch Them Before They Fall

38 Curriculum-Embedded Assessment A curriculum-embedded assessment system is essential to determining effectiveness of instruction and student progress. To impact student achievement, data analysis must be examined both vertically and horizontally.

39 Vertical Analysis

40 Horizontal Analysis

41 Look at the Vertical Data Look vertically at the class scores for that monitored skill. Note percentage of students scoring at or above benchmark in that column. Reflect on ways to improve instruction if more than 10% of students score below benchmark.

42 Next Steps Formulate a plan Tackle one skill at a time Determine if more support is needed

43 Analyzing Assessment Data

44 Reflecting on Instruction Has Direct Instruction been used? Has the lesson been properly scaffolded? Has the material been judiciously reviewed? Has student engagement been monitored?

45 Look at the Horizontal Data Student Groups Preteaching Support Intervention Accelerated/challenge

46 Universal Access

47 Identifying Students for Intervention

48 Analyzing Assessments – Horizontally

49 “We must provide high-quality teaching with fidelity to the core to ensure student success in every classroom.” It’s All About the Teaching

50 End-of-Year Assessment

51 End-of-Year Materials List Resource Booklet: p. 17

52 Kindergarten Standards Assessed at the End of the Year