MTC Technology Transfer Seminar Transit Signal Priority Abbas Mohaddes, President & CEO 714.780.7243 October 22, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aggressive Signal Priority with Compensation: Maximizing the Transit Benefit Without Disrupting Traffic Peter G. Furth Northeastern University.
Advertisements

Bus Priority in Portland - Lessons Learned
1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program Joanne Haracz, AICP responsive client solutions since 1976 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association April.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
Transit Signal Priority Work Group Report 7/30/13
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Chapter 221 Chapter 22: Fundamentals of Signal Timing: Actuated Signals Explain terms related to actuated signals Explain why and where actuated signals.
Lecture #12 Arterial Design and LOS Analysis. Objectives  Understand the factors in arterial design Understand how arterial LOS is determined.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
TSP Must Fit Within An Overall Agency ITS Plan. Transit Priority Data Needs Vehicle Location –Speed Door & Lift Status –Predictions Passenger Counting.
Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic Programming Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic.
Gainesville Area Traffic Management System. Traffic Management System  In 1984, the original Traffic Signal Master Plan was developed for the Gainesville.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting Adaptive Signal Control Workshop Session 2: Field Experience January 11, 2004.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 7 Field Operations.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
3rd Street Light Rail Process and Challenges of Developing Transit Signal Priority Javad Mirabdal, Jack Fleck & Britt Thesen Department of Parking and.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 11 Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) and Railroad (RR) Preemption.
1Prepared by AC Transit Service Development Transit Signal Priority For the San Pablo Rapid Bus.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Evolving TSP to meet the needs of the ITS community 1.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
Transit Signal Prioritization (TSP) and RTS RTS Transit Signal Priority Work Group A Path to Successful Implementation 1 July 16, 2013.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
Metrobus 30s Line Study Improving Your Customer’s Transit Experience Virginia Transit Association May 20,
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
NESTS Transit Planning Project Facilities and Technology Briefing with CAST of Cornell University and Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP.
The Transit “T” Craig Lamothe UPA Transit Project Manager City of Minneapolis City of Lakes Innovative Choices for Congestion Relief.
Chapter 20: Actuated Signal Control and Detection
U.S. DOT T3 Webinar Mobile Device Technology TCRP Synthesis 91 April 10, 2012 Case Study LeeTran – Lee County, FL Mike Horsting, AICP 1.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
1 Development of a Regional BRT System Proposal Presented to the TPB Access for All Committee April 23, 2009 Michael Eichler and Monica Bansal Transportation.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
New York State DOT Statewide Perspective BRT Project Development Lessons Learned from Los Angeles Site Visit.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP): Deployment Issues and R&D Needs as Identified by Practitioners Hallie Smith Brendon Hemily.
MIT - October 1, 2004Jeffrey D. Ensor 1 RSTP Planning for Operations Jeffrey D. Ensor Malaysia Transport Group M.I.T. October 1, 2004.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Use of HITL in Bus Priority Design Kevin Balke, Ph.D., P.E. TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Hardware-in-the-Loop Symposium.
1 Presentation to TAC May 20, 2009 Priority Corridor Network (PCN) Evaluation Project Introduction.
Abstract The City of Portland, in collaboration with TriMet (Portland’s regional transit service provider) and the Oregon Department of Transportation,
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Overview of King County Transit Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
SCATS Congestion Improvement Program. The Scope of the SCATS Congestion Improvement Program.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Intelligent Transportation Society of Virginia Annual Conference & Exposition May 19-20, 2016.
Thinking Inside the Box
MOVA Traffic Signal Control Trial
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) and Railroad (RR) Preemption
Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting
* Topic 7 Field Operations
Transit Signal Priority: Evolution
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
City of Alexandria Virginia Transportation and Environmental Services
Presentation transcript:

MTC Technology Transfer Seminar Transit Signal Priority Abbas Mohaddes, President & CEO October 22, 2003

Outline Seminar Objectives Brief description of BRT Defining TSP Signal Cycle Strategies Bus Location Methodologies Technical Considerations Case Study Examples

Objectives Briefly describe BRT Define Transit Priority Methods Identify Technology Solutions (State of the Art) Discuss Operational Considerations Present Lessons Learned

What is BRT? BRT is an integrated bus-based “rapid” transit system typically utilizing: highly-flexible service and advanced technologies to improve customer convenience and reduce delays.

What Characterizes BRT Ideal BRT will incorporate these components: Enhanced stations Advanced vehicles Faster service Modified route structure Advanced fare collection Intelligent transportation systems BRT is far more than a fancy new kind of vehicle

Special Access Signal Priority Re-Entry Phasing HOV Lane: HOV Emphasis Lane Bus-Stop Improvements Parking Management Potential Improvements Dual Turn Lane Queue Bypass Upgrade of Busways to BRT

Defining TSP

Transit Signal Priority ( TSP ) … provides for a traffic signal controller to react to the presence of an approaching bus and to give the bus its passage through the intersection with less delay than would have otherwise occurred.

Pre-Emption VS. Priority

Preemption (EVPE and RRPE): Provides emergency vehicles with a green light at intersections during emergency situations Also occurs at railroad and trolley crossings Overrides the traffic signal system – – USUALLY NOTICEABLE !

Priority vs. Pre-Emption Priority: Occurs at locations where preferential treatment (i.e. a green light) is given to specific vehicles like transit buses Moves transit riders through congestion faster Increases transit vehicle’s average route speed Often not noticeable - operates as part of the signal coordination

Rationale for Providing TSP Improve Schedule Adherence Reduce Bus Operating Costs Speed up buses’ run times Increase Transit Mode Split While concurrently … Not significantly worsening overall delays

Signal Cycle Strategies

Signal Coordination Cycle

Green is Held

Green Extension

Early Green (red truncation)

Start Green Early Shorten Other Splits Normal Start of Coordinated Green Coordinated Phase

Transition/Recovery Varies from one controller software to another… Early green needs no recovery Controller is back in “sync” at the end of that coordinated green

Recovery from Early Green Recovery Cycle Recovery completed

Transition/Recovery Extended green TSP can recover in one of two ways: Shorten the following non-bus phase, or Give them their full split and shortening the next cycle’s bus phase

Recovery from Green Extension Recovery Cycle Start Green Here? Or, here?

Queue-jumping A different form of TSP: Detection is at / near the stopline A normally-skipped, specially- inserted phase is called to serve the bus Bus gets the green, while adjacent traffic is held a few seconds at a red

Queue Jump Geometry

Queue Jump Phasing R1 R2 TRADITIONAL NEMA BARRIERS OLB 47 3 OLA 10 9 SB QJ NB QJ ARTERIAL SIDE STREET SB QJ NB QJ Overlap A = phases 9+11 Overlap B = phases 10+12

Bus Location Methodologies

Locating the Transit Vehicle Accurate Real-Time Position To place a priority request not too early, not too late Make an educated guess as to the transit vehicle’s precise ETA at the intersection Only 2 Methods: Intersection-to-Vehicle Proximity Detection Continuous Vehicle Tracking

Bus Location Technologies Optical - Strobe Lights

Bus Location Technologies Magnetic Detection-Inductive Loops Check-In Check-Out

Bus Location Technologies RF / Infrared Tags RF /

Bus Location Technologies Global Positioning

Technical Considerations 1) Delays to Non-Transit Vehicles 2) Conditional Priority Methods 3) Bus Stop Location- Nearside VS. far side 4) Intersecting Bus Routes

Technical Considerations 5) Successive TSP Service Calls 6) Headway vs. Time Based Schedule Adherence 7) Benefit / Cost 8) Standards

Technical Considerations 9) Early and extended Green, or Extended Green only 10) Performance Measurement 11) Programming Difficulty

Case Studies Glendale Centrally - directed LADOT Centrally - directed Sacramento County Watt Ave. San Diego’s BRT – planning stage

City of Glendale (centrally-directed) Buses tracked w/ GPS system When a bus is determined to be late: Bus location is compared to traffic signal ETA is calculated for its predicted arrival

City of Glendale (centrally-directed) Signal system sends TSP request to the target intersection Controller activates internal TSP algorithm to produce: Held Green, or Early Green, or Extended Green

LADOT (centrally-directed) Buses tracked by signal system as they pass over loop detectors Signal system predicts bus ETA at next upcoming traffic signal Signal system adjust splits (& phase sequence) to match green window to bus arrival LoopComm Detection

Changed Phase Sequence Start Green WAY Early Normal Start of Coordinated Green Coordinated Phase SWAP LT+Thru

Sacramento Watt Avenue TSP Buses equipped with Opticom emitters Opticom detectors’ range set for 10” of bus travel time When zone is breached, TSP call is placed in Eagle (Siemens) controller Internal controller algorithms allow for up to 10” of early or extended green

San Diego’s BRT (planned) Wide variety of TSP technologies being examined But controllers and system will be uniform across region (BI Tran) Opticom exists, but older generation Several Caltrans intersections in pilot corridor

Caltrans considerations All Caltrans traffic systems use Caltrans software CTNET – system for remote supervision TRFM – field master controller software C8 – local controller software (Type 170) ACCMA Smart Corridors project has deployed TSP in Caltrans-controlled intersections for the first time

General Cost Implications Just one factor in selecting an appropriate TSP solution Costs vary depending on solution chosen GPS-Based Proximity zone-based Loops

Strategies for Restricting TSP Conditional (aka Differential) TSP is applying TSP only to a subset of the bus fleet Late buses only Peak-direction buses only Heavily-loaded buses only No TSP for LOS E intersections during peak No TSP within “x” minutes of a previous TSP event

Summary BRT popularity is rapidly expanding! And TSP plays an important role in it. TSP System must accurately predict bus arrival at intersection To choose which TSP response to activate Various TSP strategies exist…tailor to fit ! “Extended green” is best ! Easiest to achieve Biggest time-saving benefit Can rebalance splits on following cycle