Evaluation of Sanity at the Time of the Offense - §19.2-169.5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

MENTALLY ILL & THE LAW Madhurima, Prison Reforms Programme,
Drug Court Defense Attorneys What is our role?. We are a team member. WE ARE IMPORTANT!!!!! The new best standards say that we are a vital member of a.
302 Involuntary Commitment
Interface of legal and clinical issues in emergency settings Kathleen Crapanzano, M.D. Office of Mental Health Medical Director.
Involuntary Outpatient Commitment Legislation: State Perspectives Virginia House of Delegate's Health, Welfare and Institutions Committee July 30, 2007.
Pretrial Procedures Transfer hearings Detention Intake Diversion
Massachusetts Department of Correction Bridgewater State Hospital Luis S. Spencer, Commissioner.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Laura’s Law May 29, 2014.
Juvenile Justice system
Adjudication hearing More than a million cases of alleged delinquency brought before the juvenile court each year More than half are petitioned to court.
Mental Health Issues in the Courtroom – A Primer on Relevant Code Sections.
SERVICES AND RESOURCES. Total Unduplicated Youth Youth with Mental Health Diagnosis % % % % %
Neglected Adults Eastern Health Community Supports Program.
INCOMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL ART. 46B.003 Lacks rational and factual understanding of the proceedings Cannot consult with counsel Presumed competent Burden.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
SECLUSION AND RESTRAINT PROVISIONS Marion Greenfield.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Program Evaluation and Reporting Requirements in New York July 9, 2014.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
2005 Children’s Code Amendments: Delinquency Act.
Sentencing Unit 2 Chapter 11.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
Mental Health Law Reform Office of the Vice President for Government Relations and Health Policy.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
MENTAL HEALTH (AMENDMENT) ACT 2003 Given Royal Assent on 21 October Except for Part 2, the Act came into operation the day after it was given Royal.
Children’s Mental Health Crisis Response Services Presentation to the Allied Health Caucus, Virginia General Assembly February 24, 2012.
Reporting Requirements for School Staff Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011 Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011.
Legal and Ethical Issues Chapter 14 Mental Health and the Legal System: An Overview A variety of legal and ethical issues exist in regard to mental health.
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
1 APPEARING BEFORE THE MENTAL HEALTH TRIBUNAL. 2 Index The Provisions of the Act relating to Tribunal hearings3 – 6 What is Evidence 7 Section 24 Continuing.
Joint Hearing of Senate Health and Human Services and Senate State Affairs Joint Interim Charge #3 August 23, 2006.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Comparison of Health Laws Audrey Kaiser Manka, J.D. Minnesota Assistant Attorney General "The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
Implementation of the Mental Health Act 2007 Section 12(2) Approved Doctors.
Lethality Assessment Page 27.  Has a history of domestic violence  Has access to guns  Abuses the victim in public places  Holds obsessive or possessive.
Chapter 12 Parole and Release to the Community 1.
Disposition Hearing Juvenile Law Cle Oct 17, 2014.
Chapter 19: Legal/Ethical Issues DSM V: Recommended Changes Abnormal Psychology April 28, 2009 Class #29.
ICAOS Training 103-Supervision in the Receiving State [Revision 12/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
PRINCIPLES OF DRUG ADDICTION TREATMENT Dr. K. S. NJUGUNA.
1 MANDATORY OUTPATIENT TREATMENT Jane D. Hickey Office of the Attorney General June 5, 2008.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 18 Mental Health and the Law.
Mandatory Outpatient Treatment Following Involuntary Inpatient Admission Allyson K. Tysinger Office of the Attorney General May 2010.
Mental Health Law Reform 2008 Procedural Changes Allyson K. Tysinger Assistant Attorney General June 4-5, 2008.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
CIVIL COMMITMENT: Network Service Provider Responsibilities.
Section 5: Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment 1.
WV DHHR Bureau for Behavioral Health and Health Facilities Crisis Services Program.
2009 Legislative Changes Concerning Protective Orders and Firearms Effective October 1, 2009 FVC--1.
Westminster Homeless Health Co-ordination project 02/02/2016
Criminal Cases YOU BROKE THE LAW! Now What?. Criminal Cases A crime is an act that breaks a federal, state, or city law A crime is an act that breaks.
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
This guide simplifies the arrest-to-sentence process in New York County.
Intro to OBRA and the Nursing Assistant. INTRODUCTION  You need to know:  What you can and cannot do  What conduct is right & wrong  Your legal limits.
The Mental Health Act & Mental Capacity act Dr Faye Tarrant ST5 Substance Misuse.
Douglas County Juvenile Court 8700 Hospital Drive Douglasville, GA
PATIENT & FAMILY RIGHTS AT DOHMS. Fully understand and practice all your rights. You will receive a written copy of these rights from the Reception, Registration.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
Criminal and Civil Competence
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Chapter 2 Ethical and Legal Issues
2014 Legislative Changes to Virginia’s Civil Commitment Laws
Roles of the Mental Health Team:
Assertive community treatment webinar
Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Sanity at the Time of the Offense - §

Purpose of the Insanity Defense Focuses on defendant’s mental condition at the time of offense and asks whether the defendant was so impaired as to be not criminally responsible (i.e., not an appropriate subject for penal sanctions) Designed to protect against the conviction and punishment of morally blameless persons Serves as the exception to the rule that people exercise free will and therefore may legitimately be punished when they do wrong

Frequency of Insanity Defense Insanity defense raised in about 1% of criminal cases nationally, as low as.1% in some states Successful only about 25% of the time (nationally) when the insanity defense is raised In Virginia, most recent data suggests similar trends in Virginia.

Virginia Insanity Test Defendant was insane at the time of the offense, as a result of mental disease or defect (MDOD), if the defendant: 1)Did not understand the nature, character, and consequences of his or her acts or 2) Was unable to distinguish right from wrong, or 3) Was unable to resist the impulse to commit the act.

Virginia Insanity Test (Continued) Insanity defense not defined in statute MDOD must cause substantial impairment Mental retardation may qualify Intoxication does not qualify, but “settled insanity” may Does not say if “morally” or “legally” wrong Irresistible impulse, not just passion Must be impulse, not planned Burden on Defendant – sane until proven insane

Myths About the Insanity Defense Overused Used only in murder cases There is no risk to defendant NGRI acquittees are released quickly Acquittees spend less time in custody Most insanity defenses are faked Most trials include battle of experts Used to beat the rap

Who is Qualified to Conduct Sanity Evaluations? Per § (A) – as “(i) a psychiatrist, a clinical psychologist, or an individual with a doctorate degree in clinical psychology who has successfully completed forensic evaluation training as approved by the Commissioner of Behavioral Health & Developmental Services and (ii) qualified by specialized training and experience to perform forensic evaluations.” The Commissioner of Behavioral Health & Developmental Services has designated the five day long Basic Forensic Evaluation: Principles and Practice training offered by the Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy (ILPPP) at the University of Virginia as satisfying the minimum standard requirement required by this section of the Code. Virginia Code § defines a clinical psychologist as “an individual licensed to practice clinical psychology” The Commissioner of Behavioral Health & Developmental Services has designated the five day long Basic Forensic Evaluation: Principles and Practice training offered by the Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy (ILPPP) at the University of Virginia as satisfying the minimum standard requirement required by this section of the Code. A list of appropriately trained evaluators can be found at:

Location of Evaluation Per § (B) the evaluation SHALL be performed on outpatient basis unless the court specifically finds that outpatient services are unavailable or unless the results of outpatient evaluation indicate that hospitalization of the defendant for evaluation of his sanity at the time of the offense is necessary. If evaluation is ordered inpatient – Hospitalization should not exceed 30 days. If outpatient – make sure order and collateral are immediately sent to evaluator. If inpatient – send order and collateral to Forensic Coordinator at your local state hospital who will triage admission and make approach referrals as necessary.

Attorney’s Role in Sanity Evaluation Provide collateral materials – Per (c) to include warrant, police investigative reports, defendant’s prior mental health treatment records, prior arrest record, victim, witness, and defendant statements to law enforcement. Evaluator likely will want to speak with family members and/or others who know defendant well so have contact information available. If there were witnesses/victims evaluator may also want to speak with them so have their contact information available.

What to look for in Sanity at the Time of the Offense report Clear explanation of what defendant’s mental status likely was like at time of the offense. This description should, to the degree possible, include corroborating details from family, victims, witnesses, and mental health records. Clear examples of how the defendant’s symptoms (if present) affected their perceptions, thinking, and judgment A clear description of the defendant’s account of the offense – including how they were thinking, feeling, and perceiving A clear linkage between the defendant’s illness (if present), symptoms (if present), and impairment in one of the NGRI prongs (if present) Alternative hypotheses for why incident may have occurred Explanation of what factors support insanity defense and what factors don’t support an insanity defense

Evaluation on Motion of the Commonwealth after Notice ( ) Provides opportunity for second opinion on issue of sanity Qualifications of evaluator are same CWA is responsible for providing collateral materials Helpful if first opinion is inconclusive, if the original report is “weak”, or if there continues to be lingering doubt about defendant’s sanity If defendant refuses to participate then original sanity evaluation may be excluded

NGRI Acquittal Rate – Per 100,000 by CSB (FY03- FY 11) Update this slide depending on locality

Facts about NGRIs in Virginia

Disposition of NGRI Acquittees Not subject to penal sanctions (i.e., can’t be incarcerated because they are acquitted). They can be committed to DBHDS for “indeterminate period” (except misdemeanants) after temporary custody Trial Court maintains jurisdiction over case until released unconditionally and NGRI status is removed They will continue to require ongoing legal representation throughout process. Placed in DBHDS custody – usually at CSH –for Temporary Custody evaluations Average Length of Stay in DBHDS hospital for Insanity Acquittee is 6 ½ years. Average Length of Stay on Conditional Release = 3 years

CSH – Maximum Security Accredited psychiatric facility with increased security Emphasis on both security and treatment Large volume with frequent admissions/discharges Each acquittee assigned a team composed of Psychiatrist, Psychologist, Social Worker, Nurse, and other needed staff. What you can expect at CSH

What Patients Can Expect While at CSH They will enter through secured sally port and be searched upon admission. They will be in a secured environment with little contact with outside They are required to walk in single file lines to and from activities. They will be “pat searched” multiple times a day. They will have limited access to personal items They can expect to remain at CSH longer than the allocated 45 days for the evaluation (time to schedule hearing, if committed it takes time for civil transfer, etc). It is a non-smoking environment.

Temporary Custody Evaluations § Does not matter if felony or misdemeanor acquittal, on bond or not, must come “into custody” of DBHDS to have evaluations completed Code allows 45 days to complete after admission – however there often is a delay between NGRI finding and actual admission. 2 Evaluators appointed (1 Psychiatrist and 1 Psychologist) Majority of evaluations are done at CSH

Temporary Custody Evaluations (cont’d) Evaluators can recommend Commitment (most), Conditional Release (some) or Unconditional Release (very few) to the Court Initial Analysis of Aggressive Behavior (AAB) is completed by CSH psychologist during the temporary custody period Following evaluations, the Court shall schedule a hearing on an expedited basis If one or both evaluators recommend Conditional Release then DBHDS will request the period of Temporary Custody be extended for a minimum of 45 more days so that a Conditional Release Plan can be developed by the treatment team and CSB.

Results of Temporary Custody Evaluations Acquittee returns to court Court decides one of the following: – Commitment (initial) – Conditional Release – Unconditional Release * Approximately 20-25% of NGRIs are Conditionally Released out of Temporary Custody. The remaining 75-80% are committed to DBHDS custody.

NGRI Commitment to DBHDS § While there is much variability in length of stay in DBHDS custody, the average length of stay for NGRI acquittees not Conditionally Released out of Temporary Custody is 6 ½ - 7 years. **Persons adjudicated NGRI for misdemeanor offenses can only be committed under § for 1 year. They must then either be Conditionally Released, Unconditionally Released, or be recommended for civil commitment. While the defendant will initially stay at CSH Maximum Security, they will eventually be transferred to a state hospital or non- maximum security unit closer to their home. The NGRI acquittee must work their way through a series of graduated privileges as part of DBHDS’ “demonstration model” of risk management

Graduated Release Process Behavioral/Demonstration model of clinical risk management. – Thoughtful progression in transitioning from maximum security to reintegration into the community. – Gradual increases in freedom based on successful completion of the previous, more restrictive level of privileges.

Privilege Levels Transfer to civil hospital Escorted grounds Unescorted grounds Escorted community visits Unescorted community visits (not overnight) Unescorted community visits (up to 48 hours) Trial visits for greater than 48 hours (with court approval) Conditional release (with court approval) Unconditional release (with court approval)

Annual NGRI Commitment Review § Hospital will submit reports to the Court with copies to the CWA and defense attorney yearly for the duration of the individual’s commitment to DBHDS custody Individual is entitled to yearly (for 1 st five years and then every other year thereafter) hearing to determine if they continue to require inpatient hospitalization Acquittee guaranteed representation by his/her attorney for that hearing Acquittee (through attorney) may petition for release (even if his/her team does not recommend release) and the Court can order DBHDS to appoint an independent evaluator If acquittee is re-committed, the recommitment is for a maximum of 365 days, although if he/she is ready for release prior to the expiration of the order the Commissioner may petition the Court to schedule a hearing to review issue of Conditional Release

Conditional Release § Conditional Release is often equated with “mental health probation” It is a comprehensive discharge plan with prescribed outpatient services specifically geared to address the individual’s risk factors. It is developed by the Community Services Board with input from the state hospital and the acquittee It is designed to provide adequate services to maximize the probability of the individual remaining well and/or to set up sufficient supports to catch the individual before they get so ill they become a danger.

CRP Must be Based on Risk Factors Identified in the AAB Examples include: – Significant alcohol abuse history – Medication non-compliance

General Conditions Summary The client agrees to follow all laws Not to leave the Commonwealth without court permission Abstain from alcohol and illicit drugs or medication that is not prescribed Acknowledges they remain under the jurisdiction of the court and the supervision of the CSB and agrees to follow CSB directives and treatment plans and to make themselves available for supervision

General Conditions Summary (cont’d) Follow their conditional release plan and conduct themselves in a manner that maintains their mental health Acknowledges that they can be returned to the state hospital if they violate a condition or if their mental health deteriorates (even if it is not their fault)

General Conditions Summary (cont’d) Agrees to pay for MH and SA services according to the sliding scale Not to own firearms or illegal weapons or associate with persons or places that do Agrees to release information as requested

Special Conditions Individualized to fit acquittee’s mental health needs Individualized to manage acquittee’s risk factors Attention to family dynamics Residential placement Therapeutic/vocational activities

The Acquittee Moves from the Hospital to the Community- It’s Time to Implement the CRP Court-ordered CRP for acquittee and CSB Acquittee cannot be released until hospital has received signed order

Stages of Compliance and Non-compliance Acquittees are on conditional release for an indeterminate length of time Anticipate there will be “ups” and “downs” with compliance. The time spent on conditional release is very individualized, depending on acquittee’s compliance with the CRP On average, individuals remain on Conditional Release for 3 years.

Six-month Reports to the Court While acquittee is on Conditional Release, CSB will file reports with the Court Every six months. Report will address mental status and compliance issues If your acquittee is having issues complying with conditions it is better to intervene sooner than later. Encourage ongoing compliance and/or advocate a compromise/modification of conditions with the CSB

NON-COMPLIANCE IN THE COMMUNITY

Most Acquittees Do Extremely Well on Conditional Release… HOWEVER…there are exceptions to every rule

Managing Non-compliance Assess the Type of Non-Compliance – Psychiatric Issues – Substance Abuse Issues – Other (housing problems, missed appointments, etc.) CSB will make recommendations for managing non- compliance.

How Serious is the Non-compliance? Decompensation or relapse may occur Does the CSB have to revoke the acquittee? Can the CSB manage the risk safely? Is the acquittee willing to cooperate with outpatient or community-based hospitalization recommendations?

So…what are the legal interventions for non-compliance? § Modification of CRP § Revocation (non-emergency) § Emergency revocation § Contempt of court

§ : Modification of the CRP Addition or adjustment of treatment interventions Must be court-approved, if not specified in the CRP CSB will either file a petition or will include recommendations in their 6 month report.

REVOCATION § : Non-Emergency § : Emergency

§ : Regular Revocation (Non-emergency) Used in non-emergency situations CSB must petition the court Judge will appoint an independent evaluator After evaluation is completed, the Judge will determine if revocation is warranted Note: This process is rarely used

§ : Emergency Revocation Used in emergency situations Uses the same ECO and TDO process; however, the criteria are different Sometimes this is difficult for the Special Justices to understand Acquittee will have an attorney for commitment hearing but attorney of record still handles NGRI case If can be stabilized rapidly they can be re-released as if revocation never occurred

Revocation Criteria For the Acquittee 1.Has violated the conditions of his release or is no longer a proper subject for conditional release based on application of the criteria for conditional release AND 2.Is mentally ill or mentally retarded and requires inpatient (DBHDS) hospitalization

§ : Contempt of Court Used when acquittee has violated CRP, but does NOT need inpatient hospitalization CSB will inform the court of the non-compliance and suggest this intervention For some individuals (even those with mental illness), being held in contempt of court and briefly jailed will enhance their future compliance If the Judge finds acquittee in contempt of court, the consequences are varied and up to the discretion of the Judge

Unconditional Release § % of acquittees who have been Conditionally Released have eventually been unconditionally released Ideally, unconditional release should be proposed when acquittees condition is stable enough and risk factors can be sufficiently managed without court mandated treatment. This does not mean they no longer need mental health care, but simply means they are able and willing to seek care voluntarily It is the final step of the graduated release process and should occur after thoughtful, progressive removal of conditions. Attorney may need to advocate for client and encourage CSB to consider removal of 1 or 2 conditions each year and then ultimately encourage Unconditional Release As long as individual remains on Conditional Release, he will continue to require your representation.

Further Questions….. Insert the telephone numbers and addresses for the presenters