© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Algebra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Common Core Mathematical Practices. People who are good in math… Make sense of problems.
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Professional Development Module Common Core Math Shift: Focus Grade 6.
Mathematics- Module B Diana Roscoe & Crystal Lancour Comparison of the Prioritized Curriculum and Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Welcome! 1.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Welcome to TNCore Training! Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Geometry Introduction of 2013 CCSS.
Study Group 2 – Algebra 2 Welcome Back!
NEK CCSSM – HS Session # 2 Algebra Content Domain and Applications of Practice Standards Wednesday, November 28, 2012.
1 Exploring Rigor in the 2011 MA Curriculum Framework for Mathematics Exploration Activity : Connecting the Standards for Mathematical Practice to the.
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Algebra.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Geometry.
DDI and Assessments in Mathematics: Designing Assessments that Provide Meaningful Data At the 6-12 Level February 4, 2014.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
History & Vision.  The new standards are rigorous, research- based, and designed to prepare every student for success in college and the workforce. 
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
2010 New Math Standards. Mathematical Practices 1. Attend to precision 2. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others 3. Make sense.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Algebra.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Transitioning to the Common Core.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Apply across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically proficient student.
UCDMP Saturday Series Secondary Session 3 January 26, 2013.
September, Network for New Science/Math Teachers September 24, 2010 Meeting 1, Year 2 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Partnership Institute.
How to read the grade level standards Standards Clusters Domains define what students should understand and be able to do. are groups of related standards.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
The Common Core Comes to Arkansas or Teaching the New Algebra I Saturday January 29, :15-11:45 a.m. - Room 2506 David A. Young T 3 National Instructor.
The Common Core State Standards August Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on Final Standards released June.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
Standards for Mathematical Practice #1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. I can: explain the meaning of a problem. choose the right.
Common Core Mathematics. Learning Norms 2 Restrooms Parking Lot evaluation connections General comments.
Sunnyside School District
MATH – High School Common Core Vs Tested Kansas Standards Please note: For informational purposes, all Common Core standards are listed, and the tested.
1 Purpose of the Standards “These Standards are not intended to be new names for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step. It.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Strategies for Scaffolding Student Understanding: Academically Productive.
Using Technology to Uncover the Mathematics August 3-6, 2015 Dave Brownslides available at Professor, Ithaca Collegehttp://faculty.ithaca.edu/dabrown/geneva/
January 8,  Common Core State Standards  Fully implemented by 2013/2014  New state assessment  This year’s First Graders 
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
2010 Arizona Mathematics Standards (Common Core).
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Algebra 2 Illuminating Student Thinking:
Unit 7 An Introduction to Exponential Functions 5 weeks or 25 days
Mt. Olive Elementary School February 9, 2015 Joyce Bishop, Ph.D.
Vacaville USD October 28, AGENDA Problem Solving, Patterns, Expressions and Equations Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices.
USING VIDEO TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THE MATH PRACTICES LOOK LIKE IN K-5 CLASSROOMS.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Enacting Instructional Tasks:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
WELCOME HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATORS Help yourself to breakfast. Please have a seat in a desk with your subject-specific materials. Introduce yourself to the.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
This module was developed by Lynn Raith, Mathematics Curriculum Specialist K-12. Video courtesy of NYC District 2 and the Institute for Learning. These.
Presented by: Angela J. Williams
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Cumberland County Schools Mathematics Common Core
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Algebra 2 Deepening Our Understanding of CCSS Via A Constructed Response Assessment

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Forms of Assessment Assessment for LearningAssessment of Learning Assessment as Learning

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Session Goals Participants will: deepen understanding of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for Mathematical Practice and Mathematical Content; understand how Constructed Response Assessments (CRAs) assess the CCSS for both Mathematical Content and Practice; and understand the ways in which CRAs assess students’ conceptual understanding.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Overview of Activities Participants will: analyze Constructed Response Assessments (CRAs) in order to determine the way they are assessing the CCSSM; analyze and discuss the CCSS for Mathematical Content and Mathematical Practice; discuss what it means to develop and assess conceptual understanding; and discuss the CCSS related to the tasks and the implications for instruction and learning.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH The Common Core State Standards The standards consist of:  The CCSS for Mathematical Content  The CCSS for Mathematical Practice

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Analyzing a Performance-Based Assessment

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Tennessee Focus Clusters Algebra 2  Extend the properties of exponents to rational exponents.  Write expressions in equivalent forms to solve problems.  Understand the relationship between zeros and factors of polynomials.  Build a function that models a relationship between two quantities. 7

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Analyzing Assessment Items (Private Think Time) Four assessment items have been provided:  Car Depreciation  Writing a Polynomial  Patterns in Patterns  One Rocket, Three Equations For each assessment item: solve the assessment item; and make connections between the standard(s) and the assessment item.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1. Car Depreciation After you purchase a new car, it begins to lose value. As the years pass, more and more value is lost. This process is known as depreciation. a.Carmen buys a new car for $24,500. Carmen’s new car loses 14% of its value each year through depreciation. Write a function that can be used to model the value of the car at the end of each year that Carmen owns the car. Justify your equation mathematically. b.After Carmen buys the car, he adds an audio and speaker system worth $500. The audio system loses 15% of its value the minute it is installed into the car, and 7% of the remaining value each year through depreciation. Write a function that can be used to model the value of the car with the audio system and speakers at the end of each year that Carmen owns the car.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 2. Writing a Polynomial Recall that polynomial functions with only real number zeros can be written in factored form as follows: where each z n represents some real root of the function, and each p n is a whole number exponent greater than or equal to 1. Consider the graph of the polynomial function below.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 3. Patterns in Patterns a.Write a function that can be used to determine the diameter of any circle drawn in the poster in this way. Explain the meaning of each term in your expression in the context of the problem. b.Laura eventually draws 10 circles. Write and use a formula for the sum of a series to find the sum of the circumferences of the 10 circles, accurate to two decimal places. Show your work. 28 inches

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 4. One Rocket, Three Equations

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Discussing Content Standards (Small Group Time) For each assessment item: With your small group, discuss the connections between the content standard(s) and the assessment item.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Deepening Understanding of the Content Standards via the Assessment Items (Whole Group) As a result of looking at the assessment items, what do you better understand about the specifics of the content standards? What are you still wondering about?

The CCSS for Mathematical Content CCSS Conceptual Category – Number and Quantity Common Core State Standards, 2010 The Real Number System(N-RN) Extend the properties of exponents to rational exponents. N-RN.A.1Explain how the definition of the meaning of rational exponents follows from extending the properties of integer exponents to those values, allowing for a notation for radicals in terms of rational exponents. For example, we define 5 1/3 to be the cube root of 5 because we want (5 1/3 ) 3 = 5 (1/3)3 to hold, so (5 1/3 ) 3 must equal 5. N-RN.A.2Rewrite expressions involving radicals and rational exponents using the properties of exponents.

The CCSS for Mathematical Content CCSS Conceptual Category – Algebra Common Core State Standards, 2010 Seeing Structure in Expressions (A-SSE) Write expressions in equivalent forms to solve problems A-SSE.B.3Choose and produce an equivalent form of an expression to reveal and explain properties of the quantity represented by an expression. ★ A-SSE.B.3cUse the properties of exponents to transform expressions for exponential functions. For example the expression 1.15 t can be rewritten as (1.15 1/12 ) 12t ≈ t to reveal the approximate equivalent monthly interest rate if the annual rate is 15%. A-SSE.B.4Derive the formula for the sum of a finite geometric series (when the common ratio is not 1), and use the formula to solve problems. For example, calculate mortgage payments. ★ ★ Mathematical Modeling is a Standard for Mathematical Practice (MP4) and a Conceptual Category, and specific modeling standards appear throughout the high school standards indicated with a star ( ★ ). Where an entire domain is marked with a star, each standard in that domain is a modeling standard.

The CCSS for Mathematical Content CCSS Conceptual Category – Algebra Common Core State Standards, 2010 Arithmetic with Polynomials and Rational Expressions (A-APR) Understand the relationship between zeros and factors of polynomials A-APR.B.2Know and apply the Remainder Theorem: For a polynomial p(x) and a number a, the remainder on division by x – a is p(a), so p(a) = 0 if and only if (x – a) is a factor of p(x). A-APR.B.3Identify zeros of polynomials when suitable factorizations are available, and use the zeros to construct a rough graph of the function defined by the polynomial.

The CCSS for Mathematical Content CCSS Conceptual Category – Functions Common Core State Standards, 2010 Building Functions (F-BF) Build a function that models a relationship between two quantities F-BF.A.1Write a function that describes a relationship between two quantities. ★ F-BF.A.1aDetermine an explicit expression, a recursive process, or steps for calculation from a context. F-BF.A.1bCombine standard function types using arithmetic operations. For example, build a function that models the temperature of a cooling body by adding a constant function to a decaying exponential, and relate these functions to the model. F-BF.A.2Write arithmetic and geometric sequences both recursively and with an explicit formula, use them to model situations, and translate between the two forms. ★ ★ Mathematical Modeling is a Standard for Mathematical Practice (MP4) and a Conceptual Category, and specific modeling standards appear throughout the high school standards indicated with a star ( ★ ). Where an entire domain is marked with a star, each standard in that domain is a modeling standard.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Determining the Standards for Mathematical Practice Associated with the Constructed Response Assessment

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Getting Familiar with the CCSS for Mathematical Practice (Private Think Time) Count off by 8. Each person reads one of the CCSS for Mathematical Practice. Read your assigned Mathematical Practice. Be prepared to share the “gist” of the Mathematical Practice. 20

The CCSS for Mathematical Practice 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4.Model with mathematics. 5.Use appropriate tools strategically. 6.Attend to precision. 7.Look for and make use of structure. 8.Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. 21 Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, 2010, NGA Center/CCSSO

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Discussing Practice Standards (Small Group Time) Each person has 2 minutes to share important information about his/her assigned Mathematical Practice. 22

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Discussing Practice Standards (Small Group Time) For each assessment item: With your small group, discuss the connections between the practice standards and the assessment item.

The CCSS for Mathematical Practice 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4.Model with mathematics. 5.Use appropriate tools strategically. 6.Attend to precision. 7.Look for and make use of structure. 8.Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Common Core State Standards, 2010

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Deepening Understanding of the Practice Standards via the Assessment Items (Whole Group) Which Standards for Mathematical Practice do you better understand? What are you still wondering about?

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Assessing Conceptual Understanding

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Rationale We have now examined assessment items and discussed their connection to the CCSS for Mathematical Content and Practice. A question that needs considering, however, is if and how these assessments will give us a good means of measuring the conceptual understandings our students have acquired. In this activity, you will have an opportunity to consider what it means to develop conceptual understanding, as described in the CCSS for Mathematics, and what it takes to assess for it.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Assessing for Conceptual Understanding The set of CRA items are designed to assess student understanding of expressions and equations. Look across the set of related items. What might a teacher learn about a student’s understanding by looking at the student’s performance across the set of items as a whole? What is varying from one item to the next?

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Conceptual Understanding What do the authors mean by conceptual understanding? How might analyzing student performance on this set of assessments help us determine if students have a deep understanding of the assessed standards?

Developing Conceptual Understanding Knowledge that has been learned with understanding provides the basis of generating new knowledge and for solving new and unfamiliar problems. When students have acquired conceptual understanding in an area of mathematics, they see connections among concepts and procedures and can give arguments to explain why some facts are consequences of others. They gain confidence, which then provides a base from which they can move to another level of understanding. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

The CCSS on Conceptual Understanding In this respect, those content standards which set an expectation of understanding are potential “points of intersection” between the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. These points of intersection are intended to be weighted toward central and generative concepts in the school mathematics curriculum that most merit the time, resources, innovative energies, and focus necessary to qualitatively improve the curriculum, instruction, assessment, professional development, and student achievement in mathematics. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics, 2010, p. 8, NGA Center/CCSSO

Assessing Concept Image Tall (1992) differentiates between the mathematical definition of a concept and the concept image, which is the entire cognitive structure that a person has formed related to the concept. This concept image is made up of pictures, examples and non-examples, processes, and properties. A strong concept image is a rich, integrated, mental representation that allows the student to flexibly move between multiple formulations and representations of an idea. A student who has connected mathematical ideas in this way can create and use a model to analyze a situation, uncover patterns and synthesize them to form an integrated picture. They can also use symbols meaningfully to describe generalizations which then provides a base from which they can move to another level of understanding. Brown, Seidelmann, & Zimmermann. In the trenches: Three teachers’ perspectives on moving beyond the math wars.

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Developing and Assessing Understanding Why is it important, when assessing a student’s conceptual understanding, to vary items in these ways?

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Using the Assessment to Think About Instruction In order for students to perform well on the CRA, what are the implications for instruction? What kinds of instructional tasks will need to be used in the classroom? What will teaching and learning look like and sound like in the classroom?

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Step Back What have you learned about the CCSS for Mathematical Content that surprised you? What is the difference between the CCSS for Mathematical Content and the CCSS for Mathematical Practice? Why do we say that students must work on both Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice?

Seeing Structure in Expressions pg. 5

Seeing Structure in Expressions pg. 5 Susan is told to take 250 mg doses of an antibiotic for an ear infection regularly every 12 hours for 10 days. Susan does some research online and finds out that at the end of 12 hours, about 4% of the drug is still in the body. 1. What quantity of the drug is in the body right after the first dose, the second dose, the third dose? 2. When will the total amount of the antibiotic in Susan’s body be the highest? What is that amount? A.SSE.B.4

Seeing Structure in Expressions pg. 5

Seeing Structure in Expressions pg. 5

1. Car Depreciation Common Core State Standards, 2010 Building Functions (F-BF) Build a function that models a relationship between two quantities F-BF.A.1Write a function that describes a relationship between two quantities. ★ F-BF.A.1bCombine standard function types using arithmetic operations. For example, build a function that models the temperature of a cooling body by adding a constant function to a decaying exponential, and relate these functions to the model. ★ Mathematical Modeling is a Standard for Mathematical Practice (MP4) and a Conceptual Category, and specific modeling standards appear throughout the high school standards indicated with a star ( ★ ). Where an entire domain is marked with a star, each standard in that domain is a modeling standard.

2. Writing a Polynomial Common Core State Standards, 2010 Arithmetic with Polynomials and Rational Expressions (A-APR) Understand the relationship between zeros and factors of polynomials A-APR.B.3Identify zeros of polynomials when suitable factorizations are available, and use the zeros to construct a rough graph of the function defined by the polynomial. Building Functions (F-BF) Build a function that models a relationship between two quantities F-BF.A.1Write a function that describes a relationship between two quantities. ★ ★ Mathematical Modeling is a Standard for Mathematical Practice (MP4) and a Conceptual Category, and specific modeling standards appear throughout the high school standards indicated with a star ( ★ ). Where an entire domain is marked with a star, each standard in that domain is a modeling standard.

3. Patterns in Patterns Task Common Core State Standards, 2010 Building Functions (F-BF) Build a function that models a relationship between two quantities F-BF.A.2Write arithmetic and geometric sequences both recursively and with an explicit formula, use them to model situations, and translate between the two forms. Seeing Structure in Expressions A-SSE Write expressions in equivalent forms to solve problems A.SSE.B.4 Derive the formula for the sum of a finite geometric series (when the common ratio is not 1), and use the formula to solve problems. For example, calculate mortgage payments. ★ ★ Mathematical Modeling is a Standard for Mathematical Practice (MP4) and a Conceptual Category, and specific modeling standards appear throughout the high school standards indicated with a star ( ★ ). Where an entire domain is marked with a star, each standard in that domain is a modeling standard.

4. One Rocket, Three Equations Common Core State Standards, 2010 Seeing Structure in Expressions A-SSE Write expressions in equivalent forms to solve problems A.SSE.B.3 Choose and produce an equivalent form of an expression to reveal and explain properties of the quantity represented by an expression. ★ ★ Mathematical Modeling is a Standard for Mathematical Practice (MP4) and a Conceptual Category, and specific modeling standards appear throughout the high school standards indicated with a star ( ★ ). Where an entire domain is marked with a star, each standard in that domain is a modeling standard.