Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Math Common Core Standards
Advertisements

Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
Differentiation: What It Is/What It Isn’t
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Mathematics EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Washington, DC February 11,
The Importance of Technology in Mathematics. Annika Moore Mathematics Consultant Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Professional Development.
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Rating Process Mathematics Lessons/Units Mary Cahill, Director of Curriculum, SED Anu Malipatil, Fellow for Common Core,
Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process ELA/Literacy Lessons/Units EQuIP Collaborative Fall 2012.
Mathematics EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training 1.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process Mathematics and ELA/Literacy Lessons/Units June 2012.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
(Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products)
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Mathematics Training Module: Grades K-5 1.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Analysis Grade 5—Module 3.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Poster Place a dot on each continuum. – Rate your familiarity with the content portion of the New Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics – Rate your.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Session: Mathematics.
Mathematics EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Washington, DC May 19,
Math Foundational Services SHIFT 1: Focus October 9, 2014 Cindy Dollman & Joe Delinski The PROE Center.
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process Mathematics Lessons/Units EQuIP Collaborative Fall 2012.
How do we evaluate the quality of existing and newly created text-based lessons and units of study???? Please refer to the Tri-State Review Rubric for.
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption May 29, Overview What Elementary Math Looks Like Historical Perspective District Philosophy Process and Criteria Why.
English Language Arts Common Core Lesson Alignment NCAGT/PAGE Conference March 1, 2013 Lisa L. McIntosh.
Kathleen Dial Imagine South Lake *commoncore.org * engageny.org.
Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project CCSS Stewardship Committee 2013 Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project EQuIP Network Common Core Stewardship Committee.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Mathematics Training Module: Grades 9-12
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Mathematics EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training San Diego, CA October 28,
Common Core Math Instructional Shifts. Introduction  Be college and career ready  Greater master through focus and coherence  Aspirations for math.
Dimension IV of the EQuIP Rubric: Assessment Illinois State Board of Education Content Specialists Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons.
EQuIP Rubric & Effective CCSS Feedback Training Session: Math.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
New Pathways to Academic Achievement for K-12 English Learners TESOL March 26, 2009 Anna Uhl Chamot The George Washington University.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
12/16/2015MSDE1 “Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom” Day 1 Principals Only Session.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Instructional Materials Quality Review Rubric Winter 2013 Presenters: Drew Hinds, ODE Jeff Coleman, Clackamas ESD Marta.
Using EQuIP in Professional Development Ted Coe, Ph.D. Director of Mathematics, Achieve #drtedcoe.
Reviewing Using the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool: Mathematics Module 103: Standards for Mathematical Practice and Access for All Students (AC.
The EQuIP Rubric Evaluating Quality Instructional Products.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Mathematics Training Module: Grades
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus- Grade 3.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
Poster Place a dot on each continuum.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Session: Mathematics
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
DAY 1.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Module 9: Category III: Monitoring Student Progress
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
EQuIP and Learning Forward Professional Learning Community Modules
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process
Presentation transcript:

Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics

Mathematics Dimensions Alignment to the Rigor of the Common Core Key Areas of Focus in the Common Core Instructional Supports Assessments 2

About Alignment Lesson planning should be thoughtful and based on the desired outcomes. Alignment to the content as well as the outcomes is critical. Analysis of the standards is critical in order to meet desired outcomes. 3

About Alignment Common Core State Standards 8 Standards for Mathematical Practice Formative, Interim, and Summative Assessments Appropriate Tools and Tasks 4

I. Alignment to the Rigor of the CCSS The lesson/unit aligns with the letter and spirit of the CCSS: Targets a set of grade level mathematics standard(s) at the level of rigor in the CCSS for teaching and learning. ** Standards for Mathematical Practice that are central to the lesson are identified, handled in a grade-appropriate way, and well connected to the content being addressed. ** Presents a balance of mathematical procedures and deeper conceptual understanding inherent in the CCSS. Reviewing a Lesson: Thinking About Place Value in Gr 2 5

About Focus Focus should be on the concepts, foundational knowledge and rigor prioritized in the standards. Coherence should help students make connections and transfer knowledge within and across domains. 6

About Focus Rigor tasks require students to engage in application, conceptual understanding, and procedural skill and fluency. Tedious tasks should be avoided. 7

Reviewing a Lesson: Thinking About Place Value in Gr 2 8 II. Key Areas of Focus in the CCSS The lesson/unit reflects evidence of key shifts that are reflected in the CCSS: Focus: Centers on the concepts, foundational knowledge, and level of rigor that are prioritized in the standards. ** Coherence: Makes connections and provides opportunities for students to transfer knowledge and skills within and across domains and learning progressions. Rigor: Requires students to engage with and demonstrate challenging mathematics in the following ways:  Application: Provides opportunities for students to independently apply mathematical concepts in real- world situations and problem solve with persistence, choosing and applying an appropriate model or strategy to new situations. Conceptual Understanding: Requires students to demonstrate conceptual understanding through complex problem solving, in addition to writing and speaking about their understanding.  Procedural Skill and Fluency: Expects, supports, and provides guidelines for procedural skill and fluency with core calculations and mathematical procedures (when called for in the standards for the grade) to be performed quickly and accurately.

About Instructional Supports Designed to not only support student learning but also to be gradually removed Designed to engage students in productive struggle Designed to provide scaffolding, differentiation, intervention and support 9

About Instructional Supports Variety Effective sequencing and content progression Guidelines for skills and fluency 10

Reviewing a Lesson: Thinking About Place Value in Gr 2 11 III. Instructional Supports Includes clear and sufficient guidance to support teaching and learning of the targeted standards, including, when appropriate, the use of technology and media. ** Uses and encourages precise and accurate mathematics, academic language, terminology, and concrete or abstract representations (e.g. pictures, symbols, expressions, equations, graphics, models) in the discipline. ** Engages students in productive struggle through relevant, thought-provoking questions, problems, and tasks that stimulate interest and elicit mathematical thinking. Addresses instructional expectations and is easy to understand and use. Provides appropriate level and type of scaffolding, differentiation, intervention, and support for a broad range of learners.  Supports diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds, interests, and styles. Provides extra supports for students working below grade level. Provides extensions for students with high interest or working above grade level. Continued…

(Cont. from previous slide) A unit or longer lesson should:  Recommend and facilitate a mix of instructional approaches for a variety of learners, such as using multiple representations (including models), using a range of questions, checking for understanding, flexible grouping, pair-share, etc.  Gradually remove supports, requiring students to demonstrate their mathematical understanding independently.  Demonstrate an effective sequence and a progression of learning where the concepts or skills advance and deepen over time.  Expects, supports, and provides guidelines for procedural skill and fluency with core calculations and mathematical procedures (when called for in the standards for the grade) to be performed quickly and accurately. 12 Reviewing a Lesson: Thinking About Place Value in Gr 2

(Cont. from previous slide) A unit or longer lesson should: Recommend and facilitate a mix of instructional approaches for a variety of learners, such as using multiple representations (including models), using a range of questions, checking for understanding, flexible grouping, pair-share, etc.  Gradually remove supports, requiring students to demonstrate their mathematical understanding independently. Demonstrate an effective sequence and a progression of learning where the concepts or skills advance and deepen over time.  Expects, supports, and provides guidelines for procedural skill and fluency with core calculations and mathematical procedures (when called for in the standards for the grade) to be performed quickly and accurately. 13 Reviewing a Lesson: Thinking About Place Value in Gr 2

About Assessments Assessments should be designed to elicit evidence. Assessments should be accessible and unbiased. Assessments should include scoring guidelines for interpreting student performance. 14

About Assessments Assessments should engage students in various ways of including, but not limited to, the following: pre-, formative, summative, and self-assessments. 15

Reviewing a Lesson: Thinking About Place Value in Gr 2 16 IV. Assessment The lesson/unit regularly assesses whether students are mastering standards-based content and skills: Is designed to elicit direct, observable evidence of the degree to which a student can independently demonstrate the targeted CCSS.** Assesses student proficiency using methods that are accessible and unbiased, including the use of grade level language in student prompts.** Includes aligned rubrics, answer keys, and scoring guidelines that provide sufficient guidance for interpreting student performance. ** A unit or longer lesson should: Use varied modes of curriculum embedded assessments that may include pre-, formative, summative and self-assessment measures.

Units/Lessons exemplars-for-mathematics exemplars-for-mathematics x.html x.html 17

Challenges Development of in-depth units and lessons is countercultural to some recent practice. This type of development is time consuming. This work can be overwhelming if expected to take place in a short period of time. 18

Rewards Better teacher understanding of the CCSS Deeper student understanding of concepts and key areas of focus Quality lessons and units which could be refined 19

Slides developed by and used with permission from the Tri-State Collaborative Project: Achieve th Street, NW / Suite 510 Washington, DC 20036