1. Reviewing Using the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool: Mathematics Module 103: Standards for Mathematical Practice and Access for All Students (AC 2 and 3) www.achievethecore.org

2. PAGE 2 Essential Questions How does the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool (IMET) reflect the major features of the Standards and the Shifts? What understandings support high-quality, accurate application of the IMET metrics?

3. PAGE 3 Goals Understand how aligned materials embody the shifts inherent in the Common Core State Standards Understand the precise meaning of each metric of the IMET Recognize examples and non-examples related to each metric of Alignment Criteria 2 and 3

4. Alignment Criterion 2: Standards for Mathematical Practice

5. PAGE 5 Alignment Criterion 2: Materials must demonstrate authentic connections between content standards and practice standards. Standards for Mathematical Practice IMET p. 25

6. PAGE 6 Not uniformly applied over all the work that students do Not intended as free-floating proficiencies Handout p. 2

7. PAGE 7 Standards for Mathematical Practice In K-8, practice standards are embedded within the content standards, in addition to being a separate list of expectations 4.NBT.A.1 Recognize that in a multi-digit whole number, a digit in one place represents ten times what it represents in the place to its right. For example, recognize that 700 ÷ 70 = 10 by applying concepts of place value and division. Intentional connections between practice and content standards Content standards increase in complexity over the course of the grades, so should the MPs

8. PAGE 8 AC Metric 2B: Materials attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. Standards for Mathematical Practice IMET p. 27

9. PAGE 9 IMET p. 28

10. PAGE 10 2B: Materials attend to the full meaning of each practice Standard. MP.1 does not say, “Solve problems.” or “Make sense of problems.” or “Make sense of problems and solve them.” It says “Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.”

11. PAGE 11 What Is the Full Meaning of Each Practice Standard? Jigsaw: Elaborations for Standards for Mathematical Practice Do a close reading of your pair of MPs. Underline important words in the text. At your table, discuss the big ideas of the pair of MPs. Create a group with one person from each table and share the important ideas of each MP.

12. PAGE 12 AC 2B: Over the course of any given year of instruction, is each mathematical practice standard meaningfully present in the form of assignments, activities, or problems that stimulate students to develop the habits of mind described in the practice standard? Handout p. 3 IMET p. 28

13. PAGE 13 AC 2B: Are there teacher directed materials that explain the role of the practice standards in the classroom and in students’ mathematical development? Are alignments to practice standards accurate? Handout p. 4 IMET p. 28

14. PAGE 14 AC 2B: Are there teacher directed materials that explain the role of the practice standards in the classroom and in students’ mathematical development? Are alignments to practice standards accurate? Handout p. 5 IMET p. 28

15. PAGE 15 AC 2B: Do the materials treat practice standards as developing across grades or grade bands? Are the practice standards in early grades appropriately simple? Do they display an arc of growing sophistication across the grades? Read and solve the 4 problems provided. Match each problem to one of the standards listed at the top of the page. Discuss with your group: – What kind of modeling is required for each problem? – How does modeling grow in sophistication from K-4? Handout p. 6

16. PAGE 16 AC Metric 2A: Materials address the practice standards in such a way as to enrich the Major Work of the grade; practice standards strengthen the focus on Major Work instead of detracting from it, in both teacher and student materials Standards for Mathematical Practice IMET p. 26

17. PAGE 17 IMET p. 26

18. PAGE 18 2A: Connecting Content and Practice “Designers of curricula, assessments, and professional development should all attend to the need to connect the mathematical practices to mathematical content in mathematics instruction.” (CCSSM, p. 8)

19. PAGE 19 AC 2A: Materials address the practice standards in such a way as to enrich the Major Work of the grade; practice standards strengthen the focus on Major Work instead of detracting from it, in both teacher and student materials Handout p. 7 IMET p. 26

20. PAGE 20 AC 2A: Materials address the practice standards in such a way as to enrich the Major Work of the grade; practice standards strengthen the focus on Major Work instead of detracting from it, in both teacher and student materials Handout p. 8 IMET p. 26

21. PAGE 21 AC Metric 2C: Materials support the Standards’ emphasis on mathematical reasoning. Standards for Mathematical Practice IMET p. 29

22. PAGE 22 IMET p. 30

23. PAGE 23 AC 2C: Do the materials support students in constructing viable arguments and critiquing the arguments of others concerning grade-level mathematics that is detailed in the content standards? Handout p. 9 IMET p. 30

24. PAGE 24 Alignment Criterion 2: Optional Activity Review the grade 4 lesson on pp. 10-14 of your handout. Note evidence for each question associated with Alignment Criteria 2 on pp. 26, 28, & 30 of your IMET. Discuss: - Gut check: Would these materials meet, partially meet, or not meet AC 2? What is your evidence? - What other things would you want to look at in these materials to determine your rating?

25. PAGE 25 IMET p. 31

26. Alignment Criterion 3: Access to the Standards for All Students

27. PAGE 27 Alignment Criterion 3: Materials must provide supports for English Language Learners and other special populations. Access for All Students IMET p. 32

28. PAGE 28 Guidance for Supporting Special Populations http://ell.stanford.edu/ Handout p. 15

29. PAGE 29 AC 3A: Support for English Language Learners and other special populations is thoughtful and helps those students meet the same Standards as all other students. The language in which problems are posed is carefully considered. Handout p. 16 IMET p. 33

30. PAGE 30 AC 3B: Materials provide appropriate level and type of scaffolding, differentiation, intervention, and support for a broad range of learners with gradual removal of supports, when needed, to allow students to demonstrate their mathematical understanding independently. Handout p. 17 IMET p. 34

31. PAGE 31 AC 3C: Design of lessons recommends and facilitates a mix of instructional approaches for a variety of learners (e.g., using multiple representations, asking a range of questions, checking for understanding, flexible grouping, pair-share, deconstructing/ reconstructing the language of problems). Handout pp. 18-19 IMET p. 35

32. PAGE 32 Alignment Criterion 3: Optional Activity Review the grade 4 lesson on pp. 20-24 of your handout. Note evidence for each question associated with Alignment Criteria 3 on pp. 33-35 of your IMET. Discuss: - Gut check: Would these materials meet, partially meet or not meet AC 3? What is your evidence? - What other things would you want to look at in these materials to determine your rating?

33. PAGE 33 IMET p. 36

34. Wrapping Up

35. PAGE 35 Alignment Criteria and Metrics AC #2: Standards for Mathematical Practice 2A: Connecting SMPs to content 2B: Full meaning of each practice 2C: Emphasizing mathematical reasoning AC #3: Access for All Students 3A: Access for all students to grade-level content 3B: Supporting the range of learners 3C: Variety of instructional approaches

36. PAGE 36 Essential Questions -- Discuss How does the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool (IMET) reflect the major features of the Standards and the Shifts? What understandings support high-quality, accurate application of the IMET metrics?