Birth and Death Data Release and Re-release Laws, Regulations, Policies and Procedures: State Survey Results 8 June, 2004 NAPHSIS – Portland, OR Mark Flotow,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4/27/99Health Level 7 Public Health Data Standards Consortium by Hetty Khan National Center for Health Statistics.
Advertisements

GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
Challenges and Unfinished Business for NCHS and States in Vital Registration and Statistics Charles J. Rothwell Director, NCHS National.
Data linking – Project update 15 th May 2012 – Homecare & SDS event Atlantic Quay Ellen Lynch & Euan Patterson.
National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics May The Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Copyright Eastern PA EMS Council February 2003 Health Information Portability and Accountability Act It’s the law.
Today’s Schools face:  Numerous State and Federal Regulations  Reduced Technology Funding  More Stringent Guidelines for Technology Use.
U.S. Vital Statistics Mortality Data: Past Uses and Future Directions Irma T. Elo Director, Population Studies Center Professor of Sociology University.
Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Welcome to the NAPHSIS and VSCP Project.
By Garland Land NAPHSIS Consultant. Importance of Birth Certificates Needed for: Social Security Card School Enrollment Driver’s License Passport.
Protect Yourself: Incorporate Presentation to Multiple Births Canada Volunteer Development Retreat Cathy Barr September 2012.
By Garland Land NAPHSIS Executive Director. Performance Measures Committee Dorothy Harshbarger, Alabama Dorothy Harshbarger, Alabama Barry Nangle, Utah.
National Death Index: Monitoring the Slippery Slope Lou Saadi, Ph.D. Kansas NAPHSIS Annual Meeting, 2007 Salt Lake City, Utah.
Office of Children’s Services Ombudsman May 17, 2006 Marilyn Jackson Legislative Policy Analyst.
Improving Data Quality and Quality Assurance in Newborn Screening by Including the Bloodspot Screening Collection Device Serial Number on Birth Certificates.
CUI Statistical: Collaborative Efforts of Federal Statistical Agencies Eve Powell-Griner National Center for Health Statistics.
FERPA Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and Rebecca Macon Registrar University of Georgia Presentation for GASFAA October.
Appropriate Educational Programming in the Rolling River School Division Presented to the Rolling River School Division Liaison Committee June 8, 2011.
Leslie Reynolds Executive Director National Association of Secretaries of State The National Association of Secretaries of State NASS Company Formation.
The National Vital Statistics System: Getting from Good to Great.
2008 NAPHSIS Annual Meeting Celebrating 75 Years of Excellence Orlando, FL June 1 st – 5 th, 2008 The Current Status and Future of Annual Vital Statistics.
Strengthening Partnerships: Shaping the Future Portland, OR June 6 th – 10 th, 2004 Program Committee Steven Schwartz, Ph.D., Co-Chair NAPHSIS Julia L.
Meeting the Demands for Vital Statistics: The Challenges of Collecting, Preparing, and Promoting Baltimore, MD May 31 st – June 4 th, 2009 A Second Chance.
B r a z o s R i v e r A u t h o r i t y FERC Encroachments.
Understanding the Vital Records Functional Profile (VRFP) Hetty Khan Health Informatics Specialist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National.
NCHS and Public Health Data Standards Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
An Overview and Update of the NAPHSIS Statistics Committee, NAPHSIS-NCHS Joint Annual Meeting Bruce B. Cohen, Ph.D. June 2007.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Bridged-Race Population Estimates for Chicago 6 June, 2004 NAPHSIS – Portland, OR Mark Flotow Illinois Center for Health Statistics.
Vital Event Data Release Scoring Criteria 5 June, 2005 NAPHSIS Meeting – Cincinnati, OH Mark Flotow Illinois Center for Health Statistics, IDPH.
Getting from Good to Great: NAPHSIS/NCHS Partnership NAPHSIS/NCHS Partnership Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
0 Technical Study Implementation Potential Disagreements Content of Progress Report Request for Modification to Approved Studies Request for New Study.
Think Regionally - Act Locally The Development and Evolution of the I-95 Corridor Coalition: Think Regionally - Act Locally John Baniak Executive Director,
Improving Security, Systems, and Statistics San Diego, CA June 4 th – 8 th, 2006 EVVE Applications and Partnerships NAPHSIS EVVE Update Rose Trasatti NAPHSIS.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) UNION COLLEGE.
Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Retention and Destruction of Inter-Jurisdictionally.
Who’s Keeping Score? Changes in the Vital Records and Statistics Infrastructure in the Computer Age Daniel J. Friedman The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration—
Query Health Operations Workgroup Standards & Interoperability (S&I) Framework March 15, :00am – 12:00am ET.
MyFloridaMarketPlace MyFloridaMarketPlace User Meeting July 20, 2004.
Improving Security, Systems, and Statistics San Diego, CA June 4 th – 8 th, 2006 NAPHSIS of the Future Garland Land Executive Director.
DOC Web Policies & Best Practices Jennifer Hammond NOAA Research WebShop 2002 August 7, 2002.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics National Vital Statistics System Now and in the Future.
Peter Granda Archival Assistant Director / Data Archives and Data Producers: A Cooperative Partnership.
NAPHSIS/NCHS Joint Annual Meeting 2007 Salt Lake City, UT NAPHSIS Project for Analysis of New Birth Certificate Items from the 2003 Revised Certificate.
Methods for regulating Utility-scale wind development KARIN WADSACK, PROJECT DIRECTOR NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUR CORNERS WIND RESOURCE CENTER
Modification to the NCHS Data Release Policy Modification to the NCHS Data Release Policy -A Response to the States- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Cincinnati, Ohio June 5 th – 9 th, 2005 New Member Orientation NAPHSIS Ronald Hyman Sharon Leinbach.
© 2001 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 Follow Up of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants and the Impact.
STATE of EQUILIBRIUM: DATA USE and PRIVACY Jan A. Markowitz, PhD NAPHSIS NAPHSIS-VSCP JOINT MEETING Portland, Oregon June 8, 2004.
Flowers Hospital General Compliance Training-Students 2013.
A Proposal to Modify the NCHS Data Release Policy – A Response to the States A Proposal to Modify the NCHS Data Release Policy – A Response to the States.
Implementation of the FOI Law Mrs. Carole Excell FOI Coordinator Boards and Committees November 18, 2008.
HIPAA Privacy Rule Positive Changes Affecting Hospitals’ Implementation of the Rule.
The Nation’s Need for a Great Vital Statistics System Jennifer Madans National Center for Health Statistics.
Issues in the Classification of Race and Ethnicity Data Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
The NAPHSIS/NCHS Collaboration Past Successes and Future Challenges Salt Lake City, UT June 3 rd – 7 th, 2007 Increasing the Use and Accessibility of Vital.
Fifteenth Board Meeting Geneva, April 2007 Ethics Committee Annual Report Professor Sheila Dinoshe Tlou, M.P., POH (Chair) Dr Brian Brink (Vice Chair)
Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Refining the NAPHSIS role in data access.
REVISIONS DATE SLIDE CHANGE 11/22/10
The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Implications for Medical Research
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Privacy & Confidentiality
Providing Access to Your Data: Handling sensitive data
Contract and Grant Accounting Update
Data stewardship life cycle
Data Release Policies & Procedures
Non-Assurance Services
Presentation transcript:

Birth and Death Data Release and Re-release Laws, Regulations, Policies and Procedures: State Survey Results 8 June, 2004 NAPHSIS – Portland, OR Mark Flotow, Illinois NAPHSIS Statistics Committee

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Survey Background - the VSCP contract is due for renewal 1 July, provide guidance to the NAPHSIS VSCP Committee regarding content of the new contract - NAPHSIS Statistics Committee wanted to gather information regarding jurisdictions’ data release practices and to compare those to NCHS’s

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Survey Basics - survey conducted via in April survey sent to each VSCP project director - survey consisted of nine questions regarding the release and re-release of birth and death data, with particular attention to laws, regulations, policies and procedures - the following survey results represent 39 responses

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Individual Question Results 1. Laws, regulations, policies and procedures that address the release of individual-level data Birth Data Death Data ● laws or regulations97%92% ● policies or procedures90%87% ● laws, regulations, policies or procedures 100%97%

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Individual Question Results 2. Laws, regulations, policies and procedures that address the release of individual-level data to other governmental units Birth Data Death Data ● laws or regulations/state gov.82%82% ● policies or procedures/state gov.80%80% ● laws or regulations/federal gov.82%80% ● policies or procedures/federal gov.77%77%

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Individual Question Results 3. Individual-level data files for public use or release Birth Data Death Data ● public use data sets15%20%

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Individual Question Results 4. Laws, regulations, policies and procedures that address the re- release of individual-level data Birth Data Death Data ● laws or regulations62%56% ● policies or procedures85%80%

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Individual Question Results 5. List of variables NCHS releases in their public use data files – could these data be released in their jurisdiction? Birth Data Death Data ● could release without review 5% 8% ● need approval from gate-keepers64%72% ● laws, regulations, policies or procedures prohibit release31%20%

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results NCHS Public-Use Data File NCHS Public-Use Data File includes all the variables sent to NCHS by the jurisdictions, except: - certificate number - day of event - date of birth of mother/father/decedent - county/city codes for those with < 100,000 population

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Individual Question Results 6. List of variables jurisdictions provide to NCHS – could the data from these variables be released by their jurisdiction to another federal agency? Birth Data Death Data ● could release without review 3% 8% ● need approval from gate-keepers92%89% ● laws, regulations, policies or procedures prohibit release 5% 3%

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Individual Question Results 7. List of variables jurisdictions provide to NCHS – could the data from these variables be released by their jurisdiction to researchers? Birth Data Death Data ● could release without review 0% 5% ● need approval from gate-keepers92%90% ● laws, regulations, policies or procedures prohibit release 8% 5%

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Individual Question Results 8. & 9. What modifications could be made to a data request or data file that would permit release by a jurisdiction that had laws, regulations, policies or procedures that restricted data release? Birth Data Death Data ● no modifications could be made that would allow release 8% 3% ● ask for specific variables, not entire data set63%58% ● collapse or aggregate certain data66%58% ● multiple years of data or remove year of the event from file53%47%

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Individual Question Results 8. & 9. What modifications could be made to a data request or data file that would permit release by a jurisdiction that had laws, regulations, policies or procedures that restricted data release? Birth Data Death Data ● reduce geography specificity63%55% ● remove values that most easily identify individuals55%47% ● introduce “noise” for certain variables24%18%

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Survey Implications - survey results show that both the jurisdictions and NCHS should be concerned, vis-à-vis the VSCP contract, with inconsistencies on how birth and death data are released or re-released - there are perhaps three areas where our mutual efforts should be focused: 1) public use files 2) data release to other government entities 3) data release to researchers

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Survey Implications – Public Use Files - few jurisdictions offer individual-level birth or death data files for public release - few jurisdictions could release individual-level data as currently or exactly specified in the NCHS public use data files - however, most jurisdictions could release birth and death data in the NCHS public use files with some modifications or with approval from their vital event gate-keeper(s)

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Survey Implications – Data Release to Other Government Entities - few jurisdictions could release individual-level data directly to other federal agencies for all the variables they currently send to NCHS - however, many of the jurisdictions could release birth and death data to other federal agencies with some modifications or with approval from their vital event gate-keeper(s)

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Survey Implications – Data Release to Researchers - virtually all jurisdictions require review and approval before birth and death data could be released for research purposes - NCHS’s Research Data Center and its guidelines for use by researchers could address many jurisdictions’ concerns regarding safeguarding confidentiality and other state laws, regulations, policies and procedures for birth and death data

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Survey Results Survey Conclusions - survey results suggest inconsistencies between the laws, regulations, policies and procedures concerning release of birth and death data in the individual jurisdictions and the potential re-release of those data by NCHS - such inconsistencies potentially encourage data users to try both the individual jurisdictions and NCHS to “fish” for additional data specificity or detail - this survey represents the first step in addressing this issue: acknowledging there is one

NAPHSIS Statistics Committee Members Jay Buechner, Rhode Island Bruce Cohen, Massachusetts Mark Flotow, Illinois Isabelle Horon, Maryland – Chair Garland Land, Missouri John Oswald, Minnesota