A Prospective Trial Evaluating Scleral Rebound Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Andrew Logeman, Shuchi Patel, MD Loyola University Chicago, Department of Ophthalmology,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Il controllo circadiano della pressione intraoculare: implicazioni farmacologiche N. ORZALESI, P. FOGAGNOLO Università degli Studi di Milano Ospedale San.

Advertisements

A Wireless, Implantable Intra- Ocular Pressure Sensor for the Management of Glaucoma Gabriel Simon, M.D. Ph.D. Sept 16, 2008 ESCRS.

Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Normal- Tension Glaucoma Authors: Leonidas Traipe Ines Cayuqueo Fabiola Cerfogli Claudia Goya Allister Gibbons.

Corneal biomechanical properties and their association with intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) Dimitrios P. Bessinis 1, Pandelis.

Pooja B. Jamnadas, MD, Peter Russo, OD, William Bonk, Shuchi Patel, MD Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology,

Pooja B. Jamnadas MD, Marie Brenner, MS4, Peter Russo, OD, Shuchi Patel MD Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Maywood IL At.

Recent Advances in IOP measurements

Comparison between Dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry and Ehlers-corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry in eyes after Laser In.

Comparison of corneal astigmatism measured with 3 devices Mariko Shirayama, M.D, Li Wang, M.D, PhD, Mitchell P. Weikert, M.D, Douglas D. Koch, M.D. Cullen.

E-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Comparative Study of Corneal Biomechanical Properties.

Anterior Chamber Depth, Iridocorneal Angle Width, and Intraocular Pressure Changes After Phacoemulsification: Narrow vs Open Iridocorneal Angles Huang.

SEI IOP and its correlations in a population based study in Central India. The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Krishna Bhojwani, Vinay Nangia, Jost.

The Effect of the Restor Multifocal IOL on Frequency Doubling Perimetry Elizabeth Yeu, MD1, Elizabeth Woznak, BS2, Nicole Kesten, BS2, Steven VL Brown,

Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus Goldmann Applanation R. S. Davidson 1 ; N. Faberowski 2 ; R. J. Noecker 3 ; M. Y. Kahook 1 1.

Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. David Zadok, MD, Yakov Goldich, MD, Yaniv Barkana,

A Prospective Trial Comparing Scleral Pneumotonometry to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Usiwoma Abugo, BS, Shuchi Patel MD Loyola University.

G. Jacob 1,2, C. Bouchard 2, S. Kancherla 1. Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, Department of Ophthalmology 1. Loyola University Medical Center,

Comparison of Orbscan and Ultrasound Pachymetry Measurements Faik Orucov, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD,Ziv Caspi, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, and.

Evaluation of Corneal Parameters and Spherical Aberration After DSAEK Measured with Pentacam System Orkun Muftuoglu, Pawan Prasher, R. Wayne Bowman, Steven.

Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Trabeculectomy for Open-Angle Glaucoma Takihara Y, Inatani M, Ogata-Iwao M, et.

TRANSPALPEBRAL TONOMETER APPLICATION DURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE EVALUATION IN THE PATIENTS WITH REFRACTION ANOMALY BEFORE AND AFTER KERATOPHOTOREFRACTIVE.

Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master

Purpose: Introduction:  At initial evaluation: For post-op day # 0 patients: Pre-op VA was 20/50.6 (0.395 ± 0.198); Post-op VA was 20/102.0 (0.196 ± 0.162);

Presents: Diaton Tonometer Tonometry through the Eyelid! September 2006.

Glaucoma Screening With a New Non-Contact Air Impulse Tonometer Pandelis A. Papadopoulos,1,2, Dimitrios P. Bessinis 3, Alexandros A. Papadopoulos 1, Konstantinos.

Oliver Findl 1,2, Nino Hirnschall 1,2, Alja Crnej 2 1 VIROS Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria 2 Moorfields.

Photorefractive Keratectomy in Posterior Polymorphous Dystrophy [CONTROL ID: ] Edward W. Trudo 1, Kraig S. Bower 2, Charles D. Coe 2, Denise A. Sediq.

A Prospective Study Examining Contact Lens Wear, Refractive Error, and Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements Marie Brenner.

Effect of Corneal Thickness on Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty to Decrease Intraocular Pressure as Primary or Secondary Treatment of Glaucoma ASCRS 2010.

Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD

Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. Yakov Goldich, MD, David Zadok MD, Yaniv Barkana,

ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.

Tonometry Objective measurement of IOP based, most commonly, on the forces required to flatten the cornea,or the degree of corneal indention produced.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus TonoPen- Applination Theodore H. Curtis, M.D.1, Douglas L Mackenzie, M.D.1, Robert J. Noecker.

Naomi R. Goldberg, MD PhD Kenneth J. Wolf, MD Eric J. Wolf, MD FACS The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. Comparison.

A Prospective Trial Comparing Pneumotonometry of Cornea and Sclera Usiwoma Abugo BS 1, Sara Duke MD 2, Shuchi Patel, MD 2 1 Loyola University Chicago,

E-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group The study of the correlations of the optic disc size with Cornal Geometry and Biomechanical.

The effect of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements after phacoemulsification surgery Ilker Eser M.D. 1 Arzu Taskiran-Comez M.D. 1 Baris Komur.

IOL Calculations Based on Partial Biometry in Humanitarian Missions Joseph Schmitz, MD Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS Scott McClatchey, MD The authors have no.

Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,

Efficacy and Safety of the Ex-PRESS Glaucoma Mini-Shunt with Intraoperative 5-Fluorouracil ASCRS 2009 – San Francisco A. Balashanmugam, MD, L. Farrokh-Siar,

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.

Post-LASIK Intraocular Lens Power Adjustment Nomogram Joseph Diehl Kevin Miller, MD Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine.

Effect of Refractive State on Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty ASCRS 2011 Kevin Lai Stony Brook University School of Medicine Elaine M. Miglino Floral Park.

COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OCULAR BIOMETRY USING A NEW NON-CONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER David Goldblum 1,3, Kaspar Rohrer 1, Rudolf Waelti.

Vitamin D: A New Frontier in Diabetes Management Contact Information: Background Acknowledgement Methods.

D.r Nishant Nawani, MS Dr. Surinder Singh Pandav, MD Dr. Amit Gupta, MD Dr. Sushmita Kaushik, MD Advanced Eye Centre PGIMER, Chandigarh The authors have.

Poster# P36 Comparison of Techniques of Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth and Corneal Curvature in Indian Eyes Sujata Das, MS, FRCS Anjula Kumari, B.Optom.

Use of the ICare Home Rebound Tonometer for home self-monitoring of intraocular pressure in a Singaporean population Jeanne Joyce OGLE1, Wai Cheng SOO.

CRF variations ( initial CRF – final CRF )

Tulsi Changulani 1,*, Jenny Bo 2, Mei-Ling Cheng 1, Andrew Tatham 1

Suppressive effect of combined treatment of orthokeratology and 0

Intraocular pressure & tonometry

Characteristics of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Patients with Normal Intraocular Pressure at the First Visit Won Hyuk Oh1, Bum Gi Kim1, Joo Hwa Lee2.

Safety of medication reduction for Primary Angle Closure (PAC) –

IOP = intraocular pressure; SD = standard deviation.

The authors have nothing to declare

R. S. Davidson1; N. Faberowski2; R. J. Noecker3; M. Y. Kahook1 1

Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices

Associate Professor of Ophthalmology

Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

Yakov Goldich MD,Yaniv Barkana MD, Isaac Avni MD, David Zadok MD,

Corneal Biomechanics after Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Samer Hamada MRCOphth FRCS(Ed)1,3 Louai.

Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD

Jun Her MD. PhD, Sung-wook Kim MD, Jae-hwan Ahn MD

The Effect of Corneal Thickness on Ocular Drug Penetration

Box and whiskers plot for bIOP, Goldmann applanation tonometry IOP (GAT) and Goldmann adjusted (GATAdj) in ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open-angle.

Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu

Presentation transcript:

A Prospective Trial Evaluating Scleral Rebound Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Andrew Logeman, Shuchi Patel, MD Loyola University Chicago, Department of Ophthalmology, Maywood IL Current devices used to estimate intraocular pressure (IOP) perform the measurements on the cornea. This is not possible in some patients such as those with a keratoprosthesis or other corneal pathology. Glaucoma is known to occur in about 75% of patients following a keratoprosthesis, but accurate pressure readings to monitor for adequate IOP control are not possible. Previous studies have examined the use of the TonoPen, Schiotz tonometer and pneumotonometer on the sclera to measure IOP with limited success, and none have repeatedly shown a statistically significant correlation to corneal tonometry. 1.Barraza RA, Sit AJ. Investigation to determine a relationship between scleral and corneal tonometry. ARVO poster presentation; May 02, Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2006; 15(3): Erlich JR, Haseltine S, Shimmyo M, Radcliffe NM. Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert’s ocular response analyser. Eye 2010; 24(10); Duke SL, Abugo U, Patel S. A prospective trial comparing scleral pneumotonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry. ARVO poster presentation; May 10, Shen CC, Downs J, Mansberger SL. Assessment of intraocular pressure along the limbus and sclera using contact and indentation tonometry. ARVO poster presentation; May 02, IntroductionResults AverageStandard (mmHg)Deviation GAT Corneal RT Scleral RT AverageStandard Deviation CCT (µm) AL (mm) SE (D) Results Methods Purpose 184 eyes from 101 patients ages years old were included in this study. 116 eyes from 59 patients were analyzed as 68 eyes were omitted due to incomplete data. Mean GAT IOP was mmHg (SD 4.13), mean corneal RT was mmHg (SD 4.24) and mean scleral RT was (SD 21.41). Mean spherical equivalent refraction (SE) was D (SD 2.05), mean CCT was µm (SD 45.65), mean AL was mm (SD 1.21). 89 eyes were phakic and 27 were pseudophakic. Pearson analysis reveals a strong positive correlation between GAT and corneal RT (0.77) but weak positive correlation between GAT and scleral RT (0.22) as well as corneal RT and scleral RT (0.22). This trend persists when phakic and pseudophakic eyes are evaluated independently. Multivariate regression analysis was also performed and did not find a correlation between scleral RT and GAT when accounting for GAT, CCT, AL and SE. A prospective non-randomized trial of individuals 18 years of age and older. Each had his/her IOP measured by GAT, next corneal RT then scleral RT on the inferotemporal sclera. The patient’s age, gender, refractive error, central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL) and phakic status were recorded. Pearson’s correlation and multivariate regression analysis were used for statistical examination. To determine if a predictable relationship exists between the gold standard of IOP measurement, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and scleral rebound tonometry (RT) to provide an accurate and reliable assessment of IOP via scleral measurements. Discussion Scleral RT shows IOP measurements that are consistently higher than corneal IOP measurements by roughly mmHg. Corneal RT correlates well to GAT; unfortunately, scleral RT measurements have poor correlation to corneal measurements independent of phakic status. Analysis of scleral RT with relation to GAT, CCT, AL and SE concurrently fails to reveal a statistically significant regression model in either phakic or pseudophakic eyes. This is likely due to the increased number of variables which effect scleral rigidity. In addition, the overlying conjunctiva undoubtedly contributes to inconsistent scleral IOP readings. Demographics/Characteristics Patients included (analyzed)101 (59) Eyes included (analyzed)184 (116) Male:Female28:31 Mean age (range)65 (37-90) Mean spherical equivalent to % to % to % Past Ocular History (eyes) Glaucoma39 Glaucoma suspect39 Ocular hypertension3 Pseudophakic27 Diabetes14 Thyroid eye disease2 Conclusions Scleral RT shows consistently higher IOP measurements than the corneal IOP measurements from the same eye. Scleral RT has a statistically significant positive correlation to corneal RT. In this study, scleral RT does not provide accurate and reliable IOP measurements when compared to GAT even after adjusting for phakic status, CCT, AL and SE. Further studies are needed to establish an accurate and reliable method of scleral tonometry such that patients with a keratoprosthesis and glaucoma can be better monitored. References Multivariate regression model assessing the relationship between scleral rebound tonometry and ophthalmic variables as listed above. Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the Richard A. Perritt Charitable Foundation.