DETC 86th Annual Conference April 15-17, 2012 Paul McDonald Janet Perry Karen Smith, Ph.D. Leslie Gargiulo, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Advertisements

Writing the Team Report Chairs and Evaluators Workshop.
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Commission for Academic Accreditation 1 Accreditation and Academic Quality King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Faculty Workshop Accreditation,
DETC's Fall Workshop October 14-16, 2012 Santa Fe, NM Paul McDonald Janet Perry Karen Smith, Ph.D. Leslie Gargiulo, Ph.D. 1.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators © NASFAA 2011 The following is prepared for presentation at the WASFAA Conference April 17.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Preparing for an Audit or Program Review April 17, 2011 © 2011 Global Financial Aid Services 1.
NYSFAAA Conference October 20, 2010 Adams Mark Hotel Buffalo, NY.
The DETC Process of Accreditation and How to Ensure Success Nancy Moreno-Derks, M.S. Vice President, American Pacific University Copyright © 2009 American.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Continual Commitment to Accreditation February 1, 2011.
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
NYSFAAA Leadership Preparation Program Reviews October 16, 2015 Thomas J. Dalton Assistant Vice-President, Enrollment Management Excelsior College.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
What’s Going on at SCC Presented by: Corinna Evett.
Accreditation 101 STEVEN SHEELEY, PHD VICE PRESIDENT – SACSCOC GACRAO NOVEMBER 2, 2015.
HOUSE RULES PARTICIPANTS ARE REQUESTED TO SIT AT THEIR ASSIGNED AREAS WRITE DOWN ALL AREAS OF CONCERN QUESTIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED AFTER ALL PRESENTORS.
Performance-Based Accreditation
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Self-Study Instrument for Early Childhood Centers EDITION
Learning by Doing: Participating on an Evaluation Team
Session D: The Accreditation Process.
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
All About Resources: Standard III
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Presented by: Corinna Evett
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
Fort Valley State University
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

DETC 86th Annual Conference April 15-17, 2012 Paul McDonald Janet Perry Karen Smith, Ph.D. Leslie Gargiulo, Ph.D.

 All standards –Leslie  Core Education standards -Janet ◦ Subject Specialists Report / Responses –Leslie ◦ Outcomes Assessment –Leslie  Core business standards – Paul ◦ Recruiting, Outside marketers – Paul ◦ Strategic Plan – Paul  Developing the Self Evaluation Report – Janet ◦ SER Writing and Editing – Janet  Federal government regulations and compliance –Karen ◦ Credit Hours Determination –Karen  Site-visit –Paul

I. Institution Mission, Goals, and Objectives II. Educational Program Objectives, Curricula, and Materials III. Educational Services IV. Student Support Services V. Student Achievement and Satisfaction VI. Qualifications and Duties of Owners, Governing Board Members, Officials, Administrators,Instruct ors/ Faculty, and Staff and Reputation of Institution VII. Admissions Practices and Enrollment Agreements VIII. Advertising, Promotional Literature, and Recruitment Personnel IX. Financial Responsibility X. Tuition Policies, Collection Procedures, and Cancellations/Refunds XI. Facilities, Equipment, Supplies, and Record Protection XII. Research and Self- Improvement

Standard I – Institution Mission, Goals and Objectives A mission statement tells the purpose of your institution. Goals and objectives support the mission statement. Show how you regularly review and follow your mission, goals and objectives. Be aware of policies C.1 and C.2. Standard II – Educational Program Objectives, Curricula and Materials Description of Program Objectives (II.A.) Appropriate Program Objectives (II.B.) Comprehensive Curriculum and Materials (II.C./II.E.) Up-to-Date Curriculum and Materials (II.D./II.E.) Examinations and Other Assessments (II.F.) Student Privacy, Integrity and Identity (II.L.) Standard III – Educational Services Student Inquiries and Submissions (III.A.) Individual Differences (III.B.) Handling Unsatisfactory Student Progress (III.C.) Student Evaluation of Courses (III.E.) Core Education Standards

 2 parallel tracks ◦ SER and Subject Specialist Reports ◦ SSR submitted 3 months prior to SER  SSR responses grade each course – A/B/C  Fix courses, respond to report, prepare for site visit  Program report for 1/3 of curriculum – full course materials submitted with each report ◦ ex. 6 degree programs – submit 2 programs reports with 3 full courses’ materials for each program report ◦ Use report template and evaluators checklist to guide the package development

 Critical document audit – 12 critical documents with checklists ◦ Course Development Manual ◦ Institutional Improvement Plan ◦ Outcomes Assessment Plan ◦ Determining Clock / Credit Hours  Ensure all documents tell an integrated story on how student learning is tracked, measured, and improvements made  Ensure that the narrative responses to Standards refer to the critical documents to explain how these inform policy, procedures and practices

 Accreditation Standards VII.B. to XII. Business Standards I to III  They are clear and prescriptive – follow them  Enrollment agreements – clear and specific  Advertising – content – all samples  Control of recruitment personnel – internal vs. external  Financial responsibility – practices, management, sustainability and stability, reporting and demonstrated operations  Tuition policies, fees, refunds – verifiable procedures and processes  Facilities – plan, adequate record protection  Strategic Plan – three years ◦ Future not history ◦ Scope ◦ Schedule/milestones ◦ Budget ◦ Responsibility

Developing the SER The SER is an analytical and descriptive document outlining every important aspect of your institution’s operation. It tells why, what and how. The SER is used by DETC evaluators to help them understand your institution and how it meets DETC Standards. Time is Essential The SER can take nine months or longer to develop. Assign SER Project Manager. Project Manager: establishes internal due dates; establishes guide for writing SER and organizes it into “one voice;” oversees organization of exhibits; and ensures all required items are completed, thorough, accurate and submitted by DETC deadlines. Use Your Experts Assign the writing of initial SER draft to your experts for each area. Assign Due Dates Confidentiality

Writing and Editing Your SER Read DETC instructions for completing the SER. Answer each question honestly, factually, completely and concisely. Use Standards as a guide for answering questions. “Toot your horn.” Identify challenges or weaknesses, and show how you are addressing them. Take the reader step by step through procedures and processes. If something is not applicable, make sure you state “not applicable.” Include table of contents. Final SER should be in “one voice.” Provide contact person for each Standard topic. Provide all required exhibits. Edit, edit, edit. Content Typos Grammar/Usage Voice Exhibits

I. Gainful Employment in a Recognized Occupation II. Consumer Protection for Misleading Information, Recruiting, and State Oversight III. Ensuring Only Eligible Students Receive Federal Funds IV. Clarification of Federal Aid Eligible Courses and Allocation

Proxy Measure of a Quantity of Student Learning  Carnegie Unit  Level of Instruction  Academic Rigor  Course Time Requirements

 Before – Developing the SER ◦ Follow timeline ◦ Wide participation but one project manager ◦ Write in basic English – edit ◦ Follow format ◦ Consultants?  During the Visit ◦ Staff prepared and there ◦ Answering questions – contradicting SER ◦ Incomplete files ◦ Staff/faculty not familiar with policies ◦ Listen carefully to team’s questions  After the Visit ◦ Chair’s report – “Take a Deep Breath” ◦ Read it and take a day or two to think about it ◦ Don’t respond defensively ◦ State what you are doing and provide evidence

???