An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Advertisements

Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT) Webinar.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
Broader Impacts September 30th and October 2nd, 2014 Writing the NSF GRFP Marianne Smith, Ph.D. Research Development Officer Ayala School of Biological.
The Proposal Review Process Matt Germonprez Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor ISQA College of IS&T.
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants Improve dissertation research – Provide funds not normally available to graduate students significant data-gathering.
DIMACS/CCICADA/DIMATIA/Rutgers Math REU
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
1 Exploring NSF Funding Opportunities in DUE Tim Fossum Division of Undergraduate Education Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day May 6, 2008.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
EAS 299 Writing research papers
Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Operations Center.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
Tips for Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Diana Lipscomb Associate Dean for Faculty and Research CCAS.
WE ARE A COMPLEX LAND. MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS DESIRE TO HELP OTHERS MEANING TO LIFE ESTEEM NEEDS RECOGNITION & APPRECIATION BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE.
Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.
Funding Opportunities for Chemists at the National Science Foundation Division of Undergraduate Education Pamela Brown, NSF Program Director Division of.
The Budget Linda Mason Recipient of $millions in grants!
Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal
Susanne Hambrusch Department of Computer Science Department Head Increase diversity of faculty, students, and staff Division Director in CISE at NSF The.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
NSF: Proposal and Merit Review Process Muriel Poston, Ph.D. National Science Foundation 2005.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning Trina McMahon Professor of Civil and Environmental.
NSF Arctic Sciences Section and TREC Background, Goals, Hints for Success Renée Crain Assistant Program Officer.
NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Tackling the Broader Impacts Challenge: Advice and Resources Nathan Meier Director of Research Strategy Office of Research and Economic Development October.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program September 2007 Major Research Instrumentation QEM Workshop 2007 September 28,
NSF Funding Opportunities Anthony Garza. General Funding Opportunities Standard proposals or investigator-initiated research projects (submission once.
How to Obtain NSF Grants Review of Proposal Pieces A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards. Sponsored.
Improving Research Proposals: Writing Proposals and the Proposal Review Process Heather Macdonald (based on material from Richelle Allen-King, Cathy Manduca,
Pre-Submission Proposal Preparation Proposal Processing & Review.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program February 25, 2016.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
CARER Proposal Writing Workshop November 2004
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
David W. Mogk Dept. of Earth Sciences Montana State University
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
  PREM Annual Reporting “These guidelines were developed to provide a uniform reporting structure for the Partnerships in Research and Education in Materials.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Gulf States Math Alliance 2019 Conference
Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program, NSF
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them Known to All Who Need to Know.

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT EMPHASIZE PREVIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON CURRENT STEM PROGRAMS. PROVIDE DATA ON CURRENT STEM ENROLLMENT. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PARTNERS. INSTITUTION SUPPORT FOR PRESENT PROGRAMS.

BASELINE DATA BASE LINE DATA # CURRENT STATE OF STEM PROGRAMS. # PROVIDE ACCURATE INFORMATION ON PRESENT STEM PROGRAMS IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF FACULTY AND STUDENTS INVOLVED IN EACH ACTIVITY. # PROVIDE A CLEAR STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR EACH PROGRAM

Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the activity? Potential Considerations: How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within the field? How well qualified are the team members to conduct the project? Is it well organized? To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? Is there sufficient access to resources?

Criterion 2: What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? Potential Considerations: How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? How does the activity include participation of underrepresented minority groups? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure? Will the results be disseminated broadly? What may be the benefits of the activity to society?

PROPOSAL REVIEW Principal investigators should address the following elements in their proposal. Integration of Research and Education One of the principal strategies in support of NSF goals is to foster integration of research and education in funded projects through the programs, projects, and activities at academic and research institutions. Integrating Diversity into NSF Projects Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering.

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES DESCRIBE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SOLICITATION AND THE INSTITUTIONS LONG TERM GOALS AND MISSION. PROVIDE EVIDENCE ON THE COMMITMENT OF THE INSTITUTION AND ITS PARTNERS TO IMPROVE THIS AREA. (Longitudinal Databases) MAKE CERTAIN THE BUDGET FITS THE SUMMARY PAGE GOALS / OBJECTIVES. WHEN IN DOUBT LEAVE IT OUT, BUT DO MENTION OTHER FUNDED PROJECTS.

Budgetary Guidelines Amounts Reasonable for work---Realistic Well justified---Need established In line with program requests Eligible Costs Personnel Equipment Travel Other direct costs---Sub-awards Indirect Costs

PROPOSAL PREPARATION PROJECT SUMMARY This project is designed to assist the professional development of high school teachers. Most of our teachers are not certified to teach algebra or calculus. Also, State Government has passed a Standards Based Curriculum that teachers are not ready to implement. This will benefit our minority students and teachers. The intellectual merit of the project is that it will build on the Standards activity and will have more students taking calculus. The broader impact will be that teachers will share more information through teachers meetings and students will take more mathematics and become scientists in the work force. BUDGET Personnel (Five Senior and one Clerical)$136,555 Equipment (new computer)$ 45,000 Travel $ 5,000 Participant Support (8 Teachers)$ 10,000 Other (Supplies $1000; Consultants $20,000)$ 21,000 Indirect CostWaived

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROVIDE A MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT THAT WILL INSURE THE ACTIVITIES WILL BE IMPLEMENTED ON TIME AND WITHIN BUDGET. INCLUDE AN ORGANIZATION CHART AND A TIME TABLE FOR OBJECTIVES. DISCUSS INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL COMMITTEES. ( COMMITTEES KEEP MINUTES.)

EVALUATION MUST CONFORM TO THE GPRA RULES: INPUT-OUTPUT-OUTCOMES. DESCRIBE THE FORMATIVE PROJECT EVALUATION METHODS TO BE USED. DESCRIBE THE SUMMATIVE EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT WITH MEASURABLE OUTCOMES THAT WILL TELL WHETHER THE PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES HAVE BEEN MET.

DISSEMINATION DESCRIBE HOW THE DISSEMINATION PLAN WILL SPREAD THE INFORMATION ON RESULTS, PROVIDE FOR AN EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION, AND IMPLEMENT NEW INITIATIVES. DESCRIBE HOW THE EVALUATION DATA WILL BE COLLECTED AND SUBMITTED FOR USE IN THE DISSEMINATION PROCESS. UTILIZE PARTNERSHIPS FOR EFFECTIVE DISSEMINATION.

Undergraduate Enrollment TOTAL 16,114,000 MINORITY 2,900,000 Four-Year Enrollment TOTAL 10,169,000 Two-Year Enrollment TOTAL 6,300,000 Assoc. Deg. 620,000 Bachelor’s Degrees TOTAL 1,253,121 (12% of all four-year students) MINORITY 209,967 NS&E BS Degrees 210,434 (17% of all bachelor degrees) MINORITY 28,000 NS&E Graduate Enrollment TOTAL 403,855 MINORITY 43,289 FOREIGN 123,112 NS&E PhD Degrees TOTAL 17,844 MINORITY 2,857 FOREIGN 7,723 Transition to the Ph.D High School Graduation 3,116,000

The Knowledge Revolution Cooperation, Innovation and Entrepreneurship BUSINESS SUCCESS PEOPLE IDEAS TOOLS SCIENCE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ECONOMICS

10 -8 cm 2.5 x cm 5 x cm 1 cm cm 2.5 x cm 5 x cm 1 cm