1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

ILC – The International Linear Collider Project Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, November ILC Valencia SIMULATION OF BEAMCAL WITH B FIELDS SIMULATION.
11-13/10/2007 ILC BDS Kick-Off Meeting, SLAC, US 1 BDS Vacuum System Dr. Oleg B. Malyshev ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
Lausanne, Generator Miniworkshop, March 2001 Massimiliano Ferro-Luzzi, CERN/EP Beam-gas background in LHCb What nuisances for LHCb from p-A background.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Backgrounds Update Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
SLC  Testbed Proposal Jeff Gronberg  working group SC Linear Collider Retreat June 26 – 29, 2002.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
About L* i.e. the distance between the end of the last quadrupole “QD0” and the IP Until now, L* has been different for SiD and ILD, -> due to detector.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
2009/1/16-18 ILD09 Seoul 1 Notes for ILD Beam Pipe (Technical Aspect) Y. Suetsugu, KEK Parasitic loss Vacuum pressure profile Some comments for beam pipe.
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Working Group D Backgrounds M Sullivan for everyone in WG D IRENG07 Sept 20, 2007.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
September 17-21, 2007Workshop on ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design, SLAC IR Vacuum Systems first thoughts Oleg Malyshev ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
IR/Backgrounds & Beam Instrumentation Summary Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ALCPG’09, UNM, Albuquerque 3 October 2009 Six Sessions, 20 talks Instrumentation: –WAB.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting Updated
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
L. Keller 3/18/02 Beam-Gas-Bremsstrahlung and Coulomb Scattering in the NLC Beam Delivery System Conditions for Calculation: 1. Program is DECAY TURTLE.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
W. Morse GamCal1 GamCal: a Beam-strahlung Gamma Detector for Beam Diagnostics William M. Morse Brookhaven National Lab.
2007/09/17-21 SLAC IRENG07 1 A Basic Design of IR Vacuum system Y. Suetsugu, KEK Possibility of a pumping system without in-situ baking at z < L*
COMPENSATION OF DETECTOR SOLENOID FIELD WITH L*=4.1M Glen White, SLAC April 20, 2015 ALCW2015, KEK, Japan.
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Beam Background Simulation at Belle/KEKB Motivation SR background Particle background Feedback to the detector design SR alarm Summary O. Tajima (Tohoku.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Beampipe design F.Raffaelli G.Calderini, M.Marchiori, M.Mazur, E.Paoloni Framework for Geant4 Interaction Region simulation.
Octobre LAL Orsay Report from the IRENG07 workshop at SLAC W. Lohmann, DESY from Septembre 17 – 21, ~ 100 participants - plenary and parallel sessions.
2007/09/17 SLAC IRENG07 1 Comment on IR Vacuum system Y. Suetsugu Pumping System without in-situ baking at z < L*
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
The Interaction Region
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
Summary on vacuum requirements and design options
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
Background Simulations at Fermilab
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009

2 Beam-gas Interactions in the Beam Delivery System L. KELLER, T. MARUYAMA and T. MARKIEWICZ ILC-NOTE Beam-gas interactions are simulated in the ILC Beam Delivery System. –BDS length 1500 m –“SLC” gas: 62% H 2, 22% CO, 16% CO 2  = 6.5  g/cm atm room temp., X 0 = 5x10 13 nTorr Scattering rates at 10 nTorr (both beams): –Bremsstrahlung 2.9/bunch –Coulomb2.3/bunch –Moller (atomic electrons)0.3/bunch Find the point of origin of charged particles which hit the FD protection collimator and reach the IP.

3 β coll.E coll. E spect. Mask1, 50 m, ± 0.74 cm H ± 0.40 cm V FD prot. coll., 13m ± 0.78 cm H ± 0.45 cm V Loss pts. of 150 random beam-gas brem. trajectories in the BDS IP

4 Beam-Gas Bremsstrahlung Electrons Hitting Beyond the Final Doublet Cut: Outside 10 mm at entrance to 1 st extraction line quad Average Energy = 100 GeV Origin is inside 200 m from the IP IP

5 Origin of Charged Beam-gas Bremsstrahlung for Hits Near FD Number / 20 m (arb.) Coulomb electrons (all beam energy)

6 Summary for 10 nTorr: 1.Within the IP region there are hits/bunch at an average energy of about 100 GeV/hit originating 0–200 m from the IP. Therefore 1 nTorr from 0–200 m is conservative. Pressure in the IP Region can be much higher. 2.On the FD protection collimator there are 0.20 charged hits/bunch at an average energy of about 240 GeV/hit and 0.06 photon hits/bunch at an average energy of about 50 GeV/hit originating 0–800 m from the IP. Therefore 10 nTorr from 200–800 m. 3.Beyond 800 m from the IP the pressure could conceivably be at least an order of magnitude higher than 10 nTorr.

7 Update on Conclusion 1 NH = 0: 3158/4246 = 74% NH < 15: 742/4246 = 17% NH > 15: 346/4246 = 8% BeamCal These are most serious. Track those particles/BX in the SiD detector. No. of Charged Hits 4246 particles Only 10% of particles would generate significant number of hits.  10 nTorr is acceptable.

8 IP Vacuum 0-th draft of IR region (A. Seryi) Pump IP

9 Pump system_5 Pressure distribution after 100 hours evacuation Calculated by a Monte Carlo code Some pumping are required at z < L* ! –Q = 2x10 -8 Pa m 3 /s /m 2 for CO –P (z 1x10 -6 Pa! Suetsugu (IRENG07) 1 nTorr ~20 nTorr

10 SiD Forward Region QD0 BeamCalLumiCalMask No Space for Vacuum pump in the SiD Forward region Do we need vacuum pumps inside the detector?

11 How bad is the beam gas scattering if the IP vacuum is 1000 nT? Among the three beam gas scattering processes considered in the BDS, only Moller scattering off atomic electrons is significant. 2.4-cm  7-m long gas (H 2 /CO/CO 2 ) 250 GeV e- e- 0.07/BX pt>9 MeV/c come out of the beampipe Pt (GeV/c) nT

12 Electro-production of hadrons –Fixed target data  TOT ~ 2 mb  5  /BX –FLUKA does not simulate this process. Replace e- with  : 1.9  –GEANT4 simulates this process (GHAD package) 3.3  /BX Luminosity backgrounds (pairs,  hadrons) are much higher.

13 Other IP Vacuum Issue Particle stimulated gas desorption (Malyshev) –e+/e- flux from beamstrahlung pairs can reach ~10 9 /s. –NEG coated vacuum chamber?

14 Conclusions Based on the beam gas scattering, the vacuum requirements are –Up to 800 m from IP10 nT –Beyond 800 m>> 10 nT Beam gas scattering inside the detector is negligible compared to the luminosity background even at 1000 nT. –IP vacuum requirement is not determined by the beam-gas scattering rate. Gas desorption needs to be studied for the IP vacuum consideration.