Cyber Education Project Accreditation Committee November 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standards Alignment A study of alignment between state standards and the ACM K-12 Curriculum.
Advertisements

Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
ABET Accreditation Workshop on Innovations in ICT Education Beijing, China Oct. 22, 2012 Michael Lightner, Prof. and Chair ECEE University of Colorado,
4/30/2011FCIT – Tutorial 11 ABET Accreditation At FCIT Tutorial 1: Course Binder 1.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
1 Undergraduate Curriculum Revision Department of Computer Science February 10, 2010.
1 Copyright © 2010 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. Introduction to the new specification GCSE Computer Science Paul Varey.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
UGCC Report, 11/29/05 Committee: Bettati, Gutierrez, Keyser, Jiheon Kwan (undergrad rep), Leyk, Loguinov, Petersen, Welch (chair) Meetings: Fridays 2-3.
Overview of the Rose-Hulman Bachelor of Science in Software Engineering Don Bagert SE Faculty Retreat – New Faculty Tutorial August 23, 2005.
Page 0 Optimization Uncertainty Decision Analysis Systems Economics Masters of Engineering With Concentration in Systems Engineering A 30 hour graduate.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.
Overview of the MS Program Jan Prins. The Computer Science MS Objective – prepare students for advanced technical careers in computing or a related field.
Opportunities in Quantitative Finance in the Department of Mathematics.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
Bioinformatics Curriculum Guidelines: Toward a Definition of Core Competencies Lonnie Welch School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Biomedical.
Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was established in 1868 and the first undergraduate degrees were awarded in The Department.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
Welcome to USA DAY at University of South Alabama School of Computer and Information Sciences
Updating the Guidelines for Undergraduate Programs in Statistics Nicholas Horton (Amherst College) November 12, 2013 CAUSE Teaching.
Utah Valley State College CNS, PEng, and EART Planning Meeting.
School of Management & Information Systems
A Sample Poster — Landscape Layout Name of Team Members Mechanical Engineering Department Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Structure of Study Programmes
CSE ACCREDITATION REVIEW BY CAC & EAC UC Irvine October 2, 2013.
Proposal for a Bachelor of Science in Software Engineering Donald J. Bagert, P.E. Mark A. Ardis Cary Laxer Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering.
Learning by Doing (LBD) based Course Content Development (in Areas of CS and ECE) International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, India 1.
Proposal for Background Requirements Changes For the current MS/PhD programs, background requirements are expressed in the "Background Preparation Worksheet"
Texas Tech University NSF-SFS Workshop on Educational Initiatives in Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure Workshop Summary May 3, 2013 Support for.
Learning outcomes for BUSINESS INFORMATCIS Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST)
1 November 7, 2002 ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT November 7, 2002 EE CURRICULAR REVISION.
KFUPM-COE Industrial Advisory Council Meeting 31/5/ Department of Computer Engineering (COE) College of Computer Sciences and Engineering (CCSE)
Copyright © 2008 by ABET, Inc. 1 Conducting a Visit Using the New Criteria Conducting a Visit Using the New Criteria 1.
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations during the Accreditation Cycle.
IT Accreditation and Model Curriculum Eydie Lawson, Chair SIGITE Barry M. Lunt, Ph.D. ISECON Nov
CS.UCSB.EDU U. C. S A N T A B A R B A R A C O M P U T E R S C I E N C E I want to be a Computer Scientist Why should I choose UCSB?
PROPOSED CURRICULUM FOR B.Sc. IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Muhammad Taher Abuelma’atti.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
FECS 2007 Assessment and its Role in Accreditation Deborah Whitfield Frances Bailie Adel Abunawass.
B - 1 October 2004 Eric Guilbeau, PhD  Department Chair, ASU, has overseen 4 visits to ASU (2 BME, 1 ChE, 1 Mat’ls Eng)  Lead 1 PEV visit (Bioengineering)
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
1 Undergraduate Software Engineering Programs in the United States (in 2003) Mark A. Ardis Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
New Curricula Proposal at FSMN by Miroslav Ćirić & Predrag Krtolica.
Interdisciplinary MS in Information Assurance Jim Wolfe Computer Science Department Indiana University of Pennsylvania EPASEC 2006.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Industry Advisory Board May 29 th, 2015
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
New Computer Science Programme at the Department of Informatics Pedro Guerreiro University of Nis, March 24, 2006.
Computer Security Course Syllabus 1 Computer Security Lecturer : H.Ben Othmen.
Course Overview Stephen M. Thebaut, Ph.D. University of Florida Software Engineering.
Using core competencies in curriculum design
Criteria Rollout Meeting October 30, 2016
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Neeraj Mittal September 29, 2017
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Assessment and Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

Cyber Education Project Accreditation Committee November 2014

 Accreditation Committee Overview  Expectations of Members  What is Cyber Science?  ABET Background on Program Criteria  Thoughts about Program Criteria in Cyber Science  Process and Timeline  Discussion Outline

 WHO: Representatives from academia, industry, government, and other major stakeholder groups interested in the accreditation of cyber science programs.  STRUCTURE: Chair and co-chair, and both of these individuals will serve on the Cyber Education Project’s (CEP) Steering Committee.  NEW MEMBERS: Chair and co-chair will approve new members for service on the committee. The chair of the CEP Steering Committee can also appoint members to the Accreditation Committee.  INFORMATION: Members of the committee and their contact information shall be posted at the CEP website. Accreditation Committee Overview

 Develop draft ABET Program Criteria for Cyber Science. Intent is to encourage the Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC) of ABET to adopt these Criteria by working thru CSAB as the lead society.  Interface with CSAB and ABET. And other cooperating societies as they express interest.  Work closely with CEP’s Learning Outcomes Committee.  Share committee minutes with CEP’s Steering Committee and other CEP committees. Charge of Committee

Committee members will …  Support the Cyber Education Project’s goals.  Attend meetings when possible and also contribute to discussions via .  Share their expertise of Cyber Science, ABET, and CSAB to work toward producing the best possible draft Program Criteria for Cyber Science.  Provide feedback on draft Program Criteria. The Accreditation Committee will likely be needed for about three years. Expectations of Members

What is Cyber Science?

V1.0 d. l. s. 08/31/2014 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT © COPYRIGHT 2014 AND LATER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Computing problem domain Adapted from ACM Computing Curricula 2005 (Overview Report, p ) The Computing Problem Domain

V1.0 d. l. s. 08/31/2014 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT © COPYRIGHT 2014 AND LATER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Positioning Information Technology Adapted from ACM Computing Curricula 2005 (Overview Report, p ) The Information Technology Domain

V1.0 d. l. s. 08/31/2014 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT © COPYRIGHT 2014 AND LATER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Positioning Information Systems Adapted from ACM Computing Curricula 2005 (Overview Report, p ) The Information Systems Domain

V1.0 d. l. s. 08/31/2014 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT © COPYRIGHT 2014 AND LATER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Positioning computer science Adapted from ACM Computing Curricula 2005 (Overview Report, p ) The Computer Science Domain

V1.0 d. l. s. 08/31/2014 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT © COPYRIGHT 2014 AND LATER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CS, IS, IT: differences and commonality CS & IS CS IS IT & CS IT IT & IS IT, CS, & IS Adapted from ACM Computing Curricula 2005 (Overview Report, p ) The Computing Problem Domains

V1.0 d. l. s. 08/31/2014 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT © COPYRIGHT 2014 AND LATER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Cyber Science Domain?

 Cyber science is a computing-based discipline regarding the study of the construction, operation, analysis, and testing of secure computer, network, and communication systems. It includes aspects of law, policy, human factors, ethics, risk management, and other topics directly related to the success of the activities and operations dependent on such systems.  Differs from CS, IT, and IS in that its focus is on security and ramifications.  Current Program Criteria do not capture this discipline.  In the next few slides we examine what existing Criteria look like and explain they do not fit what we need for Cyber Science. What is Cyber Science?

 Assumption: Cyber Science as defined by CEP is a computing-based discipline; CSAB/CAC is the likely lead for this model.  Currently there are three programs under the Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC):  Computer Science  Information Systems  Information Technology  All ABET programs accredited by the CAC must satisfy the General Criteria plus one of the Program Criteria.  Program Criteria is discipline specific.  One can view the Program Criteria as defining its discipline. ABET Background on Program Criteria

PROGRAM CRITERIA FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SIMILARLY NAMED COMPUTING PROGRAMS Lead Society: CSAB [From ABET] These program criteria apply to computing programs using computer science or similar terms in their titles. 3. Student Outcomes The program must enable students to attain, by the time of graduation: (j) An ability to apply mathematical foundations, algorithmic principles, and computer science theory in the modeling and design of computer-based systems in a way that demonstrates comprehension of the tradeoffs involved in design choices. [CS] (k) An ability to apply design and development principles in the construction of software systems of varying complexity. [CS] Program Criteria for CS

5. Curriculum Students must have the following amounts of course work or equivalent educational experience: Computer science: One and one-third years that must include:  Coverage of the fundamentals of algorithms, data structures, software design, concepts of programming languages and computer organization and architecture. [CS]  An exposure to a variety of programming languages and systems. [CS]  Proficiency in at least one higher-level language. [CS]  Advanced course work that builds on the fundamental course work to provide depth. [CS] Program Criteria for CS (cont.)

One year of science and mathematics: Mathematics: At least one half year that must include discrete mathematics. The additional mathematics might consist of courses in areas such as calculus, linear algebra, numerical methods, probability, statistics, number theory, geometry, or symbolic logic. [CS] Science: A science component that develops an understanding of the scientific method and provides students with an opportunity to experience this mode of inquiry in courses for science or engineering majors that provide some exposure to laboratory work. [CS] 6. Faculty Some full time faculty members must have a Ph.D. in computer science. Program Criteria for CS (cont.)

3. Student Outcomes The program must enable students to attain, by the time of graduation: (j) An understanding of processes that support the delivery and management of information systems within a specific application environment. [IS] 5. Curriculum Students must have course work or an equivalent educational experience that includes: Program Criteria for IS

Information Systems: One year that must include: coverage of the fundamentals of a modern programming language, data management, networking and data communications, systems analysis and design and the role of Information Systems in organizations. [IS] advanced course work that builds on the fundamental course work to provide depth. [IS] Information Systems Environment: One-half year of course work that must include varied topics that provide background in an environment in which the information systems will be applied professionally. [IS] Quantitative analysis or methods including statistics. [IS] Program Criteria for IS (cont.)

6. Faculty Some full-time faculty, including those responsible for the IS curriculum development, must hold a terminal degree in information systems. Program Criteria for IS (cont.)

3. Student Outcomes The program must enable students to attain, by the time of graduation: (j) An ability to use and apply current technical concepts and practices in the core information technologies. [IT] (k) An ability to identify and analyze user needs and take them into account in the selection, creation, evaluation and administration of computer-based systems. [IT] (l) An ability to effectively integrate IT-based solutions into the user environment. [IT] (m) An understanding of best practices and standards and their application. [IT] (n) An ability to assist in the creation of an effective project plan. [IT] Program Criteria for IT

5. Curriculum Students must have course work or an equivalent educational experience that includes: Coverage of the fundamentals of the core information technologies of human computer interaction, information management, programming, networking, web systems and technologies. [IT] information assurance and security. [IT] system administration and maintenance. [IT] system integration and architecture. [IT] Advanced course work that builds on the fundamental course work to provide depth. [IT] Program Criteria for IT (cont.)

Our goal will be to develop draft Cyber Science (CySc) Program Criteria The next slides, show some ideas in order to stimulate conversation What eventually become the CySc criteria will surely evolve alongside the work of the Learning Outcomes Committee What do Cyber Science Criteria Look Like?

3. Student Outcomes The program must enable students to attain, by the time of graduation: (j) An ability to conduct a threat and vulnerability assessment of a system. [CySc] (k) An ability to perform tactical and strategic planning in the context of Cyber Science. [CySc] (l) An ability to conduct a forensic analysis of a cyber system using standard computing tools. [CySc] (m) An ability to perform reconnaissance of a network. [CySc] (n) An understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security, and social issues and responsibilities in the context of Cyber Science. [CySc] Sample Set of Program Criteria for Cyber Science

5. Curriculum Students must have course work or an equivalent educational experience that includes coverage of the fundamentals of:  Cyber attack and cyber defense. [CySc]  Information assurance and network security. [CySc]  Cryptography. [CySc]  Systems security engineering and system administration and maintenance. [CySc]  Wireless networks and electronic communications. [CySc]  An exposure to a variety of programming languages and operating systems. [CySc]  A mathematics component that must include discrete mathematics. [CySc]  Advanced course work that builds on the fundamental course work to provide depth. [CySc] Program Criteria for Cyber Science (cont.)

6. Faculty Faculty members must remain current in Cyber Science. Program Criteria for Cyber Science (cont.)

 Work closely with CEP’s Learning Outcomes Committee, using their work to help define or validate the criteria If / when CSAB decides to “take over”, work closely with the CSAB criteria.  Generate and iterate through versions of the Program Criteria, sharing that work with the Steering Committee.  Provide draft Program Criteria to the Lead Society (CSAB) for Cyber Science.  There will be a public comment period for the proposed Program Criteria.  We will revise the Program Criteria and submit for another period of public comment.  Conduct pilot visits with a version of the Criteria.  Timeline is roughly two to three years. Process and Timeline

 Questions and comments  Volunteers Discussion