3040 50 L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 1 SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis Leica GPS System 500.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Advertisements

Unlocking the Mysteries of Hypothesis Testing
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
“Students” t-test.
1 Regression as Moment Structure. 2 Regression Equation Y =  X + v Observable Variables Y z = X Moment matrix  YY  YX  =  YX  XX Moment structure.
Multiple regression analysis
1 Test a hypothesis about a mean Formulate hypothesis about mean, e.g., mean starting income for graduates from WSU is $25,000. Get random sample, say.
Business 205. Review Sampling Continuous Random Variables Central Limit Theorem Z-test.
DATA ANALYSIS I MKT525. Plan of analysis What decision must be made? What are research objectives? What do you have to know to reach those objectives?
9-1 Hypothesis Testing Statistical Hypotheses Statistical hypothesis testing and confidence interval estimation of parameters are the fundamental.
Power. The Four Components to a Statistical Conclusion The number of units (e.g., people) accessible to study The salience of the program relative to.
Hypothesis Testing: Type II Error and Power.
Final Jeopardy $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 LosingConfidenceLosingConfidenceTesting.
Adjustment theory / least squares adjustment Tutorial at IWAA2010 / examples Markus Schlösser adjustment theory Hamburg,
Inferences About Means of Single Samples Chapter 10 Homework: 1-6.
T-test.
Chapter 3 Hypothesis Testing. Curriculum Object Specified the problem based the form of hypothesis Student can arrange for hypothesis step Analyze a problem.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 21 – April 8, 2008.
Statistics 101 Class 9. Overview Last class Last class Our FAVORATE 3 distributions Our FAVORATE 3 distributions The one sample Z-test The one sample.
T-Tests Lecture: Nov. 6, 2002.
Sample Size Determination In the Context of Hypothesis Testing
Inferences About Process Quality
© 1999 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap Chapter Topics Hypothesis Testing Methodology Z Test for the Mean (  Known) p-Value Approach to Hypothesis Testing.
Statistics 270– Lecture 25. Cautions about Z-Tests Data must be a random sample Outliers can distort results Shape of the population distribution matters.
The t-test Inferences about Population Means when population SD is unknown.
Inferential Statistics
Hypothesis Testing and T-Tests. Hypothesis Tests Related to Differences Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Tests of Differences One.
Business Research Methods William G. Zikmund Chapter 21: Univariate Statistics.
Two Sample Tests Ho Ho Ha Ha TEST FOR EQUAL VARIANCES
Chapter 13 – 1 Chapter 12: Testing Hypotheses Overview Research and null hypotheses One and two-tailed tests Errors Testing the difference between two.
Introduction to Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
1/2555 สมศักดิ์ ศิวดำรงพงศ์
Review of Statistical Inference Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University ECON 4550 Econometrics Memorial University of Newfoundland.
1 SVY207: Lecture 18 Network Solutions Given many GPS solutions for vectors between pairs of observed stations Compute a unique network solution (for many.
Sample size determination Nick Barrowman, PhD Senior Statistician Clinical Research Unit, CHEO Research Institute March 29, 2010.
1 Power and Sample Size in Testing One Mean. 2 Type I & Type II Error Type I Error: reject the null hypothesis when it is true. The probability of a Type.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 17 Inferential Statistics.
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing and Estimation for Two Population Parameters.
Business Research Methods William G. Zikmund
9-1 Hypothesis Testing Statistical Hypotheses Definition Statistical hypothesis testing and confidence interval estimation of parameters are.
Say not, „I have found the truth," but rather, „I have found a truth.„ Kahlin Gibran “The Prophet” Hypothesis testing.
1 10 Statistical Inference for Two Samples 10-1 Inference on the Difference in Means of Two Normal Distributions, Variances Known Hypothesis tests.
Testing of Hypothesis Fundamentals of Hypothesis.
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL It is the interval or range of values which most likely encompasses the true population value. It is the extent that a particular.
4 Hypothesis & Testing. CHAPTER OUTLINE 4-1 STATISTICAL INFERENCE 4-2 POINT ESTIMATION 4-3 HYPOTHESIS TESTING Statistical Hypotheses Testing.
1 9 Tests of Hypotheses for a Single Sample. © John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, by Montgomery and Runger. 9-1.
Chapter 9: Testing Hypotheses Overview Research and null hypotheses One and two-tailed tests Type I and II Errors Testing the difference between two means.
One-Sample Hypothesis Tests Chapter99 Logic of Hypothesis Testing Statistical Hypothesis Testing Testing a Mean: Known Population Variance Testing a Mean:
Statistical Inference Statistical inference is concerned with the use of sample data to make inferences about unknown population parameters. For example,
ES 07 These slides can be found at optimized for Windows)
ST236 Site Calibrations with Trimble GNSS
Hypothesis Testing Steps for the Rejection Region Method State H 1 and State H 0 State the Test Statistic and its sampling distribution (normal or t) Determine.
Sample Size Needed to Achieve High Confidence (Means)
Hypothesis Tests u Structure of hypothesis tests 1. choose the appropriate test »based on: data characteristics, study objectives »parametric or nonparametric.
Example The strength of concrete depends, to some extent on the method used for drying it. Two different drying methods were tested independently on specimens.
Lec. 19 – Hypothesis Testing: The Null and Types of Error.
CHAPTER 7: TESTING HYPOTHESES Leon-Guerrero and Frankfort-Nachmias, Essentials of Statistics for a Diverse Society.
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 8&9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms variance and standard error of a sample mean, Null Hypothesis,
Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 7 Inferences Concerning Means.
Chapter 10: The t Test For Two Independent Samples.
Learning Objectives Describe the hypothesis testing process Distinguish the types of hypotheses Explain hypothesis testing errors Solve hypothesis testing.
More on Inference.
Hypothesis Testing: Preliminaries
TESTS OF HYPOTHESES.
CONCEPTS OF HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing.
More on Inference.
Unlocking the Mysteries of Hypothesis Testing
LESSON 18: CONFIDENCE INTERVAL ESTIMATION
Survey Networks Theory, Design and Testing
Presentation transcript:

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 1 SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis Leica GPS System 500

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 2 SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis  Content:  SKI-Pro Statistical Tests  Adjustment Logfile Examination  Exercise:  Adjustment Troubleshooting.  Identify, remove and correct Bad Vector(s).

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 3 SKI-Pro Statistical Hypothesis Testing  Statistical testing involves accepting or rejecting a statement using a Prime and Alternate Hypotheses:  The rejection of the Prime hypothesis while in fact the statement is true leads to a Type I decision error having a probability given by .  The acceptance of the Prime hypothesis while in fact the statement is false leads to a Type II decision error having a probability given by  (where (1-  ) is the power of the test). StatementDecision: accept PrimeDecision: reject Prime (reject Alternate) (accept Alternate) Truecorrect decision: Type I error: probability = (1 -  )probability =  FalseType II error:correct decision: probability =  probability = (1 -  )

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 4 SKI-Pro Statistical Test Error Probability Levels Error Probability Levels (Alpha)

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 5 SKI-Pro Statistical Test Power Levels Power Levels (1-Beta)

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 6 SKI-Pro Variance Ratio F - Test F - Critical Value  (1-  ) F - Distribution F - Test Confidence Level (%) F - Test Error Probability Level (%)  (1-  ) Prime Hypothesis Alternate Hypothesis Acceptance RegionRejection Region Power of test

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 7 SKI-Pro Individual Blunder Detection W - Test (1-  ) Tau - Distribution W -Test Confidence Level (%) W - Test Error Probability Level (%)  /2  (1-  ) Prime Hypothesis Alternate Hypothesis Acceptance Region Rejection Region Power of test - (W - Critical Value)W - Critical Value

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 8 SKI-Pro Group Blunder Detection T - Test T - Critical Value (1-  ) Tau - Distribution T -Test Confidence Level (%) T - Test Error Probability Level (%)   (1-  ) Prime Hypothesis Alternate Hypothesis Acceptance Region Rejection Region Power of test

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 9 SKI-Pro Adjustment Logfile Header Information 3D minimally constrained network on WGS'84 ellipsoid STATIONS Number of (partly) known stations 1 Number of unknown stations 3 Total 4 OBSERVATIONS GPS coordinate differences 18 (6 baselines) Known coordinates 3 Total 21 UNKNOWNS Coordinates 12 Total 12 Degrees of freedom 9 ADJUSTMENT Number of iterations 1 Max coord correction in last iteration m # of Stations x 3 # of Observations - # of Unknowns Solution Convergence # of Baselines x 3

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 10 SKI-Pro Adjustment Logfile Statistical Test Values TESTING Alfa (multi dimensional) Alfa 0 (one dimensional) Beta 0.80 Critical value W-test 1.96 Critical value T-test (3 dimensional) 1.89 Critical value F-test 1.20 F-test accepted W-Test Error Probability (5%) (1-Beta) Power Level (80%) Computed Variance Ratio and F-Test Acceptance Tau Critical Value for W-Outlier Detection Test Tau Critical Value for T-Outlier Detection Test F- Critical Value for Variance Ratio Test F-Test Error Probability (29%)

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 11 SKI-Pro Adjustment Logfile Initial Coordinates Results based on a-posteriori variance factor ELLIPSOID CONSTANTS Ellipsoid WGS'84 Semi major axis m Inverse flattening INPUT APPROXIMATE GPS COORDINATES Station Latitude Longitude Height (m) BABBAGE N W BOSSLER N* W* * known DUNROBIN N W PIER N W Initial WGS-84 Coordinate Values 3-D Cartesian Reference System Computed Variance Factor  2 applied to Adjustment Error Estimates

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 12 SKI-Pro Raw Observations & Initial Error Estimates INPUT OBSERVATIONS Station Target St ih Tg ih Reading DX BABBAGE BOSSLER m DY m DZ m DX BABBAGE DUNROBIN m DY m DZ m INPUT STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF OBSERVATIONS Station Target Sd abs Sd rel Sd tot DX BABBAGE BOSSLER m DY cor m DZ cor cor m DX BABBAGE DUNROBIN m DY cor m DZ cor cor m GPS Vector Covariance Lower Triangular Part of GPS Vector Covariance Matrix GPS Raw Vector Components

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 13 SKI-Pro Adjusted Coordinates COORDINATES (MINIMALLY CONSTRAINED NETWORK) Station Coordinate Corr Sd BABBAGE Latitude N m Longitude W m Height m BOSSLER Latitude N* fixed m Longitude W* fixed m Height * fixed m DUNROBIN Latitude N m Longitude W m Height m PIER51 Latitude N m Longitude W m Height m Adjusted Coordinates Network Constraining Status Coordinates held fixed Coordinate Standard Deviations (1-Sigma precision estimates) Correction from initial to adjusted coordinate values

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 14 SKI-Pro External Reliability on Coordinates EXTERNAL RELIABILITY Station Ext Rel Station Target BABBAGE Latitude m DY BABBAGE BOSSLER Longitude m DX BABBAGE DUNROBIN Height m DZ BABBAGE BOSSLER BOSSLER Latitude m DY BOSSLER PIER51 Longitude m DX BOSSLER PIER51 Height m DZ BOSSLER PIER51 DUNROBIN Latitude m DZ BOSSLER DUNROBIN Longitude m DX BOSSLER PIER51 Height m DY DUNROBIN PIER51 PIER51 Latitude m DY BOSSLER PIER51 Longitude m DX BOSSLER PIER51 Height m DY BOSSLER PIER51 External Reliability

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 15 SKI-Pro Absolute & Relative Confidence Regions ABSOLUTE STANDARD ELLIPSES Station A B A/B Phi BABBAGE m deg BOSSLER m deg DUNROBIN m deg PIER m deg RELATIVE STANDARD ELLIPSES Station Station A B A/B Psi Sd Hgt BABBAGE BOSSLER m deg m BABBAGE DUNROBIN m deg m BABBAGE PIER m deg m DUNROBIN PIER m deg m BOSSLER DUNROBIN m deg m Point Confidence Regions Error Ellipse Orientation from North Semi Major Axis Semi Minor AxisAxis Ratio Confidence Regions between Points Standard Deviation in Height Difference

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 16 SKI-Pro Residuals & Adjusted Observations ADJUSTED OBSERVATIONS Station Target Adj obs Resid Resid(ENH) Sd DX BABBAGE BOSSLER m DY m DZ m DX BABBAGE DUNROBIN m DY m DZ m DX BABBAGE PIER m DY m DZ m DX DUNROBIN PIER m DY m DZ m DX BOSSLER DUNROBIN m DY m DZ m Residuals in Cartesian Units Residuals in Geographic Units Standard Deviations of Adjusted Observations

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 17 SKI-Pro Blunder Detection & Internal Reliability TEST OF OBSERVATIONS Station Target MDB Red BNR W-test T-test DX BABBAGE BOSSLER m DY m DZ m DX BABBAGE DUNROBIN m DY m DZ m DX DUNROBIN PIER m DY m DZ m ** DX BOSSLER DUNROBIN m ** DY m DZ m ** Blunder Detection W & T Tests Minimum Detectable Bias Redundancy Number in %Bias to Noise RatioStandardized Residuals Vector Standardized Residuals Flagged Measurements as “possible” Blunders

L MADE TO MEASURE SKI-Pro Adjustment Result Analysis - 18 SKI-Pro Estimated Errors from W & T Test Failures ESTIMATED ERRORS FOR OBSERVATIONS WITH REJECTED W-TESTS (max 10) Record Station Target W-test Fact Est err 5 DZ BOSSLER DUNROBIN m 4 DZ DUNROBIN PIER m ESTIMATED ERRORS FOR OBSERVATIONS WITH REJECTED T-TESTS (max 10) Record Station Target T-test Fact Est err 5 DX BOSSLER DUNROBIN m DY m DZ m Estimated Errors on Rejected Standardized Residuals from Blunder Detection W-Test Estimated Errors on Rejected Vector Residuals from 3-D Blunder Detection T-Test