SENTENCING FOR CRIME CONTROL Mark Kleiman National Association of Sentencing Commissions Chicago August 7, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
Advertisements

Residential Community Supervision Programs
Slide 1 Recent Developments in Sentencing and Corrections Reform Presentation to the Nevada Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice January.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM.  Branches of Government  Legislative  Executive  Judicial  Levels of Government  Local  State  Federal.
1 17-Year-Old Offenders in the Adult Criminal Justice System Legislative Audit Bureau April 2008.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
1 Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Judge.
California Static Risk Assessment (CSRA)
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing and Corrections 1. Sentencing Options 2. Purposes of Punishment 3. Parole 4. Capital Punishment 5. Corrections.
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial
Sentencing and Corrections. Repeat offender Serves the following purpose: Retribution (eye for an eye) Deterrence (to discourage defendant from committing.
Presented By: Chief Edward Medrano Gardena Police Department.
2 HOPE Probation H awai`i’s H awai`i’s O pportunity O pportunity P robation with P robation with E nforcement E nforcement August 2009 Judge Steven S.
WISP Assessing Implementation and Early Outcomes Seattle City Council Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD December 12, 2011.
HOPE Probation H awaii’s O pportunity P robation with E nforcement October 2012 Judge Steven S. Alm First Circuit Court, Honolulu, Hawai`i
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
Community Corrections Research Papers Due At Beginning Of Class Probation, Parole And Intermediate Sanctions.
Intro to Law Criminal Process: Sentencing. Sentencing Options Suspended Sentence – given, but does not have be served at that time, but may have to serve.
Prison and probation in cooperation – possibilities for improvement Rait Kuuse Director Prison of Tallinn.
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Frank Schmalleger Criminal Justice Today 13 th Edition.
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 8 th Chapter 18 Incarceration Trends.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
The Correction of Offenders generally divided into 2 broad categories:
Integrating Treatment into Sentencing/Court Orders Hon. William F. Dressel President The National Judicial College.
Community Sanctions in Croatia Neven Ricijaš, Ph.D. Department of Behavior Disorders Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Science University of Zagreb.
Chapter 6 Postimprisonment Community Supervision.
Imprisonment and Crime: Can Both be Reduced? Daniel S. Nagin Carnegie Mellon University National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
REALIGNMENT RESEARCH UPDATE January 24, Realignment Research Group Charter  Define a Data Governance Processes  Make recommendations for a county-wide.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions Alternatives to incarceration Operated by probation/parole agencies No need to create new bureaucracies More punitive.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.
Public Safety Improvement Act. Criminal Justice Initiative Work Group Process 35+ stakeholder meetings 6 meetings from July through October 2012 – Analyzed.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Diversion and Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished 1.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
Incarceration, Reentry and Disparities in Health: What are the connections? Nicholas Freudenberg Hunter College, May 5, 2006 Presented at the Prisoner.
Michigan Department of Corrections Updated Prison Bed Space Projections Impact from Probation, Community Corrections, Parole and the MPRI Presentation.
Intensive Supervision Probation (or Parole) Initial Rise to Prominence Research on First Gen ISP Programs Finding Something Useful in ISP.
ASCA Performance Based Measures System Training Performance Standards, Measures, and Key Indicators ASCA 1.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTRO TO CORRECTIONS. WHAT IS CORRECTIONS? Corrections is that portion of the criminal justice system charged with carrying out the sentences.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND THE ROLE OF GPS Thomas H. Williams, Associate Director Community Supervision Services July 14-15, 2008 United States Sentencing.
Dealing with Lawbreakers
Chapter 10 Looking Toward the Future Overcrowded Prisons, Drugs, Laws, and Race 7 million Americans under correctional supervision; 2 million in prison.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
Deviance and the Criminal Justice System 1.Illegitimate Opportunity Structures and perceptions of crime in our society 2.The Criminal Justice System 3.The.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Conflict Resolution and Consequences
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Conflict Resolution and Consequences
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

SENTENCING FOR CRIME CONTROL Mark Kleiman National Association of Sentencing Commissions Chicago August 7, 2012

COMPARATIVE INCARCERATION RATES

HOW PUNISHMENT CONTROLS CRIME Deterrence Incapacitation Rehabilitation Norm reinforcement

THE COSTS OF PUNISHMENT Expenditure Suffering – Prisoners – Family and friends Neighborhood effects Punishment is a cost, not a benefit – Benefit is public safety Looking for the minimum effective dose

DETERMINANTS OF DETERRENT EFFECTIVENESS Swiftness Certainty Severity

WHAT MATTERS MOST? Expected value: Increasing severity is just as good as increasing certainty (Becker) Swiftness and certainty matter most (Beccaria)/(Kahnemann and Tversky) Fairness, goodwill, and predictability Procedural justice (Tyler) Reinforcing internal locus of control

POSITIVE FEEDBACK AND TIPPING With limited punishment capacity, each offender’s risk depends on other offenders’ behavior High violation rates as a social trap “The perfect threat is the one you never have to carry out.”

WHY ARE DRUG CRIMES DIFFERENT? Market replacement Negative feedback Supply control or violence reduction?

INSTITUTIONAL CORRECTIONS V. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS Populations Budgets The case for justice reinvestment

ENFORCING CONDITIONS OF COMMUNITY CORRECTION Randomized draconianism (current system) Swift/certain/proportionate sanctions (HOPE)

RISK AND SUPERVISION “Supervising low-risk offenders increases recidivism” Under what conditions is that claim true? What could make it false?

HOPE PROCESS Warning to probationers in open court. Required abstinence from illicit drugs. Randomized drug testing with “hot line.” Short jail stays as sanctions. Prompt and reliable sanctions delivery. Formal treatment only on request or after multiple failures (behavioral triage). Phase-down of supervision as reward.

HOPE OUTCOMES (Compared to routine probation) 85% reduction in drug use 50% reduction in new arrests 50% reduction in days-behind-bars – No more jail days – Fewer revocations – Fewer sentences on new charges 80% successful (free and drug-free) at one year

EXPANDING HOPE Parole Pretrial release Juveniles Fresh prison releasees Current prisoners

ADDING TO HOPE Alcohol monitoring (Sobriety 24/7) GPS position monitoring Curfew as sanction Outpatient incarceration: the virtual prison cell

TRANSFORMING THE SYSTEM Mass de-carceration (80%?) All felony probation and post-prison supervision starts with tight monitoring and HOPE-style sanctioning Misdemeanor supervision: “HOPE Lite” HOPE as the first sanction for probation and parole violations Prison only for the violent, the incorrigible, and the absconders