Chancellerie fédérale Section des droits politiques Voting observation in the context of the Swiss internet voting projects Workshop on the "Observation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legislative Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Advertisements

Lesson 1 – Foundations of Government
ETen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 1 E-TEN E-POLL Project Electronic Polling System for Remote Operation Strasbourg.
ICT IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS: LESSONS LEARNED Susanne Caarls International Electoral Affairs Symposium May 2012.
ACEEEO Association of European Election Officials discussions on e-voting Jenő Szép Council of Europe Meeting to Review Developments in e-voting November.
POWER OF THE DISABILITY VOTE. VOTERS WITH DISABILITIES More than 35 million Americans with disabilities are eligible to vote. But only 15 million do vote.
Observation of e-enabled elections Jonathan Stonestreet Council of Europe Workshop Oslo, March 2010.
Federal Office of Topography - swisstopo A law on geoinformation in Switzerland Why? For whom? How? CLGE – GA Prag 1 march 2008 René Sonney Ingénieur Géomètre.
European online voting experiences Andreu Riera, PhD Chairman Scytl Online World Security S.A. DIMACS Voting Workshop Rutgers University May 2004.
Innovative Policy 2015 on Political Participation Voting and Participation in the Electoral Process in Spain ZERO PROJECT IV CONFERENCE ON INDEPENDENT.
Lesson 2: Democratic Rights and Responsibilities
European values and media pluralism Petra Lea Láncos.
Central Electoral Commission of The Republic of Lithuania THE LITHUANIAN CONCEPT OF VOTING VIA INTERNET FOR ELECTIONS AND REFERENDA Approved by the Seimas.
Council of Europe e-voting meeting Progress Report – Austria Andreas Ehringfeld INSO - Industrial Software Institute of Computer Aided Automation | Vienna.
Secure Information Technology Center - Austria Workshop on the certification of e-voting systems Council of Europe Strasbourg, 26 November 2009 Certification.
M. ANGELA JIMENEZ 1 UNIT 5. REGULATION OF EXTERNAL AUDIT IFAC AND E.C.
Preparing for SAC 2B Monday 27 May Focus your revision on…  Restrictions on the power of the Commonwealth and the State Parliaments  The role.
Terezia Sinkova EFSA The new EU Food Safety Agency.
International Election Observation Jacques Drouin September 8, 2011.
Democracy. What is a Democracy A Form of government, where a constitution guarantees basic personal and political rights, fair and free elections, and.
The Eighth Asian Bioethics Conference Biotechnology, Culture, and Human Values in Asia and Beyond Confidentiality and Genetic data: Ethical and Legal Rights.
A.ABDULLAEV, Director of the Public Fund for Support and Development of Print Media and Information Agencies of Uzbekistan.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. The regulatory framework in Romania allows the civil society to impact public decision making. There are.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM. election period pre-election period post-election period period in-between elections pre-election period electoral.
Read the following situations, decide whether it is more likely to occur under a democratic or authoritarian government. 1.While voting in a national.
Legal capacity law reform in the Czech Republic and rights of persons with disabilities Conference on Autonomy and Inclusion Copenhagen, 7- 8 June 2012.
Auditing of the Internet voting system: Estonian case Prof. Ülle Madise Member of the National Electoral Committee.
DOST and RA 9369 or the Automated Election Law. Background on RA9369  Authorizes the Comelec to implement an end to end nationwide automated election.
Lesson 1 – Foundations of Government
Online voting: a legal perspective
Findings of the 18th ACEEEO annual conference „Judicial Protections of Electoral Rights” 3-5 September 2009, Yerevan, Armenia Forum for the Future of Democracy,
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
How and what to observe in e-enabled elections Presentation by Mats Lindberg, Election Adviser, Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
1 STUDY VISIT BY THE UGANDAN PARLIAMENTARY DELEGATION ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN ELECTORAL SYSTEM PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS HON ANDRE GAUM PREPARED.
Amalia Ferrera Electoral Accessibility Coordinator National Electoral Office - Argentina September 23 - Mexico Democracy for All: Inclusion and Accessible.
30 March 2015 The organisation of neutral elections: the Belgium experience The essential elements for neutral, impartial and transparent elections.
Direct Democracy: The Swiss experience Dr. iur. Magdalena Forowicz.
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REFORMS IN ALBANIA 10 th PUBLIC PROCUREMENT EXCHANGE PLATFORM May, 27-30, 2014 Istanbul, Turkey 1.
Council of Europe workshop on the certification of e-voting systems Strasbourg, November 2009.
1 The new legislative Framework for European statistics: Towards implementation in the areas of quality and confidentiality* Martina Hahn, Caroline Willeke.
Democracy and International Law. The Right to Democracy The Right to Democracy Democratic Deficit in IOs Democratic Deficit in IOs IOs and Democratization.
GRECO evaluations on political financing and recommendations follow-up Zurab Sanikidze Head of the Analytical Department of the Ministry of Justice of.
Second Edition of the Thematic Workshop on Elections, Violence and Conflict Prevention Pre-Election Phase - Programming for Electoral Conflict Prevention.
European Law in the Case- law of the Constitutional Court of Latvia Kristine Kruma.
Domestic Election Observation and Reporting
Lesson 1 – Foundations of Government
Parliamentary Election in Belarus Special Co-ordinator Kent Härstedt
Observation of Internet voting: Estonian case
Type your topic here Electoral Commission
National Electoral Register
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
CENTRAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION
SESSION 3. Civil Registration in the Context of Basic Human Rights
Lesson 1 – Foundations of Government
Geneva's approach to Internet voting (eVoting) certification
Good Practice – Georgian Experience
Election Security Best Practices
The contribution of the council of europe in establishing standards to ensure secure use of new technologies in elections Ardita DRIZA MAURER lead expert.
Good Governance in Singapore
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Lesson 1 – Foundations of Government
Election Security Best Practices
Securing free and fair European elections
Lesson 2: Democratic Rights and Responsibilities
Lesson 1 – Foundations of Government
Lesson 1 – Foundations of Government
Lesson 1 – Foundations of Government
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
SCHOOL COUNCIL ELECTIONS
Separation of Powers (Balance of powers)
Presentation transcript:

Chancellerie fédérale Section des droits politiques Voting observation in the context of the Swiss internet voting projects Workshop on the "Observation of e-enabled elections“ Oslo, March 2010

I.Context II.International guidelines on i-voting observation III.Regulatory framework IV.I-voting observation in practice V.Conclusions

Switzerland: a federal state (cantons have big cst’l autonomy with respect to political rights) and a (semi-) direct democracy (frequent votes at communal, cantonal and federal level) Three voting channels at federal level: polling station, postal voting (fully liberalized), i-voting (currently available to a part of the electorate in 4 cantons: three of them have developed their own i-voting system) A fourth channel at cantonal, communal level: Landsgemeinde Switzerland is the only country to have fully liberalized distant postal voting : at federal level some 90% of voters vote (~4 times a year) and elect (each 4 years) through this channel I-voting is being tested ~10 years with the aim of meeting existing needs (ex. Swiss abroad) and to gain experience : currently ~5% of the federal electorate are being involved in internet voting tests

Control procedures vary depending on the voting channel* Landsgemeinde (only cantonal and communal level): each voter can see the result and hear the “estimation of results” Polling station vote: democratic control (of voting, counting, establishing and transmission of results) is exercised by voters’ representatives : jurés and electoral commissions Postal vote : same control as vote at polling station i-voting : the impossibility to see needs be compensated * Andreas Auer, Nicolas von Arx, „La légitimité des procédures de vote: les défis du e-voting“:

I.Context II.International guidelines on i-voting observation III.Regulatory framework IV.I-voting observation in practice V.Conclusions

1990 OSCE Copenhagen commitments Council of Europe – Venise Commission: Code of good practice in electoral matters (2002) Code of good practice on Referendums (2006) Council of Europe Recommendation on Legal, Operational and Technical Standards for E-Voting (2004) OSCE-ODIHR Discussion paper in preparation of guidelines for the observation of electronic voting (2008)

I.Context II.International guidelines on i-voting observation III.Regulatory framework IV.I-voting observation in practice V.Conclusions

Regulation of observation in general Art Federal Constitution 1 Political rights shall be guaranteed. 2 The guarantee of political rights protects the freedom of the citizen to form an opinion and to give genuine expression to his or her will. Extent & modalities - regulated in cantonal legislation Internal partisan and non-partisan observation and international observation are not explicitly foreseen in federal law (but are possible*). Internal partisan observation (and sometime non- partisan) is foreseen in cantonal/communal legislations. Ways are always found to allow interested non- partisan observers to follow the election process* * see OSCE/ODIHR Election Assessment Mission Report, Swiss Confederation federal elections 21 october 2007, chap. IV, E

Regulation specific to i-voting observation Art. 8a.2 BPR/LDP (electronic voting): - the verification of eligibility to vote, voting secrecy and the counting of all the votes cast must be guaranteed and abuses prevented; - the Federal Council (Gvt.) regulates details Federal control exercised during the authorization procedure Asked how observers could exercise their task in the context of internet voting, the Federal Council replied (2005) that …electoral commissions …could also be involved in the establishing of internet voting results. Details are regulated in cantonal legislation. Democratic control exercised through electoral commissions Individual voters’ control? Regulated in cantonal law

I.Context II.International guidelines on i-voting observation III.Regulatory framework IV.I-voting observation in practice V.Conclusions

Federal authorization When applying for authorization, cantons have to prove that i-voting will respect federal requirements They submit a complete documentation (complete transparency) to the federal authority An independent verification (ordered by the federal authority) is done when a system is first implemented and at each system modification Federal authorities have access to audit reports (ordered and paid by cantons) Issue of authorization is conditioned by implementation of recommendations for improvements The Federal Council can withdraw the authorization Communication concept for reporting problems during an i-voting trial is implemented

Electoral commission (best practices) A permanent electoral commission (EC) controls the regularity of i-voting (partisan+non partisan observers) EC can access documentation incl. source code of the applications and order controls all the time EC encrypts and decrypts the electronic ballot box + makes a “control vote” during a real vote (27n bis VPR/ODP). Control votes are treated as other votes. At the end of the vote the electoral commission can see whether systematic external manipulation of the ballot box occurred Procedural measures (federal and cantonal provisions) to control internal threats have been adopted. Ex.: any intervention in the system during the vote should be duly authorized, made by at least 2 persons (specific employment rules), duly reported and controlled ( incl. by observers) System monitoring produces observable data

Individual elector (best practices) Voter can verify that her vote was counted (control codes published on the Internet after the end of the vote) Transparency (publication of documents) of internet voting systems is regulated by cantonal legislation : transparency laws, political rights regulation and regulation specific to internet portal of cantons. Best practices include: Audits’ results are published Source code of the applications is made available for verification to any voter with an ideal/scientific interest who agrees to respect its confidentiality (upheld by the Federal supreme court) Access to other system documents= same as access to source code

I.Context II.International guidelines on i-voting observation III.Regulatory framework IV.I-voting observation in practice V.Conclusions

In Switzerland Internet voting observation is organized similar to postal voting observation: through an electoral commission. Technical and procedural measures as well as access to the entire documentation by a permanent commission, make such observation meaningful Identification of best existing practices and their dissemination in i-voting cantons. Adopting specific communal/cantonal regulation takes more time Individual traceability (=each voter verifies that her vote was counted as cast) is not possible in other voting channels. Its feasibility in the Internet voting context is being studied (workshop on transparent i-voting systems, Fribourg – 6 September 2010, cc.ch/)

Chancellerie fédérale Section des droits politiques Thank you !