Christopher V. Barns Wilderness Specialist, BLM National Landscape Conservation System BLM Representative, Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Note to presenters - This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should.
Advertisements

Wilderness and Cultural Resources: Symbiotic Management Pei-Lin Yu Rocky Mountains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit March 6, 2013.
Note to presenters - This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should.
1 INTEGRATING WILDERNESS CHARACTER INTO PLANNING Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center, March 2012 Wilderness Character Webinar #3 Arthur.
1 MAKING DECISIONS: EVALUATING IMPACTS AND TRADEOFFS ON WILDERNESS CHARACTER Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center, March 2012 Wilderness.
1 This document is contained within the Traditional Tools and Skills Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may.
Peter A. Appel Alex W. Smith Professor University of Georgia School of Law Presented via Webinar Sponsored by the Carhart Center November 15,
JESSICA OWLEY UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO LAW SCHOOL Conservation Easements.
Peter A. Appel Alex W. Smith Professor University of Georgia School of Law Presented via Webinar Sponsored by the Carhart Center February 20, 2013.
Monitoring Changes in Wilderness Character Why, What, and How 1.
Significant Cave Designation Process James R. Goodbar Senior Cave/Karst Specialist Bureau of Land Management May 12-16, 2014 Cody, Wyoming.
I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures A. Background B. Route Analysis & Boundary Identification C. Size D. Naturalness E. Outstanding Opportunities.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Protected Areas. The implementation of protected areas is an extension to the concept of protection if biodiversity IUCN (international Union for Conservation.
INTERNATIONAL CHARTER FOR THE CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF MONUMENTS AND SITES THE VENICE CHARTER.
This document is contained within the Visitor Use Management Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be of interest,
Managing Marine Conservation Zones Dr Angela Moffat Marine Bill Project Manager Natural England
Endangered Species Act
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
 This document is contained within the Visitor Use Management Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be of.
Working towards Natural England for people places and nature Potential Policy Applications of Historic Data A Natural England Perspective Institute of.
Visual Resource Management May 2015 Lander, Wyoming.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
< This document is contained within the Visitor Use Management Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be of.
Manual Direction Cave & Karst Resources Management James Goodbar Senior Cave /Karst Specialist Bureau of Land Management May 12-16, 2014 Cody, Wyoming.
Category Ia Aldabra Atoll National Park and World Heritage Site: Seychelles.
I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures A. Background B. Route Analysis & Boundary Identification C. Size D. Naturalness E. Outstanding Opportunities.
Wilderness Viewpoints Anthropocentric vs. Biocentric.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation.
I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures A. Background B. Route Analysis & Boundary Identification C. Size D. Naturalness E. Outstanding Opportunities.
BAILMENT Sec
Cultural Resources Structures & Installations. Except in certain specific instances, “there shall be no...structure or installation within any [wilderness]
This document is contained within the Visitor Use Management Toolbox on Wilderness.net. Since other related resources found in this toolbox may be of interest,
Defining protected areas – implication of revising the IUCN categories to protected areas in the United Kingdom.
PROTECTED AREAS.
“A wilderness...(4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value.” Wilderness Act,
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
RESOURCE ADVISING IN SPECIAL MGMT. AREAS. TYPES OF SMA’S Designated Wilderness WSA - Wilderness Study Area National Monuments and similar areas Wild and.
Bureau of Land Management: Identifying Land with Wilderness Characteristics By: Heather Evans.
Cave Management Regulations 43 CFR Part CFR Part 37and 36 CFR Part CFR Part 290 James R. Goodbar Senior Cave/Karst Specialist Bureau of Land.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at: This presentation should be reviewed and.
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
NEPA and WildernessNEPA and Wilderness Michael C. Blumm & Lorena Wisehart ‘13 Wilderness Act at 50 (April 11, 2014) Lewis and Clark Law School.
Why preserve it? What is it? How to monitor it? Citizen stewardship WILDERNESS CHARACTER.
Proposition 65 Safe Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 Purpose: prevent exposure to toxics through water & other means Two approaches to managing.
Global Protected Areas Programme Protected areas.... Achieving quality.
Why The Forest Service and the BLM Have Different Wilderness Management Histories The Wilderness Act at 50 Lewis and Clark Law School April 11, 2014 Robert.
PETER A. APPEL ALEX W. SMITH PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY. OF GEORGIA SCHOOL OF LAW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRESENTED AT LEWIS AND CLARK LAW SCHOOL APRIL 11,
NO NET LOSS of PUBLIC HUNTING LANDS in FLORIDA June 2008 Update.
CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.
Wilderness Fires Law, Policy, Mgt Approach Steve Kimball, R1 Prog. Mgr. Wilderness, WSR’s, O/G’s Law, Policy, Mgt Approach Steve Kimball, R1 Prog. Mgr.
Cultural Resources and Wilderness Character
Wilderness Fires Law, Policy, Mgt Approach
Continuing Authorities Program
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
one millennial’s perspective on technology use IN wilderness
Food for thought… What did you learn from your timeline?
Understanding Legal Rules
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
Research in Wilderness: How much is enough?
Updating the Article 6 guide Outline of envisaged changes
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
National Historic Preservation Act
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
Presentation transcript:

Christopher V. Barns Wilderness Specialist, BLM National Landscape Conservation System BLM Representative, Arthur Carhart National Wilderness Training Center

Except in certain specific instances, “there shall be no...structure or installation within any [wilderness] area.” Wilderness Act, Section 4(c)

“Except as otherwise provided in this Act, wilderness areas shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreational, scenic, scientific, educational, conservation, and historical use.” Wilderness Act, Section 4(b)

Wilderness Watch v. Mainella (11 th Cir. 2004) “...we cannot agree...that the preservation of historical structures furthers the goals of the Wilderness Act.” “...the only reasonable reading of ‘historical use’ in the Wilderness Act refers to natural, rather than man- made features.” “Absent...explicit statutory instructions...the need to preserve historical structures may not be inferred from the Wilderness Act nor grafted onto its general purpose.” OLYM Park Assoc. v. Mainella (W.D. Wash. 2005) “The Court’s reasoning in Wilderness Watch v. Mainella is persuasive.”

Wilderness Watch v. Mainella (11 th Cir. 2004) “...we cannot agree...that the preservation of historical structures furthers the goals of the Wilderness Act.” “...the only reasonable reading of ‘historical use’ in the Wilderness Act refers to natural, rather than man- made features.” “Absent...explicit statutory instructions...the need to preserve historical structures may not be inferred from the Wilderness Act nor grafted onto its general purpose.” High Sierra Hikers v. USFS (E.D. Calif. 2006) Wilderness Watch v. Iwamoto (W.D. Wash. 2012) Agency claimed “historical use” Courts cite 1 st two cases

Wilderness Watch v. Mainella (11 th Cir. 2004) “...we cannot agree...that the preservation of historical structures furthers the goals of the Wilderness Act.” “...the only reasonable reading of ‘historical use’ in the Wilderness Act refers to natural, rather than man- made features.” “Absent...explicit statutory instructions...the need to preserve historical structures may not be inferred from the Wilderness Act nor grafted onto its general purpose.”

“A wilderness...(4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value.” Wilderness Act, Section 2(c)

“A wilderness...(4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value.” Wilderness Act, Section 2(c)

DEFINITION [2(c)] USE [4(b)] ecologicalgeologicalscientificeducationalscenichistorical recreational scenic scientific educational conservation historical

DEFINITION [2(c)] USE [4(b)] ecologicalgeologicalscientificeducationalscenichistorical recreational scenic scientific educational conservation historical

DEFINITION [2(c)] USE [4(b)] “a precise meaning or significance; the act of making clear and distinct” Wilderness Character “the employment of something for some purpose; the quality of being suitable or adaptable to an end” Public Purposes ≠

Structures and Installations (among other uses) are prohibited “except as necessary to meet minimum requirements for the administration of the area for the purpose of this Act.” Wilderness Act, Section 4(c)

Structures and Installations (among other uses) are prohibited “except as necessary to meet minimum requirements for the administration of the area for the purpose of this Act.” Wilderness Act, Section 4(c) “ administration ” NOT just regulatory “Activity in the exercise of [the agency’s] duties”

Structures and Installations (among other uses) are prohibited “except as necessary to meet minimum requirements for the administration of the area for the purpose of this Act.” Wilderness Act, Section 4(c) “ the purpose ” is to preserve wilderness character NOT to facilitate public uses

DEFINITION [2(c)] USE [4(b)] “a precise meaning or significance; the act of making clear and distinct” Wilderness Character “the employment of something for some purpose; the quality of being suitable or adaptable to an end” Public Purposes ≠ ↑ We have been arguing for this ↑ We should have been arguing for this

“A wilderness...(4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value.” Wilderness Act, Section 2(c)

“A wilderness...(4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value.” Wilderness Act, Section 2(c) “Any prominent or distinctive aspect or quality.”

To what extent do your wilderness area’s contribute to making clear and distinct the area’s precise meaning and significance? To what extent are those an inextricable part of the area’s wilderness character? Other Features of Value Other Features

To what extent do your wilderness area’s contribute to making clear and distinct the area’s precise meaning and significance? To what extent are those an inextricable part of the area’s wilderness character? Cultural Resources

Sec. 3(b): “...there shall be no...structure or installation in excess of the minimum required for the administration of the area for the purposes of this Act.” Sec. 1(c)(2): “’Wilderness’ shall include...those units within the National Park Service...except those portions set aside...for roads and accommodations for visitors.” Sec. 2(b): “The System shall include...Mesa Verde National Park.”

1) Wilderness Character would be improved without it. REMOVE REMOVE

1) Wilderness Character would be improved without it. REMOVE REMOVE 2) Mixed effects to Wilderness Character if it disappeared DOCUMENT, AT LEAST DOCUMENT, AT LEAST 3) Wilderness Character would be irrevocably damaged if it were lost. PRESERVE PRESERVE

“A wilderness...(4) may also contain... features of... historical value.” Wilderness Act, Section 2(c) “Definition of Wilderness”