Www.nrpa.no First Technical Meeting on EMRAS II new working group on “Reference approaches to modelling for regulatory compliance for legacy site management”

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Management of Radioactive Residues from Mining, Mineral Processing, and other NORM related Activities (DS459) -

Advertisements

Remediation Challenges and Stakeholder Engagement: A Canadian Perspective Michael Binder President Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Presentation to the.

IAEA EMRAS Biota working group Future (suggested) plans.

DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and.

Biota Modelling Group WG Leader: Nick Beresford Participants: Participants: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Rep., France, Korea, Norway, Russia, Spain,

Wildlife transfer handbook WG leader: Brenda Howard.

 Progress with the revision and consolidation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive Stefan Mundigl European Commission DG Energy and Transport.

RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES CONTROL JE Jan Horyna State Office for Nuclear Safety Czech Republic September 2009 Vienna.

1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT (PART 1) A RAHMAN RWE NUKEM Ltd (UK)

Alternatives to biofuels: efficiency, efficiency and efficiency! Aat Peterse, T&E Berlin, October 6, 2007.

IAEA EMRAS II : background and introduction. Environmental Modelling for RAdiation Safety (EMRAS II) General aim of programme To improve capabilities.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS- SANITATION INPUTS ON NATIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 29 MAY 2012 By Mandisa Mangqalaza.

School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.

Life Cycle Analysis and Resource Management Dr. Forbes McDougall Procter & Gamble UK.

IAEA plans with respect to environmental protection EC PROTECT Workshop Oslo, Norway, 28–30 January 2008.

SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.

30 September 2008BRMF & SAFESPUR, Radioactive v Non-Radioactive Contamination 1 Regulatory Framework for Contaminated Land on Nuclear and Other Radioactively.

Environmental Protection Waste Safety Section, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Workshop on the Safe Disposal of Low Level Radioactive Waste WG3 debriefing.

Working Group 1 Reference and Graded Approaches for Assessing the Impact of Radioactive Discharges.

Kiggavik Project Final Hearing Presentation

Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24.

First Technical Meeting on EMRAS II - proposal for a new working group / sub group Astrid Liland and Malgorzata Sneve, Norwegian Radiation.

Environmental Remediation National Policy,Strategy and

Update on progress with development of DS459

RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Kazakhstan.

1 International Working Forum on Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) Technical Meeting Amel MELLOUK – ASN / DRC Jérémie VALLET – MEDDE/MSNR Regulatory.

WG3 Leader: Michelle Bush International Working Forum for Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) – Technical Meeting October 2013.

1 SAFEGROUNDS SAFety and Environmental Guidance for the Remediation of UK Nuclear and Defence Sites.

Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.

AMAP - An international cooperation in far northern conditions Yuri Tsaturov - Roshydromet & Morten Sickel – Norwegian Radiation Protection.

BIOPROTA Biosphere modelling for waste repositories This presentation Objectives Participation and management What it has done and publications Projects.

Working Group 2 Safety Assessment Methods and Environmental Impact Assessment for Legacy Sites 11 October 2012.

Practical Implications of changes to the Exemption Orders for Project Teams Alan Fisher, on behalf of The Clearance and Exemption Working Group.

RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Azerbaijan.

International Working Forum for Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) Review of 2013 and Introduction of Next Steps of RSLS Malgorzata.

Clean-up of former nuclear sites and the role of the Planning regime Jim Cochrane.

RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Bulgaria.

International Working Forum on Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) - Technical Meeting October 2013, Vienna, Austria Results and discussion.

Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Legislation.

DRAFT Proposal for a European Directive on the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide Subject to modification on adoption by the Commission.

Sessions VI and VII Conclusions and summary Francois Besnus Session Chair Cape Town July 6, 2007.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.

Regulatory Approach to Radioactive Waste Management and Remediation in Central Asia Tamara Zhunussova Vienna, IAEA, 6-8 November, 2012.

56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference

“ OVERALL DECISION MAKING IN PLANNING FOR REMEDIATION OF URANIUM MINES” Presentation to the Senior Regulator’s meeting at the 56 th IAEA General Conference.

Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.

Clear thinking on Nuclear: Waste disposal 1.One site for high-level radioactive waste is easier to monitor, regulate, and secure 2.A repository will provide.

International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.

Nuclear Research and consultancy Group European Radiation Survey Site Execution Manual Leo van Velzen ENVIRONET Kick-off meeting Vienna 23 – 26 November.

-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.

International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.

23 January 2016 Gustavo C ARUSO Head, Regulatory Activities Section Division of Nuclear Installations Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.

International Atomic Energy Agency Meeting Summary Technical meeting of the International Project on Demonstration of Operational and Long-Term Safety.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The Activities of the IAEA to Improve the Management of NORM G. Proehl, R. Edge, S. Guy, D. Louvat J. Rowat Division.

Nuclear decommissioning: Turning waste into Wealth

The JMWP Consultation Visit frackfreeyork.org.uk for a link to the consultation page Download parts A and B of the publication response form if you plan.

Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61

Safety and Regulatory Aspects of Remediation

Basic Safety Standards Directive (BSSD)

IAEA Safety Guidance on Licensing and Oversight Activities

ENVIRONET Plenary Meeting Vienna, Austria, 5 – 7 December 2017

Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN

2nd NUCLEAR REGULATORY INFORMATION CONFERENCE 16 – 18 May 2018

ESTABLISHING A NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN RADIATION, TRANSPORT AND WASTE SAFETY: IAEA’S APPROACH TO SUPPORT MEMBER STATES Amparo.

Training and Tutoring Approaches in the Field of Radiation Safety

Plenary Meeting of the Network on Environmental

SMR Regulators’ Forum Pilot Project Report

SMR Regulators’ Forum Mr. Stewart Magruder

IAEA International Workshop on Safe Disposal of LLW

Presentation transcript:

First Technical Meeting on EMRAS II new working group on “Reference approaches to modelling for regulatory compliance for legacy site management” Interim progress 21 January 2009 in Vienna For Astrid Liland and Malgorzata Sneve Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority

Use of assessment tools to meet IAEA basic safety standards and related requirements, as applied to nuclear legacy sites Goal: Establish a forum for researcher/modellers and regulators where models for environmental impact and risk assessment, including remediation measures, could be tested for regulatory purposes... To develop a reference approach for such assessments Proposed objectives: remain unchanged, more or less

Participants contributing to discussion France Greece Iraq Italy Hungary Argentina Brasil Bulgaria Spain Australia UK Thailand Bosnia Herzogovenia Norway Advisors to government departments Technical Support Organisations Regulators No operators!

Main interests NORM Phosphogypsum waste Monazite sand process waste Oil and gas scale waste Mine waste.. metals and coal Burning of fossil fuel Uranium mining and milling wastes Nuclear legacy sites from nuclear fuel cycle/military activities NW Russia USA (Hanford) Definite most people interested in NORM but not always as legacy sites. Relevant Russian and USA participants not able to be here...

How to develop work plan..? Situations of interest Atmospheric discharges Liquid discharges Fresh water Marine Contaminated land Releases from it Building on it Clearance and land use restrictions Disposal sites Are they in acceptable conditions? IAEA BSS etc.. If not, how to choose among options for remediation? Very diverse geographically and technically Is something missing..?

For each situation it is decided to study:- Identify the quantities which need to be calculated to demonstrate acceptability dose limits, humans and other biota environmental protection standards optimisation... (?) Definition of monitoring requirements Definition of next stage of site or waste characterisation Identify the processes relevant to their assessment New brain storms Review existing models Review EMRAS I output >>Identify situations which are currently very difficult to regulate because regulatory basis does not exist or data to support environmental safety assessment does not exist, or models

Then:- Compare alternative models for specific situations Compare models against independent data Develop guidance in light of the results However!!! General lack of datasets.... HELP!!!