1 Performance Vector CAPT Tom Broderick, Program Manager LCDR Mark Bourne, Project Officer Navy Personnel Command, Millington TN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

Performance Management
State of Florida Performance Management. Performance Management The process of motivating employees through setting goals, measuring progress, giving.
Developing Our Leaders – Creating a Foundation for Success
COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY/VIMS
Competencies Are King… Improving organizational and staff performance
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Center for Learning & Professional Development Just-In-Time Performance Evaluation Workshop v1.4 2/11/14 Just-In-Time Performance Evaluation Workshop.
Key Result Areas” or KRAs refer to general areas of outputs or outcomes for which the department’s role is responsible. Key Result Area in simple Terms.
Improving Individual Performance: Effective Performance Management for Small States Presented by Curt P. Wellington.
The University of Alabama Annual Employee Performance Evaluation Supervisor Tutorial (Length/Completion Time: 21 Slides/Approximately 10 Minutes)
Gathering Performance Information: Overview
Performance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal System Update
Definitions Performance Appraisal
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL SYSTEM
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR W W W. P R E N H A L L. C O M / R O B B I N S T E N T H E D I T I O N.
Review Performance Management and Appraisal
project management office(PMO)
Copyright© 2015 Trilogy Development. All rights reserved. Trilogydevelopment.com Assessment and Vision Exercise 1.Your company/firm has a culture of learning.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Performance Management
Appraisal Types.
Measuring Competencies as Way to Increase Your Productivity Suzanne Simpson, Ph.D. President Human Resource Systems Group Ltd. IMAC ’99 Conference.
Performance Appraisal
Performance Management 2 MANA 3320
Competency Models Impact on Talent Management
Performance Appraisal
What is the Global Grading Project
Performance Management System (PMS). The major concern for the organization to assess the level of efficiency of the employees working in the organization.
Maximizing “Human Capital” Performance Management: Mentoring, Team Analysis & 360 Peer Reviews Assessments USA & Canada
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
ePerformance for Managers OPB
1 Human Performance Improvement Process INTRODUCTION Connie Johnson.
BA 2204 and BAS 324 Human Resource Management Appraising and managing performance Instructor: Ça ğ rı Topal 1.
Chapter 4 Performance Management and Appraisal
HUMAN RESOURCES PLANNING What is HR ? Any practice that deals with enhancing competencies, commitment and culture building can be considered as a HR.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Performance Appraisal Instruments used in the United States International Conference on Civil Servants’ Performance Appraisal August 25-26, 2015, Issyk-Kul,
The Performance Management And Appraisal System (PMAS) Principal Performance Appraisal.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama CHAPTER 11 Performance Management and Appraisal Section 3 Developing Human Resources.
 Employees are often frustrated about the appraisal process  Appraisals are too subjective  Possibility of unfair treatment by a supervisor  Way to.
Job Analysis - Competency Modeling MANA 5322 Dr. Jeanne Michalski
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL. Performance is a systematic evaluation of the individual with respect to his performance on the job and his potential for development.
Pre-Supervisory Development Programs. Our Nation’s future and the future success of our individual organizations depends on the leaders we develop today.
Chapter 7 Rewards and Performance Management
People Priorities Framework
Organization Development and Change © PAPERHINT.COM.
Performance Appraisals
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502) Lecture-43. Summary of Lecture-42.
Canberra Chapter July PMI Chapter Meeting July 2007 PMCDF Competence Framework A presentation by Chris Cartwright.
MANAGING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE Facilitator: Joan Strohauer, CalHR Guest Presenters: Marva Lee, Personnel Officer, CalSTRS Brenna Neuharth, Workforce Planning.
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Job Analysis and Competency Models.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Performance Management
Performance Appraisal
INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
OD Interventions.
Organization Development
Internship Bill of Rights
Performance Management
Improving the Sailor Performance Evaluation Journey
Performance Management Training
Improving the Sailor Performance Evaluation Journey
A VOYAGE THROUGH PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Vector CAPT Tom Broderick, Program Manager LCDR Mark Bourne, Project Officer Navy Personnel Command, Millington TN

2 Performance Vector: Mission “I need a personnel system that is able to compete in the 21st century marketplace.” CNO, 9 May 03

3 Performance Vector: Strategy CNO Transformational Task: Navy’s Organizational Foundation: -Cultural values define acceptable behaviors, values and organizational norms. -These values were defined by the Fleet…Not HQ. -Culture needs to link all HR activities: Counseling Performance Management Fitrep / Evals Performance Appraisal Advancement Reward System Promotion

4 Manage CareersPlan Succession Develop TalentDistribute Reward What is Performance Management? Performance Management ObserveObserve AdjustAdjust CoachCoach DevelopDevelop AssessAssess PlanPlan

5 Human Performance System Model III. Develop ComponentsIV. Execute & Measure II. Define Solutions I. Define Requirements Establish Performance Standards & Requirements Develop, Build, & Integrate Tools Design Human Performance Solutions Implement & Test Intervention; Evaluate “Product of Process” Periodic Review Performance Analysis Develop Tools Integrate, Validate The fundamental process that underlies the Revolution in Training

6 Performance Vector: Methods Assembled team of five doctoral level Research Psychologists with nationally recognized publications in performance appraisal. Conducted 24 water-front focus groups with over 190 personnel to identify job dimensions. Sorted dimensions into similar categories. Psychologists then used statistical methods to refine dimensions. Result was 9 general areas for Non-Supervisory and 9 general areas for Supervisory jobs:

7 Performance Vector: Results Cooperation Task Proficiency Adaptability Knowledge / Support of Command Objectives Problem Solving Work Ethic Communicating Effectively Integrity / Honesty Initiative and Self- Development Non-Supervisory Job-Dimensions

8 Performance Vector: Results Mission Accomplishment Coaching / Mentoring Embracing Personal & Professional Development Resource Stewardship Communication Skills Displaying Integrity & Professionalism Leading Change Leading People Organizational Savvy Supervisory Job-Dimensions

9 Performance Vector: Results Validation study reproduced same results with 97.4% accuracy for Non-Supervisory job dimensions. Validation study reproduced same results with 99.2% accuracy for Supervisory job dimensions. A menu of “Targeted Areas for Performance” will help define each job dimension. -This is not a check-list -Defines behaviors as standards -Clear expectation for future performance -Facilitates dialog & feedback

10 Benchmarking Study Industry and DoD / DoT Best Practices: -Performance Counseling -Performance Appraisal -Promotion Systems -Cultural Change Management Air Force, Army, Marine Corps & Coast Guard Alaris Medical Systems, Gateway Computers, QualComm & Cymer

11 Select Employees

12 HPFD Document Sections

13 Create HPFD Document

14 HPFD Supervisor Behaviors

15 HPFD Non-Supervisor Behaviors

16 HPFD Behavior Description

17 Target Behaviors

18 Annual Performance Appraisal Document Sections

19 Performance Appraisal Average Document

20 Performance Appraisal Comments on Average Document

21 Rating Descriptions

22 Rater Statistical Summary

23 Rater Statistics by Grade

24 Rater Statistics by Job Code/Designator

25 Performance Vector: Tactics Performance Management: -Human Performance Feedback and Development (HPFD) -NSIPS/PeopleSoft e-Performance 8.8 -Implementation Jul 03 Performance Appraisal: -Supervisor & Non-Supervisor Documents -Uses HPFD Behavioral Performance Dimensions -NSIPS/PeopleSoft e-Performance 8.8 -Implementation Jul 04 Reward System: -Create standardized measure of Performance -Implementation Oct 03

26 Performance Vector: Reward System Current System Enlisted Evals use Forced Distribution rating as data source…not average of traits like Officers. *Subjective vs. Objective rating systems. *Measure of performance or index of organizational tenure? “ Hard” vs. “Easy” graders throughout career. *Relative position to reporting senior’s average. *Promotion Boards try to interpret meaning to this pattern. *“What is the Reporting Senior trying to say?” Is the current system the most accurate portrait of performance throughout a career?

27 Performance Vector: Reward System Future System Employ use of Standardized Scores on trait average. *Long history of use in education and testing Defining characteristics: *Defines distance between grade and reporting senior’s average. *Ignores relative position of high vs. low scores. *Evens-out effect of “hard” vs “easy” graders. More accurate measure of performance over time. *Improvement in Navy’s HR reward system Increases trust that the “system” is fair and unbiased.

28 CREATES STANDARD SCORE FOR LAST 5 YEARS FOR ALL SAILORS NORMALIZES SCORE ACROSS ALL YEARS AND DIFFERENT REPORTING SENIORS CONVERTS SCORE TO A PERCENTILE FOR EASY INTERPRETAION

29 COMPARES INDIVUAL SAILOR AGAINST PEER GROUP CREATES GRAPHIC OF COMPARISON FOR FUTURE SELECTION BOARD SELECTS SAILOR TO CREATE PERFORMANCE VECTOR SCORE FOR 5 VECTOR MODEL AVERAGES PERFORMANCE OVER LAST FIVE YEARS FOR SELECTED SAILOR

30

31 Promotion Algorithm Study Vector Quotient Professional Development Personal Development Leadership Certifications & Qualifications Performance Performance Mark Average Advancement Potential Order of Advancement

32 Promotion Algorithm Study

33 Promotion Algorithm Study SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS NSIPS / PeopleSoft needs a “statistical engine.” *One-time purchase of software for entire personnel system…about 53 cents a Sailor. NSIPS only contains data on E5 and above. *Data mandate for E4 and below for AG, IT, & MS pilots for “quick win.” Develop strategic communication plan with NPDC. *Let Sailors know this is an improvement in the Navy’s HR system. *Promotion algorithm is next step.

34 Promotion Algorithm Study “Data Call” from all 5 Vectors. -Vector definitions, metrics and strategic direction. Policy Capturing Study with Senior Leadership. Develop scoring algorithm with SMEs at “Centers.” -Requires KSAs, professional milestones, certifications and qualifications and career path. Final validation using statistical modeling from past Service Records.

35 TFE Performance Vector