Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Advertisements

Monitoring and Communication “Teams need to receive feedback on the effectiveness of their collaboration and the way in which they are using data – both.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module: Plan
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
Collaborative Data Teams
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Examining Monitoring Data
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
LESSON STUDY INSTRUCTIONAL LEARNING TEAMS – LIVING WITHIN A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY By Nancy J. Larsen, Ph.D.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
EngageNY.org Strengthening Writing through Student-Engaged Assessment.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Internal Facilitator Training Fall :30 Welcome 8:45 The “Why” 9:30 The “How” 11:15 Lunch (on your own) 12:15 Internal Facilitator Disposition.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement December 1, 2010.
Activity 2a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
District Meeting # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
March (February) ISLN March 17, 2016
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Morgan County Schools Response to Instruction
Inclusion of Exceptional Learners
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
Using the new Teacher-Based Team Protocol
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Chicago Public Schools
Georgia Department of Education
Build Capacity to Train TBTs in Ohio 5-Step Process
Coaching TBTs and BLTs Brian A McNulty Ph. D..
Our Leadership Journey
Presentation transcript:

Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation Webinar Hosted by Becky Rees, from

1. Please print copies of the resources prior to listening to the webinar. The toolbox icon will be used on slides that have a corresponding resource. 2. This webinar is meant to be stopped at specific points to allow your Building Leadership Team time to rate themselves on the BLT rubric. 3. The length of the webinar without stopping for dialogue is about 40 minutes.

Resources

BLT Rubric

This webinar is divided into 3 sections. After each section, you should pause the video and the team should discuss those specific items on the rubric. Make sure the team discusses the evidence they are using for determining the rubric score for each item.

Items 1-6 on the BLT Rubric 1.Meet monthly. Schedule is created at beginning of school year and shared with all building staff and DLT 2.Principal attends every meeting (100%) and expects BLT members to be prepared

3. Membership on team includes a representative from each grade level/department (including preschool) and special education. Think about staff that can cover multiple roles, i.e. Title I is assigned to 2 nd grade team so is dually 2 nd grade representative and Title I. Think about: social worker, after-school programming, parent, speech therapist, psychologist. Bring your “Opinion Leaders” to the table

4. Principal is the facilitator who assigns defined roles/responsibilities that rotate among all team members. 3 roles are always included: a.) Recorder: Minutes are taken electronically during the meeting in order to capture group thinking. b.) 5-Step Process Checker c.) Reflective Questioner

5. Group norms are followed and monitored for meeting effectiveness at the end of each meeting. Norms of CollaborationWorking Agreements 1. Pausing1. Start and End On Time 2. Paraphrasing2. Be Prepared for Meetings 3. Posing Questions3. Manage Electronic Devices 4. Putting Ideas on the Table4. Monitor Side Conversations 5. Providing Data 6. Paying Attention to Self and OthersWorking Agreements can be adapted to meet the needs of each group 7. Presuming Positive Intentions Quick Checks on Meeting Process Monthly Highly Effective Meeting Profile Yearly

Pause for Team Dialogue 6. Team forms, agenda, & protocols guide the critical learning during the BLT meeting. a)5-Step Process Template b)Agenda Templates c)Examining Student Work Protocols

Items 7-12 on the BLT Rubric 7.Dialogue is focused on changing instruction (what the adults do) to effect student achievement 8. Building/District has a defined common language and understanding of: a. assessment literacy, (FIP: Formative Instructional Practices) b. research/evidence based instruction that defines your Instructional Framework, c. high quality professional development, d. data analysis, e. learning standards and curriculum f. differentiation

9. 5-Step process is a part of every meeting with dialogue relating to adult and student data. For example: Steps 1-3 are done during one meeting. The next month you would revisit your implementation of Steps 3- 4 and discuss fidelity to implementation along with additional needs/supports. Step 4 could be an agenda item for several months until there is data to complete Step 5. a. Identified strengths and weaknesses are attributed to factors within the teacher’s control b. Strategies are being evaluated on their effectiveness and impact c. Descriptions of strategies are specific enough to allow for replication (i.e., implementation, frequency, duration, resources) d. Team members collaboratively analyze student work in-between data collection points

10. Subgroup data is reviewed at every meeting related to “gap” groups. Instructional needs are prioritized and communicated to all staff and monitored for growth each month. 11. TBTs/BLT understand the distinction between an instructional strategy and activity. (strategy vs. activity = what the teacher does vs. what the student does) 12. Every TBT representative shares (at every meeting) to update where they are within the 5-Step process. This could include sharing student data and/or explaining the specific teaching strategies/actions adults are implementing that are showing positive results. Dialogue supports reflective questions regarding how to replicate specific instruction or modify if needed. You may invite all members of a specific TBT to the meeting to share a complete debrief of their most recent 5-Step process.

Pause for Team Dialogue

Items on the BLT Rubric 13. BLT monitors effectiveness of TBT implementation through use of TBT self- assessment and observational data from walk-throughs at least 3x/year 14. BLT analyzes TBT implementation data to determine what supports are needed to have at least 90% of TBTs highly effective AND follows- through with a plan of action for that support

15. Feedback is provided to all staff after every BLT meeting as a result of the adult/student data collected. There is a process in place that is followed to share what happens in BLT and questions staff have that need to be addressed by BLT. 16. Feedback/Communication is provided to the DLT after every BLT meeting that is related to what support & PD is needed specifically by the building. 17. BLTs report to the DLT quarterly data on: implemented instructional strategies (adults) and student performance by subgroup

18. BLT reviews their service delivery plan showing where all students are receiving core instruction at the start of the year and their plan for monitoring the effectiveness.

Create Implementation Goal for BLT Using your data from completing the BLT rubric, choose 1 or 2 areas that you will work on getting to the highest level of implementation as demonstrated on the rubric. Apply the 5-Step process to this goal and monitor your implementation

Additional Resources OhioLeadership Google Folder: OIP Facilitator Support LUFYyUG44dXZRenM/edit?usp=sharing

Thank you! If you have additional questions, please contact Becky Rees at

Complete Team Dialogue over Items 13-18