Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
The Quality Matters Rubric ® ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
Institutional Policy & Quality Matters Standards: The impact of policy on course quality Deb Adair, QM Director Sloan-C Conference November 9-11, 2011.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Quality Matters! Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann and Sandy Johnson NMSU Quality Matters Institutional.
Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design
Applying the QM Rubric August 2008
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
Quality Bucks Inter-Collegiate Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Defining and Implementing Quality Assurance Standards for Online Courses Lawrence C. Ragan, Director, Instructional Design/Development, The Pennsylvania.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Introducing the Quality Matters Continuing Education Rubric
Mentee Overview. Welcome to Gold Star Welcome to Gold Star mentee! This pilot has been designed based on Quality Matters, a faculty- centered, peer review.
Mentor Overview.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
Quality Assurance Initiative. What is it anyway? The Quality Assurance (QA) Initiative is a faculty-centered, peer review process designed to assess the.
1 Quality Matters: A FIPSE project for Peer Course Review A Grant Initiative of MarylandOnline Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
Online Course Quality and Peer Review Adapted from Maryland Online FIPSE Project “QUALITY MATTERS” Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Quality Matters: Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning A Grant Initiative of MarylandOnline Sponsored by the U.S. Dept. Education Fund.
Blackboard Course Design and Quality Matters
Quality Matters and Online Courses in Sakai Brian Dashew, Instructional Designer, Marist College Dr. Reba-Anna Lee, Assistant Director for Academic Technology.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University November 2013.
Comparing Cookies to Courses Best Practice Session at Detroit Lakes Based on Quality Matters Project Resources from the Maryland Online Consortium Deborah.
Finding the Good Fit: Faculty Members, Instruction, Evidence, and Technology Patricia A. McGee, PhD Associate Professor/2003 NLII.
Peer Reviewer Training(f2f) Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Updated January 2007 Proposed for use by all QM.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Introduction to Quality Matters ™ Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
1 The Use of Standards for Peer Review of Online Courses Barbara Battin Little, DNP, MPH, RN
Indicators of Quality in the Design and Evaluation of Blended and Online Courses November 2006 Renee Welch, External Education – Part I Nancy Pogue, Regional.
FALCON 2013 Well, Duh! Quality Matters™ Sharon K. Calhoon Associate Professor of Psychology, Indiana University Kokomo Assistant Vice President for University.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University Spring 2015.
“Developing Faculty Capabilities to Support Integrative Learning A Session Led by: L. Dee Fink, Ph.D. International Consultant in Higher Education AAC&U.
Building Trust with Quality Assurance Strategies in TAACCCT Gerry Hanley (TAACCCT Repository Services) Executive Director, MERLOT Assistant Vice Chancellor,
ELEARNING IN EDUCATION: AN OVERVIEW Raymond S. Pastore, Ph.D. Bloomsburg Univeristy Bloomsburg, PA SITE 2002 Thursday, March 21, 2002 Purpose: To give.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Mapping Your Online Course Susie Bussmann, Ph.D. & Sandy Johnson, M.A. & M.S.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
ENHANCING QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING Nadeosa Conference Durban University of Technology 8-9 July 2015 Dr Ephraim Mhlanga.
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Writing Course and Module-Level Objectives
Pilot’s Log: Getting Our Professional Development Course QM Recognized
Implementing QM towards Program Certification
Essential Attributes of Faculty Professional Development: The Excellence in Online Education Initiative Carol McQuiggan, D.Ed. Senior Instructional Designer,
The Academic Technology Center
Connecting the Dots to Create a Quality Map for Online Programs
A community of learners improving our world
From the Ground Up: RN to BSN Completion
Katie Datko PCC Online Distance Education Webinar Wednesday 3/1/17
Development of Quality Initiatives on a Less-Travelled Path: The Online Fellows Program Judith A. Giering, Ph.D. Karyn E. Holt, Ph.D. Drexel University.
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Joyce Bahhouth Bladen Community College
Professional Development
Instructional Design Model
Online Course Showcase
The Buggy Before the Horse
Leveraging Instructional Design Teams
Trying to get the Horse in Front of the Buggy
Katherine M. Hitchcock, Ph.D. Michelle Franz
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Quality Matters Overview
Quality Assurance in Blended Learning Standards and Rubrics
Presentation transcript:

Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08

About Quality Matters

Quality does matter to … students faculty administrators institutions consortia accrediting agencies legislators tax-payers How do we … identify & recognize it? motivate & instill it? assess & measure it? insure it? assure it?

Peer Course Review Feedback Course Course Meets Quality Expectations Course Revision Instructional Designers Institutions Faculty Course Developers National Standards & Research Literature Rubric Faculty Reviewers Training Quality Matters: Peer Course Review Process

Factors Affecting Course Quality Course design QM REVIEWS THIS Course delivery (i.e. teaching, faculty performance) Course content Course management system Institutional infrastructure Faculty training and readiness Student engagement and readiness

For Our Purposes, Quality Is… More than average; more than “good enough” An attempt to capture what’s expected in an effective online course at about an 85% level Based on research and widely accepted standards 85 %

The Rubric

Eight General Standards: 1.Course Overview and Introduction 2.Learning Objectives 3.Assessment and Measurement 4.Resources and Materials 5.Learner Interaction 6.Course Technology 7.Learner Support 8.Accessibility Key components must align. Alignment: Critical course elements work together to ensure that students achieve the desired learning outcomes.

Course Learning Objectives (2) Resources, Materials (4) & Technology (6) Assessment and Measurement (3) Learner Interactions & Activities (5) Key sections that must align…

Rubric Scoring StandardsPointsRelative Value 173Essential 112Very Important 121Important TOTALS 4085 Team of 3 reviewers initially score individually One score per standard based on team majority Pre-assigned point value Yes/No decision; All/None points Consensus is NOT required

To Meet Expectations… A course must achieve: “Yes” on all 17 of the 3-point “essential” standards. A minimum of 72 out of 85 points 72/85 = 85%

Underlying Principles of QM… 1.Based in national standards of best practice, the research literature & instructional design principles 2.The course under review does not have to be “perfect” but better than just “good enough” (Standards met at about 85% level or better.) 3.Integral to a continuous quality improvement process 4.Valued as part of a faculty-driven, peer review process 5.Designed to promote student learning

Underlying Principles of QM (cont)…. 6.Designed to ensure all reviewed courses will eventually meet expectations 7.QM is a collegial review process, not an evaluation process 8.A review team must include an external peer reviewer 9.Set up so that the course faculty or instructor considered part of the review team