Frank Geurts Rice University.  Time-of-Flight in STAR ◦ start & stop detectors in Run 9  Time-of-Flight Calibration ◦ upVPD ◦ Barrel TOF ◦ preliminary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TDC130: High performance Time to Digital Converter in 130 nm
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
X. DongAug. 5th, 2010 RNC Group Meeting 1 Barrel Time-Of-Flight In Run10 Xin Dong Many thanks to the TOF group.
STAR MRPC TOF: Project Overview BNL January 26, 2006 Geary Eppley Rice University.
1 STAR TOF Calibration. 2 Detectors TPC(TPX) - tracking MRPC TOF (TOFr) – stop time measurement pVPD/upVPD - start time measurement Particle momentum;
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Timing Properties of T0 Detectors At PHOBOS Saba Zuberi, Erik Johnson, Nazim Khan, Frank Wolfs, Wojtek Skulski University of Rochester.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
X.Dong, USTC/LBNL Feb. 20th, 04, STAR Collaboration Meeting 1 TOF Software Progress Xin Dong, for TOF Group  TOF detectors in Run IV  Online software.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
1 TOF Aging Discussion Background information Summary of results so far Examples of gain loss mechanisms Diagnostics Possible scenarios for 2006 Discussion.
Frank Geurts Rice University.  TOF Timing ◦ HPTDC chip ◦ Calibration for HPTDC Non-Linearity  TOF Performance Monitoring ◦ Online Monitoring ◦ Prompt.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Measurement of J/ψ production in p+p collisions at √s = 500 GeV at STAR experiment Rongrong Ma (BNL) Hard Probes 2015 McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Frank Geurts Rice Univ..  Introducing ◦ barrel TOF and upVPD in Run 9  TOF software ◦ past, present, and future  Calibrations ◦ start, stop, and status.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
Feb. 23rd, 05, STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL X.Dong, USTC/LBNL 1 Time-Of-Flight in Data Stream in Run 4 and Run 5 Outline  TOF in Run 4  New design.
Time of Flight Analysis Progress on TOF Software Frank Geurts for the TOF group.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
1 MTD Calibration for Cosmic Ray Triggered Data in RUN 10 at STAR Lijuan Ruan (BNL), Liang Li (UT Austin) 04/01/ Workshop on STAR MTD Production.
STAR Collaboration Meeting Rene Bellwied – Wayne State University July 2004 SVT Calibration and STI tracking status An update of work since the SVT review.
9 th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiments 2 October 2003 P. Antonioli (INFN/Bologna) A 20 ps TDC readout module for the Alice Time of Flight system:
The Readout Electronics for Upgrading of BESIII End-capTOF Chunyan Yin University of Science and Technology of China University of Science and Technology.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Frank Geurts Rice University.  Time-of-Flight in STAR ◦ start & stop detectors in Run 9  Time-of-Flight Calibration ◦ upVPD ◦ barrel TOF ◦ preliminary.
BigCal Reconstruction and Elastic Event Selection for GEp-III Andrew Puckett, MIT on behalf of the GEp-III Collaboration.
April 27-29, Hangzhou1 STAR time-of-flight detector Calibration Ming SHAO USTC.
Bernhard Schmidt DESY - HH PRC open session, October 30, 2002 HERA-B.
Slides for Xiaoping. LBNL -- 10/9/09STAR Collaboration Meeting2 STAR TOF Offline Analysis Layout STAR/TOF DAQ GSTAR geant hits GSTAR geant hits geometry.
W-DHCAL Analysis Overview José Repond Argonne National Laboratory.
Hadron Physics in China & 12 GeV JLab, Lanzhou, July 31, Zebo Tang, USTC Zebo Tang University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) MRPC-TOF.
The STAR MRPC TOF Project BNL December 1, 2005 Geary Eppley, with Jo Schambach, for the TOF Group.
Time of Flight Detectors at RHIC Time of Flight Measurements at RHIC  TOF detector as a PID devices  PHENIX-TOF and BRAHMS-TOF PHENIX Time-of-Flight.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
Hycal Energy Resolution, Timing, &Trigger Efficiency, A cumulative study. Chris Mauney.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
Performance of Prototype MRPC Detector for STAR Frank Geurts (Rice Univ.) for the STAR TOF collaboration.
2007 Run Update for STAR Jeff Landgraf For the STAR collaboration.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
The ALICE Experiment Event by Event fluctuations ALICE TOF Calibration 30th November 2007Chiara Zampolli1.
HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
TOFp Status Report Introduction: system overview Functional requirements Analysis status –track extrapolation & matching –start time –stop time –identified.
Low Momentum dE/dx Testbeam H.P. 7/24/98. Goals for Spectrometer are based on tracking and PID –Multiparticle correlation –production of particle species.
Light Nuclei Spectra in STAR Run5 62GeV Cu+Cu Experiments Jianhang Zhou Rice University.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
CBM-TOF-FEE Jochen Frühauf, GSI Picosecond-TDC-Meeting.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Status of the Front-end-Electronics based on NINO ASIC for the Time-of-Flight measurements in the MPD V. A. Babkin, M.G. Buryakov, V. M. Golovatyuk, S.
NSS2006Shengli Huang1 The Time of Flight Detector Upgrade at PHENIX Shengli Huang PHENIX Collaboration Outlines: 1.Physics motivations 2.Multi-gap Resistive.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
QUARTIC TDC Development at Univ. of Alberta
Status of the TOF Detector
STAR Geometry and Detectors
Conceptual design of TOF and beam test results
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
10th particle physics conference
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
Presentation transcript:

Frank Geurts Rice University

 Time-of-Flight in STAR ◦ start & stop detectors in Run 9  Time-of-Flight Calibration ◦ upVPD ◦ Barrel TOF ◦ preliminary Run-9 results (500Gev & 200GeV)  Calibration History & Requirements ◦ Calibration Cross-verification  Noise Rates & Discriminator Threshold  Summary BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF2

Based on Multi-gap Resistive Plate Chambers (MRPC)  various prototypes since Run 3.  timing electronics based on CERN’s HPTDC chip Significant increase in scale:  Run 8: 5 trays (4%)  Run 9: 86 out of 120 trays (72%)  Run 10: 120 trays (100%) Run 9 experience:  stable running, TOF participated in nearly all runs;  3 dead channels out of 16,128;  2 trays disable during run  average noise rate per channel is less than 10 Hz. BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF3

BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF EAST WEST TPC support arms Run-8 trays 4

 upVPD replaced pVPD (Run8): ◦ both based on scintillator and fast PMTs ◦ uses similar timing electronics as TOF ◦ upgrade involves increase in #channels from 6 to 38 channels (east + west)  STAR |Z|=570cm and 4.24 < |η| < 5.1 BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF collision point 5

 Integral Non-Linearity (INL)  Trigger timing window  Start-side calibration upVPD ◦ signal slewing, T vs. Time-over-Threshold (TOT)  Stop-side calibration Barrel TOF ◦ TOF T0 ◦ signal slewing (T vs. TOT) ◦ MRPC cell signal propagation (T vs. Z local ) ◦ tray alignment calibration BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF6

 INL correction determined for all TOF HPTDC channels  Full TOF Barrel: 120x192 = 23k TDC channels  1024 bins/channel at 2byte precision  In Offline Database  Applied by StBTofHitMaker BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF RMS RMS σ = ≈ 18ps INL applied no INL applied HPTDC integral non-linearity (INL): periodicity 1024 bins (25ns) calibration data collected on testbench expect no change, but will monitor Jing Liu 7

 HPTDC timing information is based on a free running clock ◦ determine optimal window for trigger timing ◦ timing affected by e.g. firmware changes BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF Xiaoping Zhang Yi Zhou Final trigger timing window checked for Run 9 (500GeV and 200GeV) based on Fast-Offline data one parameter per tray, ready for database Applied by StBTofHitMaker 8

 Preliminary Calibration of Run 9 ◦ based on Fast-Offline production ◦ 500 GeV: ~3M events; 200 GeV: ~6.8M events. BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF Zebo Tang Xiaoping Zhang  Separate East & West Calibration  Iterative process  Low multiplicity in upVPD is an issue not all events will have a start- time  Calibration constants ready for database (500GeV)  200GeV in progress  Applied by StBTofCalibMaker 9

 200GeV preliminary results based on recent calibration performed on subset of fast-offline data (days ) Xiaoping Zhang 500GeV p+p 200GeV p+p BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF10

Alternative approach in upVPD calibration  less sensitive to “outliers”, e.g. potentially resulting from additional vertices. BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF Bill Llope Promising first results: Resolution per channel ~140ps  upVPD start resolution < 100ps (for 1.AND.1) 11

 Use a clean π sample, either from TPC dE/dx (and momentum cuts) or a pre-calibrated TOF in the next iterations  T0 Calibration: ◦ compensate for differences in cable lengths and signal transition times. ◦ shifts the mean of TOF measured - TOF expected to 0 ◦ determined channel by channel, i.e. per MRPC cell ◦ Parameters done for 500GeV  Ready for database  200 GeV in progress ◦ Applied in StBTofCalibMaker BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF Momentum p (GeV/c) dE/dx (KeV/cm) Tray 119 – Module 1 Zebo Tang 12

Slewing Correction  compensates for correlation between signal timing and signal height. ◦ time-over-threshold is proportional to signal height; based on a trailing edge timing measurement in addition to the leading edge  use spline fits, and store its shape, i.e. bin values  pp (500GeV): difficult to get enough statistics ◦ corrections were performed per TDIG board (4 MRPCs, 24 channels) ◦ Preliminary set ready for database, applied by StBTofCalibMaker ◦ 200GeV data: first sample done, verification in progress BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF Run-8 [pp 200GeV] Run-9 [500GeV] 3M events 13

BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF T-Z loc correlation in Run 5 Ming Shao  Local Z-hit position correction ◦ Expect a Z hit dependence as signal propagation on the pick-up pads can be 40-50ps/cm ◦ No strong dependence observed in Run 8 and 9; not yet understood.  Corrections are available for Run 9 p+p ◦ 500GeV: ready for database, applied by StBTofCalibMaker ◦ 200GeV: verification in progress Run 9 Run 8 14

 procedures involve several iterations ◦ e.g. using a slew-corrected timing to improve T ref or T0 timings  once a large statistical sample is available determine the tray alignment calibration BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF start-side calibrationstop-side calibration 15

BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF ToT fit failures σ ≈115ps Zebo Tang 16

 Preliminary 200GeV data based on subset of Fast-Offline data  Near-future detailed studies on threshold and magnet field polarity  Pending STAR production with final TPC calibrations (Sept.’09) BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF σ ≈117ps Xiaoping Zhang 17

BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF18

BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF19

 Significant statistics requirements effect turn- around time for prompt TOF PID ◦ application of “online” PID  Cross-verification of p+p calibration parameters ◦ apply 500GeV calibration on 200GeV data sample BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF σ ≈123ps σ ≈117ps 20

 Run-9 (200GeV): two discriminator thresholds ◦ high threshold (2500≈50mV): day  STAR field polarity change RFF  FF on day 147 ◦ lower threshold (1200≈24mV): day  dedicated noise runs (day 195): only little difference ◦ further study effect on calibration and efficiency BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF blue=tray minimum, black=tray average, green=tray max tray ID noise rate [Hz] 21

 TOF stable operations during Run 9 ◦ very useful to verify calibration/production procedures  TOF calibration: full-steam ahead  TOF calibration depends on TPC calibration ◦ 500GeV: preliminary calibration, ready for STAR database ◦ 200GeV: first preliminary calibration, verification in progress ◦ will require a larger data sample  verify the effect of the different discriminator threshold settings, verify field polarity change, verify effect of final TPC calibration  Preliminary p+p results for TOF resolution agree with TOF Project deliverable (100±15ps for Au+Au) ◦ expect a significant improvement of start-side resolution in full energy Au+Au ◦ expect further improvements by increasing statistics BNL -- August 10-11, 2009 DOE Close Out Review STAR TOF22