National Research Council Canada Conseil national de recherches Canada Observing Efficiency and Reliability of Gemini South MCAO Glen Herriot Herzberg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Highly Efficient Operations Keck Scientific Strategic Planning 2009 Hilton Lewis T. Armandroff, S. Adkins, R. Goodrich J. Johnson, K. Kinoshita, R. Matsuda.
Advertisements

1 Keck LGS AO Planning Workshop: Overview, Requirements & Schedule December 5, 2004.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
National Research Council Canada Conseil national de recherches Canada Experimental Laboratory for Instrument Development in Astrophysics Jean-Pierre Véran.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
March 30, 2000SPIE conference, Munich1 LGS AO photon return simulations and laser requirements for the Gemini LGS AO program Céline d’Orgeville, François.
Sodium monitoring experiment in Chile Céline d’Orgeville.
1 Logistics Measures and Considerations IEGR 459: Intro to Logistics Management and Supply Chain Sept. 19, 2011 Fall 2011 Maintainability System Effectiveness.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
Laser Launch System for the LBT Richard Davies Sebastian Rabien Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  Approaches of other observatories 
Laser Guide Stars by Roberto Ragazzoni INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Padova (Italy)
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
Measured parameters: particle backscatter at 355 and 532 nm, particle extinction at 355 nm, lidar ratio at 355 nm, particle depolarization at 355 nm, atmospheric.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
System-wide issues Before we get to the telescope System integration and verification at the telescope Operations Maintenance and support.
LGS Project Meeting February 1, 2006 Agenda 1.IPT status updates: Laser facility, AO optomechanics, AO software (Bouchez, Roberts, Trinh; 30 min) 2.Sum-Frequency.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
Demonstration of Science Observing Modes AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 D. Le Mignant, A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team.
Palomar Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Antonin Bouchez & Mitchell Troy John Angione, Rick Burruss, John Cromer, Richard Dekany, Steve Guiwits, John Henning,
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
Observing efficiency for NGAO 1.Definitions 2.Lessons learned a)Keck LGS AO “efficiency” b)Keck AO brute conclusion 3.Observing efficiency budget 4. Observing.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
PSWG March Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor.
Agenda (Fri., June 7) 8:00AO UI Demonstration 9:00Introductions to AO team 9:05AOWG Chair Selection 9:15Review Agenda (make changes?) 9:20Review Planned.
NGAO Performance Flowdowns R. Dekany 02 September 2009.
WBS 3.3 Laser Facility Jim Bell, Jason Chin, Erik Johansson, Chris Neyman, Viswa Velur Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO topical discussion: Observing Efficiency and Uptime Budgets Telecon Meeting 12/7 D. Le Mignant and E. Johansson 7 Dec Attendees; R. Campbell,
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory NGAO Next-Generation Adaptive Optics System NGAO Uptime Budget Keck NGAO Meeting.
The Gemini MCAO System (EPICS Meeting, SLAC, April 2005) 1 The Gemini MCAO System Andy Foster Observatory Sciences Ltd.
MCAO AO Module Electronics Mark Hunten. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Adaptive Optics Module Electronics The Adaptive Optics Module.
1 HST Status Cycle 14 TAC/Panels 14 March Telescope and Instrument Status Telescope and support systems are all working well – no unexpected limitations.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
MCAO Laser Coordination and SALSA Jacques Sebag / Corinne Boyer.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
Random Media in Radio Astronomy Atmospherepath length ~ 6 Km Ionospherepath length ~100 Km Interstellar Plasma path length ~ pc (3 x Km)
MCAO MCAO for Gemini South Preliminary Design Review May Hilo, Hawaii.
MCAO System Overview Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Primary subsystems and their characteristics.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS & PHYSICAL SCIENCES The Cornish Survey Workshop.
© 2002 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved. Designing for System Reliability Dave Loucks, P.E. Eaton Corporation.
SAM PDR1 S OAR Adaptive Module LGS LGSsystem Andrei Tokovinin SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
MCAO System Modeling Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Modeling objectives and approach Updated.
Gemini South Adaptive Optics Imager Peter McGregor Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics The Australian National University.
A Quick Tour of the Universe (and this course) Part 2.
1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Jan URSI1 Fast Switching Phase Compensation for ALMA Mark Holdaway NRAO/Tucson Other Fast Switching Contributors: Frazer Owen Michael Rupen Chris.
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
Why is the VLT very efficient? Fernando Comerón On behalf of Francesca Primas and Martino Romaniello.
Compaign of PHEMU Participation of Astronomical Society of Tunis (S.A.T) Tunisia Hanadi Ettroudi Sofien Kamoun H..ETTROUDI,S.A.TAstrometry after.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Tailoring the ESS Reliability and Availability needs to satisfy the users Enric Bargalló WAO October 27, 2014.
Robo-AO: Demo Period Nicholas Law.
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
From LSE-30: Observatory System Spec.
Laser(s) for Keck Observatory’s Next Generation AO (NGAO) System
Topic 9: Wave phenomena - AHL 9.4 – Resolution
Jesper Schou Instrument Scientist
HMI Reliability Dale Wolfe Reliability Engineer LMSSC*ATC*LMSAL
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism
Dynamic Scheduling with the GBT
NGAO topical discussion: Observing Efficiency and Uptime Budgets
Presentation transcript:

National Research Council Canada Conseil national de recherches Canada Observing Efficiency and Reliability of Gemini South MCAO Glen Herriot Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics National Research Council Canada

Observing Losses for MCAO Weather Satellites Failures Other Observatories Airplanes

Purpose This analysis estimates the overall observing efficiency of MCAO, which is NOT specified in the requirements documents.

Top Level Requirements Lose no more than 10% of scheduled time to failures CoDR book assumed that half the nights in a year will be scheduled for MCAO, (180 x 10 hr). But this is a classical scheduled spec. We have taken it to mean 1800 hours per year, queue-scheduled. Maximum object setup time (excluding telescope slew and acquire PWFS stars) < 120 seconds Telescope Slew and PWFS2 acquisition < 120 seconds.

Lasers Must Not Interfere With Satellites

Fraction of Time Laser Must Be Shut Down.

Worst Case Laser Duty Cycle

Slightly Better Than Typical Case

Good Case

Typical: 28 ‘On’ events, 41% Off time; 20 minute max. On ; 1 minute median Off

Histogram of Permissible Time Durations “Laser On”

Probability of “Laser On” vs. Duration > T, ( Avoid Satellites) exp(-T/  ) exp(-T/  +bT 2 -ct 3 ) Minutes % 1% 0.1% 0.01% 100%

Queue Scheduling Increases Odds of Finding a Time Slot. Probability of 1 slot of length t>T Probability of success with more targets in queue. Solve for Queue length needed:

Queue Length - vs. Integration Time >T

Thin Cirrus Clouds - Blind LGS Multiple CW LGS suffer from “fratricide” unless sky is photometric. Pulsed laser may tolerate ~20% loss on both upward and downward path. < ~1/3 magnitude extinction.

Fraction of Year Lost to Clouds -CTIO

Useful Science Time Lost to MCAO - Caused by Thin Clouds

Failures

Mean Time Before Failure (MTBF) Reliability MTBF Hrs Adaptive Optics Module 528 Beam Transfer Optics 1107 Laser Launch Telescope SALSA ( satellite, aircraft, laser safety system ) 5085 Laser ( minimum MTBF for <10% downtime from failures ) >48 Gemini South MCAO MTBF 42

Overall reliability calculated from subsystems’ Mean Time Between Failure. Reciprocal of sum of reciprocals Total MTBF is poorer than any individual subsystem’s reliability. Total MTBF dominated by “weakest link in a chain.”

Subsystem reliability: e.g., Beam Transfer Optics MTBF Hours Shutter & Beam Dump Relay Optics 6249 M6, M7 Slow tip/tilt & steering 8333 Diagnostics Fast steering mirrors 2000 Rotator Electronics Overall BTO reliability 1107

Sensitivity Analysis: MTBF & Downtime vs. Laser Reliability % Laser MTBF Hours hr Overall MCAO reliability % Downtime due to failures Laser MTBF Hours

Interference With Other Observatories, Aircraft Gemini South neighbours at CTIO and SOAR have right of way for natural guide star observations. Estimate ~1 incident per night where MCAO must shut down, costing ~2% lost time. Interference problem is Rayleigh “light sabres” clashing, not the 90 km beacon itself.

Observing Scenarios for Satellite Interference Studies. Scenario Slew, Acquire PWFS NGS Astro- metry Laser Launch, Acquire Science Integra- tion Queue Size N Lost Time % Full overhead Astrometry + Partial setup Partial setup, no astrometry Calib’n. while Laser off x 15TBD? ? 8.3 Dwell on same Object 2.0 n x 0.47n x %

% Time Sky Useful for Astronomy, But MCAO Not Available. *** Optimistic Case: Do Sky calibrations, change filters and gratings while laser off. (~38.5% of time)

Availability Calculation: Combining lost-time factors A. Convert each lost-time factor to a Probability of Success. Multiply together to get overall ‘up-time’ percentage. B. Subtract ‘up-time’ from 1 to get total percentage of time lost due to all factors

Lost Time: Overhead, Clouds, Satellites, Failures Satellite Interference Scenario Satellite Loss Pulse CW (MCAO) Full Setup + Astrometry12.9% 30% 38% Partial Setup + Astrometry11.8% 29% 37% Partial Setup, no Astrometry9.1% 27% 34.9% Part Setup- no astr'y. – cal. if laser off 8.3% 26% 34.3% Dwell on Same Object43% 54% 59% Laser Format Total Down time

PDR Agenda Friday, 5/ Laser System 0900 CTIO Sodium Studies 0915 Control System 0945 Break 1000 RTC Electronics 1045 Safety System 1100 Availability analysis 1130 Closed vendor sessions 1200 Lunch 1300 Cost and schedule 1400 Committee session 1700 Committee report 1800 Adjourn