Austin Energy’s Renewable Energy and Demand Side Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Power Saver TM Program Saving Energy Together Reducing Costs with Energy Efficiency Presented by Jerrel Gustafson, Unit Manager American Public Power Association.
Advertisements

Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
Save Energy and Money PNM Energy Efficiency Programs
Energy Savings Opportunities in Controls, Lighting, Air Conditioning, Water Heating and Refrigeration Chuck Thomas, P.E. CEM Lead Engineer.
NJ SmartStart Buildings New Jersey Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability (HEPS) January 20, 2012 Presenter: BPU President Robert Hanna.
Commercial Energy Efficiency Program GAPPA May 27, 2014.
AEP Texas Energy Efficiency / Demand Response Programs Russell G. Bego, EE/DR Coordinator AEP Texas September 24, 2014.
Demand Side Management Programs. Why Energy Efficiency? Money savings Increased comfort Conserve natural resources Cheapest power plant EPA Regulations?
ENERGY CONSUMPTION: MANZANITA HALL ENERGY UPGRADES BEN COHNDANNY GARNETT AUSTIN FROGGEPAUL SAIGEON MATT DUNCAN.
T OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AT TRIBAL GAMING FACILITIES.
Branford Board of Education Conservation Report Efforts and Results 2001-Present Mark Deming Facilities Director Branford Board of Education November 19,
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
Saving Energy Together Power Saver TM Program Putting Energy Efficiency to Work Presented by Fred Yebra, P.E. March 5, 2008.
PECO Smart Ideas Energy Efficiency Programs
Allegheny Power’s Energy Efficiency & Conservation Programs Central PA ASHRAE Chapter Harrisburg April 20, 2010.
Northumberland Manufacturers’ Association Lakefront Utilities Information Session – Dereck Paul 1.
MENG 547 LECTURE 3 By Dr. O Phillips Agboola. C OMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ENERGY AUDIT Why do we audit Commercial/Industrial buildings Important.
Regulatory View of DSM/EE David Drooz Public Staff – N.C. Utilities Commission April 2015.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Understanding Ontario’s Electricity System
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
Plant Utility System (TKK-2210)
Over 60,000 Honda MCHP Units at work in Japan
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
Georgia Power and Energy Planning Julie Paul Environmental Affairs Georgia Power Company January 14, 2013.
Steve Craker K-12 Team Lead Geoff Overland IT and Data Center Focus on Energy Increase IT Budgets with Energy Efficiency.
Utility Rebates Services and Funding to Help Build “Green” Restaurants and Hospitality Facilities Tom Coughlin Program Manager.
NH Utilities Programs/ Carbon Reduction Opportunities Thomas Palma, Esq., CSDP Project Development Executive.
Distributed Generation Programs, Incentives and Interconnections Ian Loughran, P.Eng. DSM Program Leader Renewable Energy Programs
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE EFFICIENCY MAINE’S RECENT SUCCESSES AND MAJOR OPPORTUNITIES AHEAD Michael D. Stoddard Executive Director.
Resource Planning Georgia Power’s Diverse Plan to Meet Georgia’s Energy Needs AWMA Fall 2010 Conference October 7, 2010 Jeff Burleson Director of Resource.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
1 Managing Renewables Integration Valerie Fong Utilities Director Power Association of Northern California September 17, 2013.
New Mexico State University EFFICIENT RESIDENTIAL ENERYGY Fahzy Cooperative Extension Service ______ County.
Energy Efficiency in Industrial and Commercial Facilities 2003 Energy and Environmental Conference September 16, 2003.
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
Developing and Integrated Energy Conservation and Renewable Strategy Renewable Energy Leadership Summit June 7, 2005 Lenox, MA.
Energy Efficiency – it makes sense! Ken Curry Energy Efficiency Manager
Green Solutions for NC’s Electric Co-ops CERT Conference - Sustainable Energy Alternatives and their Impact on Low Income Citizens March 19, 2009.
POTENTIAL AND STRATEGIES FOR DEMAND SIDE MANAGEMENT Dr. Ajay Mathur Director General, Bureau of Energy Efficiency.
Name of Building(s) or Project Speaker(s) Organization(s)
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Assessing Electric Utility Incentives and Support Fred Yebra, P.E. Energy Engineer State Energy Conservation Office July 28, 2015 Presentation to the Association.
Smart Energy Smart Energy July 28, Smart Energy.
Smart Grid: What’s In It for the Customer? Wharton Energy Conference 2010 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing & Regulatory Services.
10 Turn off Lights Not in Use Motion Sensors simple ways to go green
ERCOT ELTF – Overview and Brief Proposal Dr. Eric Woychik – Strategy Integration LLC representing Comverge, Inc. 8 November 2006.
2010 Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Programs July 1, 2010.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
Investing Our Energy In You Traverse City Light & Power Electric Generation TCL&P Study Session December 1, 2009.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
1 Energy Efficiency Programs For Local Governments & Community Partners Christina Prestella Program Manager, Government & Community Partnerships PG&E September.
Utah State University Logan Utah. Founded 1888 as a Land Grant Institution Host City – Logan, Utah (48,ooo+ population) ~ 15,000 Students (~ 28,700 students.
Marin Clean Energy Choice and Competition - Driving Innovation towards Environmental Goals May 2015.
Overview for Local Energy Committees February 10, 2016.
CITY OF LEOMINSTER. Customer Charge The cost of providing customer related service such as metering, meter reading and billing. These fixed costs are.
PECO Smart Ideas for Your Business Greater Philadelphia Association of Energy Engineers Mike O’Leary, PECO April 20, 2016.
1 Potomac Electric Power Company Case 9155 & Delmarva Power & Light Case 9156 EmPOWER MARYLAND DRAFT NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
Estee Lauder Companies The Beauty of Responsibility $10.2 billion global leader in Prestige Cosmetics. Company was started in Queens, NYC, New York in.
Draft SMECO EmPOWER Plans April 15, 2011.
1 Pepco and Delmarva Power Demand Side Management Programs Stakeholders Meeting February 20, 2009.
New Jersey Energy Efficiency, Generation & Resilience Funding Update
The Energy Efficiency and Solar Nexus:
2017 Commercial Energy Efficiency Program
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Tom Clark Vice President, Customer Service & Service Area Development
Presentation transcript:

Austin Energy’s Renewable Energy and Demand Side Management Reza Alaghehband, P.E. Power System Consulting Engineer, Austin Energy EMS Users Conference September 9, 2008 Atlanta, GA

Austin Energy Municipally Owned Electric Utility 9th Largest Public Power Serves > 388,000 Customers (population of 900,000) Area > 437 sq. miles Serving COA (Travis Co. and portion of Williamson Co) Austin

Austin Energy No increase in base rates since 1994 Generation 2,760 MW Peak Load ~2,500 MW ERCOT Member Austin

Generation Capacity Ratio Coal (2 units) – 23% Gas (12 units) – 52% Nuclear (2 units) – 15% Renewable – 10% Austin

Transmission Portfolio 633 Miles Transmission - 345 KV - 138 KV - 69 KV

Distribution Portfolio 10,560 Miles Distribution - 35 KV - 12.5 KV 11 transmission substations 57 distribution substations

ERCOT Market Non-Opt-In Entity (NOIE) – NO part in retail Market Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) – Submit bids, dynamic/static gen schedules, settle retail/wholesale gen resources with ERCOT according to EPS meters at tielines and gen. terminals Power Generation Entity (PGE) Transmission and Distribution Service Provider (TDSP)

Renewable Portfolio (Current) Wind (5 farms) – 274 MW (96%) Biomass (2 Landfill site) – 12 MW (4%) Solar – 2 MW Total = 288 MW Wind Provides 8% of AE Power)

ERCOT New Generation Capacity

Austin Climate Protection Plan Will make Austin the national leader among cities in the fight against global warming. City Council Resolution on February 15, 2007

Austin Climate Protection Plan Municipal Plan - Makes all COA facilities/fleets carbon neutral Homes and Buildings Plan - Makes Austin building codes most EE in nation “Go Neutral” Plan - Mechanisms for business to reduce carbon footprint to zero Community Plan – Develop complete plan for reducing GHG emissions from sources community-wide Utility (Austin Energy) Plan Make all COA facilities & fleet carbon neutral by 2020 Facilities 100% renewable by 2012 Fleet carbon neutral by 2020 AE GHG-reduction goal by 2020 Achieve carbon neutrality on new generation Establish CO2 cap for utility emissions

Utility (Austin Energy) Plan 30% renewables by 2020 700 MW of energy savings by 2020 CO2 cap and reduction plan New generation carbon-neutral Enhance building codes for zero energy-capable homes by 2015

Load Forecast & Conservation

Projected New Resources (in MW) Year Coal/Nuclear Gas Biomass Wind Solar 2008 1,029 1,444 12 274 2 2009   100 165 2010 30 2011 (77)*100 2012 2013 200 2014 50 20 2015 2016 2017 (126)*200 2018 2019 2020 110 Total 1,744 212 (203) 1,049 102 Total Additional Resources 1,376 MW *Expiring wind contracts

Strategic Conservation AE DSM Programs Strategic Conservation Peak Clipping Load Shifting Generic Load Shape Changes

DSM Cumulative Savings

Represent 35% of new DSM program mix AE DSM Programs Peak Clipping Power Partner A/C Cycling W/H Cycling Load Co-Op Aggregator Represent 35% of new DSM program mix

Power Saver Program FREE Energy Saving Products Lower energy costs 70,000 installed in homes, apartments 10,000 installed in commercial buildings

Cycling A/C Thermostats Cycling Session, June 15, 2005

Demand Response Program Customer Type and Strategy Residential A/C SuperStat®; 33% & 50% Cycling Strategy Multi-Family A/C SuperStat; 33% Cycling Strategy Multi-Family Water Heating Vaughn; 100% (digital timer) Commercial A/C SuperStat®; 33% Cycling Strategy Municipal & Government A/C SuperStat®; 33% Cycling Strategy & Set Point Limits

DR Program Implementation Power Partner - Automatic AC cycling by radio controlled thermostats.  Participant AC’s are cycled for a 10 minute block per half hour.  Total continuous MW reduction with full deployment ranges from 20-54 MW depending on temperature. Availability: June through September, Non-Holiday, weekdays from 1600 – 2000 with a target of 15 events per season  

DR Program Implementation Load Coop - ~2.5 – 3 MW of load response.  Load Coop customers are paid a capacity availability charge of $1.25/kW month and a curtailed energy charge of $0.15/kW based on deployment Availability: June through September, between 1200 – 2000 limit for a fixed block of 3 hours per day, up to 15 days or 45 total hours per season with no more than 3 consecutive activations

Demand Response Program

Demand Response June 15, 2005 Peak Day: June 2, 2005 June 15, 2005

Demand Response Program Impact on AE System Load

Demand Response Program Impact on AE System Load

Demand Response Program Impact on AE System Load

Aggregator Program Types of Participants Energy management companies Large chain stores – central energy management systems Minimum 3 sites bundled 10 kW per site minimum Self-aggregator 30 kW minimum

Aggregator Program Curtailment Events 4 events per summer minimum (once/month) 15 events per summer - anticipated Time Period June 01 – September 31 Monday - Friday only No holidays or weekends Between 3 pm to 8 pm Event maximum duration – 3 hours

Aggregator Program Set-Up Incentive If no automation equipment/software exists, $40/ton up to $10,000 for existing HVAC or refrigeration equipment Ex: $40/ton x 150 tons = $6,000 If automation equipment/software does exist, $20/ton up to $5,000 for existing HVAC or refrigeration equipment Up to 50% and 500 tons

Aggregator Program Performance (Energy) Incentive $0.24 per delivered kWh Ex: 20 kW x 3 hours x $0.24/kWh = $14.40 AE’s energy incentive not to fall below the $0.24 per kWh Minimum 4 energy payments per summer

Demand Side Management (DSM)

Strategic Conservation AE DSM Programs Strategic Conservation Total Home Efficiency Small Business Efficiency Green Building Appliance Efficiency Multi-family Rebates Commercial Rebates Refrigerator Recycling Free Weatherization Municipal Conservation Air Duct Sealing Represents 65% of new DSM program mix

Promoting Energy Efficiency Cash rebates that pay 20 – 30% of cost Up to 70% buy-down incentives for Small Business Direct install measures Free home and business energy audits Low-income Free Weatherization Engineering Feasibility studies Inter-agency agreements Utility Key Account representatives Newsletter / Mail outs

Commercial Rebates Summary of Technologies EE Lighting retrofits Air Conditioning Unit Solar Film/Screens Ceiling/Roof Insulation Reflective Roof Coatings Premium Efficiency Motor Variable Frequency Drives (VFD’s) Retro commissioning Thermal Cool Storage Custom technologies

Commercial Rebates Summary of Lighting Technologies T-8 & T-5 High Efficiency Lighting Systems Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL’s) LED (Light Emitting Diode) Exit Signs Incandescent to Fluorescent Conversions New building designs Re-lamping & Re-ballasting of Existing Fluorescent Fixtures High-Bay Fluorescent Systems Lighting Controls (occupancy sensors)

Electronically Commutated Motors (ECM) Emerging Technology for Refrigeration Fans Replaces Shaded Pole and Permanent Split Capacitor Reduced energy consumption to 60% Relatively Simple Retrofit Typical Paybacks Range from 2 to 3 years In any motor, either the rotor or the stator must have a rotating magnetic field in order to cause the motor to turn. In Electronic commutation Power is pulsed on and off electronically with semi-conductor devices sometimes called electronic switches, transistors,

Large Grocery Chain Retrofit Retrofit currently under way 22 Locations in Austin area Fans per location store ~ 200 fan/motors Energy Cost Savings ~$10,000 /location/yr Rebate varies by size of motor. $6 - $16 on this project.

High Bay Fluorescent Retrofit Manufacturing Facility Converted (514) 400-watt HID lamps to 4-lamp 240-watt T5 HO Fluorescents Annual Cost Savings: $43,812 Project Cost: $122,800 Utility rebate: $33,153 (27% of job cost) Payback was 2 years TYPE OF FACILITY: Sporting Goods Manufacturing and Distribution & Warehouse Facility (78,000 SF) OPERATING HOURS: 12 hours per day / 5 days per week Major complaint: high bills, poor light levels and poor light quality; excess heat gain. Retrofit eliminated noise, glare & heat gain associated with HID; almost doubled light levels; better CRI; and a 47% reduction in KW load. Utility rebate: $33,153 (27% of job cost)

Solar Rebate Program Up to 30% Savings 100 Mega-watts of solar by 2020 Rebates among the largest Encourage installations on homes & businesses. Demonstrations in Schools Demonstrations in City buildings

Free Home Weatherization Energy Improvements: Attic Insulation Duct Sealing Install CFLs Installing Solar Screens Caulking and Weather-stripping Free Smoke & Carbon Monoxide Detector Minor Energy Related Repairs Eligibility Requirements: Austin Energy Customer Elderly Low-to-Moderate Income Disability Renters Eligible: Rental Release Form Required Must Be in Household Minimum 3 Months Income Guidelines Number in Household 1 2 3 4 5 60 years or older $39,850 $45,500 $51,200 $56,900 $61,450 Under 60 years old $24,900 $28,450 $32,000 $35,550

Energy Conservation in Public Facilities

Strategic Conservation Municipal Energy Conservation Program Traffic Signal Conversion to LED 5,500 traffic signals Existing incandescent lamps 135 watts New LED lamps 15 watts Energy savings per lamp 120 watts 90% energy reduction

AE DSM Programs Load Shifting Time-of-Use Rate Thermal Cool Storage Systems

Load Shifting - Thermal Storage Austin-Bergstrom International Airport - July 1999

Top 160 MW is used 40 hours per year DSM Opportunity 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 0% 10% 20% 30% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% % of Yearly Hours MWs Generated AE System Duration Curve -2004 Top 160 MW is used 40 hours per year

2007 DSM Expenditures Program Area Expenditures Cost / kW Saved Commercial $ 6,406,040 $ 327 Residential $ 6,205,155 $ 483 Demand Response $ 4,852,074 $ 295 Free Weatherization $ 600,084 $ 953 Solar $ 2,637,453 $ 4,221 Grand Total $ 20,532,076 $ 410

Natural Gas – Combined Cycle $750 Pulverized Coal $1,549 Capital Cost – New Generation Power Plant Cost/kW Natural Gas – Combined Cycle $750 Pulverized Coal $1,549 Nuclear $3,000 Source – National Energy Technology Lab (NETL)

Residential Power Saver 15% Energy Savings Typical Home Size: 2,000 Sq. Ft. Pre-Retrofit = 17,960 kWh Post- Retrofit = 15,360 kWh kWh Savings = 2,600 kWh Cost Savings = $273 Customer Benefits: Energy efficiency offers enormous potential for benefiting our customers, the environment and our industry Base Home Retrofit Home Difference kWh/Sq. Ft. kWh/Sq. Ft. kWh/Sq. Ft. 8.98 per Sq. Ft. 7.68 1.3 kWh/Sq. Ft. Improvement Air Duct System Average Home Has 27% Duct Leakage Attic Insulation 30% of Homes Heat Gain Comes from Attic Solar Shading Can Reduce Sizing of A/C by ½ Ton

Cash Flow Projection of DSM FY05 Forecast DSM Analysis 2007 2008 Base Revenue Reduction $12,000,000 $16,000,000 Fuel Revenue Reduction $13,000,000 $15,000,000 Customer Savings (Bill Reduction) $25,000,000 $31,000,000

Cash Flow Projection of DSM

Cost-Effectiveness Tests (Benefits $ / Costs $ > 1) The Participant Test = NPV of Savings on electric bill + financial rebate Customer’s additional cost incurred to participate The Utility Test = NPV of Avoided (fuel + power plant operating & maintenance + capacity cost) DSM program administrative cost + financial rebates Ratepayer Test = NPV of DSM program administrative cost + financial rebates + revenue losses The Total Resource Test = NPV of Avoided ( fuel + power plant operating & maintenance + capacity cost) DSM administrative cost + Customer’s additional cost incurred

                                      Thank You!!!