The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Summer Institute, May16,  Peer review process that evaluates educational programs and services for quality.  Transferability of credit hours.
Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
- Overview- Program Review and SLOs Preparing to Write the Self-Study Why? What? How? For more SLO resources see:
DEBRA G. KLINMAN, PH.D. ELLIE A. FOGARTY, ED.D. VICE PRESIDENTS, MSCHE Tips, Strategies, and Best Practices for Team Chairs.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
What is Middle States, Anyway? Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated by Joe Marchetti, Gene.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The Middle States Accreditation and Review Process & the ESC Self-Study Center for Distance Learning Craig Lamb – Director of Academic Support Val Chukhlomin.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
FACULTY RETREAT MAY 22, H ISTORY 2006 Middle States Self-Study Reviewer’s Report Recommendations: The institution is advised that General Education.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
Working Group Training Compiling Evidence for a Successful Chapter LaMont Rouse, Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
CCC: Where Teaching and Learning Transform Lives, Putting Together the Self- Study Puzzle Corning Community College August 24, 2012.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
NSE Assessment Overview: Your Role in Outcomes-Based Assessment What Will We Learn About Our Students?
Self-Study Report in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Final Discussion and Approval Academic Senate Executive Committee June 13 and 20, 2011.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Accreditation Who? Regional Accrediting Agency: NWCCU (Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities). What? Self-study followed by on-campus.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
Preparing Your Self Study
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
A STUDENT’S GUIDE ACCREDITATION WHAT IS ACCREDITATION? The process by which a college is certified by a regional accrediting agency, such as the.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Assessment at City Tech April 17, 2015 Living Lab Associate Seminar Susan Nilsen-Kupsch RDH MPA.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
The NJIT Accreditation Process: Launching the Middle States Commission on Higher Education Self Study Presentation to Committee on Academic Affairs September.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
TRCC TAP Course Vetting: What we have learned so far
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
WASC Self Study: A First Look
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
UPRM Self-Study for MSCHE
Curriculum Committee Report
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance

Goals of the Presentation Provide an overview of the Self- Study process Discuss the time lines of the self- study The role of faculty during the self- study process.

Middle States MSCHE is Cedar Crest’s accrediting body. Cedar Crest has been a member of MSCHE since the 1940s. MSCHE covers accredited institutions from New York to D.C. (along with Puerto Rico and other location)

Middle States MSCHE requires a self-study decennial review The review is based on the 14 Standards of Excellence Cedar Crest must demonstrate compliance with these 14 standards. MSCHE has openly talked about “raising the bar” when it comes to judging compliance with the standards.

Goals of the Self-Study Process To demonstrate compliance with Middle State’s Standards of Excellence To provide a process whereby Cedar Crest can make recommendations for improvement To determine how to improve enrollment through new markets and educational offerings

End of Part I

Cedar Crest Self-Study Team Steering Committee Janet Baker Kathleen Boland Gaetan Giannini Christine Nowik Jenny Weatherford

Cedar Crest Self-Study Team Six Working Groups WG1: Institutional Stewardship WG2: Integrity, Governance & Administration WG3: Student Admissions & Support WG4: Faculty WG5: Educational Offerings WG6: Assessment

Cedar Crest Self-Study Team Tasks of the Working Groups Develop questions related to the Standards of Excellence Answer the questions Use the answers to write a chapter based on the evidence All chapters will be merged to create the self-study report The final report will be approximately 100 pages. I anticipate hundreds of pages in supporting documents.

The Self-Study Time Line Fall 2012: Working groups will seek to gather evidence in order to answer the research questions Spring 2013: Working groups submit their draft chapter to the steering committee -- The steering committee then produces the self-study report The End of Phase I

The Self-Study Time Line Public Phase Fall 2013: Campus reviews the document and suggests changes and modifications. -- CCC sends the draft report to evaluation team chair (S/he may also make suggestions and changes) -- Team chair makes a preliminary visit

The Self-Study Time Line Team Visit Phase Spring 2014: There is a team visit -- A preliminary report will be issued -- There is an institutional response Summer 2014: Middle States meets and acts

End of Part II

The Role of Faculty MSCHE views faculty as vital to the assessment of student learning. MSCHE also wants to see evidence of shared governance MSCHE wants institutions to define and measure teaching effectiveness

The Role of Faculty Faculty maintain the ongoing assessment cycle -- Faculty will play an important role in periodic program review cycle -- Cedar Crest must gather clear and compelling evidence that students are learning.

The Role of The Program Level -- Actively participate in your periodic program review process. Affirming the degree’s mission statement (Ensure the degree is aligned to the College’s mission statement) Affirming (achieving consensus on) the primary student learning outcomes (only need 4 to 6) Affirming the curriculum map Ensuring that all courses are aligned to the SLOs of the program (and these are explicitly stated in all course syllabi)

The Role of The Course Level -- Ensure that all courses are aligned to the program -- Ensure that the syllabus has explicitly stated student learning outcomes -- Ensure that major measuring units (exams, written works, creative works, etc) are closely aligned to an SLO in the course -- Gather direct evidence of student learning (keep samples of student works) -- I encourage the use of rubrics as a tool -- Save blank copies of sample exams

The Role of Faculty The Course & Gen Ed -- MSCHE wants clear and compelling evidence that students can do the following 1.Write effectively 2.Efficient oral communication skills 3.Critical thinking skills 4.Quantitative reasoning skills 5.Information literacy -- Please help the Office of Assessment where possible by using these rubrics on certain projects.

The Role of Faculty Cedar Crest’s Broad Principles -- Seek alignment with the Broad Principles where possible… 1 Civic Engagement 2. Global Connectivity 3. Health and Wellness 4. Women’s Leadership

The Role of Faculty Specific Tasks -- Participate on some level I can’t successfully complete this process if you are sitting on the sidelines. -- Engage the process Be active members in the strengthening of your major. -- Help Gather Evidence I ask that each faculty member participate in at least one GE skills study per semester. Of course, you can always do more (and I’ll buy you lunch!)