Storm-time total electron content and its response to penetration electric fields over South America P. M. de Siqueira, E. R. de Paula, M. T. A. H. Muella,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

17-21 November 2008ESWW51 SWWT Ionospheric Effects Topical Group Agenda –The Low-latitude Ionospheric Sensor Network (LISN): The First Distributed Observatory.

Advertisements

University of Bath 4D ionisation dynamics during storms of the recent solar maximum Cathryn Mitchell, Ping Yin, Paul Spencer and Dmitriy Pokhotelov, University.

Can we use total field magnetics to find buried pit houses beneath layers of volcanic ash? Visible pit houses at Bridge River, B.C. (Prentiss et al., 2009)

Introduction to the Ionosphere

The day-to-day longitudinal variability of the global ionospheric density distribution: Preliminary results E.E. Pacheco and E. Yizengaw Institute for.

Ionosphere Climate Studied by F3 / COSMIC Constellation C. H. Liu Academia Sinica In Collaboration with Tulasi Ram, C.H. Lin and S.Y. Su.

Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.

CISM All-hands Meeting Boulder, CO Sept CMIT Simulations of the Initial Phase of Geomagnetic Storms Wenbin Wang, Jiuhou Lei, Alan Burns, Stan.

LONGITUDINAL DIFFERENCES IN THE EQUATORIAL SPREAD F CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN VIETNAM AND BRAZIL Hoang Thai Lan, Abdu M. A, MacDougall J. W, Batista I.

I. U. Observatorio del Ebro, Universitat Ramon Llull Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusets Lowell IRI/COST 296 WORKSHOP; July.

J C Foster MIT Haystack Observatory Yosemite 2002 Plasma Tails & Ionospheric SED.

“EQUATORIAL TEC OVER SOUTH AMERICAN SECTOR WITH DIFFERENT MAGNETIC DECLINATION ANGLES” P. A. B. Nogueira *1, M. A. Abdu 1, J. R. Souza 1, I. S. Batista.

Sudden Stratospheric Warming Effects M.V. Klimenko, V.V. Klimenko, F.S. Bessarab, Yu.N. Koren’kov WD Pushkov IZMIRAN, RAS, Kaliningrad, Russia, WD Pushkov.

Space weather phenomena in the ionosphere and their effect on GNSS (Presented by Japan) IPXX ICAO ISTF/4 New Delhi, India, 5th to 7th February 2014 SUMMARY.

Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.

LISN Model/Data Inversion to Determine the Drivers of the Low-Latitude Ionosphere (Comparisons with JRO ISR Drift Measurements) Vince Eccles (Modeling)

Space Weather Workshop, Boulder, CO, April 2013 No. 1 Ionospheric plasma irregularities at high latitudes as observed by CHAMP Hermann Lühr and.

Ionospheric Electric Field Variations during Geomagnetic Storms Simulated using CMIT W. Wang 1, A. D. Richmond 1, J. Lei 1, A. G. Burns 1, M. Wiltberger.

SCHOOL OF PHYSICS Space Weather in the Equatorial Ionosphere Robert Stening School of Physics, University of New South Wales Acknowledge help from Dr J.

11.1 Magnetic Dipole Field Magnetic Dipole Field (2) B 

V. M. Sorokin, V.M. Chmyrev, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa Strong DC electric field formation in the ionosphere over typhoon and earthquake regions V.

Low-latitude Ionospheric Sensor Network (LISN) C. E. Valladares, Boston College V. Eccles, Space Environment Corporation E. Kudeki, University of Illinois.

Solar wind-magnetosphere- atmosphere coupling: effects of magnetic storms and substorms in atmospheric electric field variations Kleimenova N., Kozyreva.

THE INDIAN OCEAN DIPOLE AND THE SOUTH AMERICAN MONSOON SYSTEM Anita Drumond and Tércio Ambrizzi University of São Paulo São Paulo, 2007

Determining the Sharp, Longitudinal Gradients in Equatorial ExB Drift Velocities Associated with the 4-cell, Non-migrating Structures David Anderson and.

Nighttime 4-peak Longitudinal Structure of Ionospheric Plasma Density at Mid-Low latitudes During High and Extreme.

Effects of ionospheric small- scale structures on GNSS G. WAUTELET Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Ionospheric Radio Systems & Techniques (IRST)

Magnetospheric ULF wave activity monitoring based on the ULF-index OLGA KOZYREVA and N. Kleimenova Institute of the Earth Physics, RAS.

J. M. Forbes, E. K. Sutton, R. S. Nerem Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA Sean Bruinsma, CNES.

Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.

Initial Measurements of O-ion and He-ion Decay Rates Observed from the Van Allen Probes RBSPICE Instrument Andrew Gerrard, Louis Lanzerotti et al. Center.

MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.

Large electric fields near the nightside plasmapause observed by the Polar spacecraft K.-H. Kim 1, F. Mozer 2, and D.-H. Lee 1 1 Department of Astronomy.

Mapping high-latitude TEC fluctuations using GNSS I.I. SHAGIMURATOV (1), A. KRANKOWSKI (2), R. SIERADZKI (2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA (1,2), Yu.V. CHERNIAK (1),

CEDAR 2008 Workshop Observations at the Plasmaspheric Boundary Layer with the Mid-latitude SuperDARN radars Mike Ruohoniemi, Ray Greenwald, and Jo Baker.

The observations of TEC night-time enhancement in equatorial anomaly region Chen Yanhong Ma Guanyi Center for Space science and Applied Research,Chinese.

WG3 “Ionospheric Storms” Summary Report

Ionospheric irregularities observed with a GPS network in Japan TOHRU ARAMAKI[1],Yuichi Otsuka[1],Tadahiko Ogawa[1],Akinori Saito[2] and Takuya Tsugawa[2]

May 23, :45ISEA, Crete, Greece. S10 Ionospheric storms and space weather effects Penetration Characteristics of the Interplanetary Electric Field.

Space Science MO&DA Programs - November Page 1 SS It is well known that intense auroral disturbances occur in association with substorms and are.

ABSTRACT Disturbances in the magnetosphere caused by the input of energy from the solar wind enhance the magnetospheric currents and it carries a variation.

COSMIC Ionospheric measurements Jiuhou Lei NCAR ASP/HAO Research review, Boulder, March 8, 2007.

Characteristics and source of the electron density irregularities in the Earth’s ionosphere Hyosub Kil Johns Hopkins University / Applied Physics Laboratory.

Effects of January 2010 stratospheric sudden warming in the low-latitude ionosphere L. Goncharenko, A. Coster, W. Rideout, MIT Haystack Observatory, USA.

Statistical Characterization of sub-auroral polarization stream using using large scale observations by mid- latitude SuperDARN radars B. S. R. Kunduri.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SPACE RESEARCH – INPE/MCT SOUTHERN REGIONAL SPACE RESEARCH CENTER – CRS/CCR/INPE – MCT FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA MARIA - UFSM.

VT SuperDARN Group Joseph Baker Ground-Based Observations of the Plasmapause Boundary Layer (PBL) Region with.

Impact of midnight thermosphere dynamics on the equatorial ionospheric vertical drifts Tzu-Wei Fang 1,2 R. Akmaev 2, R. Stoneback 3, T. Fuller-Rowell 1,2,

pre-reversal enhancement of the evening vertical plasma drifts

LISN observations over the American continent

Space weather phenomena in the ionosphere and their effect on GNSS

Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances

1st VarSITI General Symposium 6-11 June 2016 Albena, Bulgaria

Welcome to Equatorial-PRIMO

Ionospheric Science and Space Weather

Disturbance Dynamo Effects in the Low Latitude Ionosphere

Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances

Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel MD, USA

Ionospheric fluctuations structure during strong geomagnetic storm by incoherent scatter radar and GPS data Yu.V. CHERNIAK(1), I.I. SHAGIMURATOV(1), A.

Penetration of Magnetospheric Electric Fields to the Equator and their Effects on Low Latitude Ionosphere during Intense Geomagnetic Storms B. Veenadhari1,

Mpho Tshisaphungo, Lee-Anne McKinnell and John Bosco Habarulema

Comprehensive analysis of the Geoeffective Solar Event of June 21, 2015: Effects on the Magnetosphere, Plasmasphere and Ionosphere Systems - part 2. Piersanti.

Charles Lin1, Jia-Ting Lin1, Loren Chang2, Yang-Yi Sun2

An overview of the ionospheric research at INPE, Brazil

Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2

Ionospheric Scintilatiton and TEC maps

Subauroral heliosphere-geosphere coupling during November 2004 ionospheric storms: F2-region, North-East Asia Chelpanov M. A., Zolotukhina N.A. Institute.

The Ionosphere Equatorial Anomaly.

A. Ippolito(1), C. Cesaroni(1) and L. Spogli(1,2)

Added-Value Users of ACE Real Time Solar Wind (RTSW) Data

Presentation transcript:

Storm-time total electron content and its response to penetration electric fields over South America P. M. de Siqueira, E. R. de Paula, M. T. A. H. Muella, C. M. Paulo, L. C. Viera 09/11/2011

Introduction We present the response of the ionosphere due to the severe magnetic storm of 7–10 November GPS Total Electron Content (TEC) maps of South America region were analyzed. Ionospheric vertical drift data obtained from Jicamarca ISR are used in the analysis in order to verify the disturbed zonal electric fields during the superstorm. The vertical drifts were also inferred from H magnetometer data (Jicamarca-Piura) following the methodology presented by Anderson et al. (2004).

Introduction Penetration electric fields were observed by comparing the equatorial vertical drifts and the Interplanetary Electric Field (IEF). TEC maps reveal unexpected plasma distributions and TEC levels during the main phase of the superstorm on 7 November. The results also reveal well known characteristics of the plasma distributions on 8, 9, and 10 November. The emphasized features are the expansion and intensification of EIA due to prompt penetration electric fields on November 9 and the inhibition of EIA during post- sunset hours on November 7, 8, and 10.

General Scenario of the Superstorm First increase in Sym-H: around 12 UT on Nov. 07. Minimum Sym-H: -394 nT on Nov. 08, 05:55UT.

TEC responses on November 07, 2004.

Black line (third panel) is referred to modeled vertical drifts (using H Jicamarca- Piura data in a neural network). Vertical drifts are smaller compared to quiet time before 15 UT and before the SSC. Jicamarca: LT = UT – 5 hours

Jicamarca: LT = UT – 5 hours Prompt Penetration Electric Field (PPEF) event occurs from 15 to 17 UT. Vertical drifts are negative from 17 to 18 UT. SSC occurs around 18:30 UT. Pre-reversal enhancement (PRE) is present (dh’F/dt from Jicamarca digisonde). Daytime negative vertical drifts (DD)

TEC maps  denotes the geographic positions of GPS receptors. Nov. 06 is the quiet time reference. Top: 16:00 UT (13 LT at Brazil) Bottom: 16:30 UT (13:30 LT). Higher TEC absolute values on Nov. 07 after the PPEF event. No significant differences. Nov. 06 Nov. 07

Nov. 06 (19 LT Brazil) Nov. 07 (19 LT Brazil) During PRE hours (after sunset). Smaller TEC on Nov. 07 at 19 LT (Brazil) EIA crests are diminished.

Nov. 06 (20 LT Brazil) Nov. 07 (20 LT Brazil) EIA is developed on Nov. 06 at 20 LT (quiet time reference). EIA disappears on Nov. 07 from 20 LT on (even though the occurrence of PRE). This is probably due to the smaller vertical drifts on Nov. 07 during daytime (being negative in some hours).

TEC responses on November 08, 2004.

Flat IEF Ey (IMF Bz near zero during this period). Daytime vertical drifts near zero during daytime (sometimes negative). Second panel: green line is referred to sunset hours denoting a weak PRE (~20m/s). These vertical drifts reflect the action of disturbance dynamo fields. Jicamarca: LT = UT – 5 hours Daytime drifts

Nov. 06 (12 LT Brazil) Nov. 08 (12 LT Brazil) Nov. 06 – quiet time reference. TEC enhancement confined to the geomagnetic equator and magnetic low- latitude. Typical effect of disturbance dynamo electric fields.

Nov. 06 (18:30 LT Brazil) Nov. 08 (18:30 LT Brazil) EIA starting to develop at 18:30 LT (Brazil) on Nov. 06. EIA absent on Nov. 08 and TEC enhancement prevails over the geomagnetic equator.

Nov. 06 (19:30 LT Brazil) Nov. 08 (19:30 LT Brazil) EIA developed at 19:30 LT (Brazil) on Nov. 06. EIA also developed on Nov. 08 (19:30 LT Brazil). The weak PRE occurred on Nov. 08 was efficient to develop EIA after 19:30 LT.

TEC responses on November 09-10, 2004.

Second Panel: green line is referred to vertical drifts measured at Jicamarca ISR. Great PPEF event occurs on Nov. 09, from ~19:30 UT to 21 UT (vertical drifts reach ~120m/s) during a recurrent and very intense magnetic storm. Jicamarca: LT = UT – 5 hours

Vertical drifts quite disturbed on Nov. 10 (nighttime). Daytime vertical drifts (after 12 UT on Nov. 10) present a partial recovery to quiet time patterns. Absence of PRE on Nov. 10. Jicamarca: LT = UT – 5 hours nighttime Nov. 09Nov. 10

Nov. 06 (12 LT Brazil) Nov. 09 (12 LT Brazil) TEC strongly increased on Nov. 09 (12 LT). No significant PPEF is identified at this time.

Nov. 06 (17 LT Brazil) Nov. 09 (17 LT Brazil) TEC strongly increased on Nov. 09 (17 LT). At this time occurs the strong PPEF event.

Nov. 06 (18 LT Brazil) Nov. 09 (18 LT Brazil) Anomalous development of EIA due to the PPEF. Intensified crests displaced to higher latitudes.

Nov. 06 (18:30 LT Brazil) Nov. 09 (18:30 LT Brazil) Anomalous development of EIA due to the PPEF.

Nov. 06 (20 LT Brazil) Nov. 09 (20 LT Brazil) Anomalous development of EIA due to the PPEF prevails until the end of Nov. 09. And on Nov

Nov. 06 (13 LT Brazil) Nov. 10 (13 LT Brazil) Anomalous TEC distribution on Nov. 10 (during partial recovery of vertical drifts). Negative phase of ionospheric storm is observed at mid-latitudes. Distribution of ionization is related to the decrease of O/N 2 ratio at mid-latitudes.

Nov. 06 (19 LT Brazil) Nov. 10 (19 LT Brazil) Negative phase of ionospheric storm is still observed at mid-latitudes. This result prevailed during the whole day.

Composition changes add to electrodynamics forcing. Nov. 08: Expansion at high latitudes causes decreasing in the O/N 2 ratio resulting in TEC decreases at high to mid-latitudes. Nov. 10: Decrease of O/N 2 ratio over mid-latitudes at South America region causing TEC decreases at this region. From Mannucci et al (JGR)

Final remarks EIA is inhibited on Nov. 07 even though the occurrence of PRE then it is probably due to the disturbed daytime vertical drifts (smaller compared to quiet time). Storm time TEC responses are well known on: – Nov. 08 (denoted by disturbance dynamo patterns), – Nov. 09 (denoted by strongly developed EIA due to PPEF), – Nov. 10 (denoted by the late negative phase of ionospheric storms over mid-latitudes). LISN added to RBMC (IBGE/Brazil) GPS receptors provide a good distribution over South America which is extremely important for this type of research at this region characterized by the SAMA and large declination differences.