Self-Organizing Hierarchical Routing for Scalable Ad Hoc Networking David B. Johnson Department of Computer Science Rice University Monarch Project

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Introduction Safari project goals: Self-organizing, adaptive network hierarchy Scalable ad hoc network routing (10s of thousands of nodes) Self-organizing higher layer network services and applications Integrated with Internet infrastructure where it exists Safari leverages and tightly integrates two areas of research: Ad hoc networking Peer-to-peer networking Builds an adaptive, proximity-based hierarchy of cells and leverages this for scalable routing and higher layer services Funded by NSF Special Projects in Networking Research (January 2004)

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Safari Hierarchy Self-Organization All nodes are equivalent – no specialized nodes assumed:

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Safari Hierarchy Self-Organization Nodes self-elect to become a buoy:

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Safari Hierarchy Self-Organization Buoy nodes send limited propagation beacon floods:

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Safari Hierarchy Self-Organization Other nodes associate with a buoy to form cells:

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Safari Hierarchy Self-Organization Buoys at one level self-elect to become buoy at next higher level:

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Safari Hierarchy Self-Organization Forming cells at each higher level too:

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Simulation Example

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Safari Coordinates A node’s coordinates = associated cell id at each hierarchy level a d c b e A C B A.b A.a A.c A.d A.e

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Safari Routing Overview Destination node coordinates: Stored and looked up in Distributed Hash Table (DHT) using embedded peer-to-peer system Hybrid routing protocol components: Route to destination cell following beacons (proactive routing) Incremental local repair in this path (reactive routing) Route to destination node within final cell (reactive routing) Routing table at a node: Remembers information from beacons received: –Coordinates of buoy sending beacon –Previous hop node from which beacon received –Hop count back to the buoy –Sequence number of most recent beacon from that buoy

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Proactive Inter-cell Routing Range of beacons from a buoy node: Nodes in the cell associated with that buoy Nodes a few hops away, giving them a chance to join that cell Nodes in the containing cell one level up in the hierarchy Routing table lookup algorithm: Nodes outside the cell hear the beacons: –Reasons described above –Wireless propagation allows nearby nodes to hear too Longest common prefix matching (similar to Internet !) : –Compare your own coordinates to each entry in routing table –As soon as packet comes to node with more detailed table entry, packet starts following lower in routing hierarchy Packets are routed toward buoys, not through buoys!

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Routing Example Source node S is sending a packet to destination node D: S D

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Routing Example Follow beacon path toward level 3 cell in which D is located: S D

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Routing Example Follow beacon path toward level 2 cell in which D is located: S D

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Routing Example Follow beacon path toward level 1 cell in which D is located: S D

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Reactive Intra-cell Routing Dynamic Source Routing protocol (DSR): Discovers routes only as needed, on demand (Route Discovery) Detects when links being used for routing are broken, on demand only as they are used (Route Maintenance) Very low overhead, scalable to mobility and traffic needs Zero overhead until new route is needed Using DSR in Safari routing: DSR originally designed for small or medium sized networks Safari intended to scale to much larger sizes Safari uses DSR only within destination fundamental cell Size of fundamental cells created by Safari balance two things: –Small enough for very easy efficient reactive routing –Large enough to minimize when nodes move to new cells

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Routing Example On-demand DSR routing to destination node D: S D

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Reactive Inter-cell Route Repair Beacons are sent only periodically: Long interval between beacons important for low overhead The higher the level in hierarchy, the less frequent the beacon Following beacon reverse path may fail if nodes have moved Safari local route repair in the beacon paths: Limited-hop on-demand Route Discovery Flood flows “downhill” with limited “uphill” allowed “Altitude” is  prefix length matched, sequence #, hop count  Result reestablishes new path as if original beacon path Buoy node Increasing “altitude” with hops away from buoy A node has moved away from buoy

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Simulation Evaluation Simulated using ns-2, includes detailed physical model IEEE at 2 Mbps, nominal range 250 m Studied scale from 50 to 1000 nodes: –Randomly distributed in space –Density maintained equivalent to 50 nodes in 1000  1000 m Studied percentage of nodes being mobile from 0% to 100% –Moving with Random Waypoint model, average 5 m/s Data traffic is Constant Bit Rate (CBR): –Flows with randomly chosen source and destination –4 packets/second, 64 bytes/packet Metrics shown: –Packet Delivery Ratio: percentage of packets delivered –Overhead: individual transmissions of routing packets

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari PDR vs. Number of Nodes

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari PDR vs. Percentage of Mobile Nodes (1000 nodes total)

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Overhead vs. Number of Nodes

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Overhead vs. Percentage of Mobile Nodes (1000 nodes total)

Mo bile N etworking Arch itecturesDavid B. JohnsonRice UniversityMonarch Project Safari Conclusion Safari is highly scalable and provides a basis for services: Forms an adaptive, proximity-based hierarchy of cells PDR and routing overhead change little with scale or mobility Performance studied through both simulation and analysis Ongoing and future work: Further optimization and evaluation of beaconing, cell membership, routing, local repair Interconnection to traditional Internet infrastructure Higher layer services exploiting the hierarchy and P2P Testbed and experimentation