Reaching a Verdict Persuading a Jury

Answer as many of the following statements as you can…. In Britain we have an adversarial court system, this is where…. Prior to 1215 Britain used something called…… In France they have an inquisitorial court system, this is where… At what age are you eligible to be a member of a jury? Who is not eligible for jury service? What training do jurors receive? Why are some jurors challenged “for cause” by either the prosecution or defence? What happens if this challenge is upheld? In the USA, jury selection involves voire dire explain what this entails?

Reaching a Verdict Here we will be looking at: Persuading a jury Witness appeal Reaching a verdict

Persuading a Jury: Effect of order of testimony

Persuading a Jury: Effect of order of testimony It is the job of the prosecution to persuade a jury that a defendant is guilty and the defence to persuade that the defendant is not guilty. However, many other factors may influence this: Murdoch (1962) in a lab study using word lists discovered an effect known as the ‘primacy effect’, where words at the beginning of a list were more likely to be recalled. What does this suggest in terms of the courtroom? ‘Glanzer & Cunitz’ (1966) presented two groups of participants with the same list of words and got one group to recall immediately and the other to have their recall disrupted by counting backwards. The first group showed better recall of the words at the end of the list, whereas the disrupted group lost the benefit of the recency effect. What does this suggest in terms of the courtroom? Knowing about the primary/recency effect how might that effect how a case is structured?

It is important to look at how cases are structured. Should they present their case in story order (chronological order), or should they present it in witness order (evidence arranged in the order closest to trial – best witnesses first and last). Pennington and Hastie suggest that story order is best.

Persuading a Jury: Persuasion

From the research by Loftus et al we know that eye witness testimony is unreliable. Why? * What is used in light of this in the courtroom?

Persuasion Expert witnesses are widely used in criminal trials to add scientific credence to evidence. Psychologists such as Loftus are often called as expert witnesses for the defence to warn jurors of the possible problems with eye witness testimony. However, research has shown the jurors disregard these warnings and still believe eye witness accounts. Why?

Persuading a Jury: Effect of Inadmissible Evidence

Read the booklet on Effects of evidence being ruled inadmissible and complete the chart below. How evidence is used in the UK and USA UKUSA

Effect of evidence being rules inadmissible The law says that in order for evidence to be admissible in court, its relevance must outweigh its potential for prejudice. Inadmissible evidence includes past convictions and evidence obtained by illegal means. If inadmissible evidence is presented in error by a witness, the judge will direct the jury to disregard what they have just heard. However, by drawing attention to it, it may be that the jury in fact pays even more attention to it. This is called reactance theory. The jurors feel undermined in their freedom to take into account all evidence. This is also known as the back fire effect. The consequence is the backfire effect.

Evaluation of persuading a jury Sample & Generalisibility: P & H Loftus Pickel et al

Evaluation of persuading a jury Methods All three studies used a Lab experiment and self-reports (likert scale or questionnaire). Advantages of using a Lab experiment (relate to studies): P & H Loftus et al Pickel et al

Evaluation of persuading a jury Methods Disadvantages of using a lab experiment (relate to studies): P & H Loftus et al Pickel et al

Evaluation Issues ETHICS P & H Loftus et al Pickel et al

Evaluation Issues Internal validity P & H Loftus et al Pickel et al Ecological Validity P & H Loftus et al Pickel et al

Self-reports Advantages of self-reports: P & H Loftus et al Pickel et al Disadvantages of self-reports: P & H Loftus et al Pickel et al

What implications do these studies have on persuading a jury? P & H Loftus et al Pickel et al