What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I) A N INTRODUCTION TO P OLICY D EBATE - The Minnesota Urban Debate League -
Advertisements

POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Cross Examination (CX) Debate
The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.
The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.
THE COIN TOSS Prior to each round the teams will flip a coin. The team winning the coin toss may choose either Side of Topic: Pro or Con or Order of Speaking:
Lincoln-Douglas Debate
+ Debate Basics. + DEBATE A debate is a formal argument in which two opposing teams propose or attack a given proposition or motion in a series of speeches.
 Debating the Case Mikaela Malsin, Univ. of Georgia DUDA 2012
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Debate I: Basics & Formats
Introduction to Debate -Affirmative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L.
What Is Debate? Components and Process of a Debate.
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
Debate Terminology Words every debater needs to know!
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Debate Tournaments.  Competitive High School Debate involves preparing for, and attending Tournaments, where you will debate against teams from other.
And other things… DISADVANTAGES. BUT FIRST, LETS REVIEW FOR THE QUIZ The quiz on Wednesday will be open note and will cover the two primary topics and.
Building Opposition Cases In Parliamentary Debate
Three Different Debates Cross Examination or Policy (team) Focus is on depth of research, 1 topic/ year, governmental policy. Topic : Resolved:
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
Debate A contest of argumentation.. Argument A reason to support your side of the debate.
LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE
Week 1. Q. From where did LD debate come? Q. Where policy debate involves federal policy, what does LD involve? Q. LD involves which civilization?
Lincoln - Douglas Debate. History… Abraham Lincoln Vs Stephen Douglas Topic: – Slavery Douglas: Citizens should decide for themselves Honest Abe: Slavery.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
Stoa Speech and Debate Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Judge Orientation.
Getting Started in CX Debate Julian Erdmann. What is CX debate? Team debate made up by two students from the same school. They will defend either Affirmative.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
AN INTRODUCTION COMPETITION DEBATES. DEBATE Debate is essentially the art of arguing a point, policy or proposition of value. When participating in a.
Introduction to Policy Debate The Forensics Files.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
Team Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Judy Kahalas for The Writing Center Roxbury Community College
Debate Ch. 18 Group One.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
The Structure of a Debate Constructive Speeches 1AC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 2NC: 3 Minutes 1NC: 8 Minutes Cross-Examined by 1AC: 3 Minutes 2AC: 8.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate. Resolutions: The resolution is a statement with which one contestant must agree (affirm) and the other contestant must disagree.
Beginning Policy Debate: I ain’t scared ! NSDA Nationals 2014 Jane Boyd Grapevine HS, TEXAS.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Basic Structure of a Round. a) Before the Round Pre-flowed arguments.
Chapter 16,17,18 Negative Terms. Debate Terms-Negative Must directly clash with the affirmative Must directly clash with the affirmative Negative wins.
Affirmative vs. negative
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Introduction to the Negative
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
Types of Debate Lincoln/Douglas Public Forum Policy
8th Annual Great Corporate Debate
Basics of Debate Damien Debate.
Debate I: Basics & Formats
Team Policy Debate Orientation
How to be negative Gabi Yamout.
Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Debate: The Basics.
Debate What is Debate?.
POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.
DEBATE AC ELA.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I)
Getting To Know Debate:
DEBATE AC ELA.
Presentation transcript:

What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…

How do we define debate? Debate is:  An academic game  You need to know the rules  A rhetorical contest  Communication is essential  A strategic contest  The best placed argument and/or evidence will often rule the day…

Our two flavors of Debate  Policy Debate:  Comparison of policy systems  two-on-two debate  affirmative or negative position based on a set resolution  focus on research, policy analysis, and point-by-point refutation

Lincoln-Douglas Debate  Comparison of value systems  one-on-one debate  focus on persuasion, logic, spontaneous analysis…  the “big idea” debate

Policy Debate Structure  1AC - 8 minutes  C-X - 3 minutes (2N asks, 1A answers)  1NC - 8 minutes  C-X - 3 minutes (1A asks, 1N answers)  2AC - 8 minutes  C-X - 3 minutes (1N asks, 2A answers)  2NC – 8 minutes  C-X - 3 minutes (2A asks, 2N answers)  1NR - 5 minutes  1AR - 5 minutes  2NR - 5 minutes  2AR - 5 minutes

Lincoln-Douglas Structure AC - 6 minutes C-X - 3 minutes NC - 7 minutes C-X - 3 minutes 1AR - 4 minutes NR - 6 minutes 2AR - 3 minutes

Policy Debate Topics Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase its legal protection of economic migrants in the United States; Or Resolved : The United States Federal Government should guarantee universal health care for its citizens..

Initial Affirmative Burden  It is the obligation of the affirmative to define the terms in the resolution…  Common sense definitions will work, but official defs are best.

The Affirmative Burden Establish a Prima Facie case: Need: Establish a SIGNIFICANT reason to adopt the resolution.  Clearly point out the need for a new system…  Establish an INHERENT barrier to the adoption of the resolution…what the status quo cannot meet. Plan: Provide a WORKABLE alternative to the present system. Benefits: provide a plan that is free from relative DISADVANTAGES…and produces obvious and significant benefits.

1AC & 2AC Responsibilities 1AC:  State your team’s support for the resolution  Define key terms  Establish the Need to adopt the resolution 2AC:  Reaffirm support for the Resolution  Outline the Affirmative Team’s Plan  State the Benefits of the Aff. Plan  Allot time to rebut 1NC arguments against 1AC

Obligations of the Negative  Goal: To counter the Affirmative’s Prima Facie case…  The Affirmative lacks SIGNIFICANCE, or  The Affirmative lacks INHERENCY, or  The Affirmative plan is not WORKABLE, or  The Affirmative plan contains SIGNIFICANT disadvantages.  The Negative Team must be prepared to defend the Status Quo.  The SQ doesn’t have to be perfect, and minor “repairs” are allowed

First Negative Constructive 1NC  Time allotted: 8 minutes  The First Negative Constructive (1NC) is used to make specific arguments against the Affirmative case.  These are called Case Arguments  Focus on:  Disadvantages - Critiques (inherent flaws)  Topicality - Counter-plan  1NC needs to raise doubts in the judge’s mind that the Affirmative team has me (or is meeting) their burden)

2NC Responsibilities 2NC:  Reaffirm 1NC position that the Aff. has not bet the Burden of Proof  Rebut 2AC Plan and Benefits  If time, circle back and support 1AC Case Arguments

Cross Examination Goals of Cross-Ex:  Expose contradictions  Do not allow for extended responses  Paraphrase responses to help set the trap  Break the Causal Chain  If you remove an argument from A+B+C = D, then the argument is not valid  Expose gaps in evidence and claims.  Identify missing refutations  A good tactic for pointing out to the judge that your opponent has not proved your case unworthy

Don’t forget the Zen…  Be courteous  Use your opponent’s name  Don’t lose your cool  Respond to questions briefly and to the point. Don’t ramble…  Stay focused