Pre-Launch Testing of NGSLR Ranging to LRO Anthony Mallama Jan McGarry Tom Zagwodzki Jack Cheek Christopher Clarke All at NASA/GSFC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
Advertisements

RICS Simulations for two photon excitation. Opening page of GLOBALS for Images program: Click on the SimFCS buttom.
Chromatic Dispersion Measurement methods  Pulse Delay Method (time-of-flight) ‏ IEC / ITU-T G650.1 EIA/TIA-455- FOTP-175-B  Phase Shift Method.
Introduction to SPICE Jose Luis Vázquez European Space Astronomy Centre European Space Agency.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF The SPICE system has been developed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Non-Toolkit Applications April 2012.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is the first mission in NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, a plan to return to the moon and then to travel to.
Laser Ranging to the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO): a Global Network Effort Jan McGarry, Tom Zagwodzki, Ron Zellar, Carey Noll, Greg Neumann NASA.
1 SLR Data Automatic Preprocessing BeiJing SLR Station Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping DING Jian QU Feng WEI Zhibin.
Summary: Scientific Achievement, Applications and Future Requirements Zueheir Altamimi Steve Klosko Richard Gross Aleksander Brzezinski.
School of Earth and Space Exploration Existing Lunar Datasets M. S. Robinson School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University.
A SINGLE FREQUENCY GPS SOFTWARE RECEIVER
SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.
16 th International Laser Ranging Workshop, Poznan Poland, Oct. 14 th, 2008 Laser Ranging (LR)-Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Data Flow and Scheduling.
Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,
14 October th International Workshop on Laser Ranging 1 LRO Operations at the MLRS Jerry R. Wiant Randall L. Ricklefs Peter J. Shelus Center for.
NGSLR: Sharing Eye-safe Kilohertz SLR with Transponder Ranging Jan McGarry, Tom Zagwodzki NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Tom Varghese, Cybioms John Degnan,
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Shape Model Subsystem Preview (DSK) November 2014.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
UNDERSTANDING LIDAR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING LIDAR is a remote sensing technique that can measure the distance to objects on and above the ground surface.
Poster Design & Printing by Genigraphics ® NASA’s Next Generation Satellite Laser Ranging System (NGSLR) is an autonomous, photon- counting.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Time Conversion and Formats June 2004.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Leapseconds and Spacecraft Clock Kernels LSK and SCLK November 2014.
Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Planning for the Mapping and Exploration of Human.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF SPICE Geometry Finder (GF) Subsystem Searching for times when specified geometric conditions occur November.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Polar Topographic Knowledge Prior to LCROSS Impact David E. Smith 1, Maria T. Zuber 2 1 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Laser Ranging Technique for ASTROD I Mission
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
LLR/Interplanetary Session Summary Jürgen Müller Tom Murphy.
Remote Radio Sounding Science For JIMO J. L. Green, B. W. Reinisch, P. Song, S. F. Fung, R. F. Benson, W. W. L. Taylor, J. F. Cooper, L. Garcia, D. Gallagher,
Active Microwave and LIDAR. Three models for remote sensing 1. Passive-Reflective: Sensors that rely on EM energy emitted by the sun to illuminate the.
NASA/NSTA Web Seminar: Lunar Exploration: Mapping the Moon LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP.
S. De Santis “Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal Profile in a Storage Ring by Non-Linear Laser Mixing” - BIW 2004 May, 5th Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Leapseconds and Spacecraft Clock Kernels LSK and SCLK April 2006.
Why Design Tool? 93 年 10 月 21 日. EPS Course - 2 Simple Problems Close form solution Complex Problems Computer.
Improved Geo-location Accuracy For POES Imagery 11 December 2002 NOAA/NESDIS Office of Satellite Operations Office of Systems Development Peter Phillips.
By: Eric Backman Advisor: Dr. Malinowski.  Introduction  Goals  Project Overview and Changes  Work Completed  Updated Schedule.
Spaceborne 3D Imaging Lidar John J. Degnan Geoscience Technology Office, Code Code 900 Instrument and Mission Initiative Review March 13, 2002.
Time Management.  Time management is concerned with OS facilities and services which measure real time, and is essential to the operation of timesharing.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Leapseconds and Spacecraft Clock Kernels LSK and SCLK June 2004.
USGS DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS AND MOSAICS FOR LMMP M. R. Rosiek, E. M. Lee, E. T. Howington-Kraus, R. L. Fergason, L. A. Weller, D. M. Galuszka, B. L. Redding,
THE IMPACT MISSION ON SATURN'S IAPETUS Mission: IMPOSSIBLE Introducing….
Mapping the Moon: Simulating LOLA in the Classroom Introduction to LIDAR Mapping with LOLA. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Task B-5: Lunar Control Network Improvement USGS Astrogeology Team Brent Archinal Mark Rosiek Flagstaff AZ 26 August 2004.
Transponders A new Working Group in the ILRS. In a very general way a transponder is an active component in space Laser Beacon (synchronized to a caesium.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF SPICE Toolkit Common Problems November 2014.
LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
(c) 2009 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Improving Predictions of the Earth’s Rotation Using Oceanic Angular Momentum.
SLR2000: current status & issues being worked Jan McGarry & Tom Zagwodzki Khz ranging session ILRS Workshop at Eastbourne October 2005.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Time Conversion and Time Formats January 2008.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF SPICE Toolkit Common Problems October 2007.
JASON2 Status in NOAA Gary Petti Office of Satellite Data Processing and Distribution.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
上海天文台 Shanghai Astronomical Observatory CVN in Chang’e-3 lunar exploration mission ZHENG Weimin Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese.
WEC meeting TED status and WEC timing.
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
Charles Acton NAIF Manager JPL July 18, 2007
Figure 1: Current Setup of the Photoacoutic Registration System
Technical Resource Allocations
TEMPO Instrument Update
The ROLO Lunar Calibration System Description and Current Status
Which Galaxy Did the Gravitational Wave Come from?
Level 2 Requirements (MRD)
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Jesper Schou Instrument Scientist
LRO Mission Operations Concept
NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Moblas 4 Monument Peak, CA LRO and HPWREN Scott Wetzel NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Program Near Earth Networks Programs.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)
Effectiveness of Accuracy of Eye Trackers in Laser Refractive Surgery
Presentation transcript:

Pre-Launch Testing of NGSLR Ranging to LRO Anthony Mallama Jan McGarry Tom Zagwodzki Jack Cheek Christopher Clarke All at NASA/GSFC

Goal of LRO Laser Ranging Generate a precise LRO orbit Generate a precise LRO orbit Derive an improved lunar gravity field Derive an improved lunar gravity field LRO orbit will be the reference for data from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) instrument LRO orbit will be the reference for data from the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) instrument LOLA provides high accuracy surface mapping LOLA provides high accuracy surface mapping

NGSLR to LRO Laser Ranging Laser is 28 Hz, 50 milli-Joule, 532 nm Laser is 28 Hz, 50 milli-Joule, 532 nm Laser Ranging receiver telescope on High Gain Antenna Laser Ranging receiver telescope on High Gain Antenna Fiber optic bundle carries photons to LOLA receiver Fiber optic bundle carries photons to LOLA receiver LOLA 28 Hz duty cycle has separate time windows for Earth and Moon pulses LOLA 28 Hz duty cycle has separate time windows for Earth and Moon pulses

NGSLR to LRO Laser Ranging

Testing Overview NGSLR testing program has 137 elements NGSLR testing program has 137 elements 19 are specific to LRO 19 are specific to LRO There are 4 general categories of LRO tests: There are 4 general categories of LRO tests: 1) Telescope must accurately point to LRO 2) LRO is scheduled as highest priority target 3) NGSLR software is correctly modified for LRO 4) Laser fire is correctly controlled and measured

Tests Summarized in this Presentation Laser pulses arrive at the LR receiver Laser pulses arrive at the LR receiver during the LOLA Earth window Laser fire offset and frequency can be Laser fire offset and frequency can be manually controlled Telescope pointing is correct and accurate Telescope pointing is correct and accurate

Laser pulses arrive at the LR receiver during the LOLA Earth window

Considerations for hitting the Earth window Modulo of time on spacecraft clock with 1 / 28 second must be 5 +/- 1 milliseconds Modulo of time on spacecraft clock with 1 / 28 second must be 5 +/- 1 milliseconds SCLK file relates terrestrial time and spacecraft time SCLK file relates terrestrial time and spacecraft time MET = spacecraft time - offset MET = spacecraft time - offset Light-time of NGSLR-to-LRO range Light-time of NGSLR-to-LRO range

Laser pulses arrive at the LR receiver during the LOLA Earth window SCLK File:

Laser pulses arrive at the LR receiver during the LOLA Earth window Determine the fractional part of MET seconds: Convert UT to ET Find the interval for the ET in the SCLK file (ET = 0 corresponds to epoch of J2000) Delta ET = ET – Seconds at start of interval Delta Ticks = Delta ET / Rate at start of interval Add Delta Ticks to Ticks at the start of interval Spacecraft seconds = Ticks / (nominal rate) Subtract the Offset Add the NGSLR-to-LRO range Take the modulus with 1 / 28 second

Laser pulses arrive at the LR receiver during the LOLA Earth window 99.9% are within 5 +/- 1 msec.

Laser pulses arrive at the LR receiver during the LOLA Earth window 99% are within 5.0 +/- 0.1 millisecond

Laser fire offset and frequency can be manually controlled Command offsets from ms to ms Command offsets from ms to ms Command frequency changes of +/- 100 us/s Command frequency changes of +/- 100 us/s Analyze commanded recorded fire times Analyze commanded recorded fire times Compare commanded and measured offsets and frequencies Compare commanded and measured offsets and frequencies

Laser fire offset and frequency can be manually controlled

Telescope pointing is correct and accurate Simulated an LRO pass Used NASA Flight Dynamics Facility predictions Acquired images of Moon with NGSLR camera Marked telescope pointing on the NGSLR images Compared telescope pointing with: STK image data provided by FDF Lunar coordinates generated by a SPICE program

Telescope pointing is correct and accurate

SPICE Kernels: NGSLR position, custom generated kernel Earth and Moon positions, DE421 LRO position, special orbit kernel from FDF Lunar ‘Mean Earth’ reference frame Point-ahead correction (SPICE: XCN+S) Transmission Converged Newtonian light time correction Stellar aberration Plotted lunar coordinates USGS airbrushed shaded relief map Warped to ULCN2005

Telescope pointing is correct and accurate

NGSLR versus SPICE  2.4 arc s (rms) Largest difference ~4 arc s NGSLR versus STK  3.2 arc s (rms) Largest difference ~5 arc s

Summary The LRO portion of the NGSLR testing program is nearly complete The LRO portion of the NGSLR testing program is nearly complete The telescope will track LRO correctly and accurately The telescope will track LRO correctly and accurately LRO will be scheduled as the highest priority target LRO will be scheduled as the highest priority target NGSLR software is correctly modified for LRO NGSLR software is correctly modified for LRO Laser fire is correctly controlled and measured Laser fire is correctly controlled and measured