Practical Issues in conducting multi-country studies by Ken Stanley, Ph.D. Harvard School of Public Health Collaboration Complexities 10 Basic Principles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence-based Dental Practice Developing guidelines or clinical recommendations Slide #1 This lecture follows the previous online lecture on evidence.
Advertisements

Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
Clinical Trials What Are They and When Are They Right For You? Maura N. Dickler Assistant Attending Physician Breast Cancer Medicine Service Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Introduction to the User’s Guide for Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research.
Data Monitoring Models and Adaptive Designs: Some Regulatory Experiences Sue-Jane Wang, Ph.D. Associate Director for Adaptive Design and Pharmacogenomics,
Integrating Ethics Into Your Compliance Program John A. Gallagher, Ph.D Center for Ethics in Health Care Atlanta, GA.
Nursing Research Opportunities in the USPHS CAPT. Victoria L. Anderson, RN, CRNP, MSN.
Moral  the person’s individual set of values Ethics  consensus of a social system Both try to define what is good and what is bad CUDOS (Robert Merton.
Elements of a clinical trial research protocol
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
HIV Clinical Trials Janice Price, M.Ed, RN HIV Clinical Research Program Coordinator Swedish Medical Center Seattle, WA USA.
Chapter 3 Doing Sociological Research 1. Sociology & the Scientific Method The research process: 1.Developing a research question 2.Creating a research.
Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
Kupu Taurangi Hauora o Aotearoa. Health and Disability Consumer Representative Training MODULE ONE The New Zealand health and disability context.
Large Phase 1 Studies with Expansion Cohorts: Clinical, Ethical, Regulatory and Patient Perspectives Accelerating Anticancer Agent Development and Validation.
Influencing Health Care Policy
Introduction to evidence based medicine
Clinical pharmacy Dr. Mohammed Al-Rekabi Lecture One First Semester.
Protocol Complexity as a Factor in Vendor Management Compliance Risk
Clinical Unit of Health Promotion WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Based Health Promotion in Hospitals Quality tools and Health Promotion Implementation.
Outcomes of Public Health
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Parliamentary Committees in Democracies: Unit 4 Research Services for Parliamentary Committees.
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
Everyone Has A Role and Responsibility
What is a Clinical Trial (alpha version) John M. Harris Jr., MD President Medical Directions, Inc.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Cultivating Demand Within USAID for Impact Evaluations of Democracy and Governance Assistance Mark Billera USAID Office of Democracy and Governance Perspectives.
Clinical Pharmacy Part 2
Main issues Effect-size ratio Development of protocols and improvement of designs Research workforce and stakeholders Reproducibility practices and reward.
CCR Clinical Research Priorities Clinical research is an essential part of the CCR research program Translational (collaborative) Interaction between basic.
Summary from the Economics Track With thanks to all track participants, presenters, rapporteurs, moderators and organizers.
AN INTRODUCTION TO CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY. BEFORE STARTING DRUG THERAPY, DOCTORS CONSIDER  Whether intervention needed ?  Objective of treatment ? 
Chapter 19: The Gerontological Nurse as Manager and Leader
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
An agency of the European Union Presented by: Paolo Tomasi Data Safety Monitoring Boards / Data Monitoring Committees in paediatric studies Paolo Tomasi,
Monitoring the Progress of Clinical Trials in a Network Setting: Experience from the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network P. VanVeldhuisen.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
Shaping a Health Statistics Vision for the 21 st Century 2002 NCHS Data Users Conference 16 July 2002 Daniel J. Friedman, PhD Massachusetts Department.
Using drug use evaluation (DUE) to optimise analgesic prescribing in emergency departments (EDs) Karen Kaye, Susie Welch. NSW Therapeutic Advisory Group*
Summary of Retreat & Next Steps Who? Invitations to 155 Faculty & 17 Students Attended by 93 Faculty & 11 Students representing 18 Departments Facilitated.
Improvement Model and PDSA Cycles. Organ Donation The Service Improvement Model provides a framework to test, implement and sustain change ideas to overcome.
This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator.
THE IOWA MODEL OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE TO PROMOTE QUALITY CARE Jill Collins, Jerilyn Rodgers, Sandy Siebert & Julie Unruh **please refer to page 252.
Component 2: The Culture of Health Care
Understanding Clinical Trials – Part 2 Georgianne Arnold, MD Professor of Pediatrics University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Children’s Hospital.
HSRB Criteria for Review of Pre-Rule Intentional Dosing Studies Sean Philpott, PhD, MSBioethics HSRB Chair June 24, 2009.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Session 6: Data Flow, Data Management, and Data Quality.
Workshop on Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines Institute of Medicine January 11, 2010 Vivian H. Coates, Vice President, ECRI Project Director,
 Pharmaceutical Care is a patient-centered, outcomes oriented pharmacy practice that requires the pharmacist to work in concert with the patient and.
Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
CLINICAL TRIALS.
Strategies to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance and to Improve Infection Control Robin Oliver, M.D., CPE.
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Mary Alexander, MA, RN, CRNI®, CAE, FAAN Chief Executive Officer
Within Trial Decisions: Unblinding and Termination
11 i. Create a national coordinating mechanism for aDSM
Jennifer S. Novia INFO 643 March 6, 2011
The Nursing Process and Pharmacology Jeanelle F. Jimenez RN, BSN, CCRN
Research & scholarship
Cindy Murray NP Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
11 iii. Define management and supervision roles and responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Practical Issues in conducting multi-country studies by Ken Stanley, Ph.D. Harvard School of Public Health Collaboration Complexities 10 Basic Principles

Collaboration Complexities A clinical trial in a single country is a complex undertaking Medicine Laboratory sciences Quantitative sciences Ethics Politics Regulatory affairs Involvement of multiple countries significantly increases this complexity

1.Alternate study leadership; do not share leadership Common problem in collaborative studies Everyone is trying to be very democratic and accommodating to the views of others A high-quality clinical trial needs a clear structure, hierarchical organization, and clear decision-making mechanism Select one group to be the leader this study; select another group to be the leader next study

Components to be handled by one group Operations office functions (one Study Chair) Statistical center functions Randomization/registration Analysis plan and all analyses Primary & secondary endpoint criteria Data management center functions Forms, data flow, entire database Data management & quality control Data queries & regulatory/routine reports Site performance evaluations

2.Standardize, document and periodically check all key study components Study components include Disease classification/diagnosis/eligibility Primary & secondary endpoints (in detail) Toxicity criteria & reporting Laboratory parameters (especially norms) Intervention (e.g. drug, drug dose, route, timing, modification/cessation) Concomitant medications/management

3.Agreeing to disagree is not an option Many decisions are made by a “committee” While decision is often democratic It must be implemented rigidly by all Each participating site needs to “sign-off” Make sure all staff (esp. the junior clinicians) get the message

4.The discipline of randomization must be established and maintained Randomization is scientific research at its best All staff must support the need to randomize Clinicians must not try to circumvent Randomization staff must not bend the rules Nurses must not try to guess trt. assignment Patients must not try to unblind themselves Set high scientific standards Use randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled clinical trials whenever possible

5.MDs are notoriously poor at filling out data forms Highest priority for the doctor & nurse must be care of the patient MDs shouldn’t fill out data forms Often fill out only what they feel is important Often try to rely on memory rather than check Often give low priority to “secondary” values Need to identify a “data manager” at each site - priority is collecting high-quality data

6.Data managers are professionals too A good data manager exerts a major positive influence on other study staff Goal is to generate high-quality data Set and maintain high standards Don’t permit bending of the rules Quantitative evaluation of performance Quality data managers are vital to the study Treat them as professionals “Super Dragon” of the int’l. coop. groups

7.Periodic meetings of key staff with wide-open reviews of performance Performance of sites must be monitored Monthly data timeliness & error rates Yearly detailed performance measures Reviewed in open meetings with rep’s from all sites and funding agencies Performance of all components monitored Establish measures, goals, track & report

8.Use an Executive Com. with one participant from each component Common weakness - to form an Executive Committee with only key clinicians A successful clinical trial requires quality work from all components Sites Operations Office Statistical Center Data Management Center Central labs, etc.

9.Use an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC/DSMB) If a randomized Phase III clinical trial - use an IDMC/DSMB A committee of independent experts Can guide the research Recommend study changes Not vested in the study Best group to make difficult decisions Ensure study meets international standards

10.Only modify an ongoing study if the change is “enthusiastically unanimous” Modifying an ongoing study often takes more core resources than originally starting the study Some participants will not implement the changes - if they silently disagree A study modification not uniformly implemented can severely harm a study

Concluding remarks The major initial “shock” for most new centers is the “discipline” of the clinical trial Clinical trials should be designed to be definitive – whether “+” or “-” Only when a single-country study cannot be definitive – consider a multi-country study The greatest legacy of such studies is often the promotion of good clinical research methodology among the young clinicians