HUD’s Environmental Review Process National Community Development Association Conference 2013 Jerimiah Sanders, Environmental Specialist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures OCC – Chapter 6.
Advertisements

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:
The Lifecycle of Grants: Environmental Review November 7, 2012.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
 WELCOME  Welcome to the home page for the Louisiana Mapping Project (LaMP). The LaMP effort is being undertaken by Department of Homeland Security’s.
HUD Environmental Review Requirements November 30,2010.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
1 WELCOME MAP “TUNE-UP” WORKSHOP September 19-20, 2007.
Overview the local, state, and federal regulatory authorities which affect the interim housing mission Identify vital stakeholders with regulatory authority.
USAID Africa Bureau EIA Procedures for Sub-Projects
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
2011 CDBG Recipients’ Workshop COMPLIANCE 9:30EnvironmentalRick 10:30BREAK 10:45Wage Rate ProvisionsMary Alice 11:00Uniform Acquisition Robert 11:15Conflict.
Understanding Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs) Understanding Advisory Information and the Implications for Your Home December 2012.
Presented to: Hershey Aviation Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, Charlie Campbell & Suki Gill Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Environmental.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
1 Flood Insurance. 2 Flood - History History of the Law –National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 Federally subsidized insurance became available Voluntary.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
CDBG 2015 Technical Compliance. Sections 4.4 – 4.7 Handbook & Application 4.4 – 4.6: Projects 4.7: Residential Rehab Programs.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
USAID Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 USAID Procedures Overview  USAID environmental review requirements are:  A specific.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
Environmental Troubleshooting State Community Development Block Grant Rhode Island December 2012.
La Center, Washington: Balancing Pipelines and Populations 1.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Slide 1April 8, 2015, Financial Assistance Council Meeting.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
Catharine Cyr Ransom Principal The Accord Group. Stafford Act Structured approach to disasters Partnership between local, state, Federal governments Authority.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
December 2015 Detailed Presentation STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS CALIFORNIA Water Boards.
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 2, 2015.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
 Introduction to the AFFH Rule 2   Provide for better fair housing planning  Promote better understanding by program participants of AFFH  Address.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
The Art of Developing Policies A Look At Requirements, Trends & Challenges.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Waterway Debris Program Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Using CDBG & HOME Funds for Disaster Response
Anna Preston Vance, HA of Paris
ACA Conference - September 2017
Construction Management & Inspection
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
HUD SMAC Conference November 7, 2017
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

HUD’s Environmental Review Process National Community Development Association Conference 2013 Jerimiah Sanders, Environmental Specialist

Goals: Understand NEPA Overview of levels of environmental review Spot “red flags” New Tools for Environmental Compliance

Legally required: NEPA 42 U.S.C et seq; 24 CFR 58 HUD Oversight, monitoring, can lose funding with premature start Withstand Opposition Everyone has standing for challenges – NIMBY; Disgruntled contractors Opportunity to Improve Project Part of Planning Process Avoid hazards to health and safety (e.g. floodplains, explosives, and toxics) Use Environmental Review to Move Towards Sustainability

National Environmental Policy Act 1969 NEPA: Protect, Restore and Enhance the Human Environment

NEPA Environmental Study Public Document – public process Ensures that envt’l information is available to the public BEFORE decisions are made and BEFORE actions are taken

HUD Environmental Review – Part 58 Chief Elected Official of the jurisdiction assumes responsibility for environmental review and must sign the Request for Release of Funds and Certification (58.10, 58.13) Chief Elected Official accepts the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts for the responsible entity for the environmental review (58.13(a))

Environmental Review Process and Restrictions Once applicant applies for HUD assistance, the project becomes “federal” and HUD’s restrictions at §58.22 apply Neither applicant nor partners in the process, are allowed to commit or spend HUD or non-HUD funds on physical activities, including acquisition until the review is complete

Initial Project Screening Receive Project Application Project Description Project Location Budget

Identify the Project What is the scope? What Activities will be included? What is the location? Get Maps Planning Area Map Wetlands Map Floodplain Map Historical Districts Map

Identify the Project: Aggregation Local grantees must group together and evaluate, as a single project, all individual activities that are related either geographically, functionally, or are logical parts of a composite of contemplated actions “but for” analysis... (segmentation) Consider a neighborhood target review for areas up to the size of a census track; may review a class of sites prior to identifying individual sites (see July 26, 2010 memo)

Level of Review EIS (the general trigger is 2500 units or beds or infrastructure that will or may provide capacity for 2500 but there are exceptions)EIS (the general trigger is 2500 units or beds or infrastructure that will or may provide capacity for 2500 but there are exceptions) Environmental AssessmentEnvironmental Assessment Categorically Excluded Categorically Excluded Categorically Excluded NOT Subject to 58.5Categorically Excluded NOT Subject to 58.5 ExemptExempt

Exempt Activities 24 CFR Part 58.34(a) Environmental, planning & design costs Information & financial services Administrative/management activities Public services (no physical impact) Inspections Purchase of tools/insurance Technical assistance & training Temporary assist. for imminent threats Payment of principal and interest

Categorically Excluded Activities not subject to CFR 58.35(b) Tenant-based Rental assistance Supportive Services Operating costs (utilities, supplies) ED costs (non-construction) Pre-development costs Supplemental Assistance

Categorically Excluded subject to CFR 58.35(a) Public Facilities < 20% size/ capacity increase Projects for accessibility and mobility Rehab of Single Family (density not increased beyond 4 units, land use is not changed, and footprint is not increased in floodplain or wetland) Minor Rehab of Multi-family (no change in use, < 20% change in density, est. cost rehab <75% of total cost of replacement after rehab) Rehab of Nonresidential (no change in use, - < 20% change in density) Acquisition/Disposition no change in use

Environmental Assessment NEPA portion of the review: Designed to determine if an EIS is required Requires analysis of alternatives Requires early consultation Broad Interdisciplinary study

State can act as RE or HUD (See & 58.72)

Sample or Recommended Formats Available at: nment/review nment/review

Public Notification EA: Combined Notice (FONSI and NOI) CE that “triggers” compliance: NOI/RROF only CE No Compliance Triggered None CE Not Subject to 58.5 : None Exempt: None Samples notices available at: m_offices/comm_planning/environment/review/gui dance m_offices/comm_planning/environment/review/gui dance Samples notices available at: m_offices/comm_planning/environment/review/gui dance m_offices/comm_planning/environment/review/gui dance

Public Comment Periods 24 CFR part TWO PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS (1) NOI/FONSI - 15 days from Publication 18 days from Posting NOI - 7 days from Publication 10 days from Posting RE must consider comments prior to submitting its RROF (Form ) to HUD/State (2)HUD/State Comment Period 15 days [after comment period HUD will issue a AUGF (Form )]

Public Comment Periods 24 CFR part TWO PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS RROF (Form ) to HUD/State

Public Comment Periods 24 CFR part TWO PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS AUGF (Form ) from HUD/State

Laws and Authorities 58.6/ Flood Insurance FEMA National Flood Insurance Program flood insurance is required if project is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area – 100 year floodplain. The Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as amended, requires that property owners purchase flood insurance for buildings located within Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), when Federal financial assistance is used to acquire, repair, improve, or construct a building. Also required for insurable contents. Note that this is required by a statute and not the E.O This requirement will apply in many cases where the 8 Step process may not be applicable.

BUY FLOOD INSURANCE Duration of Flood Insurance Coverage. The statutory period for flood insurance coverage may extend beyond project completion. For loans, loan insurance or loan guarantees, flood insurance coverage must be continued for the term of the loan. For grants and other non-loan forms of financial assistance, flood insurance coverage must be continued for the life of the building irrespective of the transfer of ownership. Limits of NFIP coverage: $250,000 for 1-4 family residential and $500,000 for multi-family nonresidential structures. HUD recommends purchase for all insurable structures, but it is only required for those in the SFHA.

One Bite Rule One Bite Rule. HUD cannot offer Federal disaster assistance for a person’s property for construction activities, where the person previously received Federal disaster assistance and failed to maintain the flood insurance. See 24 CFR 58.6(b). Translation: Failure to maintain flood insurance after using Federal disaster assistance jeopardizes Federal assistance following subsequent disasters.

Laws and Authorities 58.6 OTHER Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) – Prohibits federally assisted development with extremely limited exceptions – Mapper: Airport Clear Zones If the project is within 15 miles of a civil airport or military airfield, compliance is required. For properties located within 2,500 feet of a civil airport or 15,000 feet from the end of a runway at a military Airfield, compliance is required.

Laws and Authorities 58.5 Historic Preservation Act Floodplain Management & Wetlands Protection: Executive Orders Coastal Zone Management Act Safe Drinking Water Act Endangered Species Act Wild & Scenic Rivers Act Clean Air Act Environmental Justice: Executive Order Aquifers Farmland Protection Act HUD Environmental Criteria & Standards Noise Abatement and Control Near Explosives or Flammable Sites Near Airport Runway Protection Zones Toxic Hazards

Laws and Authorities 58.5 Historic Preservation Section 106 Consultation Process

Laws and Authorities 58.5 Historic Preservation Section 106 Consultation Process (if activity is an undertaking w/ potential to cause effects) Check State and National Register for Historic Properties in area of potential effect Check for historic districts Use state criteria for potentially eligible Write SHPO if listed or potentially eligible properties may suffer an adverse impact Full process is here: oc?id=DOC_12988.pdf oc?id=DOC_12988.pdf

Historic Preservation: Tribal Consultation Must consult with appropriate tribes as part of Section 106 historic preservation process o Use HUD’s Tribal Directory Assessment Tool to identify tribes interested in project area o Reach out directly to tribe for consultation- the SHPO will not do this for HUD/RE

Laws and Authorities 58.5 Floodplains

Laws and Authorities 58.5 Avoid, minimize impacts, provide public notice

Is the site in a floodplain?

Floodplain Management 24 CFR Part 55 Applies to physical actions in 100yr or (critical actions* in 500yr): 1-4 family rehab if > 50% value buildings roads pipelines anything except minor clearing and grubbing * See 55.2(b)(2) for definition

Prohibited Actions under 55.1(c) Any non-functionally dependent use in a Floodway Any Critical Action in a Coastal High Hazard Area (V Zone) Any non-Critical Action that was not designed consistent with 55.1(c)(3)

Be Aware of Cumulative Impacts

If you cannot avoid, minimize harm to lives and property limit fill of floodplain minimize grading relocate non-conforming structures preserve natural drainage use pervious surfaces / green alleys maintain buffers use detention ponds or rain gardens minimize tree cutting and destruction of wetland vegetation

Example of a FIRM

Example of an Old FIRM

Preliminary Data for Disaster Assistance EO requires “best available information” 24 CFR 55 interprets this as FEMA finalized FIRMs Disaster notices requires the use of “advisory maps” by incorporation – Other HUD programs only require enacted FIRMs

Advisory Maps The Disaster Recovery Enhancement Fund NOFA states that these grants are to be treated as the funds granted by this Hurricane Ike notice ( pdf ). The Ike notice states at 24.M: “The state certifies that it will not use CDBG disaster recovery funds for any activity in an area delineated as a special flood hazard area in FEMA’s most current flood advisory maps, unless it also ensures that the action is designed or modified to minimize harm to or within the floodplain, in accordance with Executive Order and 24 CFR part 55.” pdf

Sea-Level Rise and increases in extreme events (floods and droughts) are occurring and current maps do not consider trends or anticipated conditions (rearview): In this Aug. 24, 2010, photo is a view looking east about a block from the tiny town of Minnewaukan, N.D.'s only school. Devils Lake, which was once 8 miles away, today is lapping at the community from three sides. (AP) Washaway Beach, Cape Shoalwater, WA has been eroding an average of 100 feet per year for a century.

EO Protection of Wetlands Purpose is “to avoid to the extent possible the long and short term adverse impacts associated with the destruction or modification of wetlands and to avoid direct or indirect support of new construction in wetlands wherever there is a practicable alternative[.]”

National Wetlands Inventory Map *NWI maps are to be used from primary screening. Sites should be checked any time substantial filling, drainage, impounding, or other “new construction” activities occur.

Minimization Strategies Floodplain notices can be combined with wetlands Multiple locations can share notices and 8 Steps Minimization examples are manmade swales, permeable surfaces (e.g. green alleys), site planning around sensitive areas, and compensatory mitigation.

Noise (24 CFR ) History: Since 1973, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has conducted an Annual Housing Survey for the Census Bureau in which noise has been consistently ranked as a leading cause of neighborhood dissatisfaction. In fact, nearly one-half of the respondents each year have felt that noise was a major neighborhood problem (see Figure 1-1). In the 1975 survey, street noise was mentioned more often than all other unwanted neighborhood conditions. This survey has also shown that aircraft and traffic noise are leading factors in making people want to move from their neighborhoods. Approximately one-third of all the respondents who wished to move because of undesirable neighborhood conditions, did so because of noise.

Noise (24 CFR ) Activities that can be easily disturbed by high noise levels must be mitigated –Housing –Nursing Homes –Hospitals –Libraries –where it is determined that quiet outdoor space...ancillary to principal use (recreation/sitting area) More details in the Noise Guidebook and Factsheets: s/comm_planning/environment/review/noise s/comm_planning/environment/review/noise

Noise (24 CFR ) On-line calculator: ogram_offices/comm_planning/environment/ dnlcalculator ogram_offices/comm_planning/environment/ dnlcalculator

Acceptable Separation Distance from Explosive Hazards Project sites located too close to facilities handling, storing or processing conventional fuels (e.g. petroleum), hazardous gases (e.g. propane) or chemicals of an explosive or flammable nature (e.g. benzene) is a matter of concern when conducting an environmental assessment. Calculating the Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) is one of several steps toward determining site suitability for a proposed HUD-assisted project near hazardous facilities.

Acceptable Separation Distance from Explosive Hazards Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) Electronic Assessment Tool: ram_offices/comm_planning/environment/asdca lculator Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) Electronic Assessment Tool: ram_offices/comm_planning/environment/asdca lculator Acceptable Separation Distance Guidebook - Office of CPD Environmental Planning Division (September 2011) Acceptable Separation Distance Guidebook - Office of CPD Environmental Planning Division (September 2011)

Toxics HUD policy that all properties are free of hazards, contamination that could affect the health and safety of occupants Multifamily projects require an ASTM Phase I Environmental Assessment or equivalent – focus on Recognized Environmental Concern

Toxics – info sources

Toxics – info sources EDR Report

Environmental Review Record Written record of review Must be available for public inspections Let the file tell the story – include project description, maps, photographs, studies, correspondence, public notices, etc. Suggested format: ram_offices/comm_planning/environment/revie w ram_offices/comm_planning/environment/revie w

Importance of Early Start Begin environmental review process as early as possible 58.30(b) Typical times required to complete range from 1 to 120 days Allow time for periods of public comment on environmental notices, including Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and the Notice of Intent to Request Release of Funds (NOI-RROF)

Important Tips Recognize the additional time that will be required if the project is in the Floodplain, a wetland or has historic implications Responsible for ensuring flood insurance is maintained DON’T SPEND A DIME – until the environmental review is complete and you have received an approved Request for Release of Funds When in doubt, contact your local environmental officer!

New Compliance Tools

Environmental Contacts- Start at the Local Level

Environmental Monitoring In-depth monitoring is performed by environmental staff However, program support is vital to prevent violations and to ensure that environmental concerns are addressed from in program designs If a violation occurs, the program office determines sanctions

Tribal Directory Assessment Tool Section 106 Programmatic Agreement Database Noise Calculator Separation Distance Calculator ATEC

Questions Call your Field Environmental Officer! My contact info: p: