1 Montana Common Core Transition June 2013 CCSSO Conference Showcase Judy Snow State Assessment Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers June 2011.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
1 Judy W. Park, Ed.D., Associate Superintendent, Utah State Office of Education.
Montana Common Core Standards (MCCS) 10 Minute University.
CORE California Office to Reform Education Fall Performance Assessment Pilot October-December 2012.
Implementing Common Core State Standards in Greenville County School District Preparing Students for Success in the 21 st Century.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.
2014 Assessment Update Deb Lindsey, Administrator State Assessment.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Summer Common Core Standards for K-12 English/language arts and mathematics Initiative led by the Council of Chief.
Supporting Charter School Transition to Common Core Standards Evan Lefsky, Ph.D. Project Director Public Consulting Group.
New York State Education Department State Science Initiative Statewide Strategic Plan for Science Science Education Advisory Committee March 29, 2006.
Oregon Common Core State Standards Transitioning to New Standards and Assessments.
THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS MAINE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Common Core Standards Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC/CDE Joint Meeting May 16, 2013 Update on Key Smarter.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Common Core State Standards Unleashing a Wave of NEW INNOVATION.
Curriculum and Assessment Overview State/District Standards Formative Assessment with Performance Rubrics Differentiated Instruction RTI.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Common Core State Standards Update (CCSS) Cambrian School District May 10, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Educational Research Association November 29, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
Macomb County Support for Priority & Focus Schools Judith P. Pritchett, PhD Chief Academic Officer Macomb Intermediate School District
To update and establish the intent of the chapter  Incorporates “college and career readiness” into the purpose of the chapter.  Redefines the Core.
Changes in Community Informational Meeting March 10, 2014.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
MAC Common Assessment Training Modules Session F3 Michigan School Testing Conference February 23, 2012.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Building a System to Support Improved Teaching and Learning Joe Willhoft Shelbi Cole Juan d’Brot National Conference.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Educator Effectiveness CFMS Staff Meeting, January 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AN UPDATE ON THE NEXT GENERATION COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS A REPORT TO THE WEST VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION FEBRUARY13, 2013.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
Brinnon School District. Understanding the new standards Understanding the major shifts between the old and new standards within their subject and grade.
Transitioning to a Balanced Assessment System. Overview Professional Development in Assessment Smarter Balanced Logistics.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Overview of the Smarter Balanced Assessment System CTA Pre-Good.
Model Schools – An Evolution not a Revolution August 2010 – Administrative Staff Development – Created District Transition Team September 2010 – Sue Gendron.
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Maine Department of Education Informational Letters on Learning Results Implementation Issues May 12, 2004.
Survey of Enacted Curriculum An Essential Tool for School Improvement CCSSO SEC State Collaborative Meeting San Diego, CA February 2008 Constance J Dorr,
CCSS Updates CDE proposed timeline to State Board. CISC -ELA and math. RCOE will have introduced CCSS to over 300 administrators by March 1 in Riverside.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
Vertical Articulation Reality Orientation (Achieving Coherence in a Less-Than-Coherent World) NCSA June 25, 2014 Deb Lindsey, Director of State Assessment.
Administrators Academy August 15, College Prepared and Career Ready.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 15, 2015 Dr. Gina Cinotti, CSA.
Common Core Standards. Development of the Common Core Standards California has joined a national movement to adopt common standards and assessments for.
Common Core Study Session LVUSD. Agenda LVUSD transition to Common Core Strategic Plan goals for 13/14 Demonstration of NGA & Common Core Instructional.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March Keric Ashley,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March (Excerpted version.
Examining the Collaborative Process in Implementing the Common Core State Standards.
Transition to the Common Core Sequim School District.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
Language Arts Assessment Update
Toolkits, PLMs, Frameworks, SIMs, and the IQC
Proposed Strategies for Implementing the Common Core
Bethel School District CCSS Plan
Ready, Set, Go! Common Core
ELA and Mathematics Common Core GPS Timeline
Presentation transcript:

1 Montana Common Core Transition June 2013 CCSSO Conference Showcase Judy Snow State Assessment Director

56 Counties 491 Districts 824 Schools 142,000 Students 12,199 Licensed Staff Largest of the 8 Rocky Mountain States 4 th in size among the 50 states 147,046 square miles 2

 Development  Accountability  Use of data 3

Review cycle built into administrative rule  “Old” Standards adopted before NCLB  Used for current state assessment, Reading and Math  “Middle Standards”—adopted in  Math and ELA  Montana Common Core Standards—adopted in  Math and ELA 4

 In the middle of the CCSS movement  CCSS used as resource and partial model in the development of middle standards Development of middle standards Some middle standards modeled on the CCSS  Timeline for development of assessment for middle standards fell almost on top of the movement to the CCSS  Wrote and field tested items to middle standards with plans for full implementation within two years 5

State superintendent directed staff to development studies to compare middle and CCSS for Math and ELA.  External evaluators  Montana educators  Middle standards panels  Achieve Gap Analysis Tool  Survey of Enacted Curriculum  Content Maps 6

7

8

9

10

Montana Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)  Considered timelines and study  Recommended if adopt CCSS  continue testing the old standard  abandon the middle  develop field test items written and coded to the CCSS. 11

 Prior to adoption  Governing state, Smarter Balanced  Facts about Smarter  Informational meetings on Common Core Standards  Montana Board of Public Education  November

13

 Montana’s statewide test and educator panels—large group of ambassadors regarding assessment literacy related to the standards  Coding released items to both Montana “Middle” standards and Montana Common Core Standard  Field testing items written to the Common Core Standards—educator panel reviews 14

State assessment: CRT based on “old” Montana standards – Reporting stays the same Field testing – Items aligned to Montana Common Core Standards (MCCS) – Progressive release of field test items aligned to MCCS 15

 Operational (scored) items  where possible, items will align to both the previous Montana Standards and the new Montana Common Core Standards (MCCS)  Field test (non-scored) items  will be written to align with the MCCS, targeting standards that are similar to those in the previous Montana Standards 16

 Continue to focus on items that will meet the existing MontCAS test blueprint  Gradually introduce items that also align to MCCS into the test  Code test items to both sets of standards for as long as this is practical and desirable  Stop developing and field testing new items that match only the “old” Montana Standards 17

18

 Many of the standards are very similar between Montana Standards and MCCS  Priority will be made of first field-testing items that match both sets of standards, so differences will be minimized 19

 Assessments: pilot, field, practice  Participation in item development, review, range-finding  Formative Assessment/Digital Library  State Leadership Team  State Network of Educator 20

Bright Ideas—Connecting with the Common Core  Instructional modules  Assessment development 21

22