DHET Funding of Universities Presentation to University Councils Training Regional Workshop University of KwaZulu-Natal 25 July 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Academic Infrastructure and IQER Wendy Stubbs Assistant Director
Advertisements

A report on a survey of private higher education institutions conducted under the auspices of the CHE.
Programme Review at the NMMU – Outcomes, Lessons Learnt and Remaining Challenges Programme Review at the NMMU – Outcomes, Lessons Learnt and Remaining.
Higher Education (and Training): an overview University Councils’ Regional Training Workshop Stellenbosch University 11 July 2014 Dr Diane Parker Acting.
Ian Bunting and Charles Sheppard 23February 2012.
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI. Brief History of the University The Foundation Act for the University of Thessaloniki was approved on June 5, 1925,
1 Briefing by the Reference Group and Technical Team on the development of the Funding Framework following the Ministerial Report on University Funding.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Department of Higher Education and Training PERFORMANCE INFORMATION ON PRE-DETERMINED OBJECTIVES AND BUDGET (October 2013 to December 2013)
Presenter: Date: Arizona & Higher Education 2014 and Beyond Dan Anderson Director of Institutional Research October 22, 2014.
Challenges of Higher Education in Cyprus Efstathios Michael Senior Education Officer Department of Higher and Tertiary Education Ministry of education.
Progress on higher education reforms and the implementation of the Bologna process Ministry of Education, Republic of Moldova.
1 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND INSTITUTIONAL CASE STUDIES University of Ghana 8 May 2012.
REF2014 – results and the way forward SSHP Meeting 12 March 2015.
Measuring R&D in the social sciences: data availability and gaps Laudeline Auriol, OECD Strategic Workshop: Addressing the Shortage of Data on the Social.
Academic Affairs BOT Orientation 29 August 2011 Dr. Chula King Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Strategic, Annual Performance & Operational Planning Process
Illinois Higher Education FY15 Performance Funding Recommendations IBHE Board Presentation February 4, 2014 Dr. Alan Phillips.
1 Sector Overview and Legacy Report of PC on Higher Education and Training By Mamphago Modiba 02 JULY 2014.
Educational System of South Africa. African education includes: Equal access to basic education Opportunities for lifelong learning Language of Instruction:
INSTITUTIONAL TYPES IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN SOUTH AFRICA Ian Bunting and Nico Cloete February 2010.
FET Colleges Finances and Financial Aid Scheme 20 February 2007.
Professional Science Master’s Programs: Federal Budget Strategy April 4, 2008 Council of Graduate Schools.
1 Differentiation: Where Are We? DIVERSITY/DIFFERENTIATION: Ian Bunting CHET seminar 9 February 2012 Franschhoek.
EXPLORING TYPES OF QUALIFICATIONS...  GCE A/S AND A/2 LEVEL  BTEC  (Business & technology Education Council – now part of Edexcel)- example:  Construction.
February Graph 1 sets out data on key elements of SA’s high-level knowledge production for the period expressed as doctoral enrolments,
‘INFORMATICS & MULTIMEDIA’ Department of Applied Informatics & Multimedia School of Applied Technology TEI-Crete.
Overview of the the New Funding Framework Presented by Prof Emile Horak Thanks and recognition to Prof Pieter Vermeulen who supplied the information.
Issues on Recruitment The new funding formula (revised August 2003) The current size and shape of the University G R Barnes Management Information, August.
Using efficiency indicators to build leadership capacity in African universities Research Team: Dr Charles Sheppard: Director Management Information, NMMU.
Campus Forum: Resource Allocation at UKZN in 2008 Glen Barnes Director, Management Information (for the Budget Working Group)
Council on Higher Education: Annual Report Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 10 October 2013.
DIVISION OF REVENUE BILL VOTE 16: HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING Presentation to Standing Committee on Appropriations 26 February 2010.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
UKZN Resource Allocation Model Presentation to Senate 4 th April 2007 Glen Barnes Director, Management Information, UKZN.
DHET Funding of Universities Presentation to University Councils Training Regional Workshop 11 July 2014.
The University of North Carolina Student Credit Hour Enrollment Change Funding Model January 3, 2003.
IBHE Presentation 1 Illinois Higher Education Performance Funding Model IBHE Board Meeting February 7, 2012 Dr. Alan Phillips.
GOVT. ENGINEERING COLLEGE BARTON HILL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – th Review Meeting : TEQIP -II April 2015.
1 BRIEFING ON THE STAFFING SOUTH AFRICA’S UNIVERSITIES’ FRAMEWORK (SSAUF) Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 25 August.
1 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND ASGI-SA Presentation to PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE.
1 Funding Public Distance Education NADEOSA 2001.
Funding of Higher Education September 2011, Yerevan1 Performance Based Financing in Higher Education: Slovak Experience Peter Mederly Ministry of Education,
FLINDERS UNIVERSITY, SA Education Australia Information Session Ulan-Bator, June 23, 2012 By Batkhishig Adilbish, ALA-2011.
Institutional Profile of the NMMU 2005 – 2010/11 Presentation to Council 23 September 2011 Dr Charles Sheppard Director: Management Information Data provided.
Presentation to Portfolio committee Date: 25 January 2011.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Academic Affairs BOT Orientation 22 August 2012 David Marker, Ph.D. Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Science and Technology DATE: 14 September 2011.
The New Funding Formula for Higher Education Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Education, Cape Town, Tuesday 24 August 2004.
Research Colloquium on Post-School Education and Training 4 November 2014, Burgers Park Hotel Higher Education and Training Information System Jean Skene,
THE HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING FRAMEWORK and VUT FINANCES Prakash Naidoo
Specialties Description
Transformation Colloquium
On Road to Research-Led University of Botswana
Performance indicators
UNESCO CONFERENCE: September, 2008
education Department of Education REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SECTION 31(1) AND (2) OF THE NURSING ACT (ACT NO
Neels Bezuidenhout, University of South Africa
Department of Higher Education and Training
Knowledge Seminar: South African doctoral enrolment, graduation and demographics February 2012.
Quality, innovation and internationalization
Proposed Collaboration Between School of Education, UoN and
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Higher Education Branch Department of Education 13 November 2007
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING University of Johannesburg
Management Information & Institutional Research Office
Presentation transcript:

DHET Funding of Universities Presentation to University Councils Training Regional Workshop University of KwaZulu-Natal 25 July 2014

2 FUNDING GRFUNDING GROUP OUP ContactDistance Undergraduate: up to 3 years22.5%13.5% Undergraduate: 4 years or more22.5%13.5% Postgraduate: up to honours18%9% Postgraduate: up to masters54%27% The normative units are calculated based on the qualification type headcount enrolments for a specific year. The qualification type headcount enrolments are multiplied by the graduation benchmark as well as the weight for the qualification type to determine the normative teaching output units. To determine the teaching development units the actual teaching output units are subtracted from the normative teaching output units. If the answer is positive, i.e. less actual teaching output units were generated a development grant can be awarded. Graduation benchmarks for contact and distance programmes CALCULATION OF TEACHING DEVELOPMENT GRANTS Demonstration on flip chart handout 5 A teaching development grant is awarded to institutions who do not achieve the normative teaching output units as determined by the DHET Funding Framework implemented in 2004/05. -Performance based funding framework. -Majority of funding allocated as block grant – used at discretion of Council for funding teaching and learning activities of the university. R19,561bn for 2014/15. -Earmarked grants allocated for specific purposes and most subject to annual progress reports and audit certificates. R8,509bn of which R3,915bn is allocated to NSFAS for universities. -Funding Review undertaken and report submitted to Minister. Report was released 28 Feb Technical Team and Reference Group were appointed in Feb to model recommendations and draft a revised funding framework Funding Framework and Review

Components of the Funding Framework 3 Block Grants - Teaching Input - Teaching Output - Research Output - Institutional Factor Earmarked Grants - NSFAS - Teaching and Research development ( moved from block grants) - Infrastructure and Efficiency Funding - Establishing the 2 new universities (new money) - Foundation Provision - Veterinary Sciences - Clinical Training Grants - National institutes - Multi-campus Grant (top sliced from block grants) - Interest and redemption on loans - African institute for Mathematical studies Council discretionary funds Government controlled funds

Funding grid for TIU - CESM 5 FUNDING GROUPCESM CATEGORIESFUNDING RATIO on UG level 1 07 education, 12 law, 18 psychology, 19 public administration and services business, economics & management studies, 05 communication & journalism, 06 computer & information sciences, 11 languages, linguistics & literature, 17 philosophy, religion and theology, 20 social sciences architecture & the built environment, 08 engineering, 10 family ecology & consumer sciences, 15 mathematics & statistics agriculture & agricultural operations, 03 visual and performing arts, 09 health professions & related clinical sciences, 13 life sciences, 14 physical sciences 3.5

TEACHING INPUT UNIT SHARES 6 OUPOUP

CALCULATION OF TEACHING OUTPUT GRANTS 7 Qualification Level Rand value per graduate in 2014/15Weight 1 st certificates and diplomas of 2 years or lessR st diplomas and bachelors degrees: 3 yearsR Professional 1 st bachelors degrees: 4 years and more R Postgraduate and Post-diploma diplomasR Postgraduate bachelors degreesR Honours degrees / higher diplomasR Non-Research Masters degrees and diplomasR Funding grid for TOU Determined by the number of graduates produced in a specific year Each graduate is weighted to generate a TOU Each graduate has a certain weight depending on the length of study /qualification type

8 FUNDING GRFUNDING GROUP OUP ContactDistance Undergraduate: up to 3 years22.5%13.5% Undergraduate: 4 years or more22.5%13.5% Postgraduate: up to honours18%9% Postgraduate: up to masters54%27% The normative units are calculated based on the qualification type headcount enrolments for a specific year. The qualification type headcount enrolments are multiplied by the graduation benchmark as well as the weight for the qualification type to determine the normative teaching output units. To determine the teaching development units the actual teaching output units are subtracted from the normative teaching output units. If the answer is positive, i.e. less actual teaching output units were generated a development grant can be awarded. Graduation benchmarks for contact and distance programmes CALCULATION OF TEACHING DEVELOPMENT GRANTS Demonstration on flip chart handout 5 A teaching development grant is awarded to institutions who do not achieve the normative teaching output units as determined by the DHET. R609,5 million for 2014/15 The aim of these funds is to provide financial support to all universities to improve their graduation rate (the graduation rate is the number of student graduate heads relative to the head count of enrolled students in a particular year). Weigh the FTE unsuccessful students of the universities having low success rates and larger proportions of unsuccessful FTE students with a maximum weighting of 1,5. TEACHING DEVELOPMENT GRANTS

CALCULATION OF RESEARCH OUTPUT GRANTS Funding Grid for ROUs 9 FUNDING GRFUNDING GROUP OUP Type of ResearchWeightRand values for ROU in 2014/15 Publication Units1R Research Masters Graduates1R Doctoral Graduates3R CALCULATION OF RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT GRANT Research development grant is awarded to institutions who do not achieve the normative research output units as determined by the DHET. The normative units are calculated based on the total number of permanently appointed instruction / research staff for a specific year and then multiplied by a predetermined ratio. R187,429 million available for research development for 2014/15

CALCULATION OF INSTITUTIONAL FACTOR GRANTS 10 FUNDING GRFUNDING GROUP OUP Institutional Grant for disadvantaged students operates by adding an amount to the teaching input grants depending on the proportion of black and coloured contact students that are South African Citizens. Proportion of African and Coloured students in relevant FTE student enrolment (Only SA citizens) Additional Amount added to relevant teaching input grant 80% and above10% 75%8.75% 70%7.5% 65%6.25% 60%5% 55%3.75% 45%1.25% 40% and Below0%

CALCULATION OF INSTITUTIONAL FACTOR GRANTS 11 FUNDING GRFUNDING GROUP OUP Institutional Grant for Institutional size gives additional teaching input grants to small institutions, depending on the size of their FTE student enrolments (contact and distance) Total FTE student enrolment: Contact + DistanceAdditional amount added to teaching input grant and less15% % % % % % % % % % and more0%

INFRASTRUCTURE 2012/13 to 2014/15 12 Category ofFunding categoriesTotal allocation University (R'000) Historically disadvantagedStudent housing – upgrading and new disadvantagedupgrading and new universities (HDIs)/Infrastructure backlog campusesupgrading and new Universities/campusesStudent housing other than HDIsupgrading and new Teacher Training – meeting scarce skills needs Health sciences – meeting scarce skills needs Engineering - meeting scarce skills needs All universitiesLife and Physical Sciences – meeting scarce skills needs Cooperative Projects – partnerships with HDIs Development of African Languages, Humanities and Social Sciences Disability units - upgrading and new Research infrastructure – well founded laboratories Project Management Capacity for 12 universities ICT New Allied Health Sciences University DHET Monitoring and Oversight5 000 Total

HDI and Student Housing Focus 13 Student housing 1 st &2 nd round - R1.3 bn 3 rd round - R1. 412bn Student Housing HDIs & R239m Non-HDIs. R1,114bn HDI Backlog funding category new. Mainly used for renovation of old and build of new teaching facilities, storm water, water storage, and sewerage facilities and in some cases fencing and back-up generators. WSU 2012/13 to 2014/15 allocations – Health Sciences – R75m, Engineering – R53m, Student Housing – R120m, Teacher Education – R60m, Backlog infrastructure - R100m

14 FUNDING GRFUNDING GROUP OUP ContactDistance Undergraduate: up to 3 years22.5%13.5% Undergraduate: 4 years or more22.5%13.5% Postgraduate: up to honours18%9% Postgraduate: up to masters54%27% The normative units are calculated based on the qualification type headcount enrolments for a specific year. The qualification type headcount enrolments are multiplied by the graduation benchmark as well as the weight for the qualification type to determine the normative teaching output units. To determine the teaching development units the actual teaching output units are subtracted from the normative teaching output units. If the answer is positive, i.e. less actual teaching output units were generated a development grant can be awarded. Graduation benchmarks for contact and distance programmes CALCULATION OF TEACHING DEVELOPMENT GRANTS Demonstration on flip chart handout 5 A teaching development grant is awarded to institutions who do not achieve the normative teaching output units as determined by the DHET. -UKZN: Disability − R4.7m, Engineering − R29m, Student Housing − R80m, Life & Physical Sciences R21m, Teacher Education − R45m, Infrastructure Backlog − R56m -MUT: Engineering − R65m, Student Housing − R85m, Infrastructure Backlog R70m, Disability − R2.8 m, Project management – R4m, Well Found Lab Equip − R7m -UNIZUL: Disability − R5.4m, Student Housing − R119m, African Languages − R70m, Infrastructure Backlog − R169m, Project management − R5m -DUT: Engineering − R80.7m, Student Housing − R115.4 m, Life & Physical Sciences − R35.7m, teacher Education − R79.5m, Infrastructure Backlog − R40m INFRASTRUCTURE – KZN UNIVERSITIES

15 FUNDING GRFUNDING GROUP OUP ContactDistance Undergraduate: up to 3 years22.5%13.5% Undergraduate: 4 years or more22.5%13.5% Postgraduate: up to honours18%9% Postgraduate: up to masters54%27% The normative units are calculated based on the qualification type headcount enrolments for a specific year. The qualification type headcount enrolments are multiplied by the graduation benchmark as well as the weight for the qualification type to determine the normative teaching output units. To determine the teaching development units the actual teaching output units are subtracted from the normative teaching output units. If the answer is positive, i.e. less actual teaching output units were generated a development grant can be awarded. Graduation benchmarks for contact and distance programmes CALCULATION OF TEACHING DEVELOPMENT GRANTS Demonstration on flip chart handout 5 A teaching development grant is awarded to institutions who do not achieve the normative teaching output units as determined by the DHET. -In the Funding Review a recommendation has been made to provide additional funding to disadvantaged institutions. An amount of R410,743 million in 2015/16 has been set aside for a new factor that will be linked to disadvantage. The distribution of this fund first need to be modeled and approved before details are provided. MINISTERIAL STATEMENT ON FUNDING

Conclusion Questions