1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO 13508 Action Plan, Progress Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning for Our Future:
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Jonathan Doherty National Park Service.
Harris Creek Case Study: Oyster Restoration and GIT Collaboration Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board August 2, 2012 Peyton Robertson Fisheries Goal.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
The National Aquaculture Policy and The State Shellfish Initiative Perry Lund Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program 17 November 2011.
Update Chesapeake Action Plan – Report to Congress Strengthening the Management, Coordination, and Accountability of the Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Coastal Web Atlases in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Examples from Virginia and Maryland Marcia R. Berman Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia.
Lower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture Management Board Meeting the Expectations and Challenges of Joint Venture Implementation Buras, Louisiana June.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
Drafting the new Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes May 16, 2013.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Chesapeake Bay Initiatives John Kennedy VA DEQ, Chesapeake Bay Program
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Citizen’s Advisory Committee / Local Government Advisory Committee Joint Meeting December 5, 2013 Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA)
Citizen Engagement Of another sort. Fundamental problem in restoring Chesapeake Bay is a people problem “ there is a clear correlation between population.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
Flathead River to Lake Initiative Conservation and restoration through a diverse collaborative effort Part I – How it began Part II – Conservation Successes.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Moving towards a restored Chesapeake Bay watershed
SAV Management Strategy 1 Title of Presentation Date Image or Graphic.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Visual Decision Frameworks –Habitat GIT Adaptive Management based on annual review. Share progress and address challenges and opportunities Adjust management.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
Jim Edward, Deputy Director EPA, Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC Meeting February 18, 2016.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
Peyton Robertson, Sustainable Fisheries GIT Chair PSC Meeting February 16, 2012 Sustainable Fisheries Goal Implementation Team: Key Accomplishments.
A summary of the work and programs of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Citizen’s Advisory Committee / Local Government Advisory Committee Joint Meeting December 5, 2013 Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA)
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
Sustainable Fisheries Goal Implementation Team Executive Committee Meeting March, 26 th 2012.
Chesapeake Bay Program Budget & Finance Workgroup Meeting
Chesapeake Bay Program Updates
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Watershed Implementation Plan
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
2016 – 17 Bay Barometer.
Local Government Advisory Committee
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Presentation transcript:

1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report and Milestones

May 12, 2010 EO Chesapeake Bay Strategy 2

3 EO Strategy Goals and Outcomes RESTORE CLEAN WATER GOAL: Reduce nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and other pollutants to meet Bay water quality goals for dissolved oxygen, clarity and chlorophyll-a and toxic contaminants. WATER QUALITY OUTCOME: Meet water quality standards for dissolved oxygen, clarity/underwater grasses and chlorophyll-a in the Bay and tidal tributaries by implementing 100 percent of pollution reduction actions for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment no later than 2025, with 60 percent of segments attaining water quality standards by STREAM RESTORATION OUTCOME: Improve the health of streams so that 70 percent of sampled streams throughout the Chesapeake watershed rate fair, good or excellent, as measured by the Index of Biotic Integrity, by AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION OUTCOME: Work with producers to apply new conservation practices on 4 million acres of agricultural working lands in high-priority watersheds by 2025 to improve water quality in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. RECOVER HABITAT GOAL: Restore a network of land and water habitats to support priority species and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. WETLAND RESTORATION OUTCOME: Restore 30,000 acres of tidal and non-tidal wetlands and enhance the function of an additional 150,000 acres of degraded wetlands by FOREST BUFFER OUTCOME: Restore riparian forest buffers to 63 percent, or 181,440 miles, of the total riparian miles (stream bank and shoreline miles) in the Bay watershed by FISH PASSAGE OUTCOME: Restore historical fish migratory routes by opening 1,000 additional stream miles by 2025, with restoration success indicated by the presence of river herring, American shad and/or American eel. SUSTAIN FISH & WILDLIFE GOAL: Sustain healthy populations of fish and wildlife, which contribute to a resilient ecosystem and vibrant economy. OYSTER OUTCOME: Restore native oyster habitat and populations in 20 tributaries out of 35 to 40 candidate tributaries by BLUE CRAB OUTCOME: Maintain sustainable blue crab interim population target of 200 million adults (1+ years old) in 2011 and develop a new population rebuilding target for BROOK TROUT OUTCOME: Restore naturally reproducing brook trout populations in headwater streams by improving 58 sub-watersheds from ‘reduced’ classification (10-50 percent of habitat lost) to “healthy” (less than 10 percent of habitat lost) by BLACK DUCK OUTCOME: Restore a three-year average wintering black duck population in the Chesapeake Bay watershed of 100,000 birds by CONSERVE LAND AND INCREASE PUBLIC ACCESS Conserve landscapes to maintain water quality, habitat, sustainable working forests, farms and maritime communities; and cultural, community and indigenous values. It will also expand public access to the Bay and its tributaries through existing and new federal, state, and local parks, refuges, reserves, trails and partner sites. LAND CONSERVATION OUTCOME: Protect an additional 2 million acres of lands throughout the watershed currently identified as high conservation priorities at the federal, state or local level by 2025, including 695,000 acres of forest land of highest value for maintaining water quality. PUBLIC ACCESS OUTCOME: Increase public access to the Bay and its tributaries by adding 300 new public access sites by 2025.

EO FY11 Progress Report & FY12 Action Plan 4 Released by the FLC March 30, 2012

5 First ever EO report on progress Details the steps federal agencies took toward achieving strategy goals FY2012 efforts focused on setting a “road map” for the future Federal agencies also collaborated to eliminate duplication of efforts FY11 Progress Report

RESTORE CLEAN WATER FY2011 Accomplishments: EPA and its jurisdictional and federal partners focused on implementing the historic Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) completed in December Partners began putting in place controls that achieve 11 percent of the sediment reduction goal, 8 percent of the nitrogen reduction goal and 1 percent of the phosphorus reduction goal. This work is ahead of schedule for all but phosphorus. These local actions—put in place with the help of farmers, home builders, watershed organizations and others—will eventually help meet water quality standards for dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll a and clarity. The bay jurisdictions drafted Phase II Watershed Implementation Plans designed to show how strategies will be implemented at the local level, which provide roadmaps for reaching required TMDL pollution reductions by The jurisdictions and the federal partners also developed two-year milestones to ensure all partners keep on an aggressive path to achieving their pollution reduction targets. EPA, U.S. Geological Survey, and the states expanded the Chesapeake non-tidal water quality network to obtain new monitoring data to better assess progress toward the bay TMDL. EPA provided more than $20 million to the states and DC in implementation and accountability grants, and $5 million for local innovative and small watershed restoration actions. USDA/NRCS treated more than 650,000 acres of working lands in priority watersheds with at least one conservation practice and provided technical and financial assistance to agriculture producers. 6

FY11 Progress Report RECOVER HABITAT FY2011 Accomplishments: 148 stream miles were opened for fish passage to benefit anadromous and resident species. This exceeded the annual target of 67 stream miles. Federal and state partners completed the Maryland portion of a fish passage prioritization tool for blockages in Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania. o This tool will accelerate projects that enhance passage of target species and open large stretches of high-quality habitat. 7

FY11 Progress Report SUSTAIN FISH & WILDLIFE FY2011 Accomplishments: NOAA led the development of oyster restoration performance metrics that, for the first time in the Chesapeake Bay, set criteria for evaluating success of oyster restoration projects at both tributary and reef spatial scales. The metrics will be used to track progress toward the EO goal to restore oysters in 20 tributaries by USACE, NOAA and Maryland have also initiated a targeted effort to restore oysters in Harris Creek, a Maryland oyster sanctuary. This collaborative effort serves as a bay-wide model for science-based, large-scale oyster restoration. The 2011 Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab Stock Assessment was released by NOAA and was used by the states to establish a new adult, female-specific, blue crab abundance target of 215 million female crabs for the bay. The new target will help maintain a sustainable stock of blue crabs and ensure a robust harvest over the long-term. The Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture (which includes FWS and USGS) evaluated the health of brook trout in sub-watersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed and the FWS Coastal Program initiated 2 brook trout restoration projects in Maryland and Virginia. Federal, state and nongovernmental partners initiated work to improve a regional black duck habitat model, to assess the quality and spatial arrangement of available black duck habitat in Chesapeake Bay, and to prioritize and target restoration measures. A mid-winter aerial survey was completed, and estimated the three-year average at 47,269 black ducks in the Chesapeake Bay. 8

FY11 Progress Report CONSERVE LAND & INCREASE PUBLIC ACCESS FY2011 Accomplishments: USDA/NRCS worked with agricultural producers to enroll over 6,000 acres in programs that place permanent easements on farmland and wetlands. These efforts conserve open space, keep working lands working, and help reduce the flow of nutrients and sediment into the Chesapeake Bay. The Public Access Planning Team, led by the National Park Service, with representation from federal, state, local and nonprofit partners identified and mapped approximately 1,100 existing public access sites throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed—the first time the entire watershed was inventoried. A web-based mapping tool was developed to identify public access gaps and opportunities using input from the public, resulting in more than 300 additional public access site suggestions which will be included in a strategy for expanding public access to be released in Spring of

10 Second Annual EO action plan Includes a list of tangible efforts federal agencies will tackle to improve the Bay’s health Some of these initiatives are continuations of projects started the previous year; others are new initiatives FY12 Action Plan

FY12 Action Plan Overview FY12 Highlights Include: Continue to provide technical assistance and resources to the Chesapeake Bay jurisdictions for Phase II Watershed Implementation Plans, supporting implementation of the Bay TMDL. Invest in financial and technical assistance to farmers to help them implement voluntary conservation practices in high-priority watersheds within the Chesapeake watershed. Prepare a report on toxic contaminants in the bay and watershed to help guide new reduction goals for toxic contaminants in Continue oyster reef construction, spat-on-shell planting, and restoration monitoring and evaluation in Harris Creek, Maryland, as a blueprint for additional large-scale sanctuary restoration. Continue work to establish a watershed-side GIS based land conservation priority system. 11

FY12 Action Plan Examples of Collaborative Actions: Develop a Chesapeake Conservation Corps Network that will provide a continuum of service opportunities to help engage youth. Finalize the Elementary and Secondary Environmental Literacy Strategy that addresses goals for students, educators, and school grounds. Support an economic study on the costs of water quality improvements and the role a nutrient trading program can play in environmental markets in the Bay watershed. Hold workshops to integrate climate adaption with restoration and conservation techniques at the subwatershed level. Produce a report summarizing the potential changes in streamflow conditions in the watershed to help assess potential changes in water quality. Collaborate with state and academic partners to implement adaptive management though ChesapeakeStat and establish the Monitoring Alliance and Data Enterprise. 12

Funding Total FY2012 federal funding: $419,632,152 (actual appropriations) Based on resources that are directly attributable to implementing the EO Strategy by the FLC agencies FY2012 projections are based on an explicit strategy and a set of actions jointly adopted by all agencies 13

Funding 14

Outcomes and Milestones for the Four Goal Areas Two-year milestones for four major goal areas o Water Quality o Habitat o Fish & Wildlife o Land & Public Access Water Quality milestones issued with state two- year milestones in January 2012 Other goals in FY12 Action Plan issued March 30,

Milestones Restore Clean Water 16

Milestones Recover Habitat 17

Milestones Sustain Fish and Wildlife 18

Milestones Conserve Land and Increase Public Access 19

20 QUESTIONS /