1 DHCP-based Fast Handover protocol NTT Network service systems laboratories 2005. 3. 10 Takeshi Ogawa draft-ogawa-fhopt-00.txt 62nd IETF - Minneapolis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unified L2 Abstractions for L3-Driven Fast handover (draft-koki-mobopts-l2-abstractions-03.txt) - L3-Driven Fast Handover on FMIPv6 (TARZAN) - Koki Mitani,
Advertisements

Fast L3 Handoff in Wireless LANs Andrea G. Forte Sangho Shin Henning Schulzrinne.
DHCPv6.
1 Introduction to Mobile IPv6 IIS5711: Mobile Computing Mobile Computing and Broadband Networking Laboratory CIS, NCTU.
CPSC Network Layer4-1 IP addresses: how to get one? Q: How does a host get IP address? r hard-coded by system admin in a file m Windows: control-panel->network->configuration-
MIP Extensions: FMIP & HMIP
1Nokia Siemens Networks Presentation / Author / Date University of Twente On the Security of the Mobile IP Protocol Family Ulrike Meyer and Hannes Tschofenig.
1 Mobility Management for All-IP Mobile Networks: Mobile IPv6 vs. Proxy Mobile IPv6 Ki-Sik Kong; Wonjun Lee; Korea University Youn-Hee Han; Korea university.
Network Localized Mobility Management using DHCP
Inter-Subnet Mobile IP Handoffs in b Wireless LANs Albert Hasson.
Doc.: IEEE /1183r0 Submission September 2011 Masataka Ohta, Tokyo Institute of TechnologySlide 1 IP over Congested WLAN Date: Authors:
Movement Detection in Mobile IPv6 JinHyeock Choi, Samsung AIT
FMIPv6 Usage with DNA Protocol draft-koodli-dna-fmip-00 Rajeev Koodli, Syam Madanapalli DNA WG, 63 IETF - Paris.
1 IETF 64th meeting, Vancouver, Canada Context Transfer Using GIST Xiaoming Fu John Loughney.
Detecting Network Attachment in IPv6 Problem Statement JinHyeock Choi, Samsung AIT
1 Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers for 3G CDMA Networks Hidetoshi Yokota KDDI Lab Gopal Dommety Cisco.
Security Association Establishment for Handover Protocols Jari Arkko Ericsson Research NomadicLab.
81st IETF, Quebec Citydraft-bernardos-mext-dmm-pmip-01 A PMIPv6-based solution for Distributed Mobility Management draft-bernardos-mext-dmm-pmip-01 Carlos.
1 Handover for PMIPv6 Using MIH KANG Joon-Suk 姜 俊錫.
Media-Independent Pre-Authentication (draft-ohba-mobopts-mpa-framework-01.txt) (draft-ohba-mobopts-mpa-implementation-01.txt) Ashutosh Dutta, Telcordia.
Introducing Reliability and Load Balancing in Home Link of Mobile IPv6 based Networks Jahanzeb Faizan, Mohamed Khalil, and Hesham El-Rewini Parallel, Distributed,
1 Sideseadmed (IRT0040) loeng 5/2010 Avo
Module 12: Routing Fundamentals. Routing Overview Configuring Routing and Remote Access as a Router Quality of Service.
Agenda Introduction State the problems with regular Mobile IP Goals Fast Handover Bicasting Hierarchical Mobile IP Video Summary of conclusions Acknowledgements.
Handoff in IEEE Andrea G. Forte Sangho Shin Prof. Henning Schulzrinne.
1 Behcet Sarikaya Frank Xia Ted Lemon July 2011 DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation as IPv6 Migration Tool in Mobile Networks IETF 81
Submission doc.: IEEE /1003r2 July 2011 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 Upper Layer Data on Management frames Date:
DHCP Option for Proxy Server Vijayabhaskar A K DHC WG IETF 59 Seoul.
Mobile IPv6 in 6NET: An Overview Chris Edwards, Lancaster University, UK.
Transient BCE for Proxy Mobile IPv6 draft-ietf-mipshop-transient-bce-pmipv6-00.txt Oliver Marco
Doc.: IEEE /1019r0 Submission September 2004 Soohong Daniel Park & Jaehwan Lee Access Router Identifier (ARID) for supporting L3 mobility Soohong.
6lowpan ND Optimization draft Update Samita Chakrabarti Erik Nordmark IETF 69, 2007 draft-chakrabarti-6lowpan-ipv6-nd-03.txt.
JinHyeock Choi, DongYun Shin hppt:// Fast Router Discovery with L2 Support draft-jinchoi-dna-frd-01.txt.
Update on SEND Keys Draft draft-kempf-mipshop-handover-key-00.txt James Kempf DoCoMo Labs USA Rajeev Koodli Nokia
07/03/ nd IETF – Minneapolis Mobile IPv6 WG meeting PF_KEY Extension as an Interface between Mobile IPv6 and IPsec/IKE Shinta Sugimoto Francis Dupont.
Santhosh Rajathayalan ( ) Senthil Kumar Sevugan ( )
Cooperation between stations in wireless networks Andrea G. Forte, Henning Schulzrinne Department of Computer Science, Columbia University Presented by:
Ασύρματες και Κινητές Επικοινωνίες Ενότητα # 10: Mobile Network Layer: Mobile IP Διδάσκων: Βασίλειος Σύρης Τμήμα: Πληροφορικής.
IEEE P Handoff Submission March 2004 Soohong Daniel Park, Samsung Electronics. Awareness of the handover to be distinguished from a L2 or L3 Soohong.
IETF#83 Multimob DMM Proposal Summary Dapeng Liu China Mobile 1.
Context Transfer Protocol Extension for Multicast draft-vonhugo-multimob-cxtp-extension-00.txt Proposal of seamless handover support for IP multicast services.
DHCP options for PAA Status report of draft-ietf-dhc-paa-option-01.txt Lionel Morand IETF-65, Dallas.
RFC 4068bis draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rfc4068bis-01.txt Rajeev Koodli.
Per-MS Prefix Model for IPv6 in WiMAX by Frank Xia Behcet Sarikaya Raj Patil Presented by Jonne Soininen.
IP Address Location Privacy and Mobile IPv6: Problem Statement draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-PS-00.txt Rajeev Koodli.
DHCPv4 option for PANA Authentication Agents draft-suraj-dhcpv4-paa-option-00.txt DHC/PANA WG IETF-63 France, Paris.
Doc.: IEEE /1183r1 Submission September 2011 Masataka Ohta, Tokyo Institute of TechnologySlide 1 IP over Congested WLAN Date: Authors:
Extension of the MLD proxy functionality to support multiple upstream interfaces 1 Luis M. Contreras Telefónica I+D Carlos J. Bernardos Universidad Carlos.
Mobile IP Aamir Sohail NGN MS(TN) IQRA UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD.
Mobile IP THE 12 TH MEETING. Mobile IP  Incorporation of mobile users in the network.  Cellular system (e.g., GSM) started with mobility in mind. 
Network Localized Mobility Management using DHCP
Higher Layer Packet Container Proposal Presentation
Network –based fast handovers for local mobility (NFLM)
Thomas C. Schmidt HAW Hamburg
<draft-ohba-pana-framework-00.txt>
Network Based Connectivity and Mobility Management for IPv4 draft-chowdhury-netmip4-00.txt Kuntal Chowdhury IETF-65.
Media-Independent Pre-authentication (MPA) Framework
Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers for 3G CDMA Networks
Lionel Morand DHCP options for PAA Lionel Morand
Network Localized Mobility Management using DHCP
NETLMM protocol proposal draft-akiyoshi-netlmm-protocol-00.txt
draft-jeyatharan-netext-pmip-partial-handoff-02
The 66th IETF meeting in Montreal, Canada
Radius Attribute for MAP draft-jiang-softwire-map-radius-03
2002 IPv6 技術巡迴研討會 IPv6 Mobility
Awareness of the handover to be distinguished from a L2 or L3
Mobility Support in Wireless LAN
DHCP: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
Thomas C. Schmidt, Matthias Wählisch, Rajeev Koodli, Gorry Fairhurst
Presentation transcript:

1 DHCP-based Fast Handover protocol NTT Network service systems laboratories Takeshi Ogawa draft-ogawa-fhopt-00.txt 62nd IETF - Minneapolis dhc wg

2 Status of this draft This draft is submitted to dhc wg. The main purpose of this draft is to realize Fast Handover with plain ARs. It was Introduced in last Mobopts RG meeting, but, has not accepted as RG item (yet).

3 Outline Motivation Problem statement Proposed protocol HO sequence example Test system current situation

4 Motivation IP layer Fast Handover function is needed for real time application. A protocol, that realize FH function inexpensive and that will be available soon, is required. FMIP(MIPSHOP) and Fast RA(DNA) can reduce IP layer HO time. However, there are 4 problems in both method.

5 Problems of FMIP and Fast RA (1/3) 1.Many facilities to be up graded (expensive) With FMIP or Fast RA, all of ARs in service area MUST be up graded, and the ARs need to exchange messages for HOs. So, the number of facilities to be upgraded may be numerous, and connectivity between every pair of different venders and kinds of ARs shall be assured. The fewer facilities to be upgraded the better, and less correlation between facilities is better.

6 Problems of FMIP and Fast RA (2/3) 2. Handling of stateful address (not defined yet) Plain IP nodes (usually) uses DHCP to get stateful IP addresses. With FMIP, a new stateful IP address to be used after handover is distributed by PrRtAdv message (introduced in FMIP). We suppose unified method is better. With Fast RA, there is no function to distribute stateful IP addresses quickly.... as long as I know.

7 Problems of FMIP and Fast RA (3/3) 3.Security association (SA) set-up method between MN and NAR. (being discussed in Mobopts now) With FMIP, FBU messages MUST be authenticated by AR to prevent service from being stolen. However, the SA set–up method for it is not defined, it might take long time How to reduce L2 HO time. (not defined yet) In the FMIP and the Fast RA, there is no function to reduce the L2 HO processing time.

8 Proposed DHCP-based FH protocol IPv6 network CN HA AR IPv6 network CN HA AR Fast HO function AR DHCP server Fast HO function Current FMIP and Fast RA Proposed method MN With the protocol, DHCP server sends "Fast Handover Options" to MN before handovers. Those options include essence of FMIP, link layer and IP layer information, to be used by the MN after handovers, so that the MN can complete HO sequence quickly.

9 It solves the 4 problems (1/2) It is based on DHCP so, 1.Facilities to be up graded Fewer than FMIP and Fast RA (inexpensive) With this protocol plain access routers (if they have the DHCP relay function) can be used. 2. Handling of stateful address Unified in DHCP manner. (defined) 3.SA set-up method Not problem with this protocol. SA between MN and DHCP server can be used after handover. (no problem) (usually the DHCP server is not changed)

10 It solves the 4 problems (2/2) 4. L2 HO time Reduced by sending L2 information to MN before HO. (defined (wireless LAN) ) For example, wireless LAN channel number used by new APs are sent to an MN, and the MN can search for the notified channel only instead of all channels and can reduce layer 2 HO time. Furthermore,

11 Seamless HO for MIP sequence example with this protocol MN ( DHCP client ) DHCP server PAR NAR Layer2 switch DHCP CONFIRM/REPLY CN NS ( DAD) HA DHCP REQUEST/REPLAY BU/BA BU/BA (request sending) Fast Handover options BU/BA (request buffering) Opt DAD (Moor) No need if the MN is still in same DHCP- domain User’s IP packets It could be less than a hundred millisecond(?) (wireless LAN to wireless LAN HO) Tunnel Bufferring (Moor) Standard messages Proposed messages Defined in other draft Search available channel only HO trigger Access authentication i

12 Test system implementing status We are currently implementing the test system in Linux. The basic protocol functions are to be checked by the end of March. L2SW AP1AP2 CISCO 3745 AP3 MN DHCPv6 server MobileIPv6 HomeAgent (HA) CN L2SW DHCPv6 ( Server/Client ) Sourceforge (Version 0.10) MobileIPv6 (MN/HA) MIPL (Version 2.0) OSLinux FedoraCore 3, kernel Wireless LANAtheros, madwifi (CVS)

13 Summary A DHCP-based FH protocol is proposed. Main functions of it are ported from FMIP. It could offer FH function inexpensive and would be available soon if you give me a help. Any comments welcome! Thank you in advance!

14 Annex

15 Functions of proposed method It has 5 main Functions. (A), (B) and (C) are almost the same as FMIP, but (D) and (E) are new functions that FMIP does not offer.

16 Functions of proposed protocol (A)RA proxying function and (B) DHCP proxying function. Fast Handover Options carry information to MNs on old links, which are to be carried by the standard RA and DHCP IA options on new links, and MNs do not need to exchange RS/RA and DHCP solicit messages on new links.

17 Functions of proposed protocol (C) Movement detection function A unique ID for link (L3-information-ID) is introduced. Fast Handover Options carry new AP's ID (e.g., BSSID) and its corresponding L3- information-ID to MNs on old links, and MNs can detect movement using those IDs without NUD on a new link.

18 Functions of proposed protocol (D) Layer 2 information distribution function Fast Handover Options also carry new link information, for example, wireless LAN channel number used by new APs, and MNs can search for the notified channel only instead of all channels and can reduce layer 2 handover.

19 Functions of proposed protocol (E) Confirm Message solicit function A unique ID for DHCP-domains is also introduced. Fast Handover Options carry the IDs, and a MN can know whether it has entered a new DHCP-domain after handover. If the MN is still in the same DHCP- domain, it does not need to send a confirm Message to a DHCP server on a new link.

20 Functions not supported *Smooth HO function Tunnel Buffering may be applied *Prevent interruption during DAD Opt DAD may be applied. *Quick user authentication To be discussed but out of scope of this protocol now. *Context Transfer of AR This protocol can not offer this function.