Prosecution Group Luncheon Patents August 2012. Proposed First-To-File Rules Add definitions in AIA to Rules Declarations for removing references based.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P ROFESSOR R UTH O KEDIJI First to File Patent Systems How the New U.S. System Compares to other Systems Around the World.
Advertisements

Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
MELISSA ASFAHANI Patent Attorney El Paso, TX
William Boshnick Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
Comparison between JP & US new patent systems - First (inventor) to file, exception to loss of novelty, and grace period - NOBUTAKA YOKOTA KYOWA PATENT.
Incorporation by Reference
AIA Final Rules AIA Transition Applications March 20, 2013.
FITF Overview and Tips on Responding to Prior Art Rejections Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting United States Patent and.
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
Patent Strategy Under the AIA Washington in the West January 29, 2013.
Practical Effects of America Invents Act
Implementing First-Inventor-to-File Provisions of the AIA By: Scott D. Malpede, Seth Boeshore and Chitra Kalyanaraman USPTO Rules Effective March 16, 2013.
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association The AIA “New” Grace Period System and How to Treat “Transition Applications” AIA First-to-File.
2011 America Invents Act Patent Reform Susan B. Meyer, J.D.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
OSEP QUARTERLY CALL WITH PARENT CENTERS PART B FINAL REGULATIONS RELATED TO PARENTAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF PUBLIC BENEFITS OR INSURANCE Office of Special.
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
The America Invents Act: Approaching the Finish Line January 29, 2013 Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:
U.S. ARMY ARMAMENT RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT & ENGINEERING CENTER (ARDEC) Presented to: Federal Laboratory Consortium Northeast Region 25 Feb 2014 Mr. Tim.
America Invents Act (AIA) Changes in Patent Law That Impact Companies May Mowzoon: Mowzoon Law Office, PLLC 1.
Experts & Expert Reports  Experts and the FRE  FRCP, Rule 26 and experts  How are experts used in patent litigation?  What belongs in a Rule 26 report?
Invention Spotting – Identifying Patentable Inventions Martin Vinsome June 2012.
Determination of Obviousness Practice Under the Genus-Species Guidelines and In re Ochiai; In re Brouwer Sreeni Padmanabhan & James Wilson Supervisory.
HOW WILL THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA) CHANGE THE WAY WE PROTECT AMERICAN IMAGINEERING? Michael A. Guiliana April 24, 2012 Disney’s Grand Californian Hotel.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association David Albagli AIPLA Mid-Winter Institute IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting.
Greg H. Gardella Ex Parte and Inter Partes Reexamination Tactics AIPLA 2010 Winter Institute.
Patent Term Adjustment (Bio/Chem. Partnership) Kery Fries, Sr. Legal Advisor Phone: (571)
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Hamilton Beach Brands v. Sunbeam Products: Lessons Learned Naomi Abe Voegtli IP Practice.
AIA Strategies.
© 2010 Hodgson Russ LLP IEEE Southern Area Entrepreneur’s Day Overview Of The Patent Process R. Kent Roberts Hodgson Russ LLP (716)
The America Invents Act: Eighteen Months Post-Enactment Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator March 27, 2013.
Information Disclosure Statements
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
The New USPTO Rules and their Impact on Biomedical Patent Prosecution Mojdeh Bahar, J.D.,M.A. Technology Licensing Specialist Office of Technology Transfer.
0 Charles R. Macedo, Esq. Partner. 1 Brief Overview of Priority Under AIA Implications for Public Disclosures and Private Disclosures Role of Provisional.
Notice of Privacy Practices Nebraska SNIP Privacy Subgroup July 18, 2002 Michael J. Brown, MHA, CPA Vice-President, Administrative & Regulatory Affairs,
1 John Calvert Supervisory Patent Examiner
International IP Issues Federal Lab Consortium Meeting International IP Issues Dr Roisin McNally - European Patent Attorney 20 September 2006.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. | 600 Atlantic Avenue | Boston, Massachusetts | | fax | wolfgreenfield.com Prior Art Changes.
Who can file? Inventor Assignee of Inventor Legal Representative of Inventor or Assignee.
A Practical Guide For Prosecutors Patent Prosecution Under The AIA William R. Childs, Ph.D., J.D. August 22, 2013.
1 Patent Law in the Age of IoT The Landscape Has Shifted. Are You Prepared? 1 Jeffrey A. Miller, Esq.
Initial "Inventor" Interview (Practical Legal And Business Considerations) Greg Allen 3M Innovative Properties Company 1 August 26, 2010 AIPLA’s Practical.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Novelty II – Old an New Patent Law Prof Merges
Claims and Continuations Final Rule Overview Briefing for Examiners 1.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Imminent Changes to the US Patent Law Pre-Grant Patent Practice Under the AIA Alan J.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
James Toupin – General Counsel February 1, Summary of Proposed Rule Changes to Continuations, Double Patenting, and Claims.
April 26, 2012 Charles. R. Macedo, Esq. Partner AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP Intellectual Property Law 90 PARK AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK / 212.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Patent October PTO News Backlog of applications continues to decrease –623,000 now, decreasing about 5,000/ month –Expected.
Prosecution Group Luncheon September, America Invents Act Passed House and Senate (HR 1249) Presidential Signature expected Friday Most provisions.
Current Strategies for Patent Development Based on New AIA Patent Law November 21, 2012 J. Scott Southworth1.
Andrew B. Freistein Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P. Learning the ABC’s of Patent Term Adjustment 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Prosecution Group Luncheon March, S.23: Patent Reform Act of 2011 Senate passed 95-5 (3/8); no House action as yet First to File Virtual (Internet)
Patents and the Patenting Process Patents and the Inventor’s role in the Patenting Process.
The Impact of Patent Reform on Independent Inventors and Start-up Companies Mark Nowotarski (Patent Agent)
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences May 15, Interference Practice Q&A James T. Moore Administrative Patent Judge
Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
Tim Saulsbury -- Continuations in Part
Recognizing an AIA Patent
Presentation transcript:

Prosecution Group Luncheon Patents August 2012

Proposed First-To-File Rules Add definitions in AIA to Rules Declarations for removing references based on exceptions in new 102 Notification to PTO of post-AIA claim or new matter in child application Comment period closes October 5 77 Fed. Reg (July 26, 2012)

Submissions to Remove References Recall prior art exceptions in new 102(b)/(c): reference information not applicable if –It and claimed invention commonly owned or part of activities of joint research agreement –Within 1 year of filing, it came from inventor or one who obtained from inventor (“OWO”), or it came after public disclosure of the information by inventor or OWO Proposed Rule 104(c): common ownership –Applicant files statement in the record –Joint research agreement condition also requires giving names of parties to agreement in application

Submissions to Remove References Proposed Rule 130: Declarations –(a)(1) Show that reference was by inventor, or that its info was publicly disclosed by inventor before reference date –(a)(2) Same, as to reference or disclosure by OWO Reference is by inventor: decl’n must show he/she is in fact inventor of relied-on info Reference by OWO: same, and show inventor communicated the relied-on info (in)directly to OWO

Submissions to Remove References Inventor disclosed before reference: decl’n must –Identify/give date of disclosure –Show inventor is in fact inventor of that earlier disclosure –If reference is printed publication, provide copy –If not, describe disclosure with “detail and particularity” to show it is public disclosure of relied-on information OWO disclosed before reference: same, and show communication of relied-on info

Statements of Post-AIA Claims, Disclosure In post-AIA applications claiming pre-AIA benefit, that include(d) claim(s) with post-AIA date Must file “statement to that effect” by later of: –Four months from application filing date –16 months from benefit-application filing date –Date that the first post-AIA claim is presented Need not identify particular claim(s) –“upon reasonable belief, this application contains at least one claim that has an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013” Proposed 37 CFR 1.55, 1.78(a)

Statements of Post-AIA Claims, Disclosure In post-AIA applications claiming pre-AIA benefit, with disclosure not also in benefit application Must file “statement to that effect” by later of: –Four months from application filing date –16 months from benefit-application filing date Need not identify particular matter –“upon reasonable belief, this application contains subject matter not also disclosed in” the prior foreign, provisional or non-provisional application

Statements of Post-AIA Claims, Disclosure If you fail to provide statement in given time period, or seek to retract statement –May result in Rule 105 request for specific identification of support in benefit-application No statement required if: –Application discloses only subject matter also in benefit-application –Benefit only claimed to applications dated 3/16/13 or after

Proposed Post-AIA Examination Guidelines Reviews new provisions and how to apply Guidelines generally consider that procedure and theory remains the same –Anticipation, enablement standards –No “difference of approach to the question of obviousness” –Notes that geographic limitations are removed Comment period closes October 5 77 Fed. Reg (July 26, 2012)

Proposed Post-AIA Examination Guidelines “On Sale” –Comment sought on whether public availability has role “Otherwise available prior art”: “Catch-all” provision –Focus on availability rather than on means of dissemination –May include thesis, poster display, Internet posting, transaction not amounting to UCC “sale” Removing prior art through early disclosure –Inventor’s earlier public disclosure must be the same as the disclosure in the reference to be removed –Even if differences between reference info and inventor’s earlier disclosure “are mere insubstantial changes, or only trivial or obvious variations,” the exception does not apply

New Google Patents Features European Patents –Search by number (e.g. EP A1) –OCR text, links to EP site Prior Art Finder –Identifies key phrases from patent text, makes search query –Results come from Google Patents, Google Scholar, Google Books, and web

Google’s Find Prior Art