1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
Metastatic Gastric Cancer
CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
MOSAIC Stage ll+lll FOLFOX4 LV5FU2 Randomize. DFS DFS (months) Hazard ratio: 0.77 [0.65 – 0.92] p < 0.01 FOLFOX (n=1123) 77.9% LV5FU2 (n=1123) 72.8% FOLFOX.
A Phase III Trial Comparing FULV to FULV + Oxaliplatin in Stage II or III Carcinoma of the Colon: Results of NSABP-C-07 Norman Wolmark, MD Colorectal Cancer.
D. Haller, CRC Symposium, Oncology Spectrums, NYC Combination and Sequential Chemotherapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Daniel G. Haller, MD.
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
Adjuvante therapie van het coloncarcinoom anno : is 5FU/LV nog steeds de standaard? Prof.dr. C.J.A. Punt afd. Medische Oncologie UMC St. Radboud.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Regulatory Background and Past FDA Approvals in Colorectal Cancer Amna Ibrahim M.D DODP, FDA.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Intravenous Calcium/Magnesium to Prevent Oxaliplatin- Induced Sensory Neurotoxicity, N08CB.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Diabetes mellitus and the incidence and time to onset of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy in patients with colorectal cancer: A pooled.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL COMPARING FOLFIRINOX (5FU/LEUCOVORIN, IRINOTECAN AND OXALIPLATIN) VS GEMCITABINE AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC PANCREATIC.
Pancreatic Cancer Ali Shamseddine MD Proessor of Medicine AUBMC
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Systemic Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Living with a Moving Landscape Neal J. Meropol, MD Fox Chase Cancer Center May 16, 2005.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin versus 5-FU alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: First results.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
Phase I/II Trial of Docetaxel plus Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (D-FOX) in Patients with Untreated, Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Cancer Jaffer.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Monoclonal Antibodies EGFR Inhibitors for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Where are we and What’s next Discussion of Abstracts Jeffrey Meyerhardt,
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer: Where are we now ? Leonard Saltz, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial of Decitabine versus Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. N. Perez-Staub, G. Lledo, F. Paye, B. Gayet, M. Flesch, A. Cervantes, A. Figer,
Pharmacogenetics of Irinotecan Clinical perspectives: utility of genotyping Mark J. Ratain, MD University of Chicago 11/3/04.
Discussant: M Ducreux, MD, PhD Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif France TH-302 plus Gemcitabine vs. Gemcitabine in Patients with Untreated Advanced Pancreatic.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
นายแพทย์ธราธร ตุงคะสมิต นายแพทย์ชำนาญการพิเศษ โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งอุดรธานี
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
or other irinotecan-based regimens
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
Authors: David Cunningham et al Date posted: April 3, 2008
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS)
RTOG 9704: A Phase III Study of Adjuvant Pre and Post Chemoradiation 5-FU vs. Gemcitabine for Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma A U.S. GI INTERGROUP.
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Presentation transcript:

1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated with 5-Fluorouracil HC Pitot, KM Rowland, DJ Sargent, PA Philip, EP Mitchell, RM Goldberg, and SR Alberts NCCTG, SWOG and ECOG HC Pitot, KM Rowland, DJ Sargent, PA Philip, EP Mitchell, RM Goldberg, and SR Alberts NCCTG, SWOG and ECOG

2 N9841: Background Multicenter phase III trials with every 3 week schedule (CPT-11 2 nd line): Multicenter phase III trials with every 3 week schedule (CPT-11 2 nd line): CPT-11 vs Supportive care CPT-11 vs Supportive care  Median OS 9.2 vs 6.5 mo CPT-11 vs Infusional 5-FU CPT-11 vs Infusional 5-FU  Median OS 10.8 vs 8.5 mo Multicenter phase III trials with every 3 week schedule (CPT-11 2 nd line): Multicenter phase III trials with every 3 week schedule (CPT-11 2 nd line): CPT-11 vs Supportive care CPT-11 vs Supportive care  Median OS 9.2 vs 6.5 mo CPT-11 vs Infusional 5-FU CPT-11 vs Infusional 5-FU  Median OS 10.8 vs 8.5 mo Cunningham et al Lancet 1998 Rougier et al Lancet 1998

3 N9841: Background CPT-11: Weekly schedule compared to every 3 week (N=291) CPT-11: Weekly schedule compared to every 3 week (N=291) No differences: No differences: Median OS (9.9 mo) Median OS (9.9 mo) Time to progression Time to progression QOL measures QOL measures Neutropenia Neutropenia Toxicity: Toxicity: Gr 3/4 diarrhea less common with every 3 week Rx Gr 3/4 diarrhea less common with every 3 week Rx CPT-11: Weekly schedule compared to every 3 week (N=291) CPT-11: Weekly schedule compared to every 3 week (N=291) No differences: No differences: Median OS (9.9 mo) Median OS (9.9 mo) Time to progression Time to progression QOL measures QOL measures Neutropenia Neutropenia Toxicity: Toxicity: Gr 3/4 diarrhea less common with every 3 week Rx Gr 3/4 diarrhea less common with every 3 week Rx Fuchs et al, J Clin Oncol 2003

4 N9841: Background Oxaliplatin active as single agent or combined with 5-FU/LV in pts with progressing CRC Oxaliplatin active as single agent or combined with 5-FU/LV in pts with progressing CRC Synergy when combined with 5-FU Synergy when combined with 5-FU Phase II European trials: Phase II European trials: Response rate (N=98): 26% Response rate (N=98): 26% Median OS (N=490): 9.7 mo Median OS (N=490): 9.7 mo Toxicity: sensory neuropathy Toxicity: sensory neuropathy Oxaliplatin active as single agent or combined with 5-FU/LV in pts with progressing CRC Oxaliplatin active as single agent or combined with 5-FU/LV in pts with progressing CRC Synergy when combined with 5-FU Synergy when combined with 5-FU Phase II European trials: Phase II European trials: Response rate (N=98): 26% Response rate (N=98): 26% Median OS (N=490): 9.7 mo Median OS (N=490): 9.7 mo Toxicity: sensory neuropathy Toxicity: sensory neuropathy Bleiberg et al Sem Oncol 1998

5 N9841: Objectives Primary: Equivalence of overall survival (OS) of patients treated with FOLFOX4 or CPT-11 in 2 nd line Primary: Equivalence of overall survival (OS) of patients treated with FOLFOX4 or CPT-11 in 2 nd line Secondary: Time to tumor progression (TTP), toxicity, and overall response rate Secondary: Time to tumor progression (TTP), toxicity, and overall response rate Primary: Equivalence of overall survival (OS) of patients treated with FOLFOX4 or CPT-11 in 2 nd line Primary: Equivalence of overall survival (OS) of patients treated with FOLFOX4 or CPT-11 in 2 nd line Secondary: Time to tumor progression (TTP), toxicity, and overall response rate Secondary: Time to tumor progression (TTP), toxicity, and overall response rate

6 N9841: Main Inclusion Criteria Progressive metastatic CRC: Progressive metastatic CRC: Prior 5-FU based chemo Prior 5-FU based chemo < 6 mo from adjuvant 5-FU Rx < 6 mo from adjuvant 5-FU Rx Histologically confirmed CRC Histologically confirmed CRC ECOG PS of 0,1 or 2 ECOG PS of 0,1 or 2 Adequate organ function Adequate organ function Signed informed consent Signed informed consent Progressive metastatic CRC: Progressive metastatic CRC: Prior 5-FU based chemo Prior 5-FU based chemo < 6 mo from adjuvant 5-FU Rx < 6 mo from adjuvant 5-FU Rx Histologically confirmed CRC Histologically confirmed CRC ECOG PS of 0,1 or 2 ECOG PS of 0,1 or 2 Adequate organ function Adequate organ function Signed informed consent Signed informed consent

7 N9841: Main Exclusion Criteria > 1 prior chemo for advanced CRC > 1 prior chemo for advanced CRC Prior CPT-11 or oxaliplatin Prior CPT-11 or oxaliplatin CNS metastases CNS metastases Prior RT to >25% of bone marrow Prior RT to >25% of bone marrow Pre-existing neuropathy (>Gr 2) Pre-existing neuropathy (>Gr 2) > 3 loose stools daily > 3 loose stools daily > 1 prior chemo for advanced CRC > 1 prior chemo for advanced CRC Prior CPT-11 or oxaliplatin Prior CPT-11 or oxaliplatin CNS metastases CNS metastases Prior RT to >25% of bone marrow Prior RT to >25% of bone marrow Pre-existing neuropathy (>Gr 2) Pre-existing neuropathy (>Gr 2) > 3 loose stools daily > 3 loose stools daily

8 N9841: Protocol Therapy CPT-11 - every 3 wks CPT-11 - every 3 wks 350 mg/m 2 d1 (300 mg/m 2 if PS=2, >70 yrs, or prior pelvic rad.) 350 mg/m 2 d1 (300 mg/m 2 if PS=2, >70 yrs, or prior pelvic rad.) FOLFOX4 - every 2 wks FOLFOX4 - every 2 wks OXAL 85 mg/m 2 over 2 hr d1 OXAL 85 mg/m 2 over 2 hr d1 LV 200 mg/m 2 over 2 hr d1,2 LV 200 mg/m 2 over 2 hr d1,2 5-FU 400 mg/m 2 bolus on d1,2 5-FU 400 mg/m 2 bolus on d1,2 5-FU 600 mg/m 2 as 22 hr infusion on d1,2 5-FU 600 mg/m 2 as 22 hr infusion on d1,2 CPT-11 - every 3 wks CPT-11 - every 3 wks 350 mg/m 2 d1 (300 mg/m 2 if PS=2, >70 yrs, or prior pelvic rad.) 350 mg/m 2 d1 (300 mg/m 2 if PS=2, >70 yrs, or prior pelvic rad.) FOLFOX4 - every 2 wks FOLFOX4 - every 2 wks OXAL 85 mg/m 2 over 2 hr d1 OXAL 85 mg/m 2 over 2 hr d1 LV 200 mg/m 2 over 2 hr d1,2 LV 200 mg/m 2 over 2 hr d1,2 5-FU 400 mg/m 2 bolus on d1,2 5-FU 400 mg/m 2 bolus on d1,2 5-FU 600 mg/m 2 as 22 hr infusion on d1,2 5-FU 600 mg/m 2 as 22 hr infusion on d1,2

9 N9841: Statistical Considerations Compare OS of 2 arms for non-inferiority of FOLFOX4 Compare OS of 2 arms for non-inferiority of FOLFOX4 Planned sample size of 560 provide 95% power to detect inferiority if HR = 1.33 Planned sample size of 560 provide 95% power to detect inferiority if HR = 1.33 Due to extended accrual, full power achieved after enrollment of 490 pts Due to extended accrual, full power achieved after enrollment of 490 pts Compare OS of 2 arms for non-inferiority of FOLFOX4 Compare OS of 2 arms for non-inferiority of FOLFOX4 Planned sample size of 560 provide 95% power to detect inferiority if HR = 1.33 Planned sample size of 560 provide 95% power to detect inferiority if HR = 1.33 Due to extended accrual, full power achieved after enrollment of 490 pts Due to extended accrual, full power achieved after enrollment of 490 pts

10 N9841: Schema RANDOMIZERANDOMIZE Accrual from 10/99 to 12/03 CPT-11 (N=245) FOLFOX4 (N=246) CPT-11 (N=94) FOLFOX4 (N=126) Progression/ Failure Progression/ Failure

11 N9841: Patient Characteristics CPT-11(N=245)FOLFOX4(N=246) ECOG PS %95% Median Age 63 yrs Male Gender 62%55% Failed Adj. 5-FU 42%40% 1 o Indicator Hepatic Hepatic53%55% Pulmonary Pulmonary17%20%

12 N9841: 3rd Line Therapy 3rd Line Therapy: 220 pts (45%) CPT-11 (N=94, 38%) FOLFOX4 (N=126, 51%) Crossover at Progression/ Failure Results to be presented by Rowland et al, Abstract #3519

13 N9841: Overall Survival CPT-11 (N=245) FOLFOX4 (N=246) Median Overall Survival (mo) Hazard Ratio p value

14 N9841: Overall Survival p=0.63

15 N9841: Time to Tumor Progression CPT-11 (N=245) FOLFOX4 (N=246) Median TTP (mo) Hazard Ratio p value

16 N9841: Time to Tumor Progression p=0.10

17 N9841: Response Rate CPT-11 (N=245) FOLFOX4 (N=246) Response Rate 15%27% 95% CI % % p value --<0.01

18 N9841: Toxicity Grade > 3

19 N9841: Conclusions For patients with advanced CRC, OS is not significantly different whether 2 nd line Rx after failure of 5-FU begins with CPT-11 or FOLFOX4 (HR=1.05, 95% CI ) For patients with advanced CRC, OS is not significantly different whether 2 nd line Rx after failure of 5-FU begins with CPT-11 or FOLFOX4 (HR=1.05, 95% CI ) Toxicity profile favors FOLFOX4 Toxicity profile favors FOLFOX4 For patients with advanced CRC, OS is not significantly different whether 2 nd line Rx after failure of 5-FU begins with CPT-11 or FOLFOX4 (HR=1.05, 95% CI ) For patients with advanced CRC, OS is not significantly different whether 2 nd line Rx after failure of 5-FU begins with CPT-11 or FOLFOX4 (HR=1.05, 95% CI ) Toxicity profile favors FOLFOX4 Toxicity profile favors FOLFOX4

20 N9841: Conclusions (cont.) 2nd line FOLFOX4 produces higher RR (27% vs 15%) and trend toward longer TTP compared with CPT-11 2nd line FOLFOX4 produces higher RR (27% vs 15%) and trend toward longer TTP compared with CPT-11 Notable OS for both arms indicates importance of using all 3 effective agents against CRC Notable OS for both arms indicates importance of using all 3 effective agents against CRC 2nd line FOLFOX4 produces higher RR (27% vs 15%) and trend toward longer TTP compared with CPT-11 2nd line FOLFOX4 produces higher RR (27% vs 15%) and trend toward longer TTP compared with CPT-11 Notable OS for both arms indicates importance of using all 3 effective agents against CRC Notable OS for both arms indicates importance of using all 3 effective agents against CRC

21