Setting Acceptable Odor Criteria Using Steady-state and Variable Weather Data Z. Yu 1, H. Guo 2, C. Lague 3 1.Division of Environmental Engineering, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik Atmospheric stability in urban areas detected by ultrasonic anemometers Martin Piringer, August Kaiser.
Advertisements

FE Review for Environmental Engineering Problems, problems, problems Presented by L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Urban Heat Island Effect (城市熱島效應)
Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling for Carbon-14 Emissions 14th NUMUG Conference, June 2011, Chicago, IL Theodore A. MessierMark Strum Principal ScientistAdvisory.
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry, Microbiology.
Modeling of Reconnection of Decentralized Power Energy Sources Using EMTP ATP Ing. Dušan MEDVEĎ, PhD. Železná Ruda-Špičák, 25. May 2010 TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.
Odour offensiveness of a mink farm Dependence of annoyance spread on the size of a farm Milena Połeć Part of a master thesis carried out in the Laboratory.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Monitoring Air Quality: Emissions and Odor From A Swine Finishing Livestock Facility.
Temporal Comparison of Atmospheric Stability Classification Methods
A Study of Temporal Variability of Atmospheric Total Gaseous Mercury Concentrations in Windsor, Ontario, Canada Xiaohong (Iris) Xu, Umme Akhtar, Kyle Clark,
Performance of Air Quality Models in Urban Areas  Objectives and Motivation  St. Louis study and ISC urban  Model Improvements  Performance of Improved.
Weather and X/Q 1 Impact Of Weather Changes On TVA Nuclear Plant Chi/Q (  /Q) Kenneth G. Wastrack Doyle E. Pittman Jennifer M. Call Tennessee Valley Authority.
Transport of Air Pollutants
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
page 0 Prepared by Associate Prof. Dr. Mohamad Wijayanuddin Ali Chemical Engineering Department Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Module 9 Atmospheric Stability Photochemistry Dispersion Modeling.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
page 0 Prepared by Associate Prof. Dr. Mohamad Wijayanuddin Ali Chemical Engineering Department Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Department of Agroecology Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences Dynamic NH 3 model EMEP atmospheric dispersion model. Deposition estimates used in.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Analysis of wind energy with pumped storage systems in autonomous islands George Caralis Mechanical Engineer NTUA National Technical University of Athens.
METEO 003 LAB 6 Due Friday Oct. 17 th. Chapter 8 Question 1 a,b,c Radiosonde: instrument carried by a weather balloon to measure atmospheric variables.
Calculation of wildfire Plume Rise Bo Yan School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology.
1 Omowumi Alabi Department of Geosciences University of Missouri-Kansas City Kansas City, MO.
Air Quality Modeling.
Lapse Rates and Stability of the Atmosphere
CHAPTER 5 Concentration Models: Diffusion Model.
Stack Design Done by Eng. Mohamed AbdElRhaman. Content Definition of the stack Applications of stack Dispersion Model Selection of stack design Conclusion.
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Cases 1 through 10 above all depend on the specification of a value for the eddy diffusivity, K j. In general, K j changes with position, time, wind velocity,
Air Dispersion Primer Deposition begins when material reaches the ground Material from the lower stack reaches the ground before that of the taller stack.
TAG Progress Report: Landfill Odors Modeling Research C. D. Cooper, CECE Dept., Univ. of Central Fla. December 16, 2008.
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Meteorology & Air Quality Lecture-1
Civil Engineering Research Institute for Cold Region, PWRI, JAPAN Method for Calculating the Amount of Accumulated Snow Transported.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Technical tool to evaluate the effectiveness of control measures I. ALLEGRINI and C. PERRINO Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche ISTITUTO sull’INQUINAMENTO.
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
The climate and climate variability of the wind power resource in the Great Lakes region of the United States Sharon Zhong 1 *, Xiuping Li 1, Xindi Bian.
Air quality decision support under uncertainty (case study analysis) Piotr Holnicki Systems Research Institute PAS Warszawa, Newelska 6
How well can we model air pollution meteorology in the Houston area? Wayne Angevine CIRES / NOAA ESRL Mark Zagar Met. Office of Slovenia Jerome Brioude,
TEMPLATE DESIGN © A high-order accurate and monotonic advection scheme is used as a local interpolator to redistribute.
Transport and dispersion of air pollution
Air quality models DETERMINISTIC MODELS EULERIAN MODELS
EnE 301: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING 3.0 Air Pollution and Control 3.1 Physical and Chemical Fundamentals 3.2 Major Air Pollutants and their Effects 3.3.
Prof. Jiakuan Yang Huazhong University of Science and Technology Air Pollution Control Engineering.
1 Aika Yano, Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute of Technology October 15, th annual CMAS conference.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Example 2 Chlorine is used in a particular chemical process. A source model study indicates that for a particular accident scenario 1.0 kg of chlorine.
Jericho Project Air Quality Assessment. TOPICS METHODOLOGY EMISSION SOURCES RESULTS AND ASSESSMENT MITIGATION AND MONITORING CONCLUSION.
Meteorology for modeling AP Marti Blad PhD PE. Meteorology Study of Earth’s atmosphere Weather science Climatology and study of weather patterns Study.
Understanding Spray Drift Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Various Methodologies for Calculating the Impacts on Delta-T From Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI) Jim Holian and Steve Mirsky, SAIC.
Producing Meteorological Fields for Local Scale Pollutant Transport and Dispersion Estimates 1)Using the CALPUFF modeling system. 2)The model system produces.
Consequence Analysis Robert Wu South Coast Air Quality Management District.
Comparisons of CALPUFF and AERMOD for Vermont Applications Examining differing model performance for a 76 meter and 12 meter (stub) stack with emission.
Neutrally Buoyant Gas Dispersion Instructor: Dr. Simon Waldram
Consequence Analysis 2.1.
Fundamentals of air Pollution Engineering
Air Pollution and Control (Elective- I)
Martin Piringer, Claudia Flandorfer, Sirma Stenzel, Marlies Hrad
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
Unit 3 Functions.
Fundamentals of air Pollution Engineering
Meteorology & Air Pollution Dr. Wesam Al Madhoun
Wind Velocity One of the effects of wind speed is to dilute continuously released pollutants at the point of emission. Whether a source is at the surface.
Presentation transcript:

Setting Acceptable Odor Criteria Using Steady-state and Variable Weather Data Z. Yu 1, H. Guo 2, C. Lague 3 1.Division of Environmental Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK 2.Department of Agricultural and Bioresource Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK 3.Faculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON

Presentation outline Introduction Objectives Materials and Methods Results and Discussions Conclusions Acknowledgement

Introduction Livestock odor & Setback distance & Odor dispersion model Odor criteria – odor concentration – odor occurrence frequency Different acceptable odor concentration – different odor intensity/strength perceptions for odor concentrations – different weather data: steady-state or variable weather data – different odor occurrence frequencies

Objectives Explore the odor dispersion under steady-state and variable (hourly historical) weather conditions by CALPUFF model Identify the equivalent odor criteria (odor concentration and occurrence frequency) for determination of setback distance using these two weather conditions.

Materials and Methods Swine farm CALPUFF Weather condition – Steady state F1, F3, E3, E5, D5, D8, C5 Prevailing wind (WNW) – Variable annual hourly meteorological data (2003) Note: When using annual hourly meteorological data to study the actual occurrence and duration of the steady- state weather conditions, steady-state weather condition marked as stability with wind speed (F1, F3, etc.) represented the weather condition with certain stability class and the wind speed equal or less than certain value and any other conditions that are more stable than the indicated condition

Materials and Methods (Cont’d) Computation Assumptions and model setup – Point sources for the barn and area source for manure storage – Constant emission rates, the odor emitting height was 1.5 m for the barn and the manure storage cells located on ground level. – The odor exit velocity was considered to be 0.05 m/s. The exhaust air temperature from the barn was 22 o C. – Ambient temperature of 20 o C and mixing height of 1500 m. The wind direction was constant from WNW. – The model simulation time period was set up long enough – Deposition or chemical transformation were not considered. – Receptors were arranged in grid format of 100 m from each other within 5 km from the farm. The receptor’s detection height was considered to be 1.5 m above the ground. Data analysis method Steady-state meteorological data Variable meteorological data CDD O.F & Duration Annual O.F of certain O.C Annual mean O.C Setback distance O.C Setback distance Equivalent Comparison CDD: Critical Detection Distance O.C: Odor Concentration O.F: Occurrence Frequency

Results and Discussion Odor dispersion under steady-state meteorological conditions Annual occurrence frequency and duration of steady-state weather condition Odor dispersion using annual hourly meteorological data Comparison of odor criteria under two weather conditions

Odor dispersion under steady-state meteorological conditions Critical detection distance F1F3E3E5D5D8C5 Weather condition Odor concentration within 5 km

Annual occurrence frequency and duration of steady-state weather condition 1.Maximum Occurrence frequencies for weather conditions F1 and F3 appeared in WNW direction, 2. Maximum Occurrence frequencies of E3 and E5 in W direction and D5, D8 and C5 in SSE direction. 3. The annual occurrence Frequencies for F1 to C5 in WNW directions were 0.71%, 1.39%, 1.72%, 2.89%, 4.83%, 8.24% and 10.25%, respectively.

Annual occurrence frequency and duration of steady-state weather condition (Cont’d) 1.The stable conditions (F1 and F3) and slightly stable (E3 and E5) conditions seldom occurred at daytime. 2.Neutral conditions (D5 and D8) occurred mostly at nigh and slightly unstable condition (C5) occurred more often at night time than daytime,. 3.Long duration occurrences are mainly in winter season 4.long durations of the same weather conditions (or close to steady-state weather condition) were very rare. 5.For F1 to E5, the largest duration was 5 hours and occurred no more than 4 times in a year. 6.The largest duration is 11 hours for C5 which occurs twice

Odor dispersion using annual hourly meteorological data Mean annual odor concentration Annual occurrence frequencies for various odor concentrations 1.maximum distances occur for various odor concentrations leeward of the prevailing winds in the NW and SE areas 2.If annual average odor concentrations of 1 to 10 OU are used as setback criteria, the maximum setback distance will be in the range of 0.8 to 2.5 km

Comparison of odor criteria under two weather conditions for variable weather condition for steady state weather condition

Comparison of odor criteria under two weather conditions Cont’d

Conclusions Under steady-state weather conditions, the odor travels much farther under stable weather condition and the travel distance decreases significantly with decrease of atmospheric stability. Using the annual hourly meteorological data and considering annual average odor concentrations of 1 to 10 OU as acceptable odor concentration, the maximum setback distance will be in the range of 0.8 to 2.5 km,. These distances are much lower than that from using same odor concentration under stable steady-state weather conditions. Different odor criteria should be used to determine setback distances under different weather conditions. The relationships between odor concentration and its occurrence frequency are different between these two weather conditions. The odor criteria used to determine different setback distance were identified. Suitable odor criteria that should be used to achieve acceptable setback distance under either steady-state and variable conditions.

Acknowledgements Thanks to – NSERC and CGSR (College of Graduate studies and research) of University of Saskatchewan

Thank you