Sudden Stratospheric Warming Effects M.V. Klimenko, V.V. Klimenko, F.S. Bessarab, Yu.N. Koren’kov WD Pushkov IZMIRAN, RAS, Kaliningrad, Russia, WD Pushkov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Bath 4D ionisation dynamics during storms of the recent solar maximum Cathryn Mitchell, Ping Yin, Paul Spencer and Dmitriy Pokhotelov, University.
Advertisements

9-10 November 2011 Atmospheric Waves Workshop, ESTEC Atmospheric Waves Workshop Scott Osprey 1, Corwin Wright 2 Evidence of atmospheric gravity waves and.
Introduction to the Ionosphere
REFERENCES Alexander et al (2008): Global Estimates of Gravity Wave Momentum Flux from HIRDLS Observations. JGR 113 D15S18 Ern et al (2004): Absolute Values.
MURI,2008 Electric Field Variability and Impact on the Thermosphere Yue Deng 1,2, Astrid Maute 1, Arthur D. Richmond 1 and Ray G. Roble 1 1.HAO National.
Ionosphere Climate Studied by F3 / COSMIC Constellation C. H. Liu Academia Sinica In Collaboration with Tulasi Ram, C.H. Lin and S.Y. Su.
Storm-time total electron content and its response to penetration electric fields over South America P. M. de Siqueira, E. R. de Paula, M. T. A. H. Muella,
2011 SuperDARN Workshop, Hanover, NH 1 Solar cycle variability of atmospheric waves and tides as observed by SuperDARN Elsayed R. Talaat Johns Hopkins.
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
LISN Model/Data Inversion to Determine the Drivers of the Low-Latitude Ionosphere (Comparisons with JRO ISR Drift Measurements) Vince Eccles (Modeling)
Modelling the Thermosphere-Ionosphere Response to Space Weather Effects: the Problem with the Inputs Alan Aylward, George Millward, Alex Lotinga Atmospheric.
Erasmus Mundus Master Course Space Master - Joint European Master in Space Science and Technology Special Lecture Course on Atmospheric and Ionospheric.
Ionospheric Electric Field Variations during Geomagnetic Storms Simulated using CMIT W. Wang 1, A. D. Richmond 1, J. Lei 1, A. G. Burns 1, M. Wiltberger.
Millstone Hill ISR, June 14-18, Ti, June 14-18, 2004.
Can we trust the simulated gravity-wave response to climate change? Ted Shepherd Department of Physics University of Toronto NCAR TIIMES Gravity-Wave Retreat,
CEDAR Frontiers: Effects of stratospheric warming in the mesosphere/thermosphere L. Goncharenko, MIT Haystack Observatory I. Azeem, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical.
CISM Advisory Council Meeting 4 March Ionosphere-Thermosphere Modeling Tim Killeen, Stan Solomon, and the CISM Ionosphere-Thermosphere Team.
Periodic Modulations in Thermospheric Composition by Solar Wind High Speed Streams G. Crowley, A. Reynolds, J. P. Thayer, J. Lei, L.J. Paxton, A.B. Christensen,
Geospace Variability through the Solar Cycle John Foster MIT Haystack Observatory.
How do gravity waves determine the global distributions of winds, temperature, density and turbulence within a planetary atmosphere? What is the fundamental.
the Ionosphere as a Plasma
*K. Ikeda (CCSR, Univ. of Tokyo) M. Yamamoto (RIAM, Kyushu Univ.)
CLIMATE CHANGE INDICATORS: UPPER ATMOSPHERE.  Global Temperatures  GHG emissions  Heat waves  Drought  Precipitation  Flooding  Cyclones  Sea.
J. M. Forbes, E. K. Sutton, R. S. Nerem Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA Sean Bruinsma, CNES.
The Penetration of Solar Storm Effects into the Earth's Atmosphere Maura Hagan and Ray Roble Gang Lu, Jens Oberheide*, Stan Solomon, Art Richmond National.
How does the Sun drive the dynamics of Earth’s thermosphere and ionosphere Wenbin Wang, Alan Burns, Liying Qian and Stan Solomon High Altitude Observatory.
Altitude (km) January Global AverageTemperature (K) Pressure (hPa) With O( 3 P) Cooling WACCM-X The Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model – eXtended.
Jeff Forbes (CU), Xiaoli Zhang (CU), Sean Bruinsma (CNES), Jens Oberheide (Clemson U), Jason Leonard (CU) 1 Coupling to the Lower Atmosphere, an Observation-Based.
Ionospheric Electrodynamics & Low-Earth Orbiting Satellites (LEOS) J-M Noël, A. Russell, D. Burrell & S. Thorsteinson Royal Military College of Canada.
Neutral Winds in the Upper Atmosphere Qian Wu National Center for Atmospheric Research.
REFERENCES Alexander et al (2008): Global Estimates of Gravity Wave Momentum Flux from HIRDLS Observations. JGR 113 D15S18 Ern et al (2004): Absolute Values.
MESOSPHERE COUPLING THE ROLE OF WAVES AND TIDES. Spectra show that waves & tides of large amplitude dominate the MLT region A typical power spectrum of.
Ionospheric Research at USU R.W. Schunk, L. Scherliess, J.J. Sojka, D.C. Thompson & L. Zhu Center for Atmospheric & Space Sciences Utah State University.
Effects of the Magnetosphere and Lower Atmosphere on the Ionosphere-Thermosphere System R.W. Schunk, L. Gardner, L. Scherliess, D.C. Thompson, J.J. Sojka.
BEHAVIOR OF THE NM EMISSION IN MLT REGION DURING STRATOSPHERIC WARMING EVENTS I.V. Medvedeva, A.V. Mikhalev, M.A. Chernigovskaya Institute of Solar-Terrestrial.
GITM and Non-hydrostatic processes Yue Deng Department of Physics University of Texas, Arlington.
THE REACTION OF MID-LATITUDE IONOSPHERE ON STRONG IONOSPHERIC STORMS ON THE BASE OF THE EAST- SIBERIAN GROUND-BASED RADIO INSTRUMENT NETWORK DATA B.G.
Mapping high-latitude TEC fluctuations using GNSS I.I. SHAGIMURATOV (1), A. KRANKOWSKI (2), R. SIERADZKI (2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA (1,2), Yu.V. CHERNIAK (1),
Response of the Earth’s environment to solar radiative forcing
Ionospheric Assimilation Model for Space Weather Monitoring and Forecasting I. T. Lee 1 W. H. Chen 2, T. Matsuo 3,4, C. H. Chang 2,
Atmosphere. What makes up our atmosphere?  Nitrogen  Oxygen  Argon.
COSMIC Ionospheric measurements Jiuhou Lei NCAR ASP/HAO Research review, Boulder, March 8, 2007.
Effects of January 2010 stratospheric sudden warming in the low-latitude ionosphere L. Goncharenko, A. Coster, W. Rideout, MIT Haystack Observatory, USA.
Postmidnight ionospheric trough in summer and link to solar wind: how, when and why? Mirela Voiculescu (1), T. Nygrén (2), A. Aikio(2), H. Vanhamäki (2)
Planetary waves in the equatorial mesosphere and ionosphere measurements Lourivaldo Mota Lima (UEPB) Luciana R. Araújo, Maxwelton F. Silva (UEPB) H. Takahashi,
VT SuperDARN Group Joseph Baker Ground-Based Observations of the Plasmapause Boundary Layer (PBL) Region with.
Coupled Thermosphere Ionosphere Plasmasphere Model with self-consistent Electrodynamics (CTIPe) Global thermosphere km, solves momentum, energy,
Impact of midnight thermosphere dynamics on the equatorial ionospheric vertical drifts Tzu-Wei Fang 1,2 R. Akmaev 2, R. Stoneback 3, T. Fuller-Rowell 1,2,
When Lower Atmosphere Waves Invade the Upper Atmosphere
pre-reversal enhancement of the evening vertical plasma drifts
Pogoreltsev A., Ugrjumov A..
Connecting Earth to Space: NASA Heliophysics Provides Data on how Space Weather Impacts Earth’s Environment Using NASA Van Allen Probes mission data, researchers.
The Atmosphere.
Atmosphere-Ionosphere Wave Coupling as Revealed in Swarm Plasma Densities and Drifts Jeffrey M. Forbes Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University.
Welcome to Equatorial-PRIMO
Alfvén Dynamics in High-Latitude IT Heating
Russian-British Seminar of Young Scientists “Dynamical plasma processes in the heliosphere: from the Sun to the Earth” September 2017, Irkutsk,
GOMOS measurements of O3, NO2, and NO3 compared to model simulations
Ionospheric Models Levan Lomidze Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University CEDAR-GEM Student Workshop, June.
Thermosphere-Ionosphere Issues for DASI - I:
Ionosphere, Magnetosphere and Thermosphere Anthea Coster
Mid-latitude Electron Density Variations Under Magnetospheric Substorm Conditions As Determined From Istanbul Dynasonde Observations Aysegul Ceren MORAL,
SPP Colloquium, 16-Jun-2017, Bremen
Astrid Maute, Art Richmond, Ben Foster
Charles Lin1, Jia-Ting Lin1, Loren Chang2, Yang-Yi Sun2
Han-Li Liu, Raymond G. Roble, Arthur D. Richmond, Stanley C
The Upper Atmosphere: Problems in Developing Realistic Models
Evaluation of IRI-2012 by comparison with JASON-1 TEC and incoherent scatter radar observations during the solar minimum period Eun-Young Ji,
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Louisville, KY, USA
VarSITI Closing Simposium, Sofia, Bulgaria, June 2019
Presentation transcript:

Sudden Stratospheric Warming Effects M.V. Klimenko, V.V. Klimenko, F.S. Bessarab, Yu.N. Koren’kov WD Pushkov IZMIRAN, RAS, Kaliningrad, Russia, WD Pushkov IZMIRAN, RAS, Kaliningrad, Russia,

SSW is a dramatic, large scale meteorological process in the winter middle atmosphere which involves profound changes of temperature and circulation. SSW can last for several days or weeks. A stratospheric warming is identified as major if at height of 30 km (10 mbar) or below, the zonal mean temperature increases poleward from ~60 o latitude and an associated circulation reversal (breakdown of the polar vortex) are observed. Minor warmings may reach comparable intensities (i.e., high temperatures), but do not lead to a breakdown of the circulation as is defined above. Sudden Stratospheric Warming is the example of the links between low- and middle- atmosphere and ionosphere

Goncharenko et al, GRL 2010 Chau et al, JGR 2010 Recent Model results Whole Atmospheric Model (WAM) (0 – 600 км ) Fuller-Rowell et al., 2011, Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIMEGCM) (30 – 600 км) Liu et al., 2002, 2005, 2010; Yamashita et al., 2010 Observed data Model simulations

Pancheva and Mukhtarov., 2011 Day Number (start 1 October 2007) Day Number (start 1 October 2008 )

Model GSM TIP Brief Description Global Self-consistent Model of the Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere (GSM TIP) was developed in West Department of IZMIRAN. The model GSM TIP was described in details in Namgaladze et al., Thermospheric parameters: T n, O 2, N 2, O, NO, N( 4 S),N( 2 D) densities; vector of velocities; (from 80 km to 500 km) Ionospheric parameters: O +, H +, Mol + densities; T i and T e ; Vectors of ion velocities (from 80 km to 15 Earth radii) Electric field: The model is added by the new block of electric field calculation Klimenko et al., 2006, 2007.

SSW-2009 Westward winds slowed down and reversed direction. Major SSW event. Large and long lasting temperature increase. Low solar activity and quiet geomagnetic conditions. 11 days coverage with ISR measurements of the drifts and densities, and mesospheric dynamics. January, 23 max Tn effect January, 27 max dynamical effect

The neutral temperature disturbances at lower boundary of GSM TIP model (80 км ). First SSW scenario for 2009 COMMA-LIM model (Fröhlich et al., 2003). Quasi-stationary PW with zonal wave number s = 1. Observation data Incoherent scatter radar (ISR) electron density and temperature measurements from the Irkutsk, as well as ionosonde data of – Yakutsk (62.2° N, 162.6° E) – Irkutsk (52.2° N, 104.0° E), – Kaliningrad (54.7° N, 20.6° E), – Jicamarca (12.0° S, 76.9° W), – and St. Johns (STJ) (23.2° S, 45.9° W)

foF2 before SSW-event  foF2 (Jan 27 – Jan 15) Heating due to wave energy dissipation T i disturbances over Millstone Hill (Goncharenko and Zhang, 2008)

Tn in stratosphere 60-90N SSW peakSSW min

Summary (1) Using the presented approach allows to reproduce the observed perturbations of the neutral temperature in MLT region above Irkutsk and global negative ionospheric disturbances during 2008 and 2009 SSW events Model calculations allowed to explain the observed global negative ionospheric disturbances during SSW events Morning SSW positive effects in the electron density at low latitudes which have recently been discussed by Goncharenko et al. (2010), Chau et al. (2011), Fejer et al. (2011) are absent in our simulation results. A more realistic description of neutral atmosphere parameters at altitudes of the mesopause region (lower boundary of the GSM TIP model) has to be used in order to reproduce the observed positive ionospheric disturbances at low latitudes during stratospheric warming events.

Another Scenario For 2009 SSW SOCOL SOlar-Climate-Ozone Links model horizontal resolution: 3.75° vertical resolution: 39 levels to 0.01 hPa Winds and temperature, 41 chemical species GSM TIP Global Self-consistent Model of the Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere T n, O 2, N 2, O, NO, N( 4 S),N( 2 D) densities; vectors of velocities (from 80 km to 500 km) O +, H +, Mol + densities; T i and T e ; ion velocities (from 80 km to 15 Earth radii) Electric field GSM TIP Global Self-consistent Model of the Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere T n, O 2, N 2, O, NO, N( 4 S),N( 2 D) densities; vectors of velocities (from 80 km to 500 km) O +, H +, Mol + densities; T i and T e ; ion velocities (from 80 km to 15 Earth radii) Electric field Thermospheic output at 80 km ECMWF data for SSW 2009 event TIME-GCM model Output at 30 km Thermospheic output at 80 km

 Tn (Jan,21 – Jan, 15) on 60  N  foF2 (Jan,21 – Jan, 15) on 60  N cooling of the north polar cap

ECMWF + TIME-GCM + GSM TIP IGS GPS TEC GPS TEC

Summary (2) Mesospheric effects of SSW, as well as thermospheric and ionospheric effects simulated with GSM TIP, obtained in the second scenario are smaller than that in the first scenario. The choice of a method for calculating the mean (background) values is important for interpreting the observed data. Although a new scenario of SSW-2009 event qualitatively reproduces an increase in foF2 in a near-equatorial area, but observed magnitudes are much higher. Is it possible to reproduce so big ionospheric disturbances at low latitudes using GSM TIP model?

Jicamarca, Peru 11.9°S, 76.0°W; -0.6°, 353.9° Porto Alegre, Brazil 30.1°S, 51.1°W; -19.2°, 17.1° Qaanaaq, Greenland 77.5°N, 69.1°W: 88.9°, 6.7° Millstone Hill, MA, USA 42.6°N, 71.5°W; 54.1°, 357.0° Newest simulation obtained using GSM TIP model with taken into account observed E × B vertical plasma drift (zonal electric field) over the Jicamarca, Peru during SSW 2009 event delta Evonal on 25 January 2009 Evonal on 15 January 2009 Ezonal on 25 January 2009 Evonal on 15 January 2009 Ezonal on 25 January 2009

TEC and it disturbances obtained using GSM TIP model with observed E × B vertical drift and GPS TEC data GSM TIP on 15 January 2009 GSM TIP on 25 January 2009 delta GSM TIP on 25 January 2009 GSM TIP on 15 January 2009 GSM TIP on 25 January 2009 delta GSM TIP on 25 January 2009 GPS TEC on 15 January 2009 GPS TEC on 25 January 2009 delta GPS TEC on 25 January 2009 GPS TEC on 15 January 2009 GPS TEC on 25 January 2009 delta GPS TEC on 25 January 2009

Modulation of GW by PW Hoffmann, Jacobi (2010) MetO temperature data (red line), SABER (green lines) and the modulation of GW potential energy (blue lines). dTEC (thick black line) indicate the possible ionospheric response to the waves coming from below Acknowledgments. The authors express their sincere thanks to Hanli Liu, Eugen Rozanov, Larisa Goncharenko, Marina Chernigovskaya, for the fruitful cooperation, providing the data and making the experimental data available. These investigations were supported by RFBR Grant No and RAS Program 22.