Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan. 26-30, 2015 Collective Effects 2 So far, we have not considered the effect that particles in a bunch might.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture 16 -Negative Mass Instability 2 Consider two particles in a bunch. Below transition.
Advertisements

Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We will tackle accelerator physics the way we tackle most problems in classical physics – ie, with 18 th and 19 th century mathematics!
Sources of the Magnetic Field
Halliday/Resnick/Walker Fundamentals of Physics 8th edition
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Our previous discussion implicitly assumed that all particles were at the same momentum  Each quad has a constant focal length 
SPACE CHARGE EFFECTS IN PHOTO-INJECTORS Massimo Ferrario INFN-LNF Madison, June 28 - July 2.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Electric Fields Electric fields are created by electric charges. Any object with a charge has an electric field around it. Opposite charges attract each.
AP Physics C Montwood High School R. Casao
AC dipole for LHC Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Our previous discussion implicitly assumed that all particles were at the same momentum  Each quad has a constant focal length 
Electromagnetic Force
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…  We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like” and “cosine-like”
Lecture 8 MAGNETOSTATICS Magnetic Fields Fundamental Postulates of Magnetostatics in Free Space Prof. Viviana Vladutescu.
Monday, Mar. 27, 2006PHYS , Spring 2006 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1444 – Section 501 Lecture #16 Monday, Mar. 27, 2006 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Sources of Magnetic.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Outline Magnetic dipole moment Magnetization Magnetic induction
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Wakefields and Impedance 2 Consider the effect that one particle can have on subsequent particles.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Thursday March 31, PHYS Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 02 Lecture #16 Thursday Mar 31, 2011 Dr. Andrew Brandt HW7 Ch 27 is due Fri.
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2014 Lecture 17 -Wakefields and Impedance 2 In our last lecture, we characterized the effects.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In terms of total charge and current  In terms of free charge an current USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2013 Lecture 2 - Basic.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
FCC electron cloud study plan K. Ohmi (KEK) Mar FCC electron cloud study meeting CERN.
Beam-Beam and e-Cloud in RHIC Oct. 6, 2015 Haixin Huang, Xiaofeng Gu, Yun Luo.
Unit 4 Day 7: Magnetic Fields due to Wires Magnetic Field in a Straight Wire Magnetic Fields in 2 Parallel Conducting Wires, Side by Side Magnetic Forces.
Magnetic Fields due to Current in a Wire
Magnetic fields By the end of this chapter you should be able to: understand the meaning of magnetic fied and find its magnitude and direction in simple.
Synchrotron Radiation
Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Recall our generic transfer matrix  If we use a dipole to introduce a small bend Θ at one point, it will in general propagate as.
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2014 Lecture 20 - Evolution of the Distribution Function 2 Our simple model can only go so far.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our earlier lectures, we found the general equations of motion  We initially considered only the linear fields, but now we will.
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance) M. Zobov.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Recall our generic transfer matrix  If we use a dipole to introduce a small bend Θ at one point, it will in general propagate as.
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS IN THE LHC INJECTORS Discussion on Landau damping Ibon Santiago González Summer Student Session 2007.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2014 Lecture 14 - Collective Effects 2 So far, we have not considered the effect that particles.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Rende Steerenberg, CERN, Switzerland
PHYS 1444 – Section 501 Lecture #16
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Space-charge Effects for a KV-Beam Jeffrey Eldred
Future HERA High Luminosity Performance
Lecture HT14 Beam-Beam II
Lecture 32 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture HT13 Beam-Beam I ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 33 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 3
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Presentation transcript:

Eric Prebys, FNAL

USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Collective Effects 2 So far, we have not considered the effect that particles in a bunch might have on each other, or on particles in another bunch. Consider the effect off space charge on the transverse distribution of the beam. radial charge density If we look at the field at a radius r, we have

USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Collective Effects 3 Similarly, Ampere’s Law gives Linear charge density

USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Collective Effects 4 We can break this into components in x and y Non-linear and coupled  ouch! but for x<<σ x ~linear and decoupled

USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Collective Effects 5 “classical radius” This looks like a distributed defocusing quad of strength so the total tuneshift is Maximum tuneshift for particles near core of beam “Bunching factor”

USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Collective Effects 6 This is pretty large, but because this is a rapid cycling machine, it is less sensitive to resonances Because this affects individual particles, it’s referred to as an “incoherent tune shift”, which results in a tune spread. There is also a “coherent tune shift”, caused by images charges in the walls of the beam pipe and/or magnets, which affects the entire bunch more or less equally. This is an important effect, but beyond the scope of this lecture.

USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Collective Effects 7 If two oppositely charged bunches pass through each other… Both E and B fields are attractive to the particles in the other bunch If two bunches with the same sign pass through each other… Both E and B fields are repulsive to the particles in the other bunch In either case, the forces add

USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Collective Effects 8 Integrate… Effective Length Front of first bunch encounters front of second bunch Front of first bunch exits second bunch. “Effective length”

USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Collective Effects 9 Small x and y Maximum tuneshift for particles near center of bunch “Tuneshift Parameter” normalized emittance

USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Collective Effects 10 The total tuneshift will ultimately limit the performance of any collider, by driving the beam onto an unstable resonance. Values of on the order ~.02 are typically the limit. However, we have seen the somewhat surprising result that the tuneshift does not depend on β *, but only on For a collider, we have We assume we will run the collider at the “tuneshift limit”, in which case we can increase luminosity by Making β * as small as possible Increasing N b and ε proportionally.