Point-intercept aquatic plant sampling Ray Valley, Cindy Tomcko, Donna Dustin 19 November 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monitoring Watershed Restoration Effectiveness Nez Perce Tribe DFRM-Watershed Division Rebecca A. Lloyd, Project Leader.
Advertisements

A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Wildlife Inventory and Habitat Evaluation of Duck Valley Indian Reservation Project #32008 Shoshone-Paiute Tribes.
Strengthening the State- Tribal-Federal Partnership to Assess the Condition of Nations Waters.
Summary of Aquatic Programs Administered by the WV Division of Natural Resources Dan Cincotta WVDNR P. O. Box 67 Elkins, WV
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Research, Citizen Involvement, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Jack Sullivan Science Services Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources.
Wendy Stankovich University of Wisconsin - Platteville.
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
Monarch Larva Monitoring Project Goals and Roles.
Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:
Baraboo River Watershed RCPP
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Daren Carlson – MN DNR 14 April Overview Prairie monitoring – Change analysis – Status/trend monitoring – Grassland adaptive management collaborative.
September 6th, 2002 Lake Management Plans -What Now- Aquarius Systems’ Aquatic Plant Harvesting Seminar Craig Helker, Wisconsin DNR.
Social and Community Based Initiatives and the NE MN Landscape Plan.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Lake Status Indicator Selection and Use in SLICE David F. Staples.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
The Idaho Master Naturalist Program To develop a corps of well-informed volunteers to actively work toward stewardship of Idaho’s natural environment.
Florida Master Naturalist Program A Statewide Conservation Education Effort Dr. Martin Main UF/IFAS Professor and Wildlife Ecologist FMNP Program Leader.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
GOES GREEN! The College of Dentistry “GO GREEN” Committee The College of Dentistry.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
Great Lakes Monitoring Inventory and Gap Analysis: Recommendations for Addressing Shortfalls and Improving Monitoring Coordination in the Great Lakes Basin.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
Gap Analysis: GIS, maps and a new view of regional conservation Southwest Regional GAP Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE 2004,
Advantages of Monitoring Vegetation Restoration With the Carolina Vegetation Survey Protocol M. Forbes Boyle, Robert K. Peet, Thomas R. Wentworth, and.
The Planning Perspective Presented by Joel Eisenfeld – KFH Group.
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Integrated thematic assessments: outlook on water, data and.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
The Great Lakes Aquatic Gap Analysis Project Overview Jana Stewart U.S. Geological Survey.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment (SLICE) and its “so-called” sentinel lakes Ray Valley and Don Pereira.
The State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources The Global Plan of Action FAO
The Information Component: Help Desk Performance Measures
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
THE OFFSHORE SITUATION IN GREECE Municipality of Corfu.
Michigan Tech Research Institute (MTRI)  Michigan Technological University 3600 Green Court, Suite 100  Ann Arbor, MI (734) – Phone 
Evaluation of the Indianapolis, Indiana September 2002 – August 2003 Stamp Out Syphilis Coalition.
UESCO/IFLA Workshop on Development of Information Literacy through School Libraries in Southeast Asia September 2005.
AdriaMed Expert Consultation Interactions between capture fisheries and aquaculture Rome, Italy November st Coordination Committee (2000)
Indian Head Joint Land Use Study Presentation for COMREL May 12, 2015 Presentation for COMREL May 12, 2015.
Sentinel Lakes Program: Water quality monitoring and assessment Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division Minnesota.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment (SLICE) Sentinel Lakes Program Ray Valley and Don Pereira.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
1 Improving Statistics for Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development – Action Plan for Africa THE RESEARCH COMPONENT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION.
Desktop Analysis Used To: Identify areas that meet certain criteria (e.g. contig forest 50 acres+, id gaps as well, or set lower value in urban area) Identify.
Working Group Results Kirk LaGory North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research Planning Meeting Minerals Management Service Anchorage, Alaska November.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
The Importance of Healthy Riparian Areas and their Current Status in Wisconsin Tim Asplund, Buzz Sorge (WI DNR) Advanced Lake Leaders – Green Lake Sept.
Evaluating and Enhancing Lake Michigan Nearshore Monitoring John Hummer and Guan Wang Great Lakes Commission Summer Webinar July 24, 2013.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment - SLICE.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
SLICE Advisory Team Meeting January 26 th -27 th 2011.
Sentinel Lakes Program: MPCA Update – WQ Sampling, Data Analysis & Reporting Steve Heiskary Prepared in conjunction with: Jesse Anderson Pam Anderson Lee.
2012 User’s Group Meeting Data Collection Group Topic: Incorporating Flexibilities in FIA Data Collection Effort Bob Ilgenfritz – Data Collection Group.
Texas Master Naturalists Program overview and development guide Brett Chandler-Finch.
Stone’s Sheep Situation in NE BC Presentation of Preliminary Results March 07, 2005 Conference Call Jonah Keim AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd.
1.Define a landscape. What is the focus of Landscape Ecology. Notes 2. Discuss the role of spatial and temporal scale in affecting landscape composition,
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment - SLICE.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
…empowering communities through modeling and adaptive management Adaptive Management Conservation Strategies for Restoring Ecosystems.
Silviculture in the Face of Global Change: Overview of UMN Silviculture Program Tony D’Amato Dept. of Forest Resources University of Minnesota.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Marrakech Task Force on Sustainable Tourism Development 3 rd Task Force meeting Paris December 2007 Marrakech Task Force on Sustainable Tourism Development.
Sensitive Lakeshore Assessment Refinement and adaptation of protocol.
Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.
Tim Asplund, Buzz Sorge (WI DNR)
Presentation transcript:

Point-intercept aquatic plant sampling Ray Valley, Cindy Tomcko, Donna Dustin 19 November 2008

 Development of plant indicators that reflect status of plant community and habitat  Understanding factors contributing to curly- leaf pondweed dominance in lakes.  Short-term variability of plant indicators in a range of lakes  Development and publication of a point- intercept protocol. Suggested sample effort Indicators to monitor, ways of analyzing Recommended frequency of assessment Objectives

Highlights from 2008 Completing surveys on all sentinel lakes were a collective effort of Area and Regional Fisheries, Research, SWCD’s, SNF. Completing surveys on all sentinel lakes were a collective effort of Area and Regional Fisheries, Research, SWCD’s, SNF. P-I surveys took a fair amount of time on the large sentinel lakes P-I surveys took a fair amount of time on the large sentinel lakes

Help in Master Naturalist Program Cooperative U of MN extension & DNR volunteer program that teaches adults about Minnesota`s natural resources- empowers them to educate others and provides opportunities to do conservation projects Cooperative U of MN extension & DNR volunteer program that teaches adults about Minnesota`s natural resources- empowers them to educate others and provides opportunities to do conservation projects Mission: to promote awareness- understanding- and stewardship of Minnesota`s natural environment by developing a corps of well-informed citizens dedicated to conservation education and service within their communities Mission: to promote awareness- understanding- and stewardship of Minnesota`s natural environment by developing a corps of well-informed citizens dedicated to conservation education and service within their communities

Cooperation with Master Naturalist program 1-2 volunteers to help on Aq. plant surveys 1-2 volunteers to help on Aq. plant surveys 1 DNR or SNF Crew leader 1 DNR or SNF Crew leader I forward interest to crew leader, crew leader coordinates logistics I forward interest to crew leader, crew leader coordinates logistics Program coord. believes interest will be high Program coord. believes interest will be high

Recommended changes in 2009 Continue sampling 0.7 pt/acre grid with minor tweaks to some lakes (Elk, Cedar, Carlos) to more representatively sample steep slopes Continue sampling 0.7 pt/acre grid with minor tweaks to some lakes (Elk, Cedar, Carlos) to more representatively sample steep slopes Avoid throwing rake over waste lands. Avoid throwing rake over waste lands. Verify plant absence occasionally Verify plant absence occasionally Record depth at sample point, move to next point Record depth at sample point, move to next point  Measuring maximum depth of plants (optional) Travel perpendicular to shore from one VP to VP Travel perpendicular to shore from one VP to VP Capture waypoint and depth at edge of plants Capture waypoint and depth at edge of plants Save waypoints to shapefile, forward to GIS shop Save waypoints to shapefile, forward to GIS shop Topic and justification discussed further on SLICE blog Topic and justification discussed further on SLICE blog

What to look at for final protocol Best allocation of sampling effort Effort required to robustly yet quickly assess “status” or biotic integrity Effort required to robustly yet quickly assess “status” or biotic integrity Stratify effort by depth? Stratify effort by depth? 0 – 5 ft zone – most diverse and vulnerable to nearshore disturbance 0 – 5 ft zone – most diverse and vulnerable to nearshore disturbance Focus only on areas with substrate supporting veg growth? Focus only on areas with substrate supporting veg growth? Issue: should baseline surveys follow this same protocol or be more comprehensive to delineate areas of veg growth and species list? Issue: should baseline surveys follow this same protocol or be more comprehensive to delineate areas of veg growth and species list?

Analysis Many discussion topics on how to analyze data posted to BaseCamp feedback is encouraged Many discussion topics on how to analyze data posted to BaseCamp feedback is encouraged i.e., Over what depth do we calculate percent frequency? i.e., Over what depth do we calculate percent frequency? Constant number (15 ft) – current method Constant number (15 ft) – current method Compute over depth ranges? Compute over depth ranges? Geostatistics (kriging) the best but most complex way Geostatistics (kriging) the best but most complex way Addresses issues comparing results within/among lakes with differing sample intensity. Addresses issues comparing results within/among lakes with differing sample intensity. Evaluates patterns of areal cover Evaluates patterns of areal cover Addresses thorny issues of spatial autocorrelation of neighboring survey points. Addresses thorny issues of spatial autocorrelation of neighboring survey points.

Geostatistics - Examples CLP - KrigingPearl Survey Points

Acoustic BiovolumePoint-intercept CLP