Project Development – High Priority Segments 1/24/2011 Rumble StripE Lane Width? Rumble Strip 2 ft. shoulder paving* (up to 6 miles/year**) + rumble stripE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
Advertisements

Intersection Sight Distance Case C1 Ryan Miller CE /19/10.
HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.
Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Lesson 15 Publication No. FHWA-HRT Bicycle Lanes.
County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
HSM Practitioner’s Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Recently Developed Intersection CMFs Nancy Lefler, VHB ATSIP Traffic Records Forum, 2014.
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop Exercise IV – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross – Group Exercise - Session #8 8-1.
“ Pavement markings can enhance safety since centerlines have been shown to cut crash frequency by 29% compared to roads without them ” Wisconsin Transportation.
Investigation of the Safety Effects of Edge and Centerline Markings on Narrow, Low-Volume Roads Lance Dougald Ben Cottrell Young-Jun Kweon In-Kyu Lim.
1 LOW COST SYSTEMATIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Sue Groth Mn/DOT Sue.Grothdot.state.mn.us.
FHWA Nine Proven Crash Countermeasures
1 Context Sensitive Design A.K.A. The “Think” Method of Design Howard Preston, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineering CH2M HILL.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
1 Channelization and Turn Bays. 2 Island Channelization flush, paved, and delineated with markings – or unpaved and delineated with pavement edge and.
Exit Quiz Road Signs Recognition
Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Shared Roadways Lesson 14 (This picture shows bicyclists not.
1 Delineation, signing and lighting Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time Spent: 8 hrs.
DRIVER SAFETY.
SECTION 3. Centerline and Edge Line Final Rule DECEMBER 1999.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS. 1-2 Introduction Highway Traffic Fatalities Trend.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 9 New Technologies Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
8-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #8.
Local Government Section
SESSION 8 Shoulder Considerations. Objectives Identify shoulder/edge support types Describe benefits of each type Discuss how edge support conditions.
Selecting Countermeasures 1 Module 5 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment July 22, Boise, Idaho.
Project Development – High Priority Segments -- ATP 2 10/29/2012 Road Surface? Paved Gravel Segment received Stars for Lane Departure Crash Density & Critical.
Using Data To Drive Down Fatalities Roseanne Nance Bureau of Safety Engineering Illinois Department of Transportation.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
1 At-Grade Intersection Design. 2 Objectives Define general intersection design objectives Describe factors that influence curb return design For a nice.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
The Challenge The intersection of State Highway 13 and County Road 2 in Scott County, Minnesota, was the site of 2 fatal crashes and 50 injury crashes.
The 2010 Evaluation of Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 2010 Thomas M. Welch, P.E. State Transportation.
Airport Lighting, Markings and Sign Systems
Jason J. Siwula, PE – Safety Engineer DOES 24+0=22+2? AN INTRO TO HSM METHODS.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
MICHIGAN’s INITIATIVES FOR REDUCING HIGHWAY FATALITIES.
Louisiana Local Road Safety Program
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
6-Answers-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise – Part A – Session #6.
Roadway Markings NV Driver Education Curriculum Unit 2: Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings Presentation 3 of 3.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Successes in Reducing Highway Fatalities Kathy Harvey, MoDOT State Design Engineer July 16, 2008 Albuquerque, N.M.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Combination Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips Dr. Frank Gross, VHB.
Engineering Study Griffin View Drive & Harbor Hills Blvd. Prepared for Lake County Public Works Engineering 437 Ardice Avenue Eustis, Florida Purchase.
Unit 2: Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
Intersection Analysis March / Intersection Crash Collection Years = Remove animal crashes (TYPE= 08 and 09) Influence areas = 150’
2011 National Association of County Engineers Conference Mn/DOT County Roadway Safety Plans April 20, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
At-Grade Intersection Design
Chapter 6: Intersections
California’s Experience with HFST 1.  Overview  Challenging Locations  Collision Reduction (State and Local Roads)  Typical Placement and current.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
6-1 Module 6: Group Activity Wright County Safety Review Identifying Opportunities for Making Roads Safer 6-1.
Curve Crash Analysis March / Information Gathering PE Services Name Segment Description Radius Length Shapefiles Chevrons (based on county.
Indiana MUTCD: for Operations & Maintenance Issues/Solutions – Part II.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
Segment Crash Analysis
From Channelization, Islands and Turning Roadways (p ~ p
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
D R I V E R S E D G E USA Curriculum Use mouse to advance slides.
HSM Practicitioner's Guide for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Project Development – High Priority Segments 1/24/2011 Rumble StripE Lane Width? Rumble Strip 2 ft. shoulder paving* (up to 6 miles/year**) + rumble stripE + safety edge Noise Sensitive Receiver Paved Shoulder?PROJECT: 6” Wet Reflective in longitudinal groove Note: All projects also include Chevrons and Paving 2’ inside shoulder in Critical Radius curves, except Gravel Roads * Where regrading not required ** After 6 miles/year of paving, wet reflective longitudinal groove provided NOYES NO >=12 feet<12 feet PROJECT: 6” Latex Edgeline YESNO ADT >200? Road Surface? PavedGravel Segment received Stars for SVROR Crash Density & Critical Radius Curve Density PROJECT: Chevrons in Critical Radius Curves YESNO PROJECT 1

Directional Median + Street Lights + Upgraded Signs & Markings (Major ADT> 4,000 and Minor ADT> 500) AND Right Angle Crash? Divided Roadway? Roundabout Upgraded Signs & Markings Dynamic Mainline Warning + Street Lights + Upgraded Signs & Markings Street Lights Not Installed AND Minor ADT >200? Street Lights + Upgraded Signs & Markings CSAH ADT > TH ADT OR Major ADT ≈ Minor ADT? Street Lights + All-Way Stop + Upgraded Signs & Markings Multiple Severe Right Angle AND Major>10,000 & Minor>4,000? NO YES PROJECT: YES NO PROJECT: YES NO YES NO YES NO 2 Project Development – High Priority Rural Intersections Road Surface? All Legs Paved Minor Legs Gravel Note: On gravel approaches, install stop bar on paved apron All Legs Gravel Review for Sign Upgrade or Removal of Signs +Clear Sight Triangles PROJECT: 1/24/2011

Project Development – High Priority Curves Three ways for a Curve to receive a project 1/24/20113 High Priority Curves and those in close proximity Curves w/ Existing Chevrons All Curves on Roadways* High Priority Segments & Critical Curve Radius PROJECT: Install/upgrade Chevrons +2’ Shoulder Paving +Rumble Strip Note: Gravel roads were considered if the segment experienced a high frequency of severe curve-related crashes.