Guidelines for Preparing & Conducting the Review Of Oklahoma.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
Advertisements

Effective Casework Practice (Foster Care) Ongoing assessment of childs needs and interventions Ongoing assessment and implementation of services/supports.
The Individual Health Plan Essential to achieve educational equality for students with health management needs Ensures access to an education for students.
Supporting the education of looked after learners Rob Mills LAC Education Coordinator.
Normalcy – Letting Kids be Kids Objectives Understand the Law Recognize and Remove Barriers Deal with Frequent Issues Special Considerations
Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence CFWS In-Service.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
Youth Protection A changing scene What are the expectations that RI has on Rotary Clubs participating in its various Youth Programmes?
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
YOUTH ATTORNEY. GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 1:  The primary change in the general provisions article is the establishment of an attorney for children.
GUARDIANSHIP IN UTAH Legal Terms and Procedures. HOW DO I KNOW IF MY FAMILY MEMBER NEEDS GUARDIANSHIP? These questions are directly from the Utah Protective.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Safe Havens for Children Sponsored by the Presbyteries of Georgia in collaboration with the Georgia Department of Family and Children Services and with.
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Options for Youth, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W., J.D. Copyright 2013 Monica Bogucki.
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
1 Consent for treatment A summary guide for health practitioners about obtaining consent for treatment Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
Involving Parents 1. DeAnn Lechtenberger — Principle Investigator Nora Griffin-Shirley — Project Coordinator Doug Hamman — Project Evaluator Tonya Hettler—Business.
Treatment Parents and Therapists: working together to help children Utah Youth Village Talon Greeff.
Investigations and Interviews How to ensure GALS are getting the best information from the correct sources.
Family/Whānau Caregiver Assessment and Approval Engaging with families to achieve better outcomes for children and young people.
Welcome to the [location] CASA Information Meeting.
1 EDUCATION: Court Reports: What to include related to the Child’s Education.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Court Reports Made Easy!. A Few Basics CASA reports must be submitted to your ACM TWO WEEKS prior to the scheduled hearing Avoid redundancy Maintain objectivity.
Mentor Training Update 1 April 2014 Guardian Ad Litem Program “I am for the child”
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Hon. Robin Sage Tara Garlinghouse  Continuation of study of legal system to assess the quality of our child protection hearings  Project Goals: ▪ Establish.
Ottawa Area Intermediate School District March, 2012 Adapted from Allegan Area ESA.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration Developed by Oakland Schools 2007.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Permanency Planning in Juvenile Court The options GALs have in finding a safe, permanent home for our kids.
Conducting & Documenting Monthly Health and Safety Visits with Children, and Monthly Visits with Caregivers and Parents.
San Francisco Unified School District Student Support Services Department Foster Youth Services Program FYS Liaison Orientation.
A.J. (Tony) Brandenburg August 21, 2015 TCAP Tribal Court Conference Protecting Indian Children (760)
Adoption Selection: Caseworker, Local or Central Committee Developed by Portland State University Center for Improvement of Child and Family Services Child.
VHA Training for Staff Who Provide Information on Advance Directives and Assistance with Completing Advance Directives.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Mishi Dodson.  The Foster Care Review Board is established by Arizona statute to review at least every six months the case of each child in foster care.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Public Law H.R Background Information In September of 2014, Congress passed the “Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families”
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Being a GAL in Tribal Court NAILS Pre-NLADA Indian Law Training Paul Stenzel – Stenzel Law Office LLC November 6, 2007.
Adult Day Care Chapter 605 Survey Process OSDH. Introduction  Adult Day Care Facilities/Centers are required to be in compliance with laws established.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
The Role of the Education Rights Holder (ERH)
Options for Youth, Monica Bogucki, B.S.W., J.D.
Resolving Foster Parent Concerns
Kinship 101: Information for Relatives and “Suitable Others”
The Role of Education/Special Education Decision Makers
Court Appointed Special Advocates for Children
Operating a District or Shared Service Arrangement (SSA) Migrant Parent Advisory Council (PAC) Texas Education Agency Curriculum Division Migrant Education.
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
The Magic Ages of Transition
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
House Human Services Committee
Background checks are required by state and federal law prior to CA/DCYF staff authorizing an individual (other than a parent) to have unsupervised access.
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
Presentation transcript:

Guidelines for Preparing & Conducting the Review Of Oklahoma

Protocol & Demeanor Before the Review: Comply with the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act requirements Thoroughly prepare all cases being reviewed Arrive on time During the Review: Exhibit appropriate and unbiased behavior when interested parties are present Ask appropriate & relevant questions. Listen to other board members to prevent repetitive questioning. Be mindful of the sensitivity and confidentiality of the information being discussed- especially when children are present Do NOT lecture interested parties, practice law or therapy during the review. Even though each Board has an appointed member as the “Board Chair”, the Board functions as a group. Be willing to accept redirection from your fellow board members Handle deficiencies in case management professionally. Be conscious of the amount of time designated for the review and staying on schedule. After the Review: End the review appropriately- thank everyone for their participation Do NOT discuss the cases outside of the meeting room (i.e., hallway, restroom, etc.) 2

Prepare for the meeting Develop the meeting agenda Is your board ensuring that it reviews all open cases at least once every six months? Or are you solely relying on court or OKDHS to set your review schedule? Share the responsibilities among board members so that more than one person knows the process. Comply with the Oklahoma Open Meetings Act Agenda post 24 hours in advance Minutes of the actions taken Notify members and interested parties Remind board members of meeting. Inform OKDHS, CASA, ICW workers, Court Clerks, foster parents, etc. of the cases to be reviewed Prepare for court files to be available Confirm with Court Clerk (or other) that files will be available for the meeting 3

Getting the Meeting Started Determine whether guests will be attending Identify whether any guests are interested parties to the cases being reviewed or whether they are members of the public. If non-routine interested parties will be attending attempt to have prior notification given. For interested parties such as foster parents, parents, therapists consider having their case(s) reviewed first so they do not have to wait Quorum check ½ of board membership present, plus one Call the meeting to order Announce the meeting, clarify Open Meetings Act compliance Public comments If guests attending are not interested parties this is their opportunity to give comments to the board. The board is not able to discuss cases at this time. If the guests have information on the cases they may share it with the board but the board members may not share any case information. Enter into executive session Prior to reviewing cases the board must enter into executive session. “As permitted by Oklahoma Statute, Title 10, section (F.) I propose this board enter into executive session.” Only board members and interested parties can be involved in executive session. Interested parties can only be present for the discussion of cases they are involved in. Interested parties are not required to participate. The board determines who will or will not be involved. 4

Overview of the Review Interested Parties Court files are good to determine the decisions of the court but generally shed little light into the details of each case. Information from interested parties is critical in understanding the full scope of each case. The more sources of information only enhances the boards understanding and increases its ability to provide the court with useful recommendations. While going over the court file information let caseworker give names, ages and current placement information. This may give the board an understanding of how close the worker is to the case. When a caseworker does not know the basic information of a case ASK MORE QUESTIONS. If the worker doesn’t know then who does? Get a brief history Its important to know the background of the case but it is not the board’s role to re-investigate the case. The board needs to understand the dynamics of the family and decisions made by the court and agencies, but the board does not need to expend time looking for faults in past decisions. Look for solutions to help the case from this point forward. Identify the current situation The board needs to know where the children, parents, etc. are now, how they are doing, how much progress is being made, etc. Determine the recommendations of the interested parties What to the other players think are the important issues? What will they recommend to the court? Develop the board’s recommendation 5

Important Information to Gather Pertaining to the child:  Reasons for entering foster care  Child’s grade & academic performance  Child’s ethnicity/ICWA status  Child’s placement: placement type, current placement date, initial placement date  Services child is receiving or is in need of  Siblings/Biological parent visits Any difficulties following visits?  Medical & Dental needs being addressed  Is the child dually adjudicated (probation)?  Is the child compliant with probation requirements?  Is the child eligible for/participating in independent living skills training?  Is the child AWOL? If so, has a pick up order been issued? Slide 6

Important Information to Gather Pertaining to the Biological Parents:  Case plan requirements/Case Plan Goal  What services have been offered?  Is there compliance?  Be Specific for each requirement.  Is there anything preventing compliance that the DHS can resolve?  Paternity established?  Whereabouts unknown- have parent locators been completed?  Are there any unresolved legal issues/probation requirements? Slide 6

Important Information to Gather Pertaining to the Placement:  Are foster parents/relative caregivers in need of services?  How often do they have contact with the case worker?  Does the case worker visit the child monthly?  Do they see a need for additional services for the child?  How is the child’s behavior following the visits with siblings/parents?  Is this potential foster/adoptive or guardianship placement?  Did they receive a placement information packet when the child was first placed with them? Slide 6

Are Federal and State laws being followed?  ASFA  ICWA Are agency policies being adhered to?  OKDHS Are you doing your job?  PARB statutes  3 Questions that require a response from the Board. These questions assist the board with identifying concerns that are further discussed during the meeting. The appropriateness of the goals and objectives of the treatment and service plan The appropriateness of the goals and objectives of the permanency plan and permanency planning The appropriateness of the services provided to the child, and to the parent, step parent, or other adults living in the home of the child, or legal guardian, or custodian. Do you see issues within your community that need to be addressed?  Is there a lack of a particular service? Are terminations not occurring? Are there delays in court proceedings? etc.  Can your board find ways to address these issues?  Does the board need to contact OCCY?  Is it an issue that the State Post Adjudication Review Advisory Board can help? In addition to best interests… 7

Findings & Recommendations The Board describes their concerns and documents their recommendations.  Restating the history of the case is not needed  The courts already know the history  Other reports have this information  Stating recent changes or expected changes is appropriate  Point out new or planned events that may impact the case  Documenting concerns expressed by interested parties is appropriate  Particularly concerns of foster parents or others who may not have a strong voice in the proceedings  Pointing out any concern of the board is important  Court hearings are often spent addressing big matters such as placement, custody, and permanency. Sometimes little matters that significantly impact the child can get over looked. 8

Does the board need to talk to the Judge, District Attorney, OKDHS staff ? Do all the parties have all the necessary information? Does the judge need to be aware of a situation? Does the board need to contact OCCY? OCCY is able to investigate information and can intervene in a case if necessary Sometimes it doesn't feel like enough 9

CONCERNS- What is the board concerned about? Example: “The board is concerned that the plan for these children is family reunification.” WHY? All concerns should be supported by case details which can be received from statements made by interested parties and/or from information contained in the reports being considered by the board. 1 to 3 supporting statements should be used for every concern listed. Example: “The board is concerned that the plan for these children is family reunification. The child’s behavioral difficulties seem to escalate each time there is a significant change in his life. The mother has not been able to maintain a stable housing arrangement for almost a year. The paternity between the mother’s previous boyfriend’s has not been determined due to their unknown whereabouts. What is the board’s recommendation regarding the concern or issue? For every concern identified, there should be an action statement such as a recommendation or encouragement which is directed to a specific person and/or agency who is responsible for addressing the issue. Example: “The board is concerned that the plan for these children is family reunification. The child’s behavioral difficulties seem to escalate each time there is a significant change in his life. The mother has not been able to maintain a stable housing arrangement for almost a year and reportedly stays with different friends and even strangers. The paternity between the mother’s previous boyfriend’s has not been determined due to their unknown whereabouts. The board recommends the case plan goal be changed. The mother has failed to correct the conditions that led to the child’s removal. The board recommends that termination of parental rights be pursued.” Not a bad idea to qualify your sources of information Example: “Based on the information from the court file and verbal report given by the case worker….. What is a Good Recommendation Slide 10, 11, 12

Not a bad idea to state your sources of information Example: “Based on the information from the court file and verbal report given by the case worker….. What is a Good Recommendation 13