Community Patent Robert Clarke – Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Action Interview Pilot Program Overview. Pilot Program Objectives Promote personal interviews prior to issuance of a first Office action on the.
Advertisements

By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
1 Charts of: The Four Time Periods for Submitting an IDS and Their Corresponding Requirements “Changes to Information Disclosure Statement Requirements.
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
Enhanced First Action Interview (EFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
Preissuance Submissions Under the America Invents Act Janet Gongola Patent Reform Coordinator Direct dial:
Independent Educational Evaluations Developed by Contra Costa SELPA As Recommended for LEA Board Policy
1 Implementation of the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999 (Public Law ) and the Patent Business Goals Hiram H. Bernstein Senior Legal Advisor.
The Office of Licensing and Review. Licensing and Review Located within Technology Center The L&R staff consists of: Licensing and Review adminstrative.
Doc.: IEEE /024 Submission January 2001 Jim Carlo, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Patents and IEEE 802 Stds IEEE 802 Chair’s Viewpoint Jim Carlo General.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
PPAC Outreach Effort Andrew Faile Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Patents.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
HOW WILL THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT (AIA) CHANGE THE WAY WE PROTECT AMERICAN IMAGINEERING? Michael A. Guiliana April 24, 2012 Disney’s Grand Californian Hotel.
USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act Teresa Stanek Rea Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the.
Grants.maryland.gov The Governor’s Grants Office Presents Successful Post Award Grants Management For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Lifecycle.
FAMILY EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS AND PRIVACY ACT Electronic Signatures This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material.
1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
Full First Action Interview (FFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
United States Army Freedom of Information Act (Freedom of Information Act Managerial Training)
1 Public Outreach October 2008 By Adelina Murtezaj – Public Relation Officer For Inaugural Partnership Activity between ICC and ERO.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members in Alaska’s Commercial Fisheries Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Pilot Concerning Public Submission of Peer Reviewed Prior Art Jack Harvey Director, TC 2100 United States Patent and Trademark Office
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
Law and Administrative Rule Updates. To cover: Statutes Rules –Certified Negotiator –Confidential Information –Other Changes to 60A-1.
March 2, Help the USPTO improve the MPEP using an Online Collaboration Tool Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration.
1 Combination Products: Jurisdictional Issues MassMEDIC Presentation March 28, 2006 Janice Hogan, Esq. Partner Hogan & Hartson, LLP
Electronic Records Management: A New Understanding of Policy, Compliance, and Discovery Robert J. Sobie, Ph.D. Director Information Systems Department.
EPOCA – 13. June EPOCAConsortium Agreement (CA)
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
3 rd Party Participation Bennett Celsa TC 1600 QAS.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Imminent Changes to the US Patent Law Pre-Grant Patent Practice Under the AIA Alan J.
Division for Policy Administration 321 North Clark Street 21st Floor Chicago, IL (312) Fax: (312)
Enterprise Archiving, Retention and Discovery System Jim Albert Deputy Director Department of Information Services April 19 th 2007.
Current Strategies for Patent Development Based on New AIA Patent Law November 21, 2012 J. Scott Southworth1.
Total # of Patent Applications226 Total # of Registered Reviewers279 Total # of Prior Art References Submitted603 Total # of Prior Art References.
Double Patenting Deborah Reynolds SPE Art Unit 1632 Detailee, TC1600 Practice Specialist
C U S T O M E R D R I V E N. B U S I N E S S M I N D E D. Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs Bureau of Construction Codes Keith E. Lambert, P.S.,
Sharing Information (FERPA) FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December 5, 2007, San Diego, CA U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free.
“Welcome to the Table” May 15, 2006 Jay Lucas Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
Contractors Equipment Insurance A brief overview.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.
You are accessing a U.S. Government (USG) Information System (IS) that is provided for USG-authorized use only. By using this IS (which includes any device.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
Obligations of Educational Agencies: Parents’ Bill of Rights
Patent application procedure (…and costs)
Status Report Austin Intellectual Property Law Assoc. August 16, 2011
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Outreach Training Program Requirements
EPO′s QMS Piotr Wierzejewski Quality Management February 2018.
Third Party Pre-Issuance Submissions Under AIA
Presentation transcript:

Community Patent Robert Clarke – Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration

2 Public Interest in Community Patent Leverage private sector knowledge base to provide prior art to the Office before patents are granted Leverage existing technology for collaborative filtering to provide best prior art to the Office Provide peer review of applications

3 Currently Available USPTO procedure 37 CFR 1.99 – See MPEP Permits third parties to submit prior art after publication of an application Permits third parties to submit prior art after publication of an application Limitations: Limitations: Content Content Timing Timing Participation Participation

4 Rule 1.99 Limitations Content Content Only patents and publications may be submitted Only patents and publications may be submitted No discussion or highlighting of documents permitted No discussion or highlighting of documents permitted No more than 10 documents per submission No more than 10 documents per submission

5 Rule 1.99 Limitations Timing Timing Within two months of publication of the application; and Within two months of publication of the application; and No later than mailing of notice of allowance No later than mailing of notice of allowance NOTE: inherent delays in examination due to backlogs often make this limitation irrelevant. NOTE: inherent delays in examination due to backlogs often make this limitation irrelevant.

6 Rule 1.99 Limitations Participation Participation The Office will not communicate with the third party submitter of a rule 1.99 submission except to: The Office will not communicate with the third party submitter of a rule 1.99 submission except to: Mail a return post card, if any; and Mail a return post card, if any; and Process the fee for the submission. Process the fee for the submission.

7 Rule 1.99 Limitations Formality Review by the Office Formality Review by the Office Staff other than the examiner of record review 1.99 submissions for compliance with the content and timeliness requirements. Staff other than the examiner of record review 1.99 submissions for compliance with the content and timeliness requirements. Informal submissions are discarded and are not available to the examiner. Informal submissions are discarded and are not available to the examiner.

8 Rule 1.99 Limitations By statute some applicants may opt out of publication if By statute some applicants may opt out of publication if applicant makes a request upon filing, certifying that the invention disclosed in the application has not and will not be the subject of an application filed in another country, or under a multilateral international agreement, that requires publication of applications 18 months after filing. applicant makes a request upon filing, certifying that the invention disclosed in the application has not and will not be the subject of an application filed in another country, or under a multilateral international agreement, that requires publication of applications 18 months after filing. NOTE: the Office’s 21 st Century Strategic Plan included a recommendation that legislation to eliminate this ability be implemented. See NOTE: the Office’s 21 st Century Strategic Plan included a recommendation that legislation to eliminate this ability be implemented. See

9 Rule 1.99 Limitations Statutory reasons for the limitations Statutory reasons for the limitations 35 USC 122(c) PROTEST AND PRE-ISSUANCE OPPOSITION provides: 35 USC 122(c) PROTEST AND PRE-ISSUANCE OPPOSITION provides: The Director shall establish appropriate procedures to ensure that no protest or other form of pre-issuance opposition to the grant of a patent on an application may be initiated after publication of the application without the express written consent of the applicant. The Director shall establish appropriate procedures to ensure that no protest or other form of pre-issuance opposition to the grant of a patent on an application may be initiated after publication of the application without the express written consent of the applicant. The Office’s 21 st Century Strategic Plan did not recommend a legislative change to remove this requirement. The Office’s 21 st Century Strategic Plan did not recommend a legislative change to remove this requirement.

10 OMB Circular No. A-130 Limitations on USPTO As agencies are constrained by finite budgets, when there are several alternatives from which to choose, they should not expend public resources filling needs which have already been met by others in the public or private sector.As agencies are constrained by finite budgets, when there are several alternatives from which to choose, they should not expend public resources filling needs which have already been met by others in the public or private sector. Ensure that decisions to improve existing information systems or develop new information systems are initiated only when no alternative private sector or governmental source can efficiently meet the needEnsure that decisions to improve existing information systems or develop new information systems are initiated only when no alternative private sector or governmental source can efficiently meet the need Ensure that improvements to existing information systems and the development of planned information systems do not unnecessarily duplicate IT capabilities within the same agency, from other agencies, or from the private sectorEnsure that improvements to existing information systems and the development of planned information systems do not unnecessarily duplicate IT capabilities within the same agency, from other agencies, or from the private sector

11 Other USPTO concerns Wide-open search engine for any user may overwhelm search capability of the OfficeWide-open search engine for any user may overwhelm search capability of the Office Pilot via Community nominee(s) Should search be reviewed at some nominal level by the Office Should search request expire, particularly if user does not submit prior art under rule 1.99 Type of result output maybe limited by Office resources Xml listings of results with links to documents from uspto.gov search pages less resource intensive Wrapped pdf files of results more resource intensive

12 Questions/Suggestions Technical issues: Legal issues:

13 Contact Information Rob Clarke Office of Patent Legal Administration Phone: