 Charcuterie for Principals Nov. 2014. Today’s Agenda  Educator Evaluations  State Assessments  Michigan Merit Curriculum  Teacher & Administrator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Advertisements

Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
HOUSE BILL 5 UPDATE Foundation and Endorsement FAQs.
An Update on Novi’s Journey Presentation for MAASE April 13, 2011.
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
1 Judy W. Park, Ed.D., Associate Superintendent, Utah State Office of Education.
Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness Toward an Improvement-Focused System of Educator Evaluation Jennifer Hammond OCTE Meeting November 7, 2013.
Michigan’s High School Graduation Requirements Guide for Parents August th Edition.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
Mathematics MEAP, MME & Secondary Credit Assessment Program Kyle H. Ward Office of Educational Assessment & Accountability Michigan Educational Assessment.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
SUMMARY OF REVISED CERTIFICATION CODE MDE update May 18, 2012.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
Right-To-Learn Opt-out Campaign
SB 149: Update and FAQ May 20, “While it is critical that the state appropriately holds public schools and districts accountable for delivering.
Connections 2013 Division of Florida Colleges Update Julie Alexander Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs April 12, 2013.
One Voice, One Focus: All Students Achieving WVASA Winter Seminar Michael J. Martirano, Ed. D.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
 Politics for Principals EdCon  Educator Evaluation HB , Sec & MCEE.
Rewarding Excellence in the Classroom Idaho’s Pay for Performance Plan
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. District Assessment Coordinators Annual Meeting September 8, 2015.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
Accountability Updates NCAEE Region 1 May 2, 2014 M. E. (Butch) Hudson, Jr. Regional Accountability Coordinator Accountability Region 4.
The Portfolio ProcessThe Portfolio Process. Why do we think portfolios are the right choice?  Teacher developed and driven  Embedded professional development.
MICHIGAN MERIT CURRICULUM AND THE REVISED PERSONAL CURRICULUM MAISA JUNE 23, 2011 Robert LeFevre, Director of Education Policy, Macomb Intermediate School.
October 2009 Oregon Department of Education 1 Diploma Options 2009.
2013 MASS Executive Institute. More Than a Decade of Progress: Grade 10 MCAS % proficient or higher 2.
2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.
Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC) and Personal Curriculum (PC) Update FEBRUARY 6, 2015.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Michigan Merit Curriculum & Personal Curriculum Modification: For general education and special education March 11, 2008 Mason-Lake and Oceana Intermediate.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
Ohio’s State Assessments: What do families need to know? November 2015.
Personal Curriculum: Individualizing the Rigor and Relevance of the Michigan Merit Curriculum for ALL Students Allegan Area Educational Service Agency.
Updates from the Office of Human Resources/Accountability September 13, 2011.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Educator Evaluation Mary K. Bradley, Associate Director for School Operations Mark J. Weinberg, Director of Academic Performance & Accountability The Center.
Making Sense of the New Teacher & Administrator Rules Tuesday, September 25, 2012 Renee Papelian Director of Professional Education College of Education.
Personal Curriculum: Individualizing the Rigor and Relevance of the Michigan Merit Curriculum for ALL Students December
2012 MEATA Conference Brad Erickson Academic Support Instructor WBL Specialist Capital Area Career Center Ingham ISD
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
Presented by: Katie Shirk, Exec Director of SISS Rebecca Anders, Secondary Supervisor Hallie Snyder, Curriculum Coordinator Birmingham Public Schools Inspiring.
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC), Personal Curriculums (PC) and Certificates of Completion (COC): Addressing the Needs of Students with ASD.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) 10 Minute Meeting
The Portfolio Process.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Previewing the school year
SCHEDULING INFORMATION FOR THE 10th Grade
Michigan’s Educator Evaluations
Minnesota’s Academic Standards
Presentation transcript:

 Charcuterie for Principals Nov. 2014

Today’s Agenda  Educator Evaluations  State Assessments  Michigan Merit Curriculum  Teacher & Administrator Cert.  Election Post- Mortem Tweet Your Questions: #principal14 Me:

 Educator Evaluation SB 817, HB , & MCEE

Where We Were Going Growth as a “significant factor” System must be rigorous, “transparent, and fair” Used to inform decisions on promotion/reten tion % growth based on state growth test Multiple observations using a state- approved framework Mid-year evals 3 consecutive ineffective ratings = termination % growth using state data All of the requirements from the previous year continue

Where We Are Going Now (current law) Growth as a “significant factor” measured using both state and local data System must be “rigorous, transparent, and fair” Used to inform decisions on promotion/retenti on (HB ) 25% growth, not required to use state data Pick a framework & start training Other requirements of remain the same Multiple observations Mid-year evals for ineffect./min. effect. teachers Etc % growth, first required use of state data Research-based evaluation framework fully implemented. All of the other requirements from the previous year continue.

What’s the Road Block?  We have the votes in the Senate  The only opposition to the bill is from members of the Senate Education Committee, and that is loosening.  The perceived problems:  State assessment  Loss of local control  Cost to the state  The level of support likely means that the bills will move with or without the committee, but we prefer WITH.

Lame Duck 2014  Bills likely to be amended to push out timeline for using state assessment data for 1 year (until ).  Bills already allow districts until the end of to:  Choose a framework  Get trained  Fully implement the new system  MDE must develop a spending plan before the money is released.

What Will Things Look Like?  Breakdown for and the same.  25% student growth, no more, no less.  Have through to implement framework  Sec 1249 provisions you are familiar with take effect:  Multiple observations  At least 1 unscheduled  Mid-year progress report for ME/I T’s

Punchlist for  Ignore the BandAid and continue moving forward:  Multiple observations (at least one unscheduled)  Mid-year progress reports for less than effective teachers  Growth measures used consistently for “similarly situated educators”  Build robust local growth measures:  Student Learning Objectives  Locally-developed assessments  Vendor-Developed assessments

A Few Thoughts on Growth  Following the law…  Current law: growth must be based “at least in part” on state assessments.  HB 5223: no requirement to use state assessment data until  The Result: local districts have almost complete autonomy to choose how to apply state growth data.  Some Practical Recommendations  Keep the % small…very small…  Apply it consistently or even identically for all teachers  Don’t let it become a decision making factor  An example: use building-wide scores to inform your building level literacy goal and hold all teacher accountable equally at 1% of their total evaluation

You Don’t Want This Legislated! As introduced by the bill sponsor What schools actually needed As implemented by the Department As passed by the Legislature As recommended by the committee As amended by the lobbyists

What’s Next? Nov or Dec 2014: Senate passes HB SY : Districts adopt & begin training/impleme ntation of new eval. systems SY : 1 st year of new state tests, districts finish eval system implementation Beginning of SY 15-16: Districts have fully or partially implemented new frameworks & training SY : 1st full year w/ eval. systems in place, last year of 25% growth SY & : Evaluators have 2 years to get additional training in coaching/feedback & rater reliability (state funded) SY : 2 nd year w/ system, evaluators fully trained, growth moves to 40%

Help Us Help You! THE PUSH STARTS NOW!!! Help MASSP get HB passed into law!!!

 State Assessments and Beyond…

Summarized Requirements: Public Act 196 of 2014  Must measure student achievement & growth on current state standards in grades  ELA & Math grades 3-10, science in grades 4 & 7, social studies in grades 5 & 8.  Transparent educator review of test questions for quality, bias, & sensitive issues.  Availability of representative questions from tests or retired tests for public review.  Individual student reports on proficiency & growth available to students, parents, & teachers.  Aggregate proficiency & growth reports by teacher, grade, school, & district to be publicly available.  Reports/data capable of supporting educator evaluations.  Reports available within 60 days after the end of the assessment.  Student data privacy protection.  Pilot tested before implementation.  Testing time limited to lesser of previous recommendations or 9 hours.  Cost not to exceed 2X existing contracts. (Covers summative assessment only)

The RFP Timeline  Timeline:  Issued – August 29, 2014  Bid Window Closed – October 10, 2014  MDE Interviews Bidders – January 2014  Final Contract Awarded – March  What We Know:  ACT no longer lobbying (RFP prohibits it)  NWEA is not going to bid on the contract (they say the RFP is clearly biased toward Smarter Balanced)  Smarter Balanced did not submit a big

Spring 2015 Testing Dates  6 th Grade: May and (7.5 hours)  7 th Grade: April and May 5-7 (9 hours)  8 th Grade: April and (9 hours)  11 th Grade – State Assessment: April and (10.5 hours)  ACT Plus Writing: Initial test date March 3, makeup date March 17, accommodations testing window March  WorkKeys: Initial test date March 4, makeup date March 18, accommodations testing window March 4-18.

Set In Stone?  Principals have started to speak out.  Other groups are also frustrated and expressing concerns.  Joseph Martineau is leaving the Michigan Department of Education.

 Michigan Merit Curriculum Changes

Core MMC Requirements  Algebra II: Students may fulfill this requirement w/ a course or courses which cover the MME assessed benchmarks of Algebra II  World Language:  2 credits of grade-appropriate language anytime during grades K-12.  Classes of : May fulfill 1 credit of the 2 credits by successfully completing a formal CTE program or an additional arts course.  Science:  3 credits still required for most students. Biology required for all students.  Students have a choice of chemistry, physics, anatomy, ag science, or a course that covers the MME assessed benchmarks of chemistry or physics  May substitute a formal CTE program (regardless of content) for 3 rd credit of science.

Personal Curriculum  Schools required to write a PC if requested by the parent (or by the student if he or she is 18 years old or an emancipated minor). The school would still have the right to reject the PC once written.  Three simplifications were made to the PC process.  Only one school employee would now have to be involved.  No requirement for an in-person meeting to develop the PC.  No requirement for quarterly progress meetings.  Under a PC students/schools may now make additional modifications:  For Algebra II: students may substitute technical math or may take a class that covers at least the MME assessed benchmarks of algebra 2.  Students may substitute CTE courses (regardless of content) for up to 1 credit of social studies; 1 credit of health and physical education; and 1 credit of visual, performing, or applied arts.

Personal Curriculum (contd.)  The law would now expressly state that no limitation may be put on the number of PCs a school is allowed to have.  Schools must notify parents and students annually that they are entitled to pursue a PC. This may be done in the school newsletter, handbook, or similar communication sent to the pupil's home.  Pupils must be informed of the option to take CTE during their education development plan (EDP) development process.

 Teacher & Admin Cert

Two Great Resources  Understanding the Recent Changes to Teacher/Admin Certification Rules  _teacheradmin_certification_rules _teacheradmin_certification_rules  July 17, 2014  MDE Holds Review of Teacher/Admin Cert Requirements/Rules  in_cert_requirementsrules in_cert_requirementsrules  September 29, 2014

Things You May Not Know…  Teachers may renew a Professional certificate using district provided professional development (DPPD), but not a provisional certificate. You must accumulate either 6 credit hours or 150 state continuing education clock hours (SCECHs) to renew of provisional certificate.  The continuing education requirements for administrators to renew their certification are: 6 semester credit hours or 150 SCECHs every 5 years, OR hold a valid professional teaching certificate. NOTE: Administrators cannot use DPPD to renew a certificate, even a teaching certificate. MDE has ruled that only teachers are eligible to use DPPD for certificate renewals.

 Election Post-Mortem It’s kinda like CSI, but with sausage…

Recapping the Major Results  Governor: Rick Snyder reelected  House: R’s unseated 2 D’s & won 2 open seats for a majority  New Speaker of the House Kevin Cotter (R-Mt. Pleasant), who was the more conservative choice.  Senate: R’s turned a supermajority into a übermajority,  State Board: D’s kept both open seats to retain a 6-2 majority  Supreme Court: Richard Bernstein won & both current justices reelected, giving R’s a 4-3 majority.

Implications  Governor Snyder sees this election as a mandate to push forward with his "reinvention" agenda.  The next Republican legislature is going to be more conservative in its leanings than the last, BUT…  Huge margins mean the Republicans can, and thus have to, govern. The massive scope of the Republican victories could ironically moderate their governance.  The Dems are Expect the Dems to vocally oppose pretty much everything the Republicans do for the next two years.

Specific Issues for 2015  Career Preparation/Education  Content Standards and the Common Core  School Accountability Systems  State Assessment  EAA/Detroit Schools "Reinvention”  Third Grade Reading  Truancy/Zero Tolerance

MASSP Legislative Day “We in America do not have government by the majority. We have government by the majority who participate.” ~Thomas Jefferson FEB 24, 2014

Where’s My 3%?!?  The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in this case on October 9, No ruling has yet been made.  MASSP will keep you updated as this moves forward.  If you really want to, you can keep track of the case on the Michigan Courts website (search docket # ).  The case is AFT Michigan v State of Michigan.  Here's a direct link: x?SearchType=1&CaseNumber=148748&CourtType_CaseNumber= 1

Bob Kefgen Assistant Director for Government Relations Questions?