1 Information for schools November 2012 School Self-Evaluation Inspectorate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing SEN: Monitoring and Evaluation – Gathering Evidence: Making Judgements Day 1.
Advertisements

Planning for Learning and Teaching, Assessment and Moderation
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Performance management guidance
School Self-Evaluation Seminar for Post-Primary School Principals 2012 Session 1.
School Improvement Team (SIT)
British Nutrition Foundation Conference Update from Learning Teaching Scotland (LTS) Liz Nicoll – Development Officer Health & Wellbeing September 2010.
Transforming lives through learning Profiling and Profiles Sheila Quigley.
Consistency of Assessment
The role of the mathematics subject leader in leading sustainable improvements Thursday 23 rd September 2010 Jo Lakey School Improvement Officer.
Recording Excellence Nicole Duplain School of Humanities.
School Self-Evaluation and Planning (Post-Primary) NIPTWS02
Inter-Board Governor Support Programme
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Information for schools September 2013 School Self-Evaluation Inspectorate.
Current Context Key Points-Draft Plan Good Practice
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
0 Area Network Day - Summer Agenda 09:15 – 10:30 Assessing Pupil Progress 10:30 – 10:45 Break 10:45 – 12:00Raising Standards in Reading using.
Monitoring and Tracking Progress and Achievement in the context of 5
Developing a literacy implementation strategy
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
Building Our Curriculum
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
Teacher standards and links to curriculum and assessment.
School Self – Evaluation
October ISIS – Cluster Moderation Assessment and moderation in CfE is a process, not an event! Aims of the morning: To further inform participants in the.
Another New Framework Major Changes: No more satisfactory 2 strikes and you are out All criteria changed Very short notice No pre-inspection brief.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
Improving relevant standards. Aims and objectives Familiarize ourselves with best practice standards of teaching To think about how we can implement the.
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
Lynwood Park Public School Cyclical Review Report Date: 9-13 March 2012.
The Delivering Social Change Signature Project Planning effective intervention.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
School Self – Evaluation
Preparing for Inspection Nov 2013 Primary QIO team.
© Crown copyright 2008 Slide 1 AfL with APP for progression at Key Stages 2 and 3 Alan Howe Senior Director National Strategies.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Looking at our School—LAOS School Development Planning Initiative.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Similarities to my current programme of work Teaching of relevant strategies to be used whenever pupils listen and talk with others (e.g. one person speaking.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Fís Foghlaim Forbairt www. pdst. ie © PDST 2014 This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 Licence.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
WELCOME Challenge and Support. What is challenge and support Table discussion As a governor what do you think Challenge and Support looks like?
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
Some Definitions Monitoring – the skill of effectively over- viewing and analysing a learning situation Assessment – is the closer examination of pupil’s.
School Self-Evaluation Maria Lorigan Senior Inspector Department of Education and Skills Network of School Planners, Ireland 2 March 2013.
THE PRACTICAL APPROACH School Self Evaluation. Workshop Objectives SSE The Positives of SSE A Good Place to Begin How to choose the Area Planning Together.
A Brief Overview of the Irish Inspectorate and its work in schools 29 October 2015 Dr. Suzanne Dillon Assistant Chief Inspector.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
April 2016 Marie Keen Quality Improvement Officer – Early Years
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Multi-grade Workshop Improving teaching and learning IPPN Conference 2008.
WSE in context The principal and NQTs IPPN 9/16 September 2009 Presenter’s name Deirdre Mathews PCC.
Analysis of Research and Impact on Practice, Action Planning Monday December 13th.
Building Our Curriculum Louise Turnbull Head Teacher Livingston Village Primary School All for the children, for all of the children!
Information for Parents Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Information for Parents Key Stage 3 Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Information for Parents Statutory Assessment Arrangements
BUMP IT UP STRATEGY in NSW Public Schools
School Self-Evaluation 
Leading Teaching and Learning through School Self-Evaluation
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
ETBI Annual Conference for Principals and Deputy Principals
Presentation transcript:

1 Information for schools November 2012 School Self-Evaluation Inspectorate

2 Aim of session –To enhance understanding of SSE –To prepare schools to use SSE as a school improvement process

3 Objectives of Session 1.What is SSE? 2.Why? 3.What does the SSE process look like? 4.What does this mean for schools? What does this mean for me as a teacher? 5.Support for SSE

4 1.WHAT IS SCHOOL SELF- EVALUATION?

5 What is school self-evaluation? SSE is a way of systematically looking at how we teach and how our students learn and making decisions about what we want to improve Because We want to make learning better for students We want to make teaching more rewarding Schools are best placed to examine their own practice and to tell their own story

6 Put another way… SSE is a process that allows schools and teachers to improve outcomes for learners. Reflect Collaborate Gather evidence Arrive at decisions about quality (Judgement) Direct school improvement Improve learning

7 2. WHY SCHOOL SELF-EVALUATION?

8 Why school self- evaluation? We know SSE works –Research here: evidence from DEIS schools pilot project trial schools –Research in other countries New Zealand, Scotland, Finland, Canada

9 Why school self- evaluation? Part of balanced and integrated approach to supporting better teaching and learning Supports the Literacy and Numeracy strategy Consistent with DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools) (action planning) Gives greater autonomy to teachers

10 SSE encompasses… Over time schools will address three dimensions –Teaching and Learning –Management and leadership –Support for pupils We want schools to start by focusing on teaching and learning

11 We are focusing on teaching and learning… Because… –Teaching and learning is the core work of school –All teachers want to improve learning for students Building on and reframing SDP –SDP helped focus on developing policy, promoted collaboration and dialogue –SSE will focus more on having an impact on teaching, learning and outcomes for students

12 SDP and School Self-Evaluation The SSE process is a reframing of the school development planning process It places a greater focus on gathering evidence and making judgements It works best when it is integrated into the day- to-day work of the school It leads to action for improvement

13 Task Purpose of task: To give teachers an opportunity to reflect on what is currently working well in teaching and learning in their school and how they know this To highlight the need to base judgements on evidence Task In pairs discuss what is working well in teaching and learning Indicate how you know Suggest how you could find out more

14 3. WHAT DOES THE SCHOOL SELF- EVALUATION PROCESS LOOK LIKE?

15 Frequently used terms in SSE –Learner outcomes –Evidence –Evaluation criteria –Quality statement –Continuum

16 SSE Process Getting started Start small – a limited aspect of teaching and learning In first four years: literacy, numeracy and one other area Ask simple questions –How well are we doing? –How do we know? What evidence do we have? –How can we find out more? –What are our strengths/areas for development? –How can we improve? Build on what you know….

17 SSE framework: Teaching and Learning Theme Sub-themes

18

19

20 SSE PROCESS Sources of evidence Assessment data – formative and summative Learner and parent surveys (student/parent voice) Focus group discussion Interviews Individual teacher reflection Group/subject department reflection Whole-school reflection Peer dialogue/sharing experience Team planning and teaching Professional collaborative review DON’T COLLECT TOO MUCH INFORMATION!

21 SSE PROCESS Analysing data and benchmarking against evaluation criteria Check learner motivation, attitudes, engagement in learning, application of knowledge and skills Share and compare practice – think and reflect on this Examine attainment levels of students (standardised tests/SEC data) : check against national norms, for in-school trends Use evaluation criteria to check analysed data against a set of standards

22 SSE PROCESS Reflect and draw conclusions Reflect on the information you have Reflect on how this compares to best practice Do the criteria and quality statement help to identify next steps in improvement? Can you place practice in this area of work on a continuum from significant strengths to significant weaknesses?

23 SSE PROCESS SSE is not about paper work. However schools need to write a concise report Report (no more than 2/3 pages) should record -Theme chosen for self-evaluation -Brief account of school context -The findings -Summary of strengths (affirm and celebrate) -Summary of areas requiring improvement -Legislative and regulatory requirements checklist (for BOM)

24 SSE PROCESS Our School Improvement Plan Summary of main strengths as identified in last SSE: Summary of main areas requiring improvement as identified in last SSE: Improvement Targets Required actions Persons responsible Timeframe for action Success criteria/measurable outcomes Review date(s)

25 SSE PROCESS Agreed actions for improvement must be implemented Actions to be implemented at individual teacher, class, subject department or whole-school level must be monitored Schools will need to decide Who will be responsible for monitoring? How monitoring will occur? How progress will be determined and reported? When progress will be reported (structures – staff/department meetings) If targets and actions are realistic or need to be changed What changes are necessary?

26 Task Purpose of task to introduce sample tools from the Guidelines and to reflect on how you might use these to gather evidence in your own school Task Use the sample self-reflection tool for teachers to think about a recent lesson. Share your reflection with a colleague. and/or How would you use the sample open questionnaire for students?

27 4. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR SCHOOLS AND TEACHERS?

28 Starting the SSE process Circular 0040/2012 Over a four year period engage in SSE of literacy, numeracy or one other aspect of teaching and learning –Take one of these aspects each year –A whole-school approach to SSE to be taken with a focus on teaching and learning –All teachers engage in SSE of the aspect selected by the school –Produce a short SSE report and summary for school community –Devise school improvement plan with targets to improve outcomes for students and summary for school community – Implement and monitor School Improvement Plan over three-year period

29 DEIS schools are ahead.. DEIS schools are already setting targets and have improvement plans in place for attendance, retention, progression, literacy, numeracy, student attainment and partnership DEIS schools should ensure that their reviews of practice are based on good SSE processes, including having an SSE report The DEIS action plan is your school improvement plan

30 For example in school X they have Selected literacy Examined records of students’ progress and assessment to check current achievement Decided on strengths in relation to literacy Identified what needed to improve Agreed that they need to focus on teaching approaches in order to improve literacy As a school..

31 In school X my responsibility as a teacher is to: Reflect on my own teaching approaches Discuss teaching approaches with subject department/ colleagues Reflect on whether I need further evidence? Views of students? Others ? Look at the evaluation criteria for teaching approaches Identify strengths and areas for development Agree teaching approaches that could be used to further develop students’ literacy skills at a subject department level As a teacher..

32 Evaluation Criteria Approaches Teaching approaches support students in engaging with the literacy and numeracy demands of the subject Subject-appropriate teaching and learning methodologies with a focus on active learning are used Lessons are well structured A range of subject-appropriate approaches is used including –Guided discussion –Collaborative and cooperative learning –Investigative approaches –Higher order thinking and problem solving –Encouragement of the students' personal and creative response to the subject

33 Quality Statement Teaching is focused, stimulating and relevant to the students’ learning needs. ………… Effective subject-specific learning approaches are used. Opportunities for the development of literacy and numeracy skills are well used. Subject-specific language is thoroughly taught. Lessons are well developed in a way that allows for progression of students’ skills, knowledge and attitudes. All aspects of the subject are thoroughly taught with progression apparent in the students’ learning as they move from one year to the next. A broad range of activities is provided to enhance the holistic development of the student.

34 Whole staff responsibility Subject departments share experience and results of reflection with whole staff Ensure evidence is balanced Agree further sources of evidence, if not balanced –Agree what tools will be used and whose views should be garnered –Agree who will gather, collate, analyse and feedback Ensure that findings from all evidence gathered and analysed helps draw conclusions/make judgement Write report Devise school improvement plan Implement and monitor across all subject departments As teaching staff..

35 SSE report – school X FocusLiteracy selected (L and N strategy, STEN results for first-year) ContextCo-ed school of 700 students. It offers the JC, TY, LCE, LCA, LCVP. Its enrolment has remained static. FindingsFocused on literacy: identified weaknesses in oral work Identified need to change our approaches to teaching literacy across subject departments StrengthsA large proportion of students performed well in reading tests A strong staff commitment to promotion of literacy Majority of students interested in reading Areas for improvement Oral skills of first-year students

36 School improvement plan TargetAt present X% of students demonstrate competence in oral language using school developed test. By Dec 2015, X+10% will demonstrate competence in oral language using the school developed test. ActionsIncreased emphasis on oral work in lessons Use of key terminology, role play, structured group work, focused discussion on topics Development of listening skills Video/audio listening task with accompanying worksheets ResponsibleAll teachers TimeframeThree years for overall target Every term for monitoring Success criteriaOngoing greater student engagement and confidence and competence in using subject specific terminology …. Overall: A measurable proportion of students will demonstrate greater oral competence in teacher administered oral tasks Review datesOngoing: end of each term/year Overall: Dec 2015

37 Strategies agreed in the School Improvement Plan Implemented over a three-year period Embed in classroom practice Part of day-to-day work Progress monitored As teaching staff..

38 5. SUPPORTS FOR SCHOOL SELF- EVALUATION

39 SSE Support Support for SSE Publications Website PDST seminars for principal Internal collaboration – use experience and expertise in own school Professional networks

40 AND A FINAL WORD….

41 –School self-evaluation works –Start small and keep it simple –Involve all teachers –Include the voice of students (and parents where relevant) –Only gather relevant information –Agree strategies and actions for improvement –Implement and monitor –Celebrate success SSE as part of normal and ongoing practice in the school Key messages

42 Thank you Go raibh maith agaibh